Let's speculate wildly: Gareon Conley

Submitted by Wbolin999 on

Michigan's to lose still, assuming we still want him. OSU is out essentially. Only way I see him at Oregon is if he gets his offer before visiting...which I doubt. This is trending back to the good guys. And I'm glad, he's a hell of a prospect.

/mod-title-editing

wresler120

November 26th, 2012 at 9:59 PM ^

as a fan and not a recruit. He was in the stands, never interacted with any recruits or coaches and left the game early. Thats being tweeted by Ohio fans as well.

Jack Daniels

November 26th, 2012 at 10:01 PM ^

I hope other recruits don't decide to take visits because of this situation. I'm pretty sure there are a few that wanted to but held off because of the rule in fear of losing their commit status, but now that Conley has seemingly pulled off a visit and remained a commit, others may use this as a reason.

Blue in Yarmouth

November 27th, 2012 at 8:57 AM ^

I mean, Conley didn't take an official visit which I always assumed was the visit committed recruits weren't allowed to take or their spot would be pulled. Conley lives in Ohio and went to a football game in Ohio, payed his way and watched in the stands. If that was agaisnt this so called "policy" where would it end? A guy can't even go watch a football game and keep his spot in the class? That seems a little harsh IMHE. 

There is a very clear line that can't be crossed if I understand the policy and that is recruits can't take official visits to other schools and if they do, they will no longer be considered a commit. Do whatever the hell else you want, go on vacation anywhere in the country and take in a game as a fan, but don't take an official visit to another school. That doesn't seem too difficult to interpret IMHE.

turd ferguson

November 26th, 2012 at 10:16 PM ^

My understanding of this policy is a little different from what I'm reading in most of these posts, but I could be wrong.

Setting Dawson aside (because something strange happened there), my impression is that if a Michigan-committed recruit reopens his commitment, Michigan will reopen its search to fill that spot.  We might still recruit that same prospect - if we want him - but he's no longer guaranteed a place in the class, and another prospect might grab the seat before him.  Being committed, in other words, guarantees that the staff won't say, "Sorry, we found someone better."  By looking around, you lose that guarantee but you still could be recruited by the Michigan staff.  It doesn't mean that, by policy, they will stop considering you altogether.

Is that consistent with what others believe?  Obviously, we're all kind of guessing about this.

Red is Blue

November 26th, 2012 at 10:23 PM ^

That is in general agreement with my understanding.  But, given that policy what keeps a kid from taking a visit and then recommitting shortly thereafter.  Unless there are other kids of the same or higher caliber waiting for an opening, what are the odds that someone loses their spot under a quick turn around scenario?

Randy Marsh

November 26th, 2012 at 10:02 PM ^

Not sure I understand the "well he let the coaches know of his plans" argument. Remember Richardson and RJS? They were open about it but still were told not to do it.

Wbolin999

November 26th, 2012 at 10:02 PM ^

Sorry guys, I'm sort of accustomed to subtle differences from being a Scout member. I never even though of it as a big deal, as threads(titles) such as this are often the norm. I must agree with the complaints that were given though, and will be more careful in the future.

Basically, Conley said he's still committed to Michigan 100%.

SFBlue

November 27th, 2012 at 2:59 AM ^

He still may be waiting to see how Ohio does in its bowl. Could also depend on how Maurice Clarett and Art Schlichter do at their parole hearings, how the rule against double jeopardy impacts noted Buckeye supporter Casey Anthony, or whether that rumored video of Urban Meyer pleasuring himself while reading his old press clippings ever surfaces.

There is a lot to consider before comitting to a legacy of villainy and infamy. For true.

turtleboy

November 26th, 2012 at 10:39 PM ^

OK, that's a thread title I can get behind. I'm changing my vote.

Through his visitation process I didn't think he was really on the outs at Michigan by the way he handled it, and felt like once he looked around he'd know he made the right decision in the first place. I'm wondering now who else will be joining him in Ann arbor. I'm guessing Green, and that's not even really a guess. Stranger things have happened, but it looks like we're the best fit for him. I'd also like to see a lineman replace Dawson, and I'd like that to be Hunt. Outside of that we've done pretty good this year. There could easily be room for more with all the kids who we could backdate, I'd still love to get McQuay on board by February on NSD, but maybe that's just wishful thinking. Who knows how USC will be looking by then. With Green and another lineman, plus Conley and Stribling getting ratings bumps Michigan could have the #2 overall recruit class.

turd ferguson

November 26th, 2012 at 10:32 PM ^

It's nice that the distraction of actual football is finally over so that we can get back to the important stuff: football recruiting.

(Not meant as criticism, by the way, as I'm just as guilty as anyone.)

WolvinLA2

November 26th, 2012 at 11:07 PM ^

I'll be pretty psyched if he ends up in this class. Rivals rating be damned, Conley is easily one of the most exciting players in our class, no matter what side of the ball he ends up on.