- Member for
- 6 years 45 weeks
- View recent blog entries
|21 hours 34 min ago||He got...Kanned...||
|21 hours 58 min ago||Or Dantonio. If Dantonio||
Or Dantonio. If Dantonio meets the pope anytime soon, it will be in a confessional, and his punishment will be wearing a horsehair shirt until his skin bleeds, as a punishment for his sins, a la Sir Thomas More...
|22 hours 57 sec ago||You know what the put in hot||
You know what the put in hot dogs? LIPS AND ASSHOLES!
|22 hours 11 min ago||It is a great photo. There is||
It is a great photo. There is a man of enormous wisdom, incredible energy, amazing experience, a spiritual leader, a person who has accomplished so much. And the pope is there, too...
|23 hours 29 min ago||I just noticed I used it||
I just noticed I used it twice. That is a shit ton of literally, figuratively speaking, of course.
|23 hours 51 min ago||Actually, yes. It's odd, I||
Actually, yes. It's odd, I know, but once an athlete starts receiving an excessive salary, the quality of his/her poop - color, size, shape, frequency of emission, etc. - no longer interests me...
|1 day 10 min ago||I was coming to post this.||
I was coming to post this. Dropped by RCMB while bored during my "morning routine" today, and as far as I can tell, the only explanation for McCoy picking UNLV over MSU is that he was paid one billion quadrillion kajillion zillion dollars by "bagmen." Lots and lots and lots of bagmen...
|1 day 49 min ago||Yes, actually. My 11-year-old||
Yes, actually. My 11-year-old sports nut son watches ESPN literally constantly. I love Michigan sports with a passion, but literally don't care about anything else, especially professional sports. So it is with great frustration that every time I walk into any room he is in, I see some retired professional athlete jabbering on about some active professional athlete, and why he shouldn't have pooped the morning before...
|1 day 2 hours ago||Username half-checks-out||
|1 day 19 hours ago||Hpmurah, who was, I do||
Hpmurah, who was, I do believe, the Fourth Pharaoh of 19th Dynasty of Egypt...
|1 day 21 hours ago||I get emails from 3 separate||
I get emails from 3 separate universities (based on some current and prior employment, etc.) and the volume is, wow, overwhelming. Yes, at least weekly from each account, and sometimes more. Have a daughter starting high school in 5 months. We will have many talks this summer, I assure you...
|1 day 21 hours ago||No opinions on this||
No opinions on this particular case - and in fact, not referring to any one case at all - but the sheer quantity of sexual violence that exists out there (in high school, college, and thereafter) horrifies me as a father of a daughter.
EDIT: I just realized, I need to amend my preachy statement. It also horrifies me as a father of a son, too. Because it is incumbent on me to teach him that it is never, ever, ever OK to do these things.
|2 days 1 hour ago||3. The average duration of a||
3. The average duration of a visit was about 3 mins with about 2 pages being viewed in that time.
So basically, MGoBlog has almost exactly the same user behavior as every porn site on the planet? It would be really weird if you had added, "...about 3 mins with about 2 pages being viewed in that time, followed immediately by the user reaching for a few sheets of paper towel..."
|2 days 1 hour ago||The Knife||
|2 days 2 hours ago||It's time to separate the||
It's time to separate the wheat from the chaff, the men from the boys, the awkwardly feminine from the possibly Canadian.
|2 days 2 hours ago||He's retiring from his||
He's retiring from his retirement. He's very confused...
|2 days 2 hours ago||& CHEESE||
|2 days 15 hours ago||Um, you're not thinking this||
Um, you're not thinking this through. The UM-MSU game cannot be at night because a substantial proportion of the MSU team cannot be out past dark, as a condition of their parole...
EDIT: I should have scrolled down. I see that 10 others made a version of this joke. Please disregard this version...
|2 days 21 hours ago||Doing something else? Like||
Doing something else? Like what?? Read??? Yeah, you can read the inside of my butt...
|2 days 21 hours ago||Every time this site goes||
Every time this site goes down, I start working. This is bullshit...
|2 days 22 hours ago||One of a handful of Michigan||
One of a handful of Michigan players I have been "up close and personal" with, and a pretty good bro-story...
It was 2006, I think. I used to live in the Georgetown neighborhood of Ann Arbor (near King George and Packard, if you know the area). There was a Rite Aid about 1 mile from my house there. I needed to get something - probably baby related, as that was when my babies were still cute - and so I went in at 9 at night or so. I get in line, and directly in front of me was a literal mountain of a human being. I am no little guy, but this was just a monster. His shoulders were larger than my whole body. In each hand, a case of Miller Lite. It looked like a normal person holding two 6-packs. But it was Jake. I gave a little "Go Blue" after he paid and was walking out, and he turned and smiled. I've always wanted to believe that Jake was spending a quiet night at home alone, and those 48 Miller Lites were what he consumed on an "off night"
Good luck in what comes next, Jake!
|3 days 2 hours ago||This board has more "hot take||
This board has more "hot take bitch" threads than it has "hot bitch" threads. Very odd, in the age of 24-7 porn...
|4 days 8 min ago||Hoosier heartless sports||
Hoosier heartless sports program that cares more about wins than the health of the players?
|5 days 1 hour ago||First, I think you're||
First, I think you're overreacting. Second, if she knew something (before, during, or after), she is quite possibly (and probably) an enabler. I didn't say it was certain or even likely, just speculating about possibilities. And if you really think spouses/partners don't regularly aid and abet criminal behavior in their partners, you need to get out more. You name the crime, there is a wife our there either actively helping the perpetrator or pretending it isn't happening when the know it is.
|5 days 1 hour ago||I was shocked at that too.||
I was shocked at that too. She might not have known and it happened quick, or maybe she is an enabler and knows all about it, in which case, double-wow...
|5 days 1 hour ago||It might have been, but I||
It might have been, but I didn't see it. Plus, according to the "Unified Laws of Internet Behavior," you cannot even ask this question, as I started off the thread with "SIAP".
|5 days 1 hour ago||Thanks. My MGoBlog skills are||
Thanks. My MGoBlog skills are pretty weak. I still can't figure out how to post memes and other pictures/files on here. And without memes, is life really worth living? :-(
|5 days 21 hours ago||How, Great and Fitting Book Reference||
It was the best of times (at the University of Michigan), it was the worst of times (at mSu). It was the age of wisdom (at the University of Michigan), it was the age of foolishness (at mSu)...
|5 days 21 hours ago||Well, while you're probably||
Well, while you're probably right - in that they are almost always "he said, she said" to some extent - you can have a case that is, relatively speaking, far, far easier to prosecute and prove. A case where the victim says, "he struck me in the face, pinned me down by my arms, forced my legs open, and then sexually assaulted me as I screamed for help," who can then corroborate this version of events with bruising to the face, arms, and legs, and with a roommate who entered the room after hearing screaming is, all else being equal, probably pretty close to a "slam-dunk case." The accused can respond by saying consenual "rough play" led to the bruising, and then somehow try to undermine the eyewitness, but let's face it, that would be very, very tough without some kind of strong evidence against the victim's credibility. Since this appears to be a "force/coercion" kind of sexual assault case, my guess is that there is photographic and medical evidence of physical injuries to the victim, and maybe even a witness.
The other 3-player case is probably something far murkier, with no eyewitnesses and an intoxicated victim involved in group sex who wasn't injured, but (at least from her perspective) was incapable of giving consent because of impairment, and maybe even claims to having stated verbal "no's" during the encounter. This latter case would leave prosecutors with a much, much tougher job.
|5 days 23 hours ago||First thing I thought.||
First thing I thought. Apparently the sheriff has some issues up there with bad/lost records, and that may explain some of the slowness/carefulness on the other case. Given that, the fact that they charged so quickly in this case means that either the other case is way more complex (and possibly unproveable), and/or this case is just a slam-dunk, no questions needed, open and shut conviction...