Derek

January 11th, 2024 at 8:04 PM ^

Norvell to Bama confirmed?

Ugh, I actually just read this, and they're not using that new-fangled Head Coach Responsibility provision? They're only going after the assistant directly responsible? Incredible.*

* By which I mean, completely predictable because the NCAA is the embodiment of corruption.

1VaBlue1

January 11th, 2024 at 8:20 PM ^

Just another data point that says CheeseburgerGate and SignGate are done.  Whatever is still left going on will be quietly swept under the rug in a midnight Friday news dump in the middle of July.  Between this, and Charlie Baker saying "fair and square", it's over.

And that is probably the reason that Michigan suddenly and inexplicably dropped the lawsuits.  Good chance Charlie called up and said 'suck it up and its over'...

vablue

January 11th, 2024 at 8:39 PM ^

In the cheeseburger case, it was the head coach doing the buying so we didn’t have to use that clause.  If you read the NCAA president’s comments yesterday, Michigan has very little to complain about from the NCAA.  Sorry if this ruins the NCAA is picking on just us narrative. 
 

The Big Ten is a different issue.

mrlmichael

January 11th, 2024 at 9:05 PM ^

I could be wrong, but wasn't that provision added AFTER the cheeseburger incident? So in that case, Harbaugh isn't going to be retroactively punished anyway.

And the Level 1 Infractions against Harbaugh don't relate him actually buying cheeseburgers, but the claim that he wasn't forthcoming with investigators about it.

Either way, it's a pretty silly hill to die on for the NCAA and I wouldn't trust that they wont die on similarly silly hills with SignGate.

Perkis-Size Me

January 11th, 2024 at 9:14 PM ^

Basically says that the NCAA can be sued by any student athlete in the state of Texas if NCAA rules compel student athletes to violate state law. So that means Texas state legislature can draft up laws saying student athletes are within their rights to smear feces on the walls of NCAA HQ, and if the NCAA compels said student athlete not to do that, the student athlete can sue for it.

 

Perkis-Size Me

January 12th, 2024 at 10:20 AM ^

The joke's up here. You're way down there. 

I mean yes, it was an obvious exaggeration, but the point remains the same. It is now state law within Texas that student athletes within the state can sue the NCAA if NCAA policy compels said student athlete to break state law.

Doesn't take much thinking to see how that can evolve down the road and what that means for the NCAA. 

M-Dog

January 11th, 2024 at 8:08 PM ^

. . . according to the NCAA, the booster encouraged the prospect to enroll at Florida State and offered him an NIL opportunity with the collective worth approximately $15,000 per month during his first year at the school.

. . . Mark Hicks, the NCAA enforcement managing director for development, told a group of administrators that the association is focused on “tampering and inducements” related to NIL and that they have proof that recruiting rules are being violated.

. . . NCAA officials are learning of new ways that universities are inducing athletes to their campus, said Hicks, including offering a combination of cash, an apartment lease, a vehicle and transportation for family members to visit campus.

Wow, it will be a game-changer if they actually start enforcing this stuff.  It is RMAPANT in college football.  Nobody thinks the NCAA will enforce the rules.

 

iMBlue2

January 11th, 2024 at 8:10 PM ^

This shit seems very selective…the shit they did to us because Jim wants the players to get a slice of the pie and now this to FSU because they spe up about Bama.  How does bama, atm, Georgia, an ohio not get investigated as it’s pretty blatant with the nil inducements, I mean ohio is essentially saying they pay to play. Because the NCAA doesn’t want to go after them.

Stringer Bell

January 11th, 2024 at 8:15 PM ^

Weird how the NCAA let this process play out before announcing it.  As opposed to dropping leaks every day leading to numerous hit pieces and a head coach getting suspended in season without a formal investigation.

vablue

January 11th, 2024 at 8:44 PM ^

See the NCAA president’s speech yesterday.  It actually makes a ton of sense.  Whether we like it or not, they did us a favor.  If the Stallions stuff broke in 2 months the champion would have been tainted in some people’s minds.  Now, you have to be an idiot to think it is tainted.