Wojo on Harbaugh: "This is what you signed up for"

Submitted by umbig11 on

There are some very interesting comments in this piece. Luginbill has a few solid comments as well.

“You have to recognize the landscape has changed, the process has changed, tactics have changed,” Tom Luginbill, ESPN’s national recruiting director, said Tuesday. “Just because you’re Michigan, you can’t do it like you did five, 10, 15 years ago. If you do, you’re gonna be left behind. Harbaugh isn’t crossing a line. This is what he is — he’s quirky, he’s unique, and when I talk to kids, the most important reaction is, he’s authentic.”

That cuts right to Wojo's point: The holier-than-them attitude made fans feel good, and they enjoyed sniffing at the undignified ways of Urban Meyer and Nick Saban, even as the Wolverines got their behinds bashed in.

http://www.detroitnews.com/story/sports/columnists/bob-wojnowski/2016/01/26/wojo-harbaughs-ways-led-commitment-issues/79386314/

Rabbit21

January 27th, 2016 at 9:15 AM ^

Swenson's highlight film and the story of the coaches wanting him to come to camp to evaluate in person(and him refusing, which based off of the highlight film is an understandable gamble) are what brought me around from, "I can't believe they took the offer." to reflect Brian and Wojo's assessment of "I get this is a business, but I hope they're more organized in the future and get ahead of the story next year."  ESPN is not exactly known for journalistic fairness, but in this case anyone who has watched football or played football can look at the highlight film and go, "Huh?, was it a walk-on offer?"  Plus if the end of the story is him going to Wisconsin or Northwestern instead of Michigan, I think a lot of people are going to end up wondering what the big deal was.

 

All that said, it's not unreasonable to want the staff to handle this stuff better in the future, while still recruiting balls to the wall.  It's not like the two are mutually exclusive.   

FauxMo

January 27th, 2016 at 6:28 AM ^

Exactly. Listen, I don't want Michigan to start offering recruits hookers and blow and bags of cash to win NCs. But if getting to that level means hurting some feelings and pushing the edges of the rules without breaking them and "getting down into the mud" with the big boys, I'm all in.

 

I'll say one other thing... I'll bet 99.9999% of the MIchigan fans on this board who have crossed their arms and turned up their noses at Harbaugh's "dirty" tactics will still cheer like crazy if Harbaugh takes us to the Rose Bowl or CFP this year. Maybe more...

dragonchild

January 27th, 2016 at 9:00 AM ^

Hear, hear.  It's OK -- well, I thought it was OK -- to overall support Harbaugh and not like his track record of lack of communication, since honestly it's not that big a deal.  We've known about it since going through his Stanford days and I think it's in bad taste but it by itself is not a reason to reject the coach overall.  But that doesn't mean I have to like it.  I think he can do better because the scope of this "scandal"(which is WAY overblown by the media) is transcended only by the ease at which Harbaugh could prevent it from being a problem in the first place.  We have to do this to win because there's literally no alternative like. . . oh, sending an e-mail in a timely fashion?  I mean, he's doing just about everything else right and for the upside, this isn't asking for much.  IMO, anyway.

It's just a communication issue, it's not even a violation, so going full SEC on it is just a wee bit alarming.  It just feels weird at how the defense of Harbaugh is so much more aggressive and extreme than it even needs to be.  I mean, I'm thinking I'm glad I don't share an office with any of these people.

"I think the coffee could be a bit better"
"GOTTA STEP ON NECKS AND SLIT THROATS TO WIN IT'S A TOUGH WORLD GET A HELMET YOU'RE A SANCTIMONIOUS HYPOCRITE STFU OR GTFO"
"Uh, huh??  You're suggesting I resign over coffee?"

Rabbit21

January 27th, 2016 at 9:45 AM ^

Could not agree more with this stance.  There is a lot of agression around here and a big, fat false choice being offered.  I get people are frustrated and see Meyer's and Saban's programs at the top of the heap and assume that what they do, so must we,  However, there's no reason to be getting this overheated, when I think at the end of the day it boils down to wanting the staff to be more organized so that we don't leave kids feeling fucked over and get this type of coverage.  

Like it or not, Michigan has a spotlight on it and expectations for the program are different.  This means some organization to go with a competitive philosophy is a requirement and not a nice to have.  Wojo has the right take on this, IMO.

The Iron Jock

January 27th, 2016 at 6:30 AM ^

He's right. The whole world has changed. Whether we like it or not, we're living in a world where the media follows everything with a microscope and people hang on the words and whims of teenagers who post everything on social media. I don't really like all of the changes, but that's the way it is. Of course, people like Mike Valenti are going to meltdown over it -- he had an absolutely epic tantrum on 97.1 yesterday -- because they know Michigan's recruiting aggressiveness means pain and suffering for them. That said, maybe things will smooth out going forward and we can have our proverbial cake and eat it, too. But maybe not, and we should probably prepare ourselves for that. 

BlueFish

January 27th, 2016 at 10:03 AM ^

But communication (and social media, and the 24-hour news cycle...) is just a part of it.  There are parallels between what's happening here (with recruiting) and what happened at the end of the Carr era.  The game, in some respects, passed him by, and he refused to adapt, because that wasn't the Michigan Way.  The game, in some respects, passed U-M by.  This is one of the reasons Martin went after RichRod, thinking we'd modernize our program a bit.

Fast forward, the game (or more specifically, recruiting) has changed and U-M was once again in danger of being passed by.  Hoke, being the good and honest person that he is, filled his classes early and stood pat with those recruits.  Unfortunately, nice guys don't always win football games (although he seemed to have no problem recruiting talent).

I see it as being similar to the marketing triangle:

Except it's more like a line spectrum.  You can have squeaky clean and do it "the right way" (e.g., Northwestern), or you can have wins at any cost (Bama or Kentucky ball).  Most fans would probably prefer to have both (win often, the right way), which isn't impossible but is much more difficult in 2016 that it was in 1985.  Our fan base wasn't happy with "the right way" and 5-7, so we brought in a coach who operates more in the middle of the spectrum than we're accustomed to.

Growing pains.  Better communication and organization should prevent recurrence.

adcough

January 27th, 2016 at 6:32 AM ^

So glad JH is the coach. Not only because he has gotten UM out of the death spiral that was the Hoke years, but mainly because he will hopefully get us to winning at a level that has not been seen since the 90's. I was never happy with the teams of the 2000s. They might have won some games but were brutally exposed on the big stage. See USC, OSU, Oregon, Texas (throw in App State). Those were far from glory days. To compete for hardware you need players and depth. As long as JH is doing it within the rules, I am cool. To the self righteous, do you really want to go back to the glory days of 4 loss seasons, or beyond? The staff is smart and not tone deaf, they will learn from this and do it better next time.

Section6

January 27th, 2016 at 6:39 AM ^

"Personally, I will take 10-3 over 5-7 and kicking the shit out of the SEC #2 team in a bowl game every year over what we had previosly!"
Ummm this years success has nothing to do with his recruiting ability. That is your whole point, correct?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Section6

January 27th, 2016 at 7:20 AM ^

Yeah those other 21 guys were totally just along for the ride, huh? Pass protection didn't have anything to do with it, neither did amazing receiver and tight end play, the defense getting a bunch of 3 and outs so Rudock could stay in rhythm had absolutely nothing to do with it, he also cost us the Utah game ya know, it goes both ways.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

BlueFish

January 27th, 2016 at 10:08 AM ^

Of course it's a team game; nobody's arguing that.  But the QB is critical to the team's success, and was especially so for this team.  We played without our star safety/nickel for the bowl game and still only gave up 7 points.  Do you really think we'd have gone 10-3 with the inexperienced QBs on our roster?  He was a godsend.

gwkrlghl

January 27th, 2016 at 10:10 AM ^

If you can look at Wilton Speight side-by-side with Jake Rudock and you can't see how Rudock was clearly worth several wins to us this season then I can't help you.

The other 21 are there, but Jake was the single most important guy to this 10 win season

jmblue

January 27th, 2016 at 8:54 AM ^

Ummm this years success has nothing to do with his recruiting ability. That is your whole point, correct?
I think he is saying that this comes part and parcel with the same coach who inspired an underperforming group of players to win 10 games. Harbaugh is nothing if not competitive. He will not tolerate a poor effort from anyone, recruits included. I think that's fine. My only nitpick is that he should make sure recruits know precisely where they stand, if they don't currently.

LSAClassOf2000

January 27th, 2016 at 6:45 AM ^

But he also knows the brutal nature of competition, and this is the source of the controversy: He’s working it as hard as anyone, and doing it more publicly than coaches at Michigan have done in the past.

In a way this speaks to something which several people have mentioned here in the last few days that has been largely ignored in the rush to comment - although social media makes all this seem new, it is really old hat and has been practice at some level and in some form (not necessarily with Harbaugh's personality injected into it, of course) for quite some time now. Whereas we get anecdotes regarding, say, Bo not signing kids in the end for reasons similar to those attributed to Jim Harbaugh, we get 24/7 coverage of such events now. 

S.D. Jones

January 27th, 2016 at 9:36 AM ^

Exactly--the process of recruiting is still the same, only our ability to follow it has changed. Nowadays, we can watch sausage being made 24/7, or rather receive constant online updates from people telling us how it is or should be made. 

When I was in school (LSA '96), most folks paid attention to about recruiting once a year, usually by reading a class round-up article printed on dead trees. Going to the fishbowl and logging on to Gopher wouldn't have turned up much more info.

Zoltanrules

January 27th, 2016 at 7:55 AM ^

It was addicting to watch for me also. I wonder how much of this football culture, good and bad, exists at Cass Tech, Cleveland Glenville, etc.other football factories. Lane Kiffin praying with the family made me sick. The Army All American college announcement made me sad for Langi and the pressure these kids are under now. I think you need to be a unique individual to recruit these kids.

dragonchild

January 27th, 2016 at 9:05 AM ^

Because if I want life advice on how to make decisions, I'm going to quote a hyperbolic fictional character from a show whose very premise is the glorification of moral compromise.

Harbaugh's getting crucified because he falls behind on his e-mail.  Why are we going all Ministry of Love on this?

dagupe

January 27th, 2016 at 6:56 AM ^

You want to play with the big boys you have to get your hands dirty.  

 

Its not like he's buying people