ak47

October 5th, 2016 at 9:56 PM ^

Maryland bring the combined 4th largest media market in the country, great recruiting area in football and basketball, a historically top 15 basketball program that is doing OK if not great and recruiting well plus some really great non revenue sports including soccer, lacrosse, field hockey, etc plus it's has some top academic programs and is middle of the road big ten academically. Literally the only thing Nebraska has better is the size of its football stadium.

MichiganStudent

October 6th, 2016 at 7:15 AM ^

I'm sorry but idiotic posts/statements like this are one of my biggest pet peeves. First off, it's boomer sooner, not sooner boomer. That's like saying go big blue when referring to Michigan. Secondly, Oklahoma would be in the west division and wouldn't play Ohio St or Michigan every year. It would be like it is right now where we play a couple of years and take a hiatus.

The only thing in your post that made any sense was that OU is more competitive in basketball and baseball.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

NFG

October 5th, 2016 at 8:32 PM ^

If true, Nebraska is that five star prospect who commits to a major program, and then doesn't get any playing time and blames everyone but himself. Then transfers to a shitty program and still doesn't see the field. All because of their attitude.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

blueday

October 5th, 2016 at 8:33 PM ^

Waffling is a bad image thing. Picking a different conference for every sport like Notre Dame is just embarrassing for them. Plus they get to play for purple face in football. A Midwest school in the ACC lol.. watch out for that hurricane.

Billy Ray Valentine

October 5th, 2016 at 8:34 PM ^

It really would have made so much more sense if these two schools would have joined a conference together. This was a great rivalry in both the 1980s and 1990s. I think academically Colorado would have fit perfectly into our conference.

BBO78

October 7th, 2016 at 7:31 AM ^

I think these 3 saw the writing on the wall and knew they needed to get out for their future stability. In addition to Texas being a conference killer, these 3 schools were Big 8 schools that no longer felt they fit the conference. Colorado almost left for the PAC 10 in the mid 90s when we saw the SWC coming to an end.

ChalmersE

October 5th, 2016 at 8:40 PM ^

If Oklahoma wants out of the 12, this makes no sense. Every Nebraska fan I know says their biggest regret is the loss of their rivalry game with Oklahoma.

drzoidburg

October 5th, 2016 at 10:22 PM ^

Nah, legislature must approve and they'll back down to save OU its legitimacy, which it would lose remaining in a conference that awful much longer. Plus OU probably has a lot more pull than Okl St Okl St might find a spot in the new "P4" anyway, but it won't be with OU (no one wants 2 teams from the same state these days)

Blau

October 5th, 2016 at 10:31 PM ^

You keep saying this like it's going to stick or something. There is no actual statute or legal backup for that statement. It's more of a cultural and traditional viewpoint than anything. Not sure anyone really cares about OK St's conference loyalties. I'm pretty sure if the B1G invites OU to the clubhouse after school, little bro OK St doesn't have to tag along. I don't ever think that's going to happen anyways so the point is moot.

drzoidburg

October 5th, 2016 at 10:18 PM ^

I don't really care where they go, so long as that conference dies. Joining the BIG West, we'd play every 10 years or whatever. But if it became the "Power 4" it'd improve our chances of making the playoff, at least slightly. I'd bet you Ohio last year would've made it over Oklahoma

Carcajou

October 5th, 2016 at 8:51 PM ^

Don't know if we'd want to play service academies three times a year. With all that cut blocking they do, we wouldn't have any healthy DL left by the end of November.

[This is the one downside of bringing GT into the conference as long as Paul Johnson is there. Otherwise, I would love to see GT in the B1G]