Michigan opens at -4 against BYU
This is somewhat surprising considering how good BYU has looked even with their backup QB. Keep in mind that this is a preliminary line (probably an offshore book) and none of the major books have released their lines yet. However, the other books will likely be close to this at least if the past is a good indicator.
http://www.vegasinsider.com/college-football/teams/team-page.cfm/team/michigan
Edit: The Wynn just opened at Michigan -5.
September 20th, 2015 at 5:24 PM ^
September 21st, 2015 at 1:12 AM ^
that can beat anyone but perhaps the elite on a given day, then I think you have to say yes.
Forget the W/Ls, BYU went to the wire with three Top 40ish teams, and two were on the road. Further, UCLA is now ranked in the Top 10. Perhaps one of those teams may turn out not to be Top 40ish, but no way will all three be grossly overrated.
OTOH, Utah has played no one but us, so using them as a benchmark for us leaves a lot more uncertainty.
I expect to win because of Harbaugh! (and maize colored glasses), not because of a comparison of play to date.
September 21st, 2015 at 10:21 AM ^
What do you think BYU fans are saying about Michigan?
CougarDevotee is posting "Is Michigan really any good? They played 2 awful teams for their wins and the 1 quality team they played they were down 24-10 until the closing moments. I watched their QB in a few of these games and he can't hit the broadside of a barn past 10 yards, and the 1 legit rush defense they played (Utah) completely stymied them."
September 20th, 2015 at 4:04 PM ^
Wolverines Run Offense vs BYU Run Defense - Advantage Wolverines; BYU Offense vs Wolverine Defense - Even....I look for a high level of physicality and team with the least amount of turnovers wins!!!!
September 20th, 2015 at 4:09 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 5:14 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 4:16 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 4:30 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 4:53 PM ^
They were wrong about Ole Miss and Bama. The BYU game is a tossup at best. The margin for error on defense and special teams is 0 until we can complete a deep pass or two and keep BYU out of the box. No way we can run against the types of fronts UNLV showed when we face more talented teams.
September 20th, 2015 at 5:10 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 6:01 PM ^
Honestly, Vegas isn't really trying to predict the actual point spread, they're trying to predict the point spread that creates a 50/50 bet distribution where losers pay winners, Vegas takes their vig, and the house doesn't have to come out of pocket to pay winners.
Usually, the Vegas line is very close to the actual point spread result, but that's a secondary effect, rather than the goal.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 6:16 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 5:20 PM ^
Im not sure the bettors have a good feel on BYU yet though. UCLA was favored by 16 which was absurd to me even before the game started (along with V Tech only favored by like 6 over Purdue ha)
September 20th, 2015 at 10:10 PM ^
September 21st, 2015 at 1:24 AM ^
of the point spread distribution are so far off that the null hypothesis can be rejected to a reasonable level in a Kolmogorov-Smirnov test?
Got it.
September 20th, 2015 at 4:31 PM ^
I watched a little bit of BYU's game last night and it looked like they had some pretty good skill players on offense. looked more explosive than ours, which isn't saying a ton. Thanks Hoke...
September 20th, 2015 at 4:45 PM ^
BYU's offense moved the ball against what is generally perceived as one of the best defenses in the country. They did lose DT Eddie Vanderdoes for the season during Week 1, but I don't think UCLA's defense will fall apart with just that one loss. BYU's lead RB averaged over 6 YPC last night.
September 20th, 2015 at 4:55 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 5:09 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 6:01 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 5:04 PM ^
But explosive they aren't. The run game did okay, but UCLA's front isn't real physical.
BYU is a good team that can definitely beat Michigan, but they are a lot like Utah, except that they have better depth at WR and lack a Booker.
It's going to be a real challenge to beat them and Michigan as a whole has to play their best yet to beat them.
September 20th, 2015 at 4:35 PM ^
Especially after watching us yesterday on offense. The passing game needs to show up next Saturday, cause BYU is going to try and limit our running game. Sounds like the same strategy most teams have used against Michigan over the last number of years. But, it's largely worked.
September 20th, 2015 at 5:18 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 6:00 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 6:15 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 10:29 PM ^
or to throw that screen pass right into the ground???
September 20th, 2015 at 7:51 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 9:30 PM ^
As the year goes on, the playbook gets larger as players get more practice reps.
September 20th, 2015 at 4:54 PM ^
consider BYU a 7 point better team even though they are listed as 4 point favorites.. However, since MIchigan is at home that is usually a 3 to 3 1/2 point advantage.
If Michigan is able to run the ball they will have a good chance to win this game. If not, stick a fork in them.
September 20th, 2015 at 4:58 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 5:24 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 5:43 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 7:08 PM ^
Good to know because betting BYU plus four is a good bet.
September 20th, 2015 at 6:00 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 5:22 PM ^
The first 3 or 4 weeks of college games are the toughest for the oddsmakers to set the lines. There are teams playing outside of conference, in some cases outside of the geographical area, and/or with no common opponents. Add in the calculus about returning starters, and how to evaluate the quality of replacements, and there is a lot of guesswork. While the books' goal is to get an equal amount bet on each side and they will adjust lines to do so, they occasionally get caught in a game where a large majority play one side and the line adjustment either isn't enough to balance it, or it allows some pros to "middle" the game: say Mich opens at -4 and money pours in on BYU to the point where they drop it to Mich -1 (this would be a huge move). In that case, some gamblers will play Utah +4 and then jump on Mich -1. If Mich wins by a FG, they win both ways.
It's rare but books occasionally will lose a lot of money on a game that they have miscaculated the odds on.
September 20th, 2015 at 5:53 PM ^
impact a team like BYU?
Is it to our advantage that they might be a little deflated? Or is that merely wishful thinking?
September 20th, 2015 at 6:17 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 7:15 PM ^
but this is a pretty suprising line given what I've seen of both of these two teams. Betters like what they see from Michigan more than I do thats for certain.
I'd need at least 6 to take Michigan with my money.
September 20th, 2015 at 8:52 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 8:56 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 8:59 PM ^
September 20th, 2015 at 9:30 PM ^
The game will not be that close. UM 31 - BYU 14. First, BYU is not that impressive. We saw Neb's defense against Miami. it is not that good. BYU was lucky in both wins and somewhat unlucky in the loss. Could be easily 0-3. Second, they have played three games in 3 different time zones. They will be tired and are not as healthy as us.
September 20th, 2015 at 9:58 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 21st, 2015 at 10:52 AM ^
Ah yes, the old "had to take a dump because it was 9 AM and missed my blocking assignment" theory of football excellence...
September 20th, 2015 at 10:00 PM ^
if I were going to gamble on this game I think I would put money on BYU. Not that I don't believe in Harbaugh, but I think Michigan's fate in this game really come down to Rudock. If he plays well we win. If he plays like he did against UNLV, egads.
Then again, it is possible that our defense is really that good and we don't need Rudock to play well to win. BYU isn't starting a very experienced QB. I guess we'll see.
September 20th, 2015 at 10:19 PM ^
1. UCLA threw 3 interceptions right in the red zone. That kept the score much closer than it should have been, even if you remove 1-2 of those interceptions.
2. BYU used a last second hail mary to beat a pretty stagnant Nebraska team (IMO).
3. Since the Utah game, I'm guessing Harbaugh has been implementing more of his system, but we still haven't seen much of it on the field - mostly because we've been up by multiple scores for both games. At least we know that BYU has thrown everything in their playbook out there so far.
I'm not going to make bets on the game, but I think if Rudock limits the turnovers (even if he has just an average performance) then I think we can win it.
September 20th, 2015 at 11:46 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
September 20th, 2015 at 11:50 PM ^
Not a surprise... you get 2.5 just for being at home. That means Vegas thinks Michigan's turnover prone QB and inconsistent running game is worth 1.5 point win.