Does Michigan pick up any USC transfers?

Submitted by Quail2theVict0r on

I've found a few NCAA rules browsing other message boards that supposedly allow USC Juniors and Seniors to transfer without sitting out a year.

As far as free transfers, every USC SR and JR can transfer and be eligible now. Bowl ban takes up the rest of their eligibility. Bylaw 13.1.1.3.3: No release needed to contact SAs if school is has postseason ban for the rest of their eligibility Bylaw 14.8.2: The COI can recommend a waiver to allow SAs to transfer and play immediately if ban is for the rest of their eligibility After Committee on Academic Approval OKs schools, USC SRs and JRs will be able to be recruited by others. Schools would have to show they have open spots ETC COI can't overrule Pac-10 intra-conference no transfer rule. And no provision in Pac-10 rules for a waiver in this case. Freshmen who signed NLOI will have to stay at USC unless some waiver would be given across the board, not likely..
A. I'm not sure how correct this is. B. Are there any Jr or Sr on USC that were high on Michigan when they were recruited?

Bosch

June 10th, 2010 at 3:03 PM ^

I am not so biased that I can't admit that Grand Haven is the more desireable tourist attraction.  The compact downtown with the boardwalk to the beach is a top notch draw.  Although I will say that I think Pere Marquette Beach is significantly more desireable than the Grand Haven State Park, I can see why people would prefer Grand Haven.  If the Brewery ever opens in downtown Muskegon, the scale may tip in favor of Muskegon for the better night life.

However, my preference has to do with the "who" as well as the "what."

Muskegon is like the friend who tells you your shirt is ugly because it is.  Grand Haven is like the friend who tells you your ugly shirt looks nice because that's what you want to hear. 

OHbornUMfan

June 10th, 2010 at 10:59 AM ^

After perusing the article about players in the B10 who are bousta blow up, it seems that there are quite a few receivers on the list.  This could be great ammo for luring a JR/SR . 

"We promise to put you on an island against the very best the B10 has to offer on a weekly basis.  You can thereby prove to the NFL that you are the next Darrelle Revis."

A one-year rental of a super-stud DB really brightens the picture for the D this year. 

 

/dream scenario

GoBlue2000

June 10th, 2010 at 11:02 AM ^

A lot of the players from what I seen had offers from U of M.  I also read, this would only apply to juniors and seniors since of the 2 year bowl ban.  The others would not be able to transfer ala Dillon Baxter & Nick Perry (RS SO).  They also stated that the other schools can start calling these guys about transfering if these type of sanctions are given.

SysMark

June 10th, 2010 at 11:03 AM ^

Perry and Baxter are outside the range and would have to sacrifice a year.  Still might be feasible if they perceive this as bad enough.

Quail2theVict0r

June 10th, 2010 at 11:08 AM ^

I wonder why Henderson decided to commit to them? He specifically waited to see what was going to happen - then committed anyway. I wonder if he'll do anything drastic.

umhero

June 10th, 2010 at 11:40 AM ^

Does it really matter? He's an OL, who would be best served to redshirt anyway.  I realize he was amazing in high school but imagine how great he will be with a year in under Barwis.  Let him transfer, sit out a year, and start four at LT. 

Seantrel come on down and bring Baxter with you!  You guys can sit out one season and start four.  That will get you multiple BCS berths and then you can go 1/2 in the draft.

Koyote

June 10th, 2010 at 11:14 AM ^

Interesting thought... but our admissions department probably wouldn't clear them anyways. From what I recall, a lot of people have trouble transfering credits to Michigan (part of the reason why we don't get a lot of JUCOs).

Tacopants

June 10th, 2010 at 12:12 PM ^

There's a difference between JUCO credits and credits from USC.

 

The real problem may lie in their credit situation though.  You can only bring over 60 credits of classword max to Michigan, so any seniors that come wouldn't be coming over to get a degree (Juniors and RS Sophs would be ok)

jtmc33

June 10th, 2010 at 11:14 AM ^

If you are quiet enough you can hear Mitch Mustain crying...  "Why Me!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"

Is the starting spot at Arkansas still open?

Maybe Arkansas State...

BiSB

June 10th, 2010 at 11:17 AM ^

is that the kids can't stay in the PAC-10 and take advantage of the transfer restriction waiver.  COME EAST, young men...

maizenbluenc

June 10th, 2010 at 11:30 AM ^

Here's the Two Deep from USC spring practice.

Here's the roster.

Corner Backs in the two deep who would be eligible: T.J. Bryant, Shareece Wright, Daniel Harper, James Harbin.

Safeties: Ryan McMahon

Of those only Bryant (Fla) is from out of state.

tpilews

June 10th, 2010 at 3:06 PM ^

UM IS deperate for experienced players, especially on defense. I know if I was UM, I'd take a couple DBs that could give you a year or two of competant to great play. With as good as UMs offense could be this year, any help the defense could gain would benefit directly in terms of wins on the field. I don't know about you, but I'd rather see UM win.

Huntington Wolverine

June 10th, 2010 at 3:08 PM ^

Closer to having her a couple years later than at the same party I would think.  I hear what you're saying but I wouldn't mind a 1-2 year lease of some 4 and 5 stars that would be good fits with what RR and company are trying to do schematically and culturally.  Consider it making up for the bare cupboard.

bronxblue

June 10th, 2010 at 11:24 AM ^

Knowing our luck, we'd snag a backup punter who tore his ACL the first time he tried to punt with one of Zoltan's old balls.  We would later learn that the football used by Zoltan were actually made out of iron, as the added weight was needed to keep the ball in the field of play when he punted; otherwise, low-flying blimps would have been in danger of a football-sized puncture whenever the offense sputtered.

psychomatt

June 10th, 2010 at 11:27 AM ^

Michigan would still need to fit them under the 25/85 scholarship limits. We know we have one available (Demar Dorsey's), but if we already have given out the remainder to walk-ons I do not see us taking those back. Anyone have any idea where we stand vis a vis scholarship limits?