The singlemost favorite double in the world. [Patrick Barron]

Neck Sharpies: Doubles, Brackets, and Lock & Levels Comment Count

Seth November 20th, 2019 at 9:00 AM

Usually in this space I like to talk about a thing that Michigan did differently to confound their opponent or add to the toolkit. This week, after a game when Harbaugh and his staff thoroughly outclassed Dantonio and his in all three phases, I'd like to discuss a thing Michigan has had in their kit for as long as Don Brown has been here, and how Michigan State came in with a gameplan to defeat it (and yes, how Michigan adjusted and went back to dominating).

That's because so many people were talking before, during, and after this game about Michigan's passing down coverage, what Gus Johnson, Joe Klatt and Urban Meyer were calling "Brackets Coverage" and which Brown, James Light, and this space shall call "Doubles."

Doubles Coverage

Unfortunately the guy who did the best job of explaining how Michigan prefers to defend passing downs was Urban Meyer, right before this game, so let's see what he had to say (I recommend the full video on Fox):

He's simplifying it, Urban's spread offensive mind thinking of it in terms of numbers: more defenders than offensive players over here, and over here, win: defense. But the basic gist of doubles coverage is understandable to every kid who's ever played playground football: play man and use the safeties to double-team two of the most likely receivers:

image

Even on this level, who gets doubled is the important part; the how they get doubled is getting into the weeds.

[Which we shall, after THE JUMP]

-------------------------------------------

Who's getting doubled matters because you're trying to cover the first read, and maybe the second read too. Say you've guessed the quarterback's first read. You've taken away the easy thing his play was supposed to create, AND the time he spends figuring this out translates to time your pass rush can use to get home. So he moves to his second read, and that's doubled. All of your rushers get to roll again. By this point he's on to his third read, and by design that's not supposed to be a very good one. Also (and this gets into the how), by this point the routes are declared and the double-teams have become dominating single-teams with zone defenders backing out and reading the quarterback's eyes. And since it's not always obvious that a bracket's in place, a less experienced quarterback is liable to throw a pick right to the safety while trying to lead his receiver away from the coverage.

Figuring out the order of the offense's reads so you can double those of the highest priority is somewhat guesswork, somewhat based on tendency, and a lot of strategy. Often you're trying to directly mess with the quarterback's reads so he'll fall into the trap of reading your doubled receivers first. You're also using your scouting of the offense.

With Michigan State for example we know:

  • Their running backs aren't very good receivers
  • Their offensive line is three freshmen and two (Campbell and Reid) of the most atrocious longtime starters in modern Big Ten history, so they're likely to need TE help.
  • The tight end is a walk-on transfer whose 19 career catches were almost all uncontested on 1st and 2nd downs.
  • Cody White far and away their biggest receiving threat.
  • Their 3rd down specialist is on the field at slot receiver.
  • You see how they align and there are three eligible receivers on the short side flanking the slot, their #2 receiver has virtually half the field to himself, and their #1 receiver is on the outer side of the numbers.

So Michigan's safeties can infer that White, the #2 receiver, or the slot are the most likely first reads, and by White's alignment in the bunch, and from scouting MSU all year, you can guess his route is a sideline fade. So they make the doubles call: bracket the H and the X, leaving your best corner on the field (Ambry) one on one with State's best receiver against a low-percentage route, and your linebackers alone on the tight end and running back since they're likely to stay in and block anyways.

How they cover these guys is pretty interesting. It's not a pure double-team so much as a read coverage—they're optioning the receivers so wherever he goes he's running into a defender. Note that coverages often denote receivers by counting eligible guys from the sideline, so the most outside receiver on either side is #1, the next guy in is #2, and so on.

image

There are four calls as far as I can tell in Brown's playbook (I have the 2013 Boston College one), and two techniques.

  • CONE (cornerback + safety on #1) or DEUCE (cornerback + safety on #2). This means the safety takes the receiver if he goes up or inside, with the cornerback staying on him to cover anything over and outside. If the receiver goes HARD inside (it's got to be blatant) the safety takes over and the corner can drop into a Cover 2 zone, attacking where he sees fit.
  • VICE (safety + viper/nickel/LB) or RABBIT (safety + cornerback). This flips the inside-/outside equation. The low man (let's say nickel here) has the receiver on anything inside up to 12 yards while the safety is over the fade. If the receiver goes outside the safety can charge on that (and try to pick it off) while the nickel looks up wherever the #1 went and charges on that, reading the QB's eyes and ready to break.

Cone/Deuce is a traditional bracket that will deter most throws. Vice/Rabbit is a more aggressive style that allows the man to man guy to play slants and the like super-aggressively because he has help over the top—it's meant to generate a throw that results in a breakup or interception because it looks like the receiver has leverage right up until he doesn't.

(The last label on the graphic above is "Green Dog." That's a general assignment for a linebacker who's covering a running back or tight end—if the guy they're covering stays in to pass protect the LB has the green light to blitz.)

I talked about this "Switching" system after Penn State. At the time we were just watching how Lavert Hill (CB on the bottom) and Brad Hawkins (safety on the bottom) react to the crossing route. The actual coverage is Doubles and those two are running a Cone. The X receiver's hard inside break relieves Lavert Hill of his Cone duties since Hawkins is going to come down all over it. Watch as Hill makes his read then backs into a zone where he can be of assistance in case the H receiver being covered by McGrone is also crossing.

Also note that Metellus is staying on top of the running back who, in Penn State's offense, is a pretty decent receiver, allowing Dax Hill to play that guy inside aggressively. That's a Vice. Finally, watch Ambry Thomas. He starts up, preventing a free release for the receiver, and then when the guy releases Ambry is taking him to the sideline, just as he did versus Cody White in the MSU example. On the opposite side you see Khaleke doing the same with the tight end.

image

Anyone whose man goes down the sideline has only the sideline for help—the brackets are there to provide coverage to either side of any in-breaking route. But the brackets can't cover everybody. Both Khaleke and Ambry are playing inside of those sideline routes, not expecting safety assistance. On the other hand Metellus and Hill both let their crossing route receivers go and convert to zone defenders, because they know they have brackets (Dax Hill and Brad Hawkins, respectively) inside to take over.

Doubles Disguises

You can think of this coverage as kind of like drawing up a blitz. You overload one side, move some guys into gaps they're not expected in, and hope the protection breaks down before your coverage does. When you blitz like that, the better you disguise who's coming and from where, the better chance you have of getting through, right? And with blitzing the converse is also true: if you telegraph where you're blitzing, they'll pick it up and throw it to wherever the blitzer just abandoned.

The same is true for Doubles coverage: if the quarterback knows ahead of time which receivers are doubled and by whom, he'll skip them and move directly to a single-covered read, which should be getting some kind of leverage. So like a blitz, you try to show a lot of different looks before doubles to make it hard for the QB to see which guy's getting the bracket. For example, a cornerback in CONE coverage will often set up inside the receiver to make it look like he's in Don Brown's Cover 2 trap coverage.

Urban showed an example like this one from Notre Dame, where Michigan shows a three-high look to disguise the coverage.

Look at the setup before the H goes in motion and see if you can guess who's getting the doubles treatment, and from whom. I'm guessing you were wrong:image

Screwing with Doubles

Phew. So I got through all of that because I had to explain that this coverage is what Michigan State was planning to mess with. And the play we're on right now is a good example. For one, the assignments will have to switch when the H goes in jet motion, with Hawkins turning into the man-to-man safety on #3 and Dax taking Brad's place as the Cone safety on #1.

image

State here is running a play I know as "Seattle" that's normally a zone-beater, but MSU is using it to exploit Michigan's plan to use all of their backside DBs to double the backside receiver, hoping to clear out the double with that guy, and leave just a wheel-route-chasin'- MLB and a late-arriving safety to deal with RB wheel route and a jetting slot receiver following.

image

Watch McGrone's coverage here. He has to dodge the pick from Cody White's route, then momentarily doubles the first read with Hawkins, who's in man on the slot who came across. But for Uche teleporting past a Spartan-quality guard that RB is about to slip by McGrone and add to Twitter's stockpile of undefeated wheel routes. That's Lewerke's first read, and he's in single coverage on a linebacker with his arm up:

image

MSU's big fall camp thing this year was coming up with these games to defeat Doubles coverages. They came in bunching their receivers together, using one receiver who's probably not doubled to split the double-team and pick the coverage. As you no doubt recall, that led to some early 3rd and long conversions:

Remember in a "VICE" call the idea is the outside player is supposed to drive hard inside, playing slants with abandon because the safety is getting over anything that turns out. That's why Metellus is apparently out in no-man's land instead of hammering down on the slant here. The guy who was supposed to get under the slant was Ambry Thomas, but he's trapped by the WR's move outside and then a natural pick from the tight end's route. Replay:

They also took advantage of the expectation that the defense couldn't help but double MSU's best receiver if they sent him vertical, then sent two more eligible receivers right at the cornerback left outside, hooking one of them for a quick snag.

image

It worked a second time, even though Ambry was prepared for it:

And it could have worked again later in the game when Dantonio added the running back as fourth wide receiver outside the bunch, and despite a 3-man pass rush (with Dwumfour dropping) there was a guy open, albeit not the first or second or probably even third read, and by then Luigi Vilain has healed two broken legs and beaten whatever passes for a Sparty left tackle these days:

All that coverage committed inside is useless if the doubles get sucked deep by a big burly guy and the offense is just lining up outside. Until Michigan adapted by shifting their alignment.

Lock & Levels

For Michigan's response we have to back to Woodson and again I recommend the whole thing:

Lock and levels is a strategy for playing man to man against these bunch sets. The idea here is if you've got a big burly receiver or tight end flexed out in a bunch to clear space, just don't let him get a release until your buddies are on the tail of their dudes.

This should leave said buddies free to stay in man coverage on their chosen matchups when the offense tries to flip that.

image

Sure you're giving up the surprise a bit, but look what you gain. Cody White is delayed off the line by Hawkins "locking" him at the line of scrimmage for a second, and that leaves plenty of room for Khaleke to follow the tight end outside and Vincent Gray to collect his guy. They're the levels: by setting up at different depths they have lanes to get around each other, and don't need to swap guys to cover.

But you can absolutely play Doubles—which is inherently a man defense—with this technique as well. In fact I think this is an example. It looks like Cover 1, i.e. Michigan's base defense, which is why they have the luxury of sending five guys at the quarterback. And technically it is, since there's a single high safety and everybody else is playing man to man. But look at the picture above, where Metellus's eyes are. He's watching Cody White, the guy Hawkins is locking, not the quarterback's eyes. And note the technique that Ambry Thomas is playing against Julian Barnett at the bottom of the screen.

image

That's not how a cornerback plays in Cover 1. That's how a cornerback plays on an island, using the sideline as his help and trying to force the receiver as close to that as possible. Because he doesn't have help over the top. Because Metellus is playing his doubles technique on the other side. And now with the one thing they prepared for this game taken off the table, MSU was out of ideas except loft it up to the guy in single coverage. MSU would average 3.4 yards per play for the next five drives, with an interception, a fumble, and three punts, and never enter Michigan territory again. Maybe next year.

Comments

dragonchild

November 20th, 2019 at 9:16 AM ^

I've seen the "unfortunately the best source was Urban Meyer" on this site a few times now and maybe that's true from a technical standpoint, but I think the "unfortunately" is a weak excuse here.

This is signal-boosting an established enabler of abuse.  I don't want to start off my morning looking at this guy.  Actually I don't want to see his face or hear his voice or read his name, ever.  The sociopath makes me sick to my stomach.  Dantonio is an active coach and is mentioned in the context of comeuppance.  We're not linking to his breakdowns of twist blitzes or quarters coverage; we're hoping Harbaugh's boys humiliate him.  Meyer is not a coach (at least for now); there is literally no justifiable reason to increase his relevance.  Can we please find a source that may not be quite as eloquent but isn't a gottdamn amoral douchebag who got away with everything?

dragonchild

November 20th, 2019 at 10:22 AM ^

Well it matters on some level or it doesn't matter at all.  That's not a false choice; Urban Meyer does not have any sort of monopoly on football breakdowns so MGoBlog has a reasonable amount of agency here.

And if we're now suddenly willing to decouple on-field and off-field issues because football then I guess we're also OK with Harbaugh hiring these sorts?  Because FWIW I'm not.

wolverine1987

November 20th, 2019 at 3:42 PM ^

"Well it matters on some level or it doesn't matter at all."

I agree, and it doesn't matter with regard to his skills as a football analyst. 

And with regard to OSU, I don't like him, and you are free to have the plausible opinion that he enabled abuse. That opinion is not an open and shut case though. 

I would hire him in two seconds if I had a team (after a binding ethics clause was incorporated ink the deal)

Couzen Rick's

November 20th, 2019 at 4:05 PM ^

the timing doesn't make sense as 03-04 was Urban's time at Utah, which were the 2 years Carr won the B1G, i.e. nowhere near the hot seat. Unless he was irked about not being an assistant pre BG? By the time Carr retired Meyer was already at Florida, and I doubt that he would've bailed for Michigan one year removed from a National Championship, with Tebow still on the roster.

Hail_Yes

November 20th, 2019 at 9:47 AM ^

Or, and just hear me out on this one, maybe he knows what he's talking about X's and O's wise and his insight is valuable to many people, myself included, who are eager to learn more about the intricacies of Michigan's defense.  Doesn't mean I like the guy.  I had many teachers in college and high school who I didn't necessarily like as a person, but I still learned a lot from them.

Also, nobody forced you to start your morning looking at this guy.  If you clicked play on that video you chose to start your morning that way.

Edit: This was supposed to be a response to TheDirtyD, meant to be a response to the original.

dragonchild

November 20th, 2019 at 10:24 AM ^

nobody forced you to start your morning looking at this guy.  If you clicked play on that video you chose to start your morning that way.

I didn't click on the video; his mug is right at the top of the FP fercrissakes, and this isn't any sort of new flash on his scandals; he's a cited resource for MGoBlog now.  There's no reasonable way for me to know in advance he was going to be there.  So whether we agree or disagree on anything else, I was in fact literally forced to look at this guy.

Bronco648

November 20th, 2019 at 12:34 PM ^

OK, I see your point. So, maybe you should help Seth find an alternative source for these break-downs. I would love to watch James Light do something similar. That said, I don't think there is anything close to what Fox puts out, video-wise. However, if there is something, I, for one, would certainly watch it. And, I'm sure Seth would be more than happy to have found a new source to help us all understand football better.

Seth

November 20th, 2019 at 12:17 PM ^

Well I've talked about Dantonio's defensive strategies ad nauseum on this site. MSU FFFFs and HTTV articles include breakdowns of his take on Quarters defense and the double-A gap blitz. I've talked about Jerry Sandusky's contributions to Cover 3 defense on here too.

Two things can be true: Urban enabled a serial abuser AND he is an extremely good football coach and analyst. I think it's foolish to expect all of society to cancel this person. We can and do mention the fact that he was unapologetic, that his firing was managed to be as advantageous to Ohio State and nondisruptive to Urban as possible with small consideration to the victim or the egregiousness of Meyer's dishonesty. If, like Fox, I hadn't also been vocally critical of Urban Meyer's conduct as OSU head coach I think your criticism would be valid.

What I'm not in favor of doing--and sorry if this sorta touches on political discourse--is treating people like they're binary good/evil (or if you prefer, somewhere on the D&D 2nd edition matrix). People are dynamic, and multi-faceted, and have varying degrees of power where their traits are more or less emphasized. Ignoring the contributions of assholes is a petty and ignorable blow against assholes that makes us a poorer society.

In Meyer's case, I think it's fine to have him as an analyst, though I would have expected some sort of contrition first, because he doesn't have that much power over people. I think he should not be a college football coach anymore because he's proven he isn't ethical or moral enough to be in a position where his decisions could use the institution to harm people.

CallsignHobo

November 20th, 2019 at 9:19 AM ^

I saw the play Meyer broke down on Fox live and while it might be a good demonstration of defensive tactics, the blatantly wide open WR running the corner route makes me cringe. Thank goodness Book bailed on a decent pocket when his first read wasn't immediately there for him

TheDirtyD

November 20th, 2019 at 9:36 AM ^

In the pre snap alignment what's the disadvantage to stacking the DB's to the field side at the top of the picture? It's 3rd and 8 what's most likely a passing down. It allows the DB to react at the steam of the routes wherever the WR runs to. He has the ability to cover both an inside or an outside route. Hudson has to run from the far spot to get all the way out side. If thats a well thrown ball its most likely a first down. Pre snap alignment is key here. I'm just not understanding why Hudson and Gray aren't stacked 5 yards off the LOS. Hudson has to run over the top of two routes he's actually lined up more inside and when combined with the angle and downfield he has to run a significantly longer distance to get to the point of contact. Hudson was lined up in the middle of the hash's when the ball is snapped his man his nearly on the hash. Stacking the DB's makes the distance to cover minimal and takes the QB an extra moment to understand whats happening. If you wanna take it another level you could rotate the Metellus down to cover a cross and Hudson back to the top of the defense to replace him. There's ways for man concepts to beat crossing routes. 

Snake Eyes

November 20th, 2019 at 11:04 AM ^

IAmNotACoach but here's my take, by stacking the 3 DBs in essentially a row, you're immediately giving the inside receiver inside leverage and the outside receiver outside leverage. When the DBs are more heads up on the guy they can more easily cover a inside-in; outside-out breaking routes as their positioning will benefit them.  If they cross like they do in the pics, they can still get inside-to-outside and vice versa as they are at slightly different "levels" while the WRs also cover the same distance while having to navigate past the "locked" WR and the other crossing WR. 

RockinLoud

November 20th, 2019 at 9:58 AM ^

Most defenses are easy to scout and counter from an X's and O's on paper standpoint for any decent OC. The problem is can a college team (QB) execute it? After the D adjusted pretty much every team they've played has been shut down this season. If it were as simple as you make it out to be the defense would not hold most teams to under 250 yds of offense.

UMFanatic96

November 20th, 2019 at 10:06 AM ^

I think this year has shown us that Michigan's defense is much more versatile this year than in the past.

So far they've shown straight man coverage, trap coverage, cover 2, doubles/brackets, and they've started dropping d-lineman into zones.

Last year OSU knew Michigan would rely on their man defense and were able to gameplan against that. By the time Michigan adjusted and started playing zone later in that game, it was too late and they hadn't done it enough in games for it to be effective.

This year, Michigan's defense is much less predictable and harder to gameplan against because they've implemented counters and different strategies all season.

If anything, this makes me more encouraged for OSU because now there is more for OSU to look at and prepare for.

Watching From Afar

November 20th, 2019 at 10:08 AM ^

That first diagram is giving me really bad flashbacks. Everyone is covered, some are double covered. That's when Indiana swings the RB out of the backfield to pull the MLB and then pulls a QB draw or scramble and gets five 3rd down conversions with no Michigan defender within 10 yards of him.

Watching From Afar

November 20th, 2019 at 10:48 AM ^

Last year's Indiana and Florida games are still fresh in my mind. They slid Paye down to 3T and had him spy Ramsey. That didn't work.

I am not a fan of leaving the 2nd level of the defense vacant by sending LBs on (edge) blitzes or leaving 0 people in strict zones watching the QB to help in case he scrambles. I'm not even saying have a spy, I'm saying have people not locked into man coverage without a single 2nd level defender between the DL and the Safeties at 15 yards.

Watching From Afar

November 20th, 2019 at 12:30 PM ^

Peyton Ramsey is not Denard and Paye is not a 300 pounder. Didn't matter last year. Ramsey scrambled for, I think, 5 first downs last year on 3rd and 5+. And the defense couldn't cover their crossers in that game either.

With the coverage Seth describes, Michigan is spending 4 guys on 2 WRs to help on in/out breaking routes. In the process, they leave the QB entirely unaccounted for unless the RB doesn't go in a route and the LB converts from blitzer to spy/blitz.

So this year they took a blitzer and now spend it on coverage, which is great to stop some things. The deep FS from last year has also converted into a coverage guy. They'll need a change up if Ramsey or Fields run.

username03

November 20th, 2019 at 12:58 PM ^

I don't disagree with any of that other than we weren't running this defense last year so I don't find the comparison all that apt. Paye is 278, please excuse my wildly exaggerated estimate. My point is I would rather have Ramsey running than throwing to open guys which seems to be the trade off that occurs with the defense that was covered here.

Alumnus93

November 20th, 2019 at 10:10 AM ^

You mentioned their OG Campbell and Reid might be the worst in BIG history....  and with a statement like that, you'd think we'd have sacked Lewerke ten times.

rc15

November 20th, 2019 at 11:17 AM ^

Doesn't this D leave you horribly exposed to a QB draw/scramble? No LB spying, and safeties doubling WRs on the outside.

Like if the QB can squeak out of the blitz, there's no second layer in the entire middle of the field.

S.G. Rice

November 20th, 2019 at 12:39 PM ^

Standard I am not a coach disclaimer.

Any coverage with man principles is going to be exposed to the potential of QB draws or scrambles.  Seems like there are many ways you can counter that risk - one of which is by having your DL be hyper-responsible for their lanes.  In a sense, not having Winovich or Gary this year is helpful since our DEs this year are less likely to fly upfield and get pushed deep to open an outside lane.

This isn't a coverage that you're going to use all day against a run threat like Justin Fields, but it's a good tool to have in the box.

Good stuff Seth.

Go Blue 80

November 20th, 2019 at 12:35 PM ^

Anyone else having difficulty with ad placement on this blog? Been having an annoying Celebrate With The Spartans add taking up 1/4 of the bottom of the screen and recently another ad covering almost half of the top of the screen.