Monday Presser 10-27-14: Doug Nussmeier Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Nuss

file

You were really animated in the fourth when the touchdown was scored. What were the emotions like?

“I mean, the one touchdown we scored, that’s a big play in a four quarter game. We’re always talking about competing and challenging, don’t worry about the scoreboard, play. Just excited that our guys had a positive thing happen to them. They fought and struggled and it would have been easy to throw in the towel, so I wanted to let them know that we’re going to be there, we’re going to encourage them, [and] we’re going to coach them. When we need to correct things we’re going to correct things and when they do good things we’re going to reinforce that behavior.”

 

You said after the Notre Dame game seven weeks ago that the offense was still in its infancy. We’ve seen some growing, but why is this team still struggling to find offensive consistency and what’s it going to take to get that with the window on the season closing?

“Sure. A number of reasons, and we talk about it. Same story, and I know I sound like a broken record, but when you look at what we’ve done the number one thing is turnover margin. You cannot turn the ball over three times and expect to win football games. We’ve talked about it week in and week out. At times we’ve limited that but we haven’t completely eliminated it the way we need to, so it’s a focal point every day and  we talk about it and we do drills in practice to practice it. It’s something our kids understand. We’ve just got to get better at it.

“The other thing is consistency in performance. We see week in and week out guys improve. The challenge we’ve had is getting all 11 guys at one time to be doing the right thing at the right time. You can see it compartmentalized a little bit and maybe you have one time here where this group does it right and this group doesn’t do theirs right, so it’s trying to get everybody on the same page. We’re still working to find the right answers.”

 

You played Shane Morris for a play instead of a series or not at all…

“Yeah, we were in a situation there towards the end of the game we told Devin, ‘Shane’s getting loose.’ We were in a situation where we didn’t know where the ball [would be] if we got it back at that point in time or not, so Shane went in for the play. We felt like Devin needed to finish the game being that he’s from Michigan and [it’s] his last time to play Michigan State so we put him back in the game.”

[After THE JUMP: Mind games before actual games]

DeVeon has been working his way into the starting role. Talk about what you’ve seen from him in terms of what he’s doing really well and what he still needs to work on.

“Well, DeVeon is a downhill runner. He’s a physical back. The biggest thing for DeVeon to continue to improve in is his anticipation; playing at a speed faster than the game’s being played. We talk about [with] our guys all the time [how] you’ve got to be prepared to play the game before the game so that when you get to the game you’ve already played the different scenarios that can play out on each and every play. A young player, which he is, he’s continuing to grow in that role and to develop in the protection area things, too.”

How big are you on literal visualization?

“I mean, we’re big in it. We talk all the time about [how] you can’t wait until Saturday to play the game. You can’t wait till the blitz hits you on third-and-five to react. You’ve got to have thought that through throughout the week and have thought that through. What’s my reaction going to be? How am I going to set my feet up? How am I going to set my eyes? Where do my hands have to go? All those things. Good football teams [and] good football players do that.”

 

Both Brady and Greg were asked what still can be accomplished here in terms of making a bowl, things like that. With how things have gone and the limited window that’s left how do you look at what can be accomplished, what successes can still be had here this year?

“When you’re involved in this game every day you see the best players in the world, the best teams in the world get beat. It’s a day in, day out thing and you’ve got to commit every day to bring your best, and we’ve talked to our players a lot about preparation, about how you continue to prepare each and every day. And every day’s going to be different. Some day’s you’re going to have success and some others [you won’t]. Again, it’ going to be the challenge of us finding consistency as a group, and that’s really where we need to improve offensively is to get all 11 guys at the right time doing the right things.”

Is it difficult when there’s not that tangible goal of winning championships, things like that versus-

“No.”

Convincing a 20 year old things like execution, [that] that’s a great accomplishment. That’s difficult, I imagine.

“We’ve got tremendous kids in our program. They’re phenomenal kids, and they understand accomplishment and they understand achievement and they strive for the best [and] nothing but the best. You don’t come to Michigan, this great school with such a great academic reputation, if you don’t want to be the best academically [and] with such great football tradition, if you don’t want to be the best when it comes to football so our kids understand that. They’re striving for that every day.”

 

Talk about the strides the offensive line has made and just kind of [inaudible].

“Well, we’ve had improvement there and we’ve done some good things. Like I said, one time we block a play perfectly or as perfect as you’re going to block it and maybe we don’t hit the right hole or maybe we don’t get up on the route at the right time or maybe we don’t see the route, those kind of things. And maybe another time we’re not as good in protection or blocking as we should be. Again, it goes back to [how] we’ve got to be getting everybody on the same page and again, I don’t mean to sound like a broken record but that’s the reality.”

 

Prior to last year’s loss against Michigan State Devin Gardner was 9-3 as a starter. Since he’s 1-4. Are you worried about his ability to win games for this offense?

“No.”

 

MGoQuestion: There were seven dropped catches in the game. What can you do from your perspective as a coordinator to address that?

“Well, that was uncharacteristic, really, of what we’ve done during the season and we had talked a lot about and felt like the game would boil down to us having the ability to make some plays down the field and have opportunities. Those opportunities presented themselves. Unfortunately we weren’t able to convert for a number of reasons. They made a couple of good plays and a couple were simple plays we should make. So give them credit, they’re a good defensive football team and we’ll just continue to work and we’ll continue to strive to get it right. That’s all we can do.”

MGoFollowUp: Were those timing or route running issues or just mistakes?

“Well, you look at it [and] you say, okay, when you look at the game what are blatant drops? When the guy’s wide open and you drop the ball and what other ones are contested catches, and [coach] Heck[linski] does a great job with the wide outs putting a standard on them that anything that’s around them they should catch, you know what I mean. And you look at Devin [Gardner] and we’re always preaching timing and throwing the perfect ball to the perfect spot where it can’t be defended, so everybody’s got to strive to do it perfectly.”

 

Funchess kind of asked for some of the pressure when he got the No. 1 jersey before the season started. Now do you talk to him about maybe putting too much pressure on himself to perform [since he’s] struggling with drops a little bit in recent weeks?

“I don’t think so. I talk to Devin and all of our players all the time about defining excellence and ever day setting the standard and master your craft. Be better than you were yesterday and strive to be the best. Be better than anybody else at your position anywhere. We talk a lot about that and what it takes from the daily grind, as some people would say, but the opportunity to go out each and every day and maybe it’s working on this release that day or maybe it’s working on this footwork or eye placement, those type of things. We talk to our guys a lot about that and they’ve embraced it. Now, has it been perfect? No, and Devin, just like every other player on this team, has to work hard this week to improve his skills.”

 

Let me reword my last question [the one about his record as a starter]. Why aren’t you worried about Devin Gardner’s ability to lead this team to wins, and also on the road this year he hasn’t thrown a touchdown on the road? Why aren’t you worried when there are signs that he’s having trouble getting the job done?

“Well, I’ve said it before. You get into isolating on one specific area or one specific player [and] you’ve got to see the big picture and you’ve got to see that everything is in sync, that the timing, that everybody’s doing what they’re supposed to be doing on each and every play. When you start singling out a group or an individual you’ve got to make sure that that’s the right thing for the team.”

Comments

Icehole Woody

October 28th, 2014 at 9:05 AM ^

I liked Nussmeier's enthusiasm in the 4th Qtr.  It's one of the things this team needs and more than I've seen out of Hoke in the last 4 years combined.  Make Nuss the interim head coach. 

Go Blue!

GoBlueKC

October 28th, 2014 at 11:18 AM ^

I would say the difference is that Nuss at least seems to be coaching on the sideline and uses the enthusiasm to punctuate plays as needed. Hoke claps whether the players did something well, did not do something well....he just claps.

pdgoblue25

October 28th, 2014 at 9:14 AM ^

The first week of practice.  Considering he knew first hand how a championship football team operates, he had to have known it was going to be a lonnnnnnng season.

dragonchild

October 28th, 2014 at 9:25 AM ^

He's been at Alabama; he's seen championship football (well technically so has Hoke but it was a different game in the 90s).  His contributions may be overstated but he knows what a top-five program looks like.  I think he knew what he was getting into when he took the job, but he's consistently spoken in vagaries about how far along the team is.  What the hell is missing from this team that they can't even do the simple things consistently?  When things are this bad, lack of transparency doesn't help.

Of all the people on the coaching staff, Nuss is the most intriguing because he has the least amount of ownership in this trainwreck of a team, yet the offense isn't just behind; it's a disaster.  This team has more turnovers than a bakery.

uncleFred

October 28th, 2014 at 2:34 PM ^

In one of the early pressers, maybe preseason, he talked about the need for patience and that there would be times when fans wouldn't see the progress the offense was making. He attempted to set reasonable expectations about how quickly the offense would gain consistency. He spoke about their need to get better every game and that they had a long way to go.

What more can you expect from a coach? He can't say " Given where we're starting from, if we can break .500 this season it will exceed reasonable expectations". No coach can say that even if they think it true, and I'm not saying that was what he thought. I think that Nussmeier's expectations were higher than that and am certain that his goal was to win every game. An undefeated run is the goal of every coach in every sport in every season.

I doubt he expected to be under .500 at this point, but here they are and we are there with them. He's not repeating a mantra because he doesn't know what to do, but because that is the hill they have to climb to "get over the hump" as Brady put it. 

Nussmeier knows that those explanations are deeply unsatisfying. He's dissatisfied as well. All the coaches are disstatisfied. All the players are dissatisfied. All the fans are dissatisfied. That is why there is such a fury around here. 

GoBLUinTX

October 28th, 2014 at 3:11 PM ^

Reasonable excpectations?  Seriously?  We were to reasonably accept an offense that is scoring less than 20 points per game, the lowest such output since 1984, the year Harbaugh broke his arm?  What is reasonable about giving away more than two touchdowns worth of points year over year?  It wasn't reasonable when Rich Rod was here...wait, nope, he only gave away six points to the previous year.

Nussmeier's offense is giving away more than 15 points to last year's offense, that is not only unreasonable, it is totally unacceptable.  

rainking

October 28th, 2014 at 9:26 AM ^

have a Hokeian moment though. "We were in a situation where we didn’t know where the ball [would be] if we got it back at that point in time or not, so Shane went in for the play." That explains it NOT AT ALL

VintageBlue

October 28th, 2014 at 9:47 AM ^

I think the most likely scenario is Nuss yanked Gardner because of his struggles during the game.  Hoke wasn't "fully aware" of the change until after Morris played a snap and overruled Nuss, reinserting Gardner.  This makes more sense than someone just changed their mind. 

 

Edit:  I knowingly misattributed "fully aware" here but the shoe fits.

uncleFred

October 28th, 2014 at 2:50 PM ^

Maybe they spotted something that made them decide that Shane shouldn't be out there. Maybe injury related. Or maybe they saw something that concerned them about Devin so they pulled him and when they ended up with better field position than they expected he said he was fine and was cleared and he convinced them he could play. If it was in anyway injury related, since they don't talk about injuries, they need a deflection. 

Either way that answer is a beautiful diversion. Because all the speculation is about dumping on the coaches and not reanimating the nearly dead corpse of the "Shane Incident". 

My larger point is that NONE of us know what happened and in the grand scheme of things speculation about this is pretty meaningless. 

howmuch

October 28th, 2014 at 10:57 AM ^

Trying to read tea leaves here, but I think what they're getting at is that they didn't expect to get the ball back in such great position and planned to put in Morris to get reps. When they got the ball, Nuss moved forward with the plan and then someone realized that they had a chance to score, so they but DG back in.

But I can totally see it going down as others have stated, Nuss pulled DG and Hoke put him back in.

MGlobules

October 28th, 2014 at 9:32 AM ^

it's kind of a different game if. . . But Speilman was right-on about the ifs. There's a kind of hesitancy, or uncertainty, a lack of poise that sooner or later you have to say starts at the top. Brady has had his chance, period.

Does offer some shred of hope that things can be better under a new coach, though.

bj dickey

October 28th, 2014 at 12:39 PM ^

do look like their confidence is gone.  Especially offensively.  And I belive the qb and the receivers are the areas it is most noticeable.  The defense came out with a great deal of confidence, and played pretty well most of the game. 

Why is the confidence lacking -- becuase they are 3-5.  We'd be looking at something entirely different were they 5-3. 

How can that change?   Well, one could argue that keeping consistency will improve confidence next year, because they'll be in their second year of the same system.  You could argue that upperclassmen will be and play more confidently.  And, again, I'm talking about the offense here.  The defense has been just fine more often than not.

But to get there means keeping the staff around.  I don't know, at this point, how that happens unless this team goes on a hot streak and shows improvement every game. 

 

GoBLUinTX

October 28th, 2014 at 2:20 PM ^

To turn them around, to instill some pride and confidence in their team.  No more buddies, no more wrestling with the players at wake up.  No more coddling players because it's their last game.  Especially that part, there is nothing about the Team, the Team, the Team, about putting a player on the field because it's their last game.

These players should be treated with respect by their coaches and as counterintuitive as it might seem, handing out participation awards is being disrespectful.  It is in fact contemptuous.

 

12 o'clock High

 

 

copacetic

October 28th, 2014 at 9:50 AM ^

I don't know how I feel about Nuss. On the one hand, the offense is absolutely horrible, they can't even get the simple things right. 

On the other hand, I thought he called a pretty good game, the opportunities were there, the players just made a ton of mistakes. He's one of the only people who looks like he really cares. And he has championship experience.

Odd

Jonadan

October 28th, 2014 at 11:08 AM ^

After the Notre Dame game, my operative theory became that Nussmeier had come in this Spring, looked at what he had, and said to himself, "Self, this is going to take a while," and so went into the year coaching "for next year".  Hoke is Brandon's guy, Brandon didn't look nearly so shaky then; it seemed plausible that, say, an 8-4 year with obvious "progress" (whatever that means) would buy Hoke at least 2015.  Especially with a win over MSU or OSU.

Michigan has looked fine against bad teams.  That's a minimum competence and wasn't there last year (see: UConn).  Against good teams - even decent teams - it's been a struggle.  The offense to me this year looks like it knows what it's trying to do and can't - missed holes, dropped passes, wild throws, poor blocking, goofy turnovers, the works.  The big red flag exception is the Minnesota game, of course, when ... I don't have an explanation.  But this is an at least slightly better thing than last year's team which often looked like it didn't know what it was trying to do even when it was working.  (And then there were the Notre Dame and OSU games, which... I also don't have an explanation for, but in a good way.)

I have no idea how to try to sift out who's responsible for what problems at this point.  I look at the team and my gut feel is that with another year Nussmeier's offense would be at least back to decent even with a new QB, just from familiarity, repetition, and some experience on the line.  It was garbage time, sure, but (at least with the rose-colored glasses) the mere fact of a touchdown against MSU is a tiny positive progress.

But I don't think we can keep Hoke, as he's shown no ability to improve a team - the opposite, rather: we need to get rid of him.  So it's new coach, new coordinators, new QB, new everything next year, and that's also going to be a pain.

looty

October 28th, 2014 at 9:52 AM ^

They are just a poorly coached football team........period!  I was concerned about players transfering but I cant say I blame them.  Kalis, Peppers, Pipkins....all potential NFL talent and its sad to see their chances ruined due to poor coaching.  I get the whole "cant guarante" thing but I'm guessing Peppers sees the writing on the wall and gets the hell out and transfers somewhere where he can develop and win.

TheBoLineage--

October 28th, 2014 at 10:20 AM ^

to begin RE-figuring it out.  Ideally--  it starts with H-Ind.  And of course we will SEE it--  its not like you can Hide This Thing for the most part.

 

There is OBVIOUSLY something apparently Vastly Different different between Nuss-OC, and the former Mch-OC Lineage reaching back Decades N Decades.

 

But--    WHAT is it  . . .

 

TheBoLineage--

October 28th, 2014 at 10:54 AM ^

is my sense--  No IDENTITY, to use this word.  Which is prolly accurate.

 

The Old Mch-OC Lineage likely would have found an RB RunPlay that works-- either RunLeft RunRight--  and as The D-calls begin to Slant-STUNT to this RB-runplay, the Mch-O would come out of it.

 

This whole approach was Greatly Modified by Moeller, from the earlier Schembechler period.  And of course--  used by Carr.

 

I had thought Nuss would begin to use the 33-RunPlays to LT-Cole, the mix of Pull-MAN schemes, as the template, because LT-Cole seemed to be doing Good Things.  But this RunPlay O-call Template, has never gotten there.

 

Princetonwolverine

October 28th, 2014 at 11:17 AM ^

Putting Devin BACK in after 3+ quarters because he is from the state of Michigan and the game is against MSU is the DUMBEST reason I have ever heard.

If it was because he gave us the best chance to win then say that. Apparently, it wasn't.

UGH.

rainking

October 28th, 2014 at 11:38 AM ^

I'm not sure i agree Nuss "called a pretty good game." How many times did Gardner roll out and either run or throw? One that i can remember though there are probably more. How many passes to tight ends? How bout the rollout dump to the fullback? That play scored a TD earlier in the year if I remember right, or came close to scoring. punting with 9 minutes to go down how many points? i could go on...

2427_Couzens

October 28th, 2014 at 2:04 PM ^

I just can't understand what has happened to Nuss' coaching skills under this regime.  He was supposed to have a track record of developing very good to excellent quarterbacks, yet both Gardner and Morris look like they haven't progressed since Spring practice.  I want to give the guy a pass since he hasn't been here very long to be "tainted," and blame it all on not having enough protection to allow the QB to demonstrate "Nuss skills."  But I just don't know...

 

Catchafire

October 28th, 2014 at 9:01 PM ^

Hindsight is 20/20, but it would have been better if Borgess had remained to guide the offense.  For us to expect so much from Gardner and this Offense is a bit hilarious after all the coaching changes over the last few years.  Gardner has played with THREE!!! 3 different OCs in his tenure here!  You simply can't progress from fundamentally different systems in ONE year

For that, blame Hoke.  He never placed Deven in a position to succeed nor the offense; with Shane, at least he will have had a year under Nuss and can continue that experience next year if Nuss is retained.  Nuss is one of the best HCs we could hope for at this point, because... who else with sense and a proven track record would want this job?!?!  And if its a different guy from Nuss, then we will further dig our program into a hole.

Some of you expect a bit too much from Nuss in his first year, and are unwilling to give him a chance...  Keep Mattison, keep Nuss, FIRE Fred Jackson and the rest of the staff.

 

GoBLUinTX

October 28th, 2014 at 10:32 PM ^

 

Some of you expect a bit too much from Nuss in his first year,...

Why do you say that?  Do all OCs turn 32 point offenses into sub 20 point offenses from one season to the next?  Or, maybe you could point to just those transitions that involved Michigan.  Tell you what, let's look at the single greatest change to the Michigan offense in my 50+ years, 2008.  

2007 offense averaged 26 points per game

2008, new OC, check; new offense philosophy, check; new inexperienced QB, check; no single player recruited for the new type of offense is available, check; scoring average 20 points per game.

That's right, they dropped just six points.  The 2007-2008 transition saw a 23% drop in scoring offense, compare and contrast that to the 2013-2014 transition of 15.5 points through eight games which is a 44% drop in scoring offense.

Do you remember Nussmeier saying only 11 points separated Michigan from four more wins, well by gawd he increased that spread five fold to 58 points.  

 

Catchafire

October 29th, 2014 at 8:48 AM ^

Well, if you are expecting a new coach to come in and work miracles then you are sadly mistaken. And to immediately write of Nuss, a coach who has produced over the years and a key factor in championships at Alabama in arguably the hardest conference, is a bit short sighted by those who do not see his value.

But, that is the arrogance that I see in a lot of Michigan fans as of late. We have lived high on the hog for many years, and now that we have hit a bump in the road (the last 7 years) we want to fire every coach that can't turn the program around in year one... We failed to give RR his 4th year, and Hoke had a lot of success his first year with RRs players. But the transition has never settled, because Hoke still uses a Dual Threat QB in a system not meant for such.

If we are patient (and realistic), we will see results. We will see an improvement in Offense if key pieces are retained for next year. If not, the time period for our team floundering in mediocrity will increase. If Nuss is not retained, 3-4 years from now he will have success with another team and we are left scratching our heads... (i.e. RR).

Rome wasn't built in a year, and neither will a new competent and competitive Michigan team.

TheBoLineage--

October 29th, 2014 at 11:36 AM ^

a good score.  He used a Scoring System by which To Grade the OL.  Passed easily for the most part--  maybe even 90-percentile.  An interesting approach.

 

This was about OL-Technique Stuff ONLY per play--  and not really about O-call types, or O-call sequencing.  The Moosman Data would seem to support other comments concerning Improved OL-play @-MSU.

 

If the above is Roughly True--  then Nuss will begin to Run Out Of Time, to find The Right O-call Sequences.  This can only be Hidden For So Long.

 

Maybe--  Magically--  Nuss can Find It for H-Ind.  And beyond.  I am Tired Of Waiting