1:40 to Kickoff on Saturday - Two Pictures, One Problem and One Proposed Solution

Submitted by mGrowOld on

 

These two pictures were taken yesterday approximately 1:40 away from kickoff.  The top picture is the alumni section and the bottom picture is the corresponding student section.  One is full and one is approximately 25% empty.   A lot of people both here on the board and in the stands are asking why this is happening and looking for answers on how to stop it.

Student attendance is a problem that is new (to Michigan anyways) and using positive reinforcement (The Hail program) didn't work.  Negative reinforcement (General Admission) appears to also not be working if the goal is to get students to the games on time.  And make no mistake from my perspective - I WANT the students to show up.  They are loud, they are enthusiastic and they make the entire gameday environment better when they are there in force.  But, I'd rather they were there from the beginning of the game and not midway into the first quarter to make their presence felt.

Here is my proposal on how to remedy this rather new student attendance issue:

  1. Discontinue general admission.  Students have always had seating assigned based on their class and this should not change.  Freshman should get the least desirable seats and Seniors should be rewarded.  It was that way when my dad was there in the late 40's, for me in the late 70's and it should be that way now.  General admission, in my opinion, is a mistake and should be ended.
  2. Stop discounting the price of student tickets.  Students should pay the same rate as the rest of us for the seat and if that is too expensive for the student (or their parents) to afford then they always have the option of not purchasing them. This should weed out those who buy them without truly wanting to use them.
  3. Allow students unfettered rights to buy and sell tickets to anyone that wants to buy them.  The free market will then determine if those seats have value and for how much.  And if they are going to pay the same price as me to buy the seat,  they should have the same freedom I do to sell that ticket for whatever the market says it's worth and to anyone who wishes to buy it.  I sold two extra seats to the Notre Dame game for $300 each.  I sold the same two tickets to Akron for $20 each.  Give the students the same freedom as I have to buy and sell their seat.

We have fantastic students who make the Big House loud and an extremely difficult place to play for opposing teams (just ask Notre Dame).  And I don't believe "punishing" them through general admission will make them show up for games earlier or in greater numbers.  But making them pay the market rate for their seat might make those who arent really sure about football think twice before buying.  And letting them sell that seat to whoever wants it is only fair.

EDIT: GoBlue20111 accurately points out the flaw in my proposal in that it depends on somebody holding mulitiple seats as I do to be able to sell one ticket at a profit while still attending the game.  And students don't hold multiple seats so my idea wouldnt really fix anything for less attractive games.  Mods can leave the post up or take it down if they chose - my idea is flawed and I see that now.  The problem is real though and while my solution may not solve it we are need to acknowledge it exists.

jmblue

October 6th, 2013 at 6:16 PM ^

I don't think this has much to do with students growing up going to, or not going to, games.   I know that's John Bacon's argument but he seems to forget that most other people did not grow up in Ann Arbor like he did.  I only went to a couple of games before I was a student, and most of my freshman classmates had never gone before.  This did not stop any of us from being diehard fans.

Also, a "family section" is normally alcohol-free, which is rather pointless in a dry stadium.  The only part of the stadium that might be "unfriendly" to families would be the student section, and they can't sit there anyway.

 

 

Danwillhor

October 6th, 2013 at 5:53 PM ^

they don't cut the section by 25-40% on top of, if anything, making it easier for students to get tickets. This would create demand for a seat and a larger base for the newly scarce seats. The goal would be to essentially rebuild the student section. If it still had issues then maybe we've found out the stadium capacity:interest ratio as to when the amount of seats and student expectations of team performance intersect negatively. Maybe?

white_pony_rocks

October 6th, 2013 at 5:59 PM ^

They should require a 20 question U of M football history test to be able to purchase student tickets.  Ask questions that are easily found on the internet though.  Make it so students have to register for  special account, set up a username, password, secret questions, account recovery options, make it time consuming to register for football tickets, most people who are just opting into student tickets because its easy and their parents will pay for it won't probably spend the time doing all that  Also, U of M tickets are overpriced, LSU, FSU and clemson all charge less for student tickets than U of M does, and they are all better teams than U of M  and have had more recent success, which matters more than tradition.

Setshot

October 6th, 2013 at 5:59 PM ^

I can barely afford tickets the way it is. I go to this great institution but I don't receive much financial help. If tickets were raised to what everyone else pays, there is no way I could afford it. But "general admission" is not the answer. When we had assigned seats, I was always in the stadium early. I love watching the team warm up, watching the country's best marching band, and watching all those winged helmets running out of the tunnel and slapping the banner. But now with this new policy, you don't have a choice where to sit. They have been assigning seats and packing people in. Being someone who wants a good perspective on the game (section 26 row 40 to 50) I need to show up near kickoff. It's really unfortunate. Growing up I always knew I would go to U of M and then after graduation I would donate to the athletic department to support our teams. But after my experience with Dave Brandon as AD, I won't ever send in a penny while he's there (and I know other students with the same POV). I have been a loyal fan and have attended games my whole life in the big house and on the road. It's a shame that DB has caused many great fans to lose their desire to support Michigan Athletics. Every game I attend in the future I'll just buy my tickets off of stubhub or some other secondary market. Also, I can't wait to see how everything goes this basketball season. I'm sure it will all work out, and everyone will be happy. /s

zroze

October 6th, 2013 at 6:01 PM ^

Just curious to ge other people's opinions close to my age... (26).

Isn't sitting in the student section way more fun than the rest of the stadium?  You can be loud, obnoxious, rowdy football fans w/out worrying about offending other people's kids.  Cheering/chanting, yelling on defense (and not feeling like you're the only one doing it), being near the band, etc.  I am what I think you'd all consider a "good fan"... show up early/on time, cheer loud, stay the whole game, etc.

For the last few years I have been attending games in the student section using my expired MCard and getting tickets through a friend's sister (who's family also had tickets, which is why hers were available).  This year, due to being out of town/not having the ticket hookup anymore, yesterday was my first game of the year, and I sat in section 15.  While it was fun and enjoyable, I think it's MUCH LESS fun than being in the student section.  Anybody else agree?

So here's my proposal--there are lots of 20-something alumni in Ann Arbor who still want to go to games.  Get rid of the validation so I don't have to worry them figuring out my MCard is expired.  More importantly, there's probably a bunch of older guys who would LOVE to sit in the student section and drunkenly relive their youth.

mGrowOld

October 6th, 2013 at 6:20 PM ^

I agree.  Ticket validation did not exist when I was in school other than the usher eyeing you up and deciding if he thought you were a student or not.  If challenged most simply used the "I left my ID at at the dorm" and that was that.  Not quite sure what the problem the university is trying to solve as anyone sitting in the student section knows exactlly what they're getting into it IMO and it would definitely be "buyer beware" for any non-student sitting there.

UMxWolverines

October 6th, 2013 at 6:19 PM ^

Pretty obvious GA hasn't done jack shit. The student section never had problems getting to 3:30 games, only noon games, but now there's more empty seats at the beginning of 3:30 games than ever before. They filled in later, but that's exactly what used to happen before GA. 

5th and Long

October 6th, 2013 at 6:20 PM ^

There's a lot of blame on the students from the older alums. As one of those alums I think we're not seeing some of the other factors affecting student attendance. The first thing to keep in mind is that the student section often fills up...just not before the game. 1 - Pre-9/11 getting alcohol into the stadium was easy. Now it's not so easy and the students choose to pre-party longer before going into the stadium. We just got to bring booze into the stadium and keep partying. 2 - Pre-2000 not every game was televised, so the only way to see Michigan play was to actually go to the game. Now students can watch the game on their phones or their tablets and don't have to be on time and won't miss anything. So 1 & 2 combined give the kids incentive to not be on time. 3 - Student ticket resale policy is just as big of a problem. We could simply resell the tickets to anyone. So if a student couldn't go to a game it was easy to find someone who wanted to go to fill that seat. Now the students are handicapped in two ways. 1 they have to get another student to buy the ticket or pay the difference and get the ticket validated as non-student. 2 Those seats are less desirable for the general public because it's not an assigned seat until you actually get to the stadium. The policies have essentially taken away the free-market in the student section. 4 - Couple that with weak non-conference home games and you have an environment that makes it difficult for students to get rid of their tickets to non-students who want them and would fill those seats. In 1991 my out of conference games were Notre Dame and UCLA. I couldn't make UCLA and it was easy to sell to my friend's dad who paid double what I paid. But now if a student wants to get rid of his Akron tickets to a non-student who wants to buy them, he probably wasn't going to get face value anyway ($40). But now he'd have to also convert the ticket to non-student and pay the difference in price for the validation. It's cheaper just to not go than to try to sell it or give it away to a non-student. Paid attendance still the same, but there's a hole in the student section.

jmblue

October 6th, 2013 at 6:38 PM ^

#1 stopped being true long before 9/11.  I started going to games in the '90s and in all the time I've gone to games,  I've never seen many people - of any age - sneaking in alcohol.  

#2 also stopped being true long before this problem started.  I think the last non-televised Michigan football game was in the early '90s.

Students arriving late (or not at all) wasn't a big issue until about the RR years.  At first I thought it was apathy due to our struggles on the field, but that wouldn't explain why it's continued.  It seems to be a nationwide trend, though, so there may not be any simple solution.

5th and Long

October 7th, 2013 at 12:55 AM ^

As late as 1993 we snuck full pony kegs into the stadium (underneath a wheel chair) in the student section.  We routinely brought flasks in and didn't really have to hide it.   No way that's happening now. 

2 - fair point about Michigan games and television.  Again as late as '93 there were non-televised games.  But more importantly, it's way easier to get that content now than it was even as recently as 7 or 8 years ago.  ESPN3, BTN App, Slingbox, hack streaming sites.  You don't even have to stay at a house with cable or go to a sports bar to preparty.  

But still the biggest problem is the ability for students to sell the tickets in the secondary market...

 

Rumsey

October 6th, 2013 at 6:23 PM ^

How about give real rewards for showing up early (clothes, stadium food, chance to win cool shit) and real penalties for showing up late to every game (show up late to every game, don't get tickets for next year) Better yet, get rid of general addmission and give the best fans the best tickets.

UMxWolverines

October 6th, 2013 at 6:32 PM ^

One thing that is REALLY stupid is how hard it is to resell a student ticket. The way you have get it validated (and pay a shit load extra to do so) is ridiculous. 

Don

October 6th, 2013 at 6:34 PM ^

DB needs to realize that the current method for seating the students is counter-productive, since as several students have pointed out here there is a perverse incentive to NOT arrive on time. IF students are going to be forced to wait in line for GA seating, then they should be able to sit wherever they goddamn feel like it in the student section.

Personally, I think the obvious solution to late-comers and no-shows is simply to reduce the student allotment; from what I understand, the student section was increased not long ago, and I suspect supply has outstripped demand. However, before the student section is decreased in size, the GA seating procedure has to be changed, and changed now.

Going forward, I also think it's stupid to not use the capability that bar codes provide to gather information about how often a ticket is used, and when the entry time is relative to kickoff. If a student has compiled a season record of attending few games and showing late to those they do attend, they should be shoved to the end of the line for buying season tix.

 

goblue20111

October 6th, 2013 at 6:42 PM ^

Other than my solution of "shut up and worry about yourself" this seems to be the best idea. If you don't scan in or scan late (say mid way through the first quarter -- hey shit happens sometimes) a certain number of times, regardless of creidts or group seating, you get worse seats. Of course, you'd get rid of GA. I think this is a fair all around solution. 

trueblueintexas

October 6th, 2013 at 6:51 PM ^

I find it amusing that almost every solution to drive student attendance is actually an effort to limit student attendance (priority for seniority, smaller student section, reward programs based on prior attendance,blah, blah,blah). If this is really about the students, which most agree it is supposed to be, try looking at it from a different perspective (i.e. Not as a fan and current ticket holder). Make it so easy any student can attend if they want. I propose students get tickets for free. They can attend any game they want without being tied to buying a package deal. Those who get there early get the best seats. Once the student section is full, they can scalp a ticket to get in like any other fan who really wanted to go but didn't plan ahead. Do this, and I guarantee the section will be full repeatedly and on time. If not, than it is an indictment of the quality of opponent. I know there will be many arguments as to why this is stupid and not realistic, but if the goal really is to get students to the game, you can't argue against this idea.

maizemama

October 6th, 2013 at 8:55 PM ^

I scrolled through the whole thread waiting to see a comment like this. My solution and yours are very similar: 1. Students get free admission. Note, there is no ticket to resell. The first 25,000 (or whatever allotment) get in free and once validated as students at the gate get a pass for a real general admission seat (i.e. they can sit anywhere in the student section). 2. A corollary to the above could be that students with excellent attendance could be eligible as upperclassmen/grad students to purchase tickets in an adjacent but "better" section.

BlueHills

October 6th, 2013 at 9:05 PM ^

I completely agree.

Student admissions should be free for the reasons you state.

The idea that DB makes a million dollars a year to run a department that ran just fine for years without him, and that he had to hire even more people to do the grunt work, is laughable. If the Athletic Department can afford that, it can afford to give a few thousand tickets to students.

David Brandon and people like him at other institutions, are a big part of what is wrong with college athletics. Can our beloved University of Michigan be doing the wrong thing? Yes, moreover, it is doing the wrong thing for the University's students and for its mission as an institution of higher learning.

On top of everything else, DB has zero class in the way he goes about things.

Yeah, I'm mad, bro. The guy is a tool.

Bando Calrissian

October 6th, 2013 at 9:09 PM ^

What might be enlightening is this review of John U. Bacon's Fourth and Long purportedly by former Michigan WR Yale Van Dyne:

http://www.amazon.com/review/R37VG4UKARWMJZ/ref=cm_cr_pr_perm?ie=UTF8&A…

It appears he's edited it since it was first posted, because the original version went far more in depth about alumni players' misgivings about Dave Brandon.

btjabrone

October 6th, 2013 at 6:51 PM ^

Lower prices for student tickets are a good idea.  The idea that students should already be 100% invested in the football team if they want to buy tickets is flawed.  One reason that student tickets are lower, among other reasons, is that it allows people who are not fans to take a chance in buying tickets for a reasonable fee and then, hopefully, those students will become fans for life.  This is exactly what happened to me.  Unlike some on this board, I never grew up a Michigan fan.  In fact, I didn't follow college football at all and only knew Michigan was any good because other people told me when I mentioned I was attending UM for college.  Nevertheless, I bought tickets because they were cheap and if I didn't like it, it wasn't a huge waste of money, because I knew I would go once or twice to try it out.  After my first game (which, by the way, was Appalachian State), I was hooked.  In all my time at Michigan, I missed exactly one half of football, because I was taking the LSAT.  I go back at least once a year for a game in person and watch every game on TV.  I am an example of student prices doing exactly what they are supposed to do: bring in new fans who will be loyal for life (and willing to pay more down the road).

cleavo77

October 6th, 2013 at 6:54 PM ^

As I read your post I had to agree that there were some flaws, but in your edit you corrected everything I questioned. The bottom line is that action does need to be taken. We've got the largest football stadium in the world, and it needs to be filled each and every saturday. In a sports economics class I'm currently taking, I've learned that as long as there are empty seats, Marginal Costs do not increase with each additional seat filled. I know this sounds basic, but maybe that's what it needs to  be taken back to. Maybe somehow we could require ticketholders to RSVP for their seat or else it will be resold. Perhaps an abismal solution, but I'm just spitballin; I'm no genius. Something will be figured out, because this is Michigan. Go Blue!

Shameless plus to my Michigan Sports blog. It's for a class I'm taking, and anyone who visits it just helps me out more. Click the link if interested, http://cleavela.newmediadl.com/ . Thanks everyone, and again, Go Blue!

Princetonwolverine

October 6th, 2013 at 6:56 PM ^

Do what a lot of stadiums do to fake attendance....paint the seats to look like people are there.

Slap some yellow paint on the student section and it will always look full on TV.

dahblue

October 6th, 2013 at 7:36 PM ^

I had no idea that the GA policy actually involved mandating seats once students arrive and stuffing everyone into their assigned seats.  What a terrible idea.  It's almost as if it were suggested by someone who never once ran a seated event before, or was never a student.  

If I were a student, there's absolutely no way I'd arrive before kickoff.  An integral part of the gameday experience takes place outside of the stadium.  Sure, "superfans" will never miss a second, but everyone else will be content with their DVR for catchup.  I just don't see a drop of benefit to this new system.  It doesn't help with the problem and, at the same time, takes away the value of seniority in student ticketing.

mGrowOld

October 6th, 2013 at 8:15 PM ^

No kidding!  My idea obviously has flaws but i had NO idea we had instituted a GA policy that punished early arrivals by forcing them into assaigned seats.  That is beyond stupid and actually works against students arriving early instead of encouraging it.  

The solution might be to actually insitute GA and let the students sit where they want instead of the silly thing we apparently have now.

Bando Calrissian

October 6th, 2013 at 8:15 PM ^

For me, this is a fundamental question of goodwill. The Athletic Department, since the beginning of time, has had a lukewarm-if-forgiving relationship with the students, as far as the students were concerned. Athletics didn't do anything overly objectionable, aside from trying to cleanse the Yost cheers every few years or raise ticket prices a couple bucks. You knew what you were getting, and you felt appreciated as a student fan.

This last year, the transparently marketing-intensive, cash-aggressive policies of this Athletic Department have turned off a lot of students, from rapidly escalating ticket prices to new seating policies. Yes, there was a freely-acknowledged apathy problem before these changes. Yet the reaction has been to throw the baby out with the bathwater. Whatever goodwill was left amongst the students towards the AD is completely and totally gone. Scorched earth. Everywhere these kids turn, DB and the marketing gurus are putting the screws to them. And then the adults turn around, go to the press, and burn the kids some more.

Any hope Dave Brandon, Hunter Lochmann, and Dave Ablauf had of getting the kids back in their camp is gone, especially since every week there's a new and even more denigrating and patronizing series of quotes from one or more of the three about the students. 

Guess what? You jerk around your most loyal consumers, the kids who literally eat, sleep, and breath the University of Michigan on a daily basis, they're going to jerk right back. What I see now is defiance, not apathy. They're pissed. And I don't blame them in the least. The systems these people come up make it easier for students to stop caring, not make them care more. Can't wait to see what happens when basketball season unfolds.

The fun part is guess who the future donors are?

NHWolverine

October 6th, 2013 at 8:43 PM ^

I hope that folks don't conclude that this is a problem that is isolated to Michigan. Last week I attended the BC game and their GA student section didn't become 70% or so full until almost halftime. That was against FSU: they had a top 10 opponent and one of the most exciting freshmen QBs coming into town!

UM2018

October 6th, 2013 at 8:45 PM ^

This is unrelated but I was wondering if anyone knew where I could find a video of the short Dhani Jones' "Lets get fired up" video they've played at the games recently. It makes me laugh everytime. 

Wheatley

October 6th, 2013 at 8:49 PM ^

Of course we are there before the game. If  I was still a student I would show up just before kickoff wasted off a couple of kegstands and surfing for some 18-22 Strange. Give em a break! lol

MGoBlue24

October 6th, 2013 at 9:03 PM ^

that we need to lop off about 10 rows of the student section. Clearly the GA compacting rule is having the effect of forcing early arrivals into less-preferred seats, and making the rest of the section look wide open until late arrivers fill in the obviously empty space. I'd revisit that sooner, not later. There are some good ideas being presented here, but I hope student prices stay low relative to other tickets, and that resales can be allowed.

taistreetsmyhero

October 6th, 2013 at 9:10 PM ^

In the north end zone looking right next to the student section looking down on everything.

My immediate, temporary fix: spread them out! There were probably as many students sardined together in that visibly 75% full section as in the normal sections, which looked very sparse from my vantage

MLDWoody

October 6th, 2013 at 9:33 PM ^

Well, I can tell you that all of those students were probably there, just not in their seats yet. I spent maybe 30-45 minutes being corralled from one line to the next like cattles when all I wanted to do was get into my seat. That is GA. It is a horrible idea and causes more problems than it fixes.

 

Everyone complaning about the wave, why do you think that is happening? Maybe it is because freshman and sophomores can sit wherever they want to, like idk, in the front where the wave normally starts. They mess a lot of stuff up, more than just the wave. That is GA...

Guttman

October 6th, 2013 at 10:16 PM ^

Let's just get this over with. . .DB, please just fire the entire student fan base in one swift move and put up a few "seeking" ads on Craigslist. . .Middle-aged W/M ISO 25,000 co-eds for weekend fun.  

 

C'mon, Dave.  You know you want it. . .

bacon

October 6th, 2013 at 10:19 PM ^

Some simple (and likely unpopular) solutions if you actually want to affect attendance: 1. Halt admission 15 min before kickoff and resume after 1st quarter. I'd hate this if I was a student, but I'd be on time. 2. They must know how many ga seat assignments they've handed out, so allow people to attend on standby. Your ticket is only guaranteed until 15 min before kickoff, then the extra tickets are sold to non-ticket holders who show up at a very low cost (maybe 5-10 dollars?). Works for the airlines. Also would hurt the scalpers, but f them. I think a lot of local alumni who can't get season tickets would probably love this because they could try for admission and if they don't get in, they can go watch in town. Students would hate this, but probably would show up on time. 3. Spread the students out around the stadium. It looks really empty because it's all together. If the students were interspersed with alumni sections it wouldn't look as bad. Plus, it would spread out the noise. A 4. Shrink the student section and sell partial season tickets. Then you only have to show up for half the games and you can buy tickets from less enthusiastic fans for the other half if you want. As incentive, allow people who show up for every game the opportunity to buy full season tickets in junior/senior years. I think this is how hockey used to work when I was in school in the late 90s (and probably still does?). 5. Make the cost of a season ticket fixed, and have fewer home games in certain years. That would allow you to schedule top teams home and away, without worrying about whether you'd lose out on the revenue of one fewer home game. I'm not sure how concessions would work out, but having one fewer home game in a year where Ohio is at home and playing lsu or someone of that caliber at home in the other should keep the tickets worth buying even in years with fewer home games.

tdcarl

October 6th, 2013 at 10:30 PM ^

1. That is terrible.

2. A lot of the students not in their seats at kickoff are stuck in the cattle chutes that are the GA lines. Line outside the stadium, line at your section, lines everywhere.

3. No. Just no. The amount of "DOWN IN FRONT" would be unbearable and everyone would be pissed.

4. I don't see how this solves anything besides pissing off more students. Laters gonna late.

5. Again, no. The AD isn't the only group that makes money off home games. The city as a whole gets a great economic benefit out of having games.

 

Sorry for coming off a bit dickish.

bacon

October 6th, 2013 at 10:49 PM ^

No offense taken. Actually I don't really like any of the ideas except the last one, but was just thinking about alternatives. For #5, I agree that it would hurt economically once out of every two years, but if you had lsu in town instead of two cupcakes, you might balance it out with higher rates for hotels, etc. Plus, with nd off schedule, you might have two marque out of conference games in a year. Otherwise how do you replace nd? Also, I was wondering if the admission lines are why the section is taking so long to fill. Maybe the problem is having too few people helping students get in or the system they have to get you guys in. Back in the day, you could just walk up with a very short line and find your seat.

Kilgore Trout

October 6th, 2013 at 11:08 PM ^

I am with those of you saying they should lower the prices for students. Things have gotten preverse with all of the money involved, but we shouldn't forget that these are students watching their peers compete for their school. The rest of us (alumni, fans, whatever) are just there reliving our glory days or bandwagoning on. If the NCAA is going to continue to claim the student part of student athlete is the most important, they should at least treat the students who want to come watch the games with respect. Students should be the first priority, the rest of us come after.

Section 1

October 7th, 2013 at 11:39 AM ^

and then just shake my head in amazement, with the student sections 1/3 empty for the first five minutes and then the last five minutes of an average game.

The students might make a lot of noise when they show up (and I for one don't mind it a bit; I'd like for there to be a better student turnout); but they aren't the best fans in the Stadium.  They are among the worst; probably the most unreliable fans and clearly the most unprofitable ticketholders.