RUMOR: True freshman NJ WR no longer on team
Knowing this board this may get negged and attacked for being too premature, but the info seems relevant and has some legs so I'm going to post it. Obviously, that being said, it is still a rumor, so grain of salt and all that.
A rumor was started on Rivals, and subseqently reinforced by Scout, that a true freshman at Michigan is in trouble with Harbaugh and on his way off the team. Allegedly this is a true FR WR from NJ and he is in some "Brian Cole"-like trouble.
Since this can apply to two people, I didn't want to name anyone in the title, but the name being thrown out there is Brad Hawkins. Mainly because his twitter profile (link) no longer has any Michigan references whatsoever while Ahmir Mitchell's twitter is still decked in Michigan stuff.
So yes, this is a post about an unsubstantiated rumor with even more inferring don from 18 year olds twitter profiles. Neg away.
Again, just imo, but nicotine test? WTF? I may be missing the obvious, but other than an employer paid life insurance policy, I fail to see the logic. I saw nothing, during my work days, that would offer proof that smokers are more prone to illness. I did become aware that lazy fucks and alchoholics had a tendency to miss more work than those with a strong work ethic and those minus a jug sucking problem.
In the case of the life insurance,(and long term illness as a result of smoking) if, indeed, these are the reasons behind the pre-hire test, I would think a waiver of same would be sufficient. If I am missing the obvious I would not be offended at all if someone would bring it to my attention.
I mean recently we've had a run on some questionable POTUSes. We had one that appeared to pillow every chick he met and even went so far as to pull out the blue veiner, possibly diamond cutter - depends on blood flow ,right in the casa blanca and even went Havannah on her ass, or another part of the anatomy situated closely thereto. His pre-hire resume indicated this had been an ongoing problem. Now in the boner vs. the stoner debate, I, and so have you, witnessed a jealous spouse go flat out Buckeye based on nothing more than what the other perceived as a flirtatious smile. All of us who are, or who have ever been married, realize it's impossible to concentrate fully ton the task at hand due to nothing more than having a jealous spouse and the issues that arise as a result. You don't need to be the one in this type of marriage. You have a friend that faces it so you know it's true. Not certain but guessing, by the job title, being clear minded, completely focused would be of greater importance in that position than to what many consider a "lesser" position.
My point is, if they try hard enough, I imagine they could pre-test the entire work force into the unemployment line. Having a very difficult time grasping both the reasoning and the fairness in penalizing someone for engaging in a completely legal act unless this act, in some fashion, creates an unacceptable work place incident.
Say Carlo Kemp goes back to Colorado and gets baked legally. He comes back and fails a drug test. He didn't break any laws so what would you do?
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Fine, he goes on vacation to another country with legal weed. What do you do?
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
seriously.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Can't even look at your avatar anymore without picturing a 1/2 oz tucked under that hat.
You smoke weed....you're cool and stick it to the man and all that. rules are rule, like it or fu*king lump it, it's up to you but deal with the consequences when they come. Go smoke a blunt and stop arguing this point. We all know you want pot legal.
For me, i couldn't care less. I have many friends who smoke it and can see arguments for and against but until it is legalized it is perfectly acceptable for people to be punished for violation of those laws/rules. Hell, I bet even if it does become legal most NCAA teams will have rules against the use of it and then you'll really blow your fu*king top.
Ummm... there is no federal law against going to another country and smoking weed. It's perfectly legal.
Now failing a drug test may run afoul of school or NCAA rules, but there is nothing illegal there.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Generally to nail you on an "internal posession" case they have to be able to prove that you ingested/consumed the drug within their jurisdiction.
Trafficing hundreds of pounds, yes. Smoking no.
While he didn't break any laws in Colorado, having the THC in his body upon entering Michigan, he technically would break the law (albeit he'd never be tested for it, other than as a student athlete). Eventually it'd exit his system and he'd be clear.
Obviously this is all hypothetical, given Carlo Kemp has done no such thing.
he's the oldest freshman ever, he broke laws. The legal age is 21.
You have to be 21 to buy pot in Colorado or Washington.
I am so tired of the "but it's the law argument"..
It's a stupid fucking law, and as such, I feel no obligation to obey it.
/also I rarely smoke weed.
Fine you use a vaporizer, why split hairs though?
I don't believe you . . . oh wait, that's me I'm thinking about.
me too paranoid, indica especially. I will have some sativa on the weekends before I do yard work or anything else that would be boring and/or require physical exertion.
I mean, I did pay for the MM card, so I have to use it sometimes or that would just be wasteful.
because otherwise you could have an entire conference saying well they are basically professional athletes so lets just pay them anyways! I mean I don't know what conference would actually do that... oh wait...
You can think it stupid, and feel no obligation to obey it, but you also are most likely not going to be tested for it by the NCAA or by your university.
If doing it, or just "fighting the power" is more important, than so be it, but it seems like a small price to pay in the end for what you could get out of your opportunity.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
A man has a duty to disobey an unjust law. Alcohol is 100x worse than some weed.
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
Not when said man is extremely careful and nobody ever knows!!!
Nobody is stopping you...
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
They aren't "stopping" him, they will just punish him after the fact. See the distinction?
Also, you are one curmudgeonly motherfucker, Salvatore.
I hate that expression "it's the law." You know else is is the law?
A woman isn’t allowed to cut her own hair without her husband’s permission in Michigan.
In Detroit, willfully destroying your old radio is prohibited.
In Kalamazoo, It is against the law to serenade your girlfriend.
In the USA, it is a federal crime to harass a golfer in any national park in Washington, DC.
In the USA, it is a federal crime to let your pet make a noise that scares the wildlife in a national park.
In the USA, it is a a federal crime to advertise wine in a manner that suggests it has intoxicating qualities.
In the USA, it is a federal crime to attempt to change the weather without telling the Secretary of Commerce.
In the USA, it is a federal crime to sell onion rings resembling normal onion rings, but made from diced onion, without saying so.
These are a few small examples. The point being, dumass laws are dumass laws and many are not enforced by police. The "it's a law so live by it" is idiotic because everyone who has ever said that has broken multiple laws. In fact, most people break numerous laws every day just driving to work or walking to go get lunch.
breaks laws all the time. Even you. That was part of my point. The other part was the holier than thou attitude, just like the one you typed, is hypocritical at best.
Literally everyone is the USA breaks the laws and must "be prepared to be a martyr/live with the consequences if you get caught."
Never sped while driving? Never crossed the road accept at a cross walk?
PS. As far as pot goes, the only thing anyone in Michigan needs to be concerned about is the MMJ card. If you have it, cops don't care. There is ZERO chance you'll get in trouble with a federal officer unless you're doing something stupid to get on their radar (more plants than you're supposed to, selling to people etc.).
Also, I get this is about a kid breaking UM rule, and he should be punished for not following the rules, even if there was nothing illegal about it (i.e. 9 pm curfew). My argument isn't about that, it was in response to the tangent of "pot is legal or illegal" and whether laws are stupid or not.
I dont think he said anywhere in there that he never broke a law.
You're right, im sure we've all sped or jay-walked. I have. And if I got pulled over for speeding, I'd accept that I'm going to get a ticket, bc I broke a rule.
Haha, no.
yea, he was.
Or did you not see the part where Reader 71 states that "That's the tangent though. I think we agree that the team rules should be followed, regardless of what we think about the law itself."
If he isn't agreeing with me, why'd he say it?