Michigan #3 nationally on food spending for student athletes

Submitted by UMProud on July 10th, 2019 at 8:07 AM

Top 20 Biggest Spenders on Student-Athlete Meals

 

  1. University of Arkansas: $3.5 million
  2. Ohio State University: $3.1 million
  3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor: $2.8 million
  4. University of Iowa: $2.8 million
  5. Texas A&M University, College Station: $2.7 million
  6. University of Texas, Austin: $2.6 million
  7. University of Minnesota, Twin Cities: $2.5 million
  8. University of Kansas: $2.2 million
  9. University of Tennessee, Knoxville: $1.9 million
  10. University of Washington, Seattle: $1.9 million
  11. University of Georgia: $1.7 million
  12. University of Oklahoma, Norman: $1.7 million
  13. University of Maryland, College Park: $1.7 million
  14. Auburn University: $1.5 million
  15. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign: $1.5 million
  16. Pennsylvania State University: $1.4 million
  17. Virginia Tech: $1.4 million
  18. University of Louisville: $1.4 million
  19. University of Oregon: $1.3 million
  20. Indiana University, Bloomington: $1.3 million

Unlike some of their classmates, who stick to three main food groups - instant noodles, cold cereal and dining hall French fries - Division I athletes generally adhere to a strategic meal plan to ensure top-end performance on the field and for training. Prominent athletic programs are now investing in what their student-athletes put in their bodies in the form of millions of dollars.

Totaling more than $7 million dollars in 2016-17—the two most recent years that reports are available from most programs—the University of Arkansas spent the most of any public school on student-athlete meals. Housed in the new $23 million, 55,000-square-foot Jerry & Gene Jones Family Student-Athlete Success Center, Arkansas’ sports nutrition department spares no expense in feeding its athletes. Members of any sports team, even those not on scholarship, are provided two meals a day, in an effort to “fuel and refuel” the athletes.

Arkansas is not the only school focused on food. More than two dozen other programs spent more than $2 million in the two-year period, with Ohio State University, University of Michigan, University of Iowa and Texas A&M University rounding out the top five of the highest spending programs (full list below). While dishing out the big bucks on dining may have no immediate financial benefit to a school, in fact it costs more, well-fueled athletes have a certain advantage when competing, bolstering the program’s reputation as a result. And that translates to best-in-class recruitment and even higher ticket sales.

Source:  https://www.forbes.com/sites/dereksaul/2019/07/09/6800-gallons-of-milk-and-2120-pounds-of-beef-jerky-behind-d1-college-athlete-diets-and-spending/#7a91e6c754e1

1VaBlue1

July 10th, 2019 at 8:27 AM ^

So 8 B1G schools are in the top 20 here.  That's pretty friggen nice!!  Or maybe it just costs more to feed athletes through the long, cold, dark winters that the south so hates?  Probably bolstered by take out costs for the first couple of months of softball and baseball seasons, too...

kejamder

July 10th, 2019 at 9:26 AM ^

I guess you have to do your own homework if you want to know how much is spent per athlete or per scholarship sport? That seems like important info if you're going to compare schools, which can have vastly different situations.

Gary_B

July 10th, 2019 at 9:26 AM ^

I really would have expected these numbers to be higher and here's why:

UM student athletes: 1011

Average cost per athlete per year: $2,769.54

Basic meal plan for non-athletes per year: $4,712

This is a perfect example of how students are being overcharged by institutions because there is no way that I can be convinced that a normal student is eating more/higher quality food than an athlete.

 

Edit: Given some of the lower numbers it would make more sense that this cost is over and above room and board costs and that athletes are closer to $7500+ per year in total cost. My point still stands though.

UMProud

July 10th, 2019 at 9:50 AM ^

I'm going to guess the athletic department may have a different cost basis than the general student population for several reasons...there may be different budgets involved, burden sharing between the school and athletic department, competitive bids for outsourcing of food may be different, etc.  The raw numbers you present probably don't tell the whole story.

Blue Durham

July 10th, 2019 at 9:34 AM ^

List was generated from data of only public schools.  I suspect Stanford, with all of the athletic programs they have (which allows them to dominate the Director's Cup) would probably be near the top of the list.  Probably a few other private schools like USC and maybe Miami would make the top 20 as well.

Nichols

July 10th, 2019 at 10:37 AM ^

One of the reasons UM spends so much money on food is because they end up wasting so much of it. Because they don't have an on site kitchen in Schembechler Hall or the new Ross South Complex building that can make made to order meals they have to cater everything and end up throwing away anything they don't eat, which is usually a lot because it's hard to proportion when you're cooking for so many athletes. 

1VaBlue1

July 10th, 2019 at 11:51 AM ^

I'm pretty sure the new building (the remodel and expansion of Schembechler Hall and the adjoining field house) includes an on-site kitchen for meal prep.  That was one of the thing Harbaugh was quite pleased with when they talked about it on his podcast last month.  I also think its available for all athletes...