Deduce new 8 game schedule

Submitted by greymarch on September 16th, 2020 at 1:26 PM

If the B1G wants to use the old 10-game schedule as a template for making the new 8 game schedule, I think we can deduce what UM's new 8 game schedule will be.  First, here is the old 10 game schedule from August:

  • Sept. 5: vs. Purdue  
  • Sept. 12: at Minnesota  
  • Sept. 19: vs. Penn State  
  • Sept. 26: at Rutgers  
  • Oct. 3: vs. Michigan State  
  • Oct. 10: Bye  
  • Oct. 17: at Indiana  
  • Oct. 24: at Ohio State  
  • Oct. 31: vs. Wisconsin  
  • Nov. 7: vs. Maryland  
  • Nov. 14: Bye  
  • Nov. 21: at Northwestern 

Since UM is going to an 8 game schedule, with a 9th game against a west-division opponent who finished in the same spot in their division, its perfectly logical that UM will be forced to play all six of the teams in their eastern division....

So, that means UM will play two western division teams. The B1G will want to force each team to play four road games, and four home games.  The Wisconsin game is a "locked in" west division game.  According to B1G rules, that game must happen if UM plays in 2020.  So, the two games that must be eliminated will come from the following 3 possibilities: home vs Purdue, at Minnesota, at Northwestern.  Using deduction, and if the B1G is using the ten game schedule as their template, that means the Purdue game is gone.  Why?  Because UM will need 4 road games and 4 home games.  If UM ditched at MN and at NW, that would put UM at 5 home games and 3 road games.  Not gonna happen.  

 

This means the Purdue game is kaput.  Which west team does UM ditch to even the season to 4 home games and 4 road games?  Like I wrote, it cant be WI.  UM will have to either ditch at MN or at NW.  MN game would get better TV ratings than NW (MN is expected to be a better team than NW), so I think its gonna be the NW game that also goes kaput.  Given that, here's how UM's schedule could look:

@MN
PSU

@RU

MSU

@IN

@OSU

Wisc

MD

 

Four home games, four road games.  UM plays all the other east teams. Two games versus west teams.  UM might ditch the MN game instead of the NW game.  Further analysis needed.

Wolverine Devotee

September 16th, 2020 at 1:29 PM ^

Funny, I predicted the same schedule on Twitter yesterday that the OP has. Not in any order though. 

If the Jug isn’t played for this year it isn’t gonna be until 2023 unless the B1G completely redoes everything. 

I love that crossover week for the other 12 B1G teams not in the title game. That’s some good shit. I hope it stays on once we exit Covid era football. 

We could actually maybe play some teams more than once every 9 years. We have been to Lincoln ONCE. 2012.

I’d rather play in the title game of course but we have yet to make it. 

AC1997

September 16th, 2020 at 1:31 PM ^

While your conclusions of WI/MN seem logical....those would have been my last choices for which games to play.  I know we've played some weird games against Purdue and Northwestern, but I'm sick of playing the toughest teams from the west when the only way for Michigan to satisfy expectations is to go undefeated or lose 1-game as long as it isn't OSU.  

In a year that is complete chaos - give me the two chaos teams that aren't likely to have winning records instead of the two leading contenders to win that division.  

I also want OSU sometime around game #3-4.  Give us a couple of weeks to shake off the rust and figure things out, but then let's play them before half the team is hurt, weather becomes a factor, and when there's still time to finish the season on a 4-5 game winning streak to take the sting out of a likely loss.  

Imjesayin

September 16th, 2020 at 1:34 PM ^

That's good analysis. I suppose you'll need to look at MN's schedule and see if that makes sense mathematically too with the 4/4 thing and playing all their division opponents. 

You'd need a computer algorithm to calculate this to be exact I suppose to see what permutations work for all teams simultaneously. It's like that logic games section on the LSAT. Ugh. Hated that.

NotADuck

September 16th, 2020 at 2:59 PM ^

Based on that I DEDUCE they drop the home game against Purdue.  Hopefully they move the OSU game up to the middle of the season like it was going to be in the 10 game schedule.  As some have said, I like the idea of playing them BEFORE half the team is hurt.

edit: I capitalized DEDUCE for funzies/emphasis.

Perkis-Size Me

September 16th, 2020 at 1:47 PM ^

Just put the OSU game in the middle of the season, please. Far enough out to where the team can get its legs under it, but not at the end of the year where an all-but-certain loss destroys any momentum you might be able to take into the offseason. 

I'd rather have them show up around game 4 or game 5, take my lumps, and then finish strong in the last 3-4 games to take some momentum into the 2021 season. 

Kilgore Trout

September 16th, 2020 at 1:51 PM ^

I'm curious on your source for Big Ten rules saying the Wisconsin game is locked in. It's true that that has been Michigan's set crossover for this six year cycle, but I doubt it's completely locked in given how everything is thrown off this year. If I were Michigan I would be fighting to keep Purdue and ditch Wisconsin. It would be kind of ridiculous for Michigan's two crossover games to be the teams that finished first and second in the west last year. 

greymarch

September 16th, 2020 at 2:01 PM ^

Here is UM's original "9 B1G games" schedule:

vs. Wisconsin

vs. Penn State

@ Michigan State

@ Minnesota

vs. Purdue

vs. Maryland

@ Rutgers

vs. Indiana

@ Ohio State

 

If this is the schedule template the B1G uses, the B1G wants to keep every team at 4 home games, 4 road games, and play all 6 of their division opponents, the only team that can be eliminated would be Purdue.  Ditching any other game would either cause UM to play 5 home games, 5 road games, or not play every team in their division.

 

So if the B1G uses the older 9 game schedule, here is what it could look like:

vs. Wisconsin

vs. Penn State

@ Michigan State

@ Minnesota

vs. Maryland

@ Rutgers

vs. Indiana

@ Ohio State

 

ex dx dy

September 16th, 2020 at 2:05 PM ^

I'm sick of Wisconsin but I would be stoked for the Jug. One of the best trophy games, and against a team that isn't at all hateable. Just all around good fun.

azee2890

September 16th, 2020 at 2:37 PM ^

Can we please just play OSU either the first or second week to either stun them in a sloppy 1st game back slobberfest or get the loss over with to temper our expectations for the season. 

The one thing that has been consistent, at least in terms of the college football games and the NBA games that have been played during quarantine, is that the better teams have not been that stellar.

See: Milwaukee Bucks, LA Clippers, Iowa State, Kansas State, and Kansas. 

AC1997

September 16th, 2020 at 2:39 PM ^

The crazy thing about all of this is the fact that the state of Illinois is still restricting any football practice and the news today indicated that they may add Wisconsin to the list of states that require you to quarantine based on recent infection rates there.  Similar situation to what the Pac-12 is dealing with (OR, CA).  

Now, this is where the rapid testing comes in - who cares if the Wisconsin people are acting like they live in Florida - test everyone before the game and the people who are healthy get to play.  We know they grow LBs and OLs on a farm somewhere so it shouldn't matter to their depth chart.  

greymarch

September 16th, 2020 at 2:39 PM ^

Whether the B1G uses the original 9-game B1G schedule, or the 10 game B1G schedule from August, one thing has become abundantly clear.....the Purdue game is kaput.  Ditching Purdue is the guaranteed answer to one of the variables from the 9-game schedule algorithm or the 10-game schedule algorithm.

maizenbluenc

September 16th, 2020 at 3:07 PM ^

This looks about right - same opponents less Purdue as the original nine game slate / same order and home or away as the ten game slate. OSU on the "traditional" Saturday after TG. Probably 3-4 losses in that mix.

Oct. 24: at Minnesota 
Oct 31: vs. Penn State 
Nov 7: at Rutgers 
Nov 14: vs. Michigan State 
Nov 21: at Indiana 
Nov 28: at Ohio State 
Dec 5: vs. Wisconsin 
Dec 12: vs. Maryland

Meteorite00

September 16th, 2020 at 3:25 PM ^

one quirky thing with Northwestern:

Cook County, which includes Evanston, currently has quarantine restrictions on visitors from high incidence states. Right now, that list includes Iowa and Nebraska, but not Michigan, and Indiana and Wisconsin have been on the threshold of restrictions. NW is also getting flack for bringing students back only to quickly go remote. 

There are few teeth to the restrictions, but I'd guess that no one in scheduling wants to create a conflict if not necessary.    

Wonder if there'd be a preference there to try to schedule Michigan or teams that could get there and back same day (Wisconsin, Illinois?) 

Panther72

September 16th, 2020 at 3:36 PM ^

I prefer to play the saggy state early however, December snow with no crowd, injuries or covid issues would make the game interesting. And if the season ends early Oh Well.

We need some time for the offense to jell. Gattis offense needs to take a huge jump in fluidity this season. Hopefully we get some kind of a run game early with Warriners  troops.

COLBlue

September 16th, 2020 at 9:56 PM ^

Best guess at the crossover games (I think the two toughest schedules are NEB & MIC):

ILL: OSU, Rtg

IND: PUR, Wis

IWA: MSU, Psu

MRY: MIN, Nwr

MIC: WIS, Min

MSU: NWR, Iwa

MIN: MIC, Mry

NEB: PSU, Osu

NWR: MRY, Msu

OSU: NEB, Ill

PSU: IWA, Neb

PUR: RTG, Ind

RTG: ILL, Pur

WIS: IND, Mic

tFerriState

September 16th, 2020 at 10:19 PM ^

The 10 game schedules for the entire conference are already set. The easy thing to do would be to drop the first 2 games or last 2 games or first and last game from each teams schedule. Bye weeks need not apply.