[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Unverified Voracity Is Not Canceled But Everything Else Is Comment Count

Brian March 13th, 2020 at 1:09 PM

Everything is canceled. Buy reasonable amounts of toilet paper and only talk to people who can't hear you. Wash your hands. Listen to what state and local officials are saying. Stop putting your hands in my water (<—mostly applicable to area one-year-olds).

Trying to un-cancel themselves. I still had the condensed recap of the Maryland game in a tab, and I watched a bit of it. Simpson hit that floater over Sticks in the second half and it occurred to me that was close to the last thing Simpson did in a Michigan uniform. Tremendously sad that he and a bunch of other seniors have had their careers terminated before they got their shot.

A number of NCAA athletes are petitioning for an extra year of eligibility:

Wahrman pulled up Change.org and got to work. She created a petition, then shared it with teammates and friends. It quickly spread to friends of friends and beyond. Across Iowa’s campus, and then across others. It ticked past 1,000 digital signatures, then 5,000, then 10,000. Around 18 hours after its creation, it was at 90,000 and rapidly climbing.

It had begun to feel like a movement. And that evening on ESPN, UConn women’s basketball coach Geno Auriemma had given it a prominent voice.

The prospect of recompensed eligibility, Auriemma explained, had been raised even before the NCAA went nuclear. “My feeling is this,” the Hall of Famer said. “It’s an unprecedented event. So you have to take unprecedented measures.

“You can’t say this year never happened, and wipe away everything,” he continued. “Because some teams had amazing seasons, incredible accomplishments, they should not be diminished, and shouldn’t be wiped away.

“In terms of each individual, I would be in favor of allowing all those that were seniors, that have not had a chance to compete, not had a chance to play their spring season, they should be given another opportunity to play. Regardless of what that does to your scholarship count. And the NCAA should foot the bill for that.”

One of the nation’s most influential athletic directors supported the movement as well. "I would like to see us look seriously at providing an additional year of eligibility for student athletes who have lost the opportunity to compete,” Oklahoma AD Joe Castiglione said. “Certainly that starts with the student athletes in their final year of eligibility. There’s not another way to get that back. I don’t know how many student athletes would come back and compete if they had an additional year of eligibility, that’s all speculative. But it’s certainly something we’re going to continue to discuss."

That's a logistical nightmare and a half. Teams have been planning for life without their seniors and even if you expand the allowable number of players you're disrupting minutes and roles pretty much everywhere. The number of transfers that would cause is potentially large.

Still might happen. It would be good press for an organization that desperately needs it, and it's got some high profile backers already. I wonder if smaller schools will nix it because they can't afford it, but the P5 can set some of their own rules now.

[After THE JUMP: old reliable Graham Couch]

At least the championship won't get vacated. Kansas is continuing its policy of maximum NCAA defiance, to the point of arguing that Adidas employees who stated in federal trials they were trying to recruit players to Kansas do not qualify as boosters:

Kansas goes on to argue that each allegation the NCAA makes in the case is based off the assertion that Adidas and its employees and consultants represented KU's athletic interests, which would qualify them as boosters. Through testimony at federal trials, one ex-Adidas consultant, TJ Gassnola, testified he worked on behalf of KU to get high profile players to play for Self at Kansas.

The verbiage is maximum asshole lawyerese:

"The allegations directed at Self are based on a misguided, unprecedented, and meritless interpretation and application of NCAA booster and recruiting legislation," Kansas said in its response.

I want the NCAA to give up on amateurism; I also want to see Kansas immolated. 

Maybe make the games less terrible to go to. Dennis Dodd notes that CFB attendance keeps declining. As per usual it's couched in "how could this be happening?" rhetoric:

At a Google innovation hub last week, administrative leaders from each of the Power Five conferences were invited to what amounted to a two-day think tank in Santa Monica, California. Google does it all the time, inviting experts from different walks of life just to … contemplate the world.

"It sounds nebulous, but it was one of the better professional days of my life," said Brad Wurthman, Virginia Tech senior associate athletic director. "Just being able to sit there and have them educate us on where the world is headed."

Part of that athletic world -- part of the Google experience last week -- is fan engagement. How to keep folks interested in the college product.

"To put it bluntly, it was a very smart person which followed another very smart person which followed a very smart person which followed another very smart person," Wurthman said. "We were all chuckling, 'We get it. You guys are geniuses.'"

None of them have been able to figure out what has become a chronic problem in college football. Once again the sport's attendance is down.

Geniuses who can't figure out that charging ever more money to sit through 10 commercial breaks a quarter might cause attendance decreases. Are the athletic directors out of touch? No, it's the fans who are wrong.

One interesting bit is that even Alabama is finding it difficult to schedule neutral site games:

After the 2021 season, no more. Alabama has scheduled seven home-and-home series against Power Five opponents from 2023-33. During that decade, fans will get to see Texas, Wisconsin, Florida State, West Virginia, Notre Dame, Georgia Tech and Oklahoma.

"The most valuable content is good, live contests on our campuses," Byrne said. "I've talked to schools who could have another [schedule] hole there to do a neutral-site game. No interest. They want content on their campuses."

We've finally reached the point where schools have to consider the impact on their season ticket bases when they schedule something daft. Most schools, anyway: Michigan canceled a home and home against UCLA for no apparent reason recently.

Couch levity in tough times. Reliable:

We may not have sports, but we have dunking on Graham Couch, which is kind of sports.

Terrance Williams on his recruitment. Juwan Howard was a major selling point:

He visited Ann Arbor in late December, taking in Michigan's 86-60 win over UMass-Lowell on Dec. 29. . At Crisler Center, fans sidled up to Howard for photos and autographs. According to Williams, Howard didn't turn down a single request.

The gesture stood out.

“I think he’s very, very honest, and he’s really, really genuine and real," Williams said. "Like when I was on my visit, he interacted with all the fans. He talked to everybody. We were getting stopped, and Coach Martelli was like, ‘You can’t keep taking pictures, you’re holding everybody up.’

"But that’s just how Juwan is. He’s a genuine person. That’s something that I love about him.”

He's optimistic Michigan will get Isaiah Todd on campus.

"Imagine what would happen if Robinson had to expend all his energy just to stop being a net-negative on defense. He would have no energy left to shoot threes. Is that what you sickos want?" –guy who put this clip reel together

Duncan Robinson's historic season. Another unfortunate thing about sports being canceled is that it prohibits Duncan Robinson from chasing some crazy numbers:

There’s no one in the NBA who plays like Duncan Robinson. That makes sense, considering there’s no one in the NBA who got there the way Robinson did.

The Heat forward is putting together one of the greatest shooting seasons of all-time in his first full year in the league. Robinson is hitting 44.6 percent of his shots from behind the arc, but his accuracy alone doesn’t capture the impact of his shooting. What makes Robinson special is his accuracy on such immense volume. Of his 9.3 field goal attempts per game, 8.1 come from three-point range. It’s helped him compile a 67.4 true shooting percentage that ranks top-10 in the NBA and has him tied for the lead with any non-center.

Robinson was at his best as the Heat beat the Magic on Wednesday. He finished the game with 27 points on 9-of-12 shooting, with every attempt coming from three-point range. It was the third time Robinson had hit nine or more threes in a single game — joining Stephen Curry, James Harden, Klay Thompson, and Buddy Hield as the only players to ever do it.

Various fancystats have him one of the top 30 players in the league this season. He's what I thought Nik Stauskas would be. Truly incredible he was playing at the DIII level.

Flyers GM on Cam York. Charlie O'Connor has some uncommonly candid takes from a front office guy in the Athletic. The relevant bit for Michigan fans is that it sounds like the Flyers are on the fence about trying to sign York this offseason:

Do you think it’s possible he could be a one-and-done and turn pro after this season?

Again, I don’t even like to talk about that for those kids and put pressure on them. All those kids think they’re ready for the NHL. If you asked them at (the U.S. national) development team and at the combine last year, they’re all one-and-dones. But the league’s hard. I think you’ve got to be mindful of where they’re at physically and where they need to get to before you rush them into the American (Hockey) League — it’s a hard league, too, if you’re young and a physically undeveloped player.

We’ll make those decisions, again, after (the season), but I do think there’s merits for both sides of it for him. I think mentally, he’s ready. I think skill set-wise, he’s ready. But whether (he’s) physically ready? I don’t know. I don’t have that answer for you.

Sounds like they'd have no intention of looking at him for the NHL next year. I gather that the Flyers have a pretty set D corps.

Meanwhile, Johnny Beecher's second-half breakout ended up a little muted for good reason:

A healthy Beecher in year two with some dudes on his line could be a thing. Hopefully we get to see that sophomore season.

Etc.: Ethan Sears on Hayden Lavigne, who watched most of this hockey season. Wolverbear explained: the same guy did 24 different variations on angry sailor hat mascot over the course of a 45-year career. German soccer fan culture is intense. Beecher profiled by Bailey Johnson. Brendan Brisson checks in at the tail end of another first round.

Comments

Red is Blue

March 13th, 2020 at 1:27 PM ^

I feel for the seniors.  Obviously scale is different and maybe that is enough to warrant special rules.  But, seniors losing the last portion of their college careers is not new.  Mario Ojemudia comes to mind as an example.

Trader Jack

March 13th, 2020 at 1:43 PM ^

The problem with granting an additional year of eligibility is that not all seniors had their season disrupted. Do schools that weren’t going to make the tournament (take Northwestern, for example) whose seasons were already over get an extra year? How would you legislate that?

Richard75

March 14th, 2020 at 9:22 AM ^

That’s not much of a rationale. You could use that as an excuse to impose any unworkable idea.

The redshirt rule is instructive here. It’s not just that it lays out the percentage threshold for losing a year of eligibility. It’s also the fact that it doesn’t have a special stipulation for missing the postseason. Schools collectively agreed on that. It’s unfortunate when a player misses the postseason for reasons outside his or her control, but whether that person should get a year back over it is a settled issue.

1VaBlue1

March 13th, 2020 at 1:44 PM ^

I don't think football, basketball, or hockey seniors should be included in any eligibility give back.  Their seasons (specifically basketball and hockey) are over, save for post-season tournaments.  As much as it sucks to not have the tourneys, they aren't promised to anyone.

Now, baseball, softball, track, etc is a different story.  Their seasons just got started, so they should get some extra time if they want it.  That needs to be figured out.

lhglrkwg

March 13th, 2020 at 3:44 PM ^

Seems like the simplest way is to treat it like the medical redshirt rule, right? You played 90% of your season and got injured? Sorry man. That's life. You played 2 games and got injured for the rest of the season. Ok, you can get another year. Seems like winter sports should be done and spring sports should get another year

funkywolve

March 14th, 2020 at 12:42 AM ^

If the spring athletes are given an extra year, would they need to be enrolled in school?  A lot of these seniors are probably graduating and as of a couple weeks were probably planning on working in the real world or going to grad school, possibly at another institution.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

March 13th, 2020 at 1:52 PM ^

I absolutely think winter and spring seniors should get another year, and I think the NCAA should stipulate that any who stay don't count against the roster and scholarship limits.

The inconvenience for incoming freshmen pales in comparison to the heartbreak of seniors who lose their shot at playing in - or winning - conference and national championships.  It barely even compares at all.

No, it's not perfect, and it causes its own consequences, but it's worth it to give the seniors back their shot.  "Nothing is guaranteed" also applies to playing time as a freshman - and that is FAR less guaranteed than the expectation of having a tournament at the end of the year.  "Sucks to be you but thanks for sacrificing for the greater good" doesn't cut it.

trueblueintexas

March 13th, 2020 at 2:44 PM ^

"Nothing is guaranteed" applies to freshman who lose playing time to a random new rule that didn't exist when they signed, but not to seniors who lose the chance to play a handful more games because of a global pandemic? 

I agree it sucks, but Simpson and Teske not getting to play in the Big Ten Tourney and the Big Dance their final year probably won't rank for either on their "top 10 heartbreaking moments" list by the time they are middle aged. 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

March 13th, 2020 at 2:53 PM ^

"Nothing is guaranteed" applies to both, which means for me it's not a reason to say "we shouldn't extend seniors' eligibility because nothing is guaranteed."  The thing that is far, FAR more guaranteed than the other is the one that we should be compensating for.

Also, I disagree with the last bit.  Simpson and Teske have played in the Big Dance before, but what about a senior at Boston U., Rutgers, or Penn State?  What about Dayton, who had their school's first legit chance at a national title in decades?  Downplaying it as "a handful more games" misses the point of what those games mean.

trueblueintexas

March 13th, 2020 at 3:36 PM ^

I fully understand the commitment put in and subsequent heartbreak of having their season end this way. I'm not a cold-hearted jerk who simply says too bad live with it.

I'm also old enough, with enough life experience, to understand while it sucks for any senior now there probably are/will be far more important things in their life than getting to complete their final season the way they wanted. 

To be fair, I'll disclose I played basketball. I was unexpectedly too sick to get our of bed on senior night. There was nothing the team or school could do to make up for that. As disappointing as it was in the moment, it's just part of life. Decades later, that memory doesn't come close to ranking in my life's top 10 most heartbreaking moments. 

I'm curious, from your perspective, what do those games mean? 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

March 13th, 2020 at 8:42 PM ^

The culmination and reward for a career's worth of hard work.  Missing senior night, to me, would be a pretty big disappointment, but it's not the thing that the entire basketball world in America points to as the pinnacle of achievement and pays attention to.  It's not the goal.  Besides, I bet you did at least get your framed jersey or whatever memento they had.

I don't believe you'll ever see happier basketball players than ones who go to some small school in, say, the Atlantic Sun conference, who just won their conference tournament and get to go to the Big Dance.  Nor have I ever seen sadder faces in any sport, anywhere, than those of seniors who are seconds away from being eliminated from it.

Full disclosure here as well.  I know a guy who was named to the US Olympic team.....for the 1980 Olympics in Moscow.  He is not over that.  That's the closest thing we have to this.  So, if we have the opportunity to do something to fix it, we should - no matter how weird people feel about giving Nebraska's seniors another year.  That to me is a nonissue.

Shop Smart Sho…

March 13th, 2020 at 1:54 PM ^

"Michigan canceled a home and home against UCLA for no apparent reason recently."


This really makes me miss the deployment of the "real journalism" tag that used to get used quite a bit more often. I can't imagine any other outlet would be all that interested, but this is the sort of thing I used to expect someone working here to get interested in and start doing a bit of digging.

M-jed

March 13th, 2020 at 2:02 PM ^

At first I was full of snark, thinking “truly incredible he didn’t hit more 3’s against Villanova” and then I remembered the shellacking they gave and thought “truly incredible run we had“ instead. Sigh, (almost) always the bridesmaid in b-ball. 

yossarians tree

March 13th, 2020 at 2:12 PM ^

I'm all for the NCAA picking up the tab for an extra year, but then victimhood is shifted to many of the new recruits who have committed to a school partially based on the availability of playing time next season. Do you release them and let loose the dogs of recruiting all over again?

matty blue

March 13th, 2020 at 2:45 PM ^

re: kansas - noted baseball stat god / lawrence, kansas resident / cranky bastard bill james suggested on twitter that kansas should just go ahead and be the first school to claim a mythical national championship in the modern era...he didn't respond to my comment suggesting that they could then become the first school to take down the banners from a claimed mythical basketball championship.  not that they actually would, of course, but hey.  it's a good joke.

re: additional eligibility - wbb captain akenrieh johnson was petitioning for an extra year due to multiple injuries earlier in her career (i believe she was supposed to hear from the ncaa this week).  this would obviously put it over the top, and would be good news for wbb - AK is an excellent wing defender that can score.

lhglrkwg

March 13th, 2020 at 3:42 PM ^

I'm surprised Kansas' lawyers didn't just call it fake news outright in their statement. That's the favorite phrase nowadays when you don't like the facts being thrown your way

Also, I fully expect a meeting of a bunch of old P5 athletic directors discussing attendance issues to come away thinking that the issue is something to do with smart phones and millenials and how kids are soft these days. So maybe if they make a cool app and kids are tougher, everyone will happily attend a 4 hour game with 2 hours of commercial breaks for $150 a pop. That's the ticket

buckeyekiller1

March 13th, 2020 at 4:26 PM ^

Great stuff as usual, and this Simpsons reference was slipped in there perfectly “Are the athletic directors out of touch? No, it's the fans who are wrong.” I got a good chuckle out of that because it couldn’t be more true.

JMK

March 13th, 2020 at 4:41 PM ^

Thank you for the wolverbear link. I had a wolverbear hat when I was about 10, in the mid 1980s, and was excited when it became a thing again a couple years ago. But I never knew its origin—very interesting.  

Tacopants

March 13th, 2020 at 6:01 PM ^

For Winter sports: I don't understand why they didn't just postpone everything until June or July. Sure, there are some logisitical issues to work out but lots of arena space sits unutilized in that timeframe. This would be disruptive to the athlete's plans for the future, but probably less so than literally staying in school for an unnecessary year.

25dodgebros

March 14th, 2020 at 3:28 PM ^

"tremendously sad" that some college athletes won't finish their season?  I would reserve "tremendously sad" for the many thousands (or even millions) of deaths that will occur as the result of the coronavirus.

Maize4Life

March 15th, 2020 at 11:33 AM ^

Im tired of listening to all the nay sayers say WHY we cant do this from a logistical standpoint..we put a man on the moon Im sure we can figure this out too