South Carolina 26, Michigan 19 Comment Count

Ace


[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

New year, same Michigan.

In one of the uglier games of an aesthetically unpleasant season, the Wolverines never managed to cobble together a coherent offense, and five-second half turnovers beget 23 unanswered points for South Carolina.

Quarterback Brandon Peters, playing behind a line down three starters by halftime, never looked comfortable. Factoring in two sacks, Peters averaged only 3.7 yards per dropback and missed a number of throws, including two late interceptions to seal the loss. Michigan fared little better on the ground, gaining all of 2.9 yards per carry.

While the Jim Harbaugh takes will reach a level of scorching usually reserved for large celestial bodies, it's fair to criticize the playcalling, which didn't do much to take the pressure off Peters or Don Brown's futilely amazing defense. No single call was responsible for the loss, but the third-and-short handoff to tight end Sean McKeon, fumbled for a South Carolina recovery, defied explanation until Harbaugh, taking responsibility, said after the game that Michigan had the wrong personnel on the field.


[Campredon]

That play was just one in a series of mistakes that turned a 19-3 second-half lead into a 26-19 loss. Karan Higdon fumbled inside the South Carolina five-yard line with the Wolverines leading 16-3 and poised to blow the game wide open. After Michigan added a field goal and SC responded their first touchdown drive, McKeon's fumble gave the Gamecocks the ball on the M 21; they needed one play to score again, with Jake Bentley's pass to Bryan Edwards cutting the lead to 19-16.

Michigan's ensuing drive went nowhere, and the defense—as we've seen too many times this year—cracked under the pressure of supporting an inept offense. Bentley improbably converted a third-and-17 on a jump ball to tight end Hayden Hurst; three plays later, Shi Smith beat Tyree Kinnel clean to the pylon for a 53-yard score.

The comedy of errors continued unabated. After driving Michigan 75 yards in seven plays, Peters committed a cardinal sin of quarterbacking, throwing under pressure across his body to get intercepted in the end zone. When the defense held, SC's punt clanged off Donovan Peoples-Jones's facemask, setting up the Gamecocks with the ball in the red zone, where they'd get a critical field goal to take a two-possession advantage.

Down to one timeout in the waning minutes, Harbaugh decided to go for it on fourth-and-ten deep in his own territory, but Peters's deep shot to Kekoa Crawford wasn't anywhere close to a completion. The defense gave Michigan one last chance, pushing SC back to force a missed field goal. Another interception by Peters, forcing it to a well-covered Crawford, ended it.

Fair or not, this will be a long offseason. The mitigating factors, or excuses, or whatever you care to call them, go away in 2018, when the program will be loaded with talent recruited by Harbaugh. They'll certainly look better than this. They'd better look a whole lot better.

Comments

MarcusRay97

January 1st, 2018 at 4:34 PM ^

The play calling is horrendous. The WRs couldn’t get open O line did ok in pass protection but couldn’t get a push on the ground... We need help all along the offensive side of the ball

I Like Burgers

January 1st, 2018 at 6:12 PM ^

Agreed and that’s also why I think saying the mitigating factors leading to this year’s performance go away in 2018 is foolish. They’ll still have a very young and inexperienced line, an inexperienced QB, and the WRs will basically be the same just eight months older than what we saw today.

And the play calling will be the same.

Expecting ALL of those issues to evaporate over the course of an off-season is downright insane.

Blue Sharpie

January 1st, 2018 at 11:51 PM ^

...can't type To blow a 16 point lead against an offensively challenged team like SC is sick. So sad. Purdue, Nebraska and every other East team have more optimism going into next year than we do. I hope this is not an inflection point for the worse, because the window to be great is shrinking. If you don't get it done in 3 or 4 years, it may not happen. After watching teams like OSU, PSU, UW, not to mention the 4 playoff teams, it seems we are well behind these teams.

Blue Sharpie

January 1st, 2018 at 11:53 PM ^

I have to put this appalling performance on coaching blunders. There is going to be some heat early on if we lose to Notre Dame next year in year 4. Especially when we could have had a home game against lowly Arkansas instead. Of the 8 Big10 teams, I really thought we had the easiest matchup going into bowl season! Wow. Glad I am not a betting man.

Yost Ghost

January 2nd, 2018 at 1:08 PM ^

No way you can put this all on Harbaugh. Did Harbaugh fumble on their 1? Did Harbaugh fumble on our 20? Did he throw 2 picks? Did he cause DPJ's face mask to collide with the ball? NO, On any of it.

Did he make a bad call to go for it on 4th and 10 deep in our territory? Yes. Did he use poor clock management wasting a TO when he shouldn't and then not using one when he should? Yes. Was the play calling lack lustre? Yes. 

So did Harbaugh play his part in the loss? Yes, but he can't play the game for the players too.

Maize4Life

January 1st, 2018 at 4:35 PM ^

and I mean HORRIBLE and Embarassing results of this game the WORST will be having to listen tomall the other BIG fans squeal about How MICHIGAN let the conference down..AND THEY ARE RIGHT

FL_Steve

January 1st, 2018 at 10:15 PM ^

would have saved face. And, If i recall correctly, the conference let us down last year with officiating, so servs all those fuckers right. It's called empathy, and the conference just got a lesson in it. 

ngeeze1

January 1st, 2018 at 4:35 PM ^

Honestly have no idea where any confidence in next year is coming from after watching that. Maybe if there's major coaching changes. But I just don't see Shea Patterson being some messiah with the geniuses we have calling plays. Hope I'm wrong

Arb lover

January 1st, 2018 at 5:15 PM ^

Possibly the loss motivates players on the offseason more than an easy/expected win. 

As a wise man/jedi once said on that one movie that just came out, you learn more from your failures. 

Either way, the last thing I want for this team is for them to think they are coming in to 2018 as a top rated program and its all easy on from here, just beach parties. 

ngeeze1

January 1st, 2018 at 8:30 PM ^

We've been waiting for this for years. Fact of the matter is this has been a country club elitist program for quite a while now. Thought we were getting the "what's your deal," go for 2 on Pete Carroll version of Jim Harbaugh, but we get this....

Erik_in_Dayton

January 1st, 2018 at 4:36 PM ^

The bad news is that the team didn’t improve from the end of the season. The good news - hard as it may be to see right now - is that today didn’t expose anything we didn’t already know about. And the offense’s problems are likely to partly improve just from a year of growth.

ryebreadboy

January 1st, 2018 at 4:37 PM ^

It is embarrassing to be a fan of this team. I no longer believe Harbaugh is the answer. A month to prepare and they ran that sludgefart out on the field? Harbaugh should give back his salary.

SugarShane

January 1st, 2018 at 9:01 PM ^

He can try. 

 

The quarterbacks will give it all away.

 

The receivers will drop the cash as its handed to them.

 

The backs will fumble the bags of cash on the way to the bank.

 

The linemen will left theifs walk up to them and take it.

 

Metellus will commit a dumb penalty and lose everything

Esterhaus

January 1st, 2018 at 4:38 PM ^

Of built-up expectations followed by consistent underperformance. I'm a successful non-gambling adult and sincerely wonder why I continue to spend the time and money I do on Michigan football. Perhaps a few years time off directed to a productive endeavor. We shall see.

jjelliso

January 1st, 2018 at 4:39 PM ^

Why will they look better than this next year? Losing their best defensive player? Returning a bunch of mediocre players on offense? Next year will likel be no better than this year and a good chance it will be worse.

Lawyer12

January 1st, 2018 at 4:46 PM ^

The defense loses a star, but will be improved overall. Solomon does look like a legit star in the making as well. Defense will be excellent.

Making the huge assumption that Patterson is eligible, he is far and away the best option at this point. The kid can flat out play. That’s the hope that remains. We still need a game breaking back and for Peoples Jones and Black to develop into the top flight talents they should be. Not at all far fetched that this team competes for a championship of the o-line play is average or better.

jjelliso

January 1st, 2018 at 4:58 PM ^

It seems a little far fetched to assume Patterson is all conference based on little more than recruiting ranking, that Solomon comes anywhere close to replacing Hurst, or that this staff that has shown absolutely no ability to develop anyone turns DPJ and Black into real threats and somehow turns this trash fire O-line into a passable unit.

Pepto Bismol

January 1st, 2018 at 5:09 PM ^

We're still doing This? Remember the booming calls for O'Korn at every Speight misstep? Or the Peters love when O'Korn struggled? Remember everybody blasting Balas for dismissing Peters? That was still happening yesterday. This us not a QB issue. All 3 QBs this year looked more or less the same - they had no idea what was happening in front of them or where to go with the ball. All of them. Maybe Patterson is a generational talent that can "Vince Young" this team to offensive success, but plugging Patterson in over Peters isn't likely going to turn this into an offense capable of winning the conference. This offense is busted. Completely. I can't believe there are fans left that think this is a single player away.

ScooterTooter

January 1st, 2018 at 5:16 PM ^

A single player could have made today better. There were plenty of clean pockets. Someone like Patterson who has mobility could have turned a few coverage incompletions/sacks into scrambles for yards or extended the play a bit more for someone to get open. 

Peters did some good things today. I'm confident had O'Korn played things would have been worse. However, he did not grab the starting job like we all hoped he would. I felt much better about Peters after the Wisconsin game, but today was a step back. 

Pepto Bismol

January 1st, 2018 at 5:30 PM ^

Shea Patterson has never even taken a practice rep in a Michigan uniform and you're sure he would've changed this offense with his (*ahem*, are you out there September O'Korn fans?)... MOBILITY!!!! SO MOBILE!!!! Who's gonna stop us now?!???! All we ever needed was a guy to blindly run around while our structured plays net us squat!!! So the answer is basically the Devin Gardner offense. MSU and OSU are quaking, I'm sure.

ScooterTooter

January 1st, 2018 at 5:40 PM ^

Yeah, don't think its far-fetched to assume that Patterson is a better athlete and talent than O'Korn. 

Notice I'm not saying the offense would have been world-beating today, just better. 

For instance, in your example, O'Korn's mobility did help him at times...he was just terrible at everything else. 

Goggles Paisano

January 2nd, 2018 at 6:06 AM ^

I get where you're coming from and yes we are far more than just one man away from fixing the offense, but we need a lot more out of the QB position.  Peters created absolutely nothing today.  College QB's have to make plays to win big games.  We need a "gamer" to run this offense.  Peters performance and his command of the team to me seems to be summed up with the word "passive".   This team needs some fire and someone to rally around.  I don't think Peters is that guy.  Patterson can be that guy and I hope to hell he is that guy.  McCaffrey could also be that guy.  We shall see next year.  

I Like Burgers

January 1st, 2018 at 5:53 PM ^

Plugging in Patterson or any QB really isn't going to change the fact that this offense has no idenity, has zero creativity, and struggles to even the simplest things at a competent level.

They could put Baker Mayfield back there at QB and this offense would still look like shit.  I mean...they threw for nine TDs this season.  NINE!!  That's tied for 119/130 in CFB.  The only Power 5 teams that were worse were Illinois (8) and Rutgers (7).

ScooterTooter

January 1st, 2018 at 6:16 PM ^

I dunno how true this is. Many of Peters' throws seemed to have someone open and he just missed them or didn't see them. A great example being the Nico Collins catch that was out of bounds. Had he thrown that better, that was an easy first down. There were a number of clean pockets today that resulted in nothing. Better QB could have been the difference in a one score game. 

Its like the people claiming Harbaugh and co. turtled last year against Ohio State. In reality, he tried to win the game, but the line couldn't hold up on passing downs and when they did, Speight missed an easy slant. Or Higdon has an easy first down and misses a cut and runs right into a linebacker. 

I don't think the playcalling was perfect by any means (seriously, why aren't they throwing the ball up for Gentry and McKeon like SC did today?), but I also think the alarm bells are overblown going into next year. There has to be a way we can turn the Ohio State game plan into a season long strategy. 

wolverine1987

January 1st, 2018 at 6:33 PM ^

at least in the first half--in the first half I thought Peters played fine and was let down by his receivers. The long throw to (forget) down the sideline was perfect, the throw to Gentry was good, and the throw to Collins you discuss IMO was Collins' fault not Peters. 

In the 4th Q though, no argument, Peters was bad.

I Like Burgers

January 1st, 2018 at 6:50 PM ^

They can plug in a new QB that can complete those easy throws, but they're going to need someone that can make the tough throws as well.  And then do all of that against great teams.  And from what we've seen that's not Shea.  At least not yet.  He was good against bad teams, but pretty iffy against the good ones. 

And if they really want to take a shot at the playoff they are going to need some offensive creativity.  And none of that choo choo train or Pepcat bullshit that gets three yards a play.  Find a way to get your skill guys like DPJ and Evans into space and get some easy yards.

Better QB play is like step one of five for next season.  And they need all five to be playoff caliber.

atticusb

January 1st, 2018 at 6:02 PM ^

Damn, at this point I totally agree with you. ... and if it's not the players, it has to be the coaches. There's no way Harbaugh can go into next season without some changes on the offensive coaching side. Or at least I pray he doesn't...

Nemesis

January 2nd, 2018 at 11:21 AM ^

.....in a logical offensive system.

 

Our offense is too complex.  And it is run by a committee of coaches (PH, JH, and TD).

 

Ruddock, Speight, OKorn, and Peters have all struggled with this offense.  At some point you have to ask, "is it the kids or the scheme?"

 

Shane Morris just had a banner year at Central Michigan, btw.  So the scheme is the issue.

 

Shea Patterson is an attacker.  A gunslinger.  Our offense will force him to slow down and think. 

 

Time to replace the offensive staff and the scheme.  And ONE person needs to run the offense.  This just is not working.

 

 

ryebreadboy

January 1st, 2018 at 4:49 PM ^

Yeah I'd love to hear where the optimism for next year is coming from. I get it from Ace - the blog has a preview magazine to sell in a few months - but not really from the fans. We're losing Hurst and (if he's smart) Winovich. We have no quarterback. The offensive coaching is putrid. There's no clear play-caller. The wide-receivers don't make plays (or catch). The offensive line blows. The team is mentally weak and folds at the slightest hint of adversity. Which parts of that are we supposed to be able to magically fix in eight months with very little coach-supervised practice?

I Like Burgers

January 1st, 2018 at 5:59 PM ^

I don't get it either.

The same coaches that couldn't improve this offense or these players on offense from the start of the season to the end of the season, are suddenly supposed to make massive improvements over spring and fall camp?  I just don't see it.

No matter what, the QB next season is going to be inexperienced in this offense, the offensive line is going to be really young and inexperienced, and the WRs are still going to be really young.

If they had gradually gotten better over the year and had something to build off of, sure.  But they seemed to get more incompetent as the year went on. Ace is expecting all of those positions to go from a D- to a B based off of what?  Time?  Hope?  Alcohol??

ScooterTooter

January 1st, 2018 at 6:12 PM ^

Didn't these same coaches (for the most part) do pretty well with the offense in 2015 and 2016? 

Other than Iowa, Michigan's offense was pretty good the last few years. Even the offensive line was playing well until the Iowa game last year. 

Even against Ohio State, Michigan looked well on their way to a 27-10 victory or something like it until Wilton Speight's godawful interception. 

Its not farfetched to think that as players get older, they get better (which is why it was no surprise the 2015 team won 10 games despite only winning 5 the year before). It's just a question of whether these coaches can make the players that extra 5-10% better to win the big games the program needs to be elite. 

Pepto Bismol

January 1st, 2018 at 6:57 PM ^

Pep Hamilton did not contribute in any way to the relative success of 15 & 16. Likewise, Jedd Fisch had no hand in this 2017 debacle. Whether that change is the sole problem, I have no idea and I'm not saying that. But don't paint it like this disastrous offensive drop off was totally random.

FrankMurphy

January 2nd, 2018 at 3:30 AM ^

Just like everyone else, I'm having a lot of trouble being optimistic right now, but the one thing we can hang our hats on is that this defense is truly elite. Not just good or decent like Rich Rod's offense was, but elite. Don Brown had to replace 10 starters and still managed to field a defense that finished the regular season 3rd in the country in total yards allowed. They kept us in games that the offense otherwise pissed away. Against MSU, it was the defense that gave us a chance at winning that game despite the offense having turned the ball over five times. Even today when we lost the lead, the defense set us up to get it back by forcing a punt that doinked off DPJ's chest. With the possible exception of the Penn State game, none of our struggles this season, none of them, can be pinned on the defense. So I don't think it's correct to say that the TEAM is mentally weak, because the defense clearly isn't. Not only do they have sound fundamentals, but they play with a fire and aggressiveness that seems to be absent from their teammates on the other side of the ball. The million dollar question is why there's such a disparity in how the offense plays vis-a-vis the defense and what needs to be done to get the offense playing at a level that approaches that of the defense.

Also, give Don Brown ALL OF THE MONIES.