M-Dog

August 30th, 2017 at 8:04 AM ^

That would be the most troll job ever . . . list each position, and then for each position just list the entire roster with 85+ ORs in it.

Anybody could play any position, just like they did it in Harbaugh's back yard when he was a kid.

Why make it complicated?

 

Boner Stabone

August 30th, 2017 at 7:40 AM ^

Jordan Anthony and Ambry Thomas are both #1 on the defensive side of the ball.  I am assuming one of them will be red shirting.  Which one will be red shirting?

LKLIII

August 30th, 2017 at 7:48 AM ^

Likely Jordan Anthony. Thomas is still competing and may get looks in nickel and dime packages. Only true freshman LB that seems like he may get snaps is Ross.

Does sharing the same number on defense mean one CANT play all year? Or just that they can't be on the field at the same time?

KennyGfanLMAO

August 30th, 2017 at 9:44 AM ^

Nate Schoenle changed his number to 81. It's better than 35, but I was hoping for another single digit number to match the rest of the young receivers. 5 would've been the only option, but Kurt Taylor took it.

Crawford - 1

Martin - 2

Collins - 4

Black - 7

DPJ - 9

Carcajou

August 30th, 2017 at 6:52 PM ^

Maybe I am just old-school, but I prefer receivers (and RBs) not to wear single digit numbers. They are a slight bit eaaier for the opponent to identify personnel and personnel packages

I've heard some coaches say they don't allow players to get single-digit numbers, cuz the kids argue and pout over them.

ChalmersE

August 30th, 2017 at 3:37 PM ^

Four guys wear 3, two are arguably the most important on offense (Speight) and defense (Gary).  The other two will also see the field: Nordin and Robbins. 

UMfan21

August 30th, 2017 at 4:25 PM ^

Would have been nice to list eligibility next to each name

(not suspended)

(not suspended)

(not suspended)

 

 

Just for that extra Florida dig.