OT: ESPN Layoffs Have Begun
This was percolating for a while, but ESPN announced today it's laying off what is reportedly close to 100 people, including quite a few on-air and digital notables, which so far include NFL reporter Ed Werder and NHL columnist Scott Burnside (these are the only two that I saw tweet about their loss of job as of this posting...those laid off are tweeting them out when they get the call).
John Skipper has just sent memo to all @espn employees. Layoffs announced today. Around 50 names you will recognize; another 50 you may not.
— jamesmiller (@JimMiller) April 26, 2017
ESPN UPDATE: I have multiple sources at ESPN telling me they expect the number of layoffs to be closer to 100 people than 70. Awful news.
— Richard Deitsch (@richarddeitsch) April 26, 2017
After 17 years reporting on #NFL, I've been informed that I'm being laid off by ESPN effective immediately. I have no plans to retire
— Ed Werder (@Edwerderespn) April 26, 2017
After 13 years of sticks and pucks can share that as of today my tenure at ESPN is at a close. I look forward to the next adventure.
— Scott Burnside (@OvertimeScottB) April 26, 2017
April 26th, 2017 at 10:32 AM ^
Does anyone watch ESPN outside of the actual sporting events?
April 26th, 2017 at 10:41 AM ^
Yes, actually. My 11-year-old sports nut son watches ESPN literally constantly. I love Michigan sports with a passion, but literally don't care about anything else, especially professional sports. So it is with great frustration that every time I walk into any room he is in, I see some retired professional athlete jabbering on about some active professional athlete, and why he shouldn't have pooped the morning before...
April 26th, 2017 at 11:19 AM ^
So you're passionate enough to care about the pooping habits of 18 to 21 year old athletes who play for free?
April 26th, 2017 at 11:39 AM ^
Actually, yes. It's odd, I know, but once an athlete starts receiving an excessive salary, the quality of his/her poop - color, size, shape, frequency of emission, etc. - no longer interests me...
Yet Deadspin has a good list going that is constantly updated.
http://deadspin.com/a-running-list-of-espn-layoffs-1794664091
And yes, as referenced further down this board, Kannell is one of them. He tested positive for being bad at his job.
April 26th, 2017 at 12:45 PM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 11:20 AM ^
But are they retired or just failed professional athletes? I thought they were failures as pro athletes for the most part.
i don't consider anyone retired until they can draw SS/medicare, so what, 65? Anyone else no matter how wealthy is just unemployed / a bum. I certainly don't use the term retired on a damn 23 year old who decided to *quit* football. This only reveals to me how plainly it's not a real job
April 26th, 2017 at 12:01 PM ^
I just noticed I used it twice. That is a shit ton of literally, figuratively speaking, of course.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:41 AM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 10:45 AM ^
Pardon The Interruption once in a while but for the most part, no.
April 26th, 2017 at 12:40 PM ^
Defnitely liked PTI when I had cable, but now I just listen to the podcast on the drive home. That's about all the extra-curricular coverage I get from ESPN.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:14 AM ^
ESPN makes for great background noise while I'm doing other things, IMO. Seriously, while I'm writing or doing things around the house, it's nice to have it there just to hear about news, see some highlights, etc. when I can't actually concentrate on watching a show.
April 26th, 2017 at 12:31 PM ^
but in the interest of not giving Disney the impression someone from this house is interested in their crappy content, I put on an old movie I've seen a thousand times before... has the same effect.
Most of the memorandums, briefs, and articles I've had to write so far have been to the sound of The Patriot, Braveheart, or A Few Good Men.
April 26th, 2017 at 12:38 PM ^
Sure its a bit embellished and historically inaccurate, but I still find it entertaining.
The Office is that show for me. I've seen it so many times at this point that it's nice to just throw it on when I don't feel like completely focusing on a new show.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:19 AM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 11:26 AM ^
I used to so often. Sometimes I will watch a 30 For 30 if I am interested in the material. ESPN is not as good as it used to be. It's great for covering sporting events, though. We all love ESPN for their hours and hours of college football coverage during the season. No one does it better than they do.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:42 PM ^
Personally, I do not. I will watch the game and the game only. I'm not interested in the pre-game or the post-game. Just let me watch the game itself. If for some reason I missed a game I will catch the highlights. As for all the talk shows, I couldn't care less.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:37 PM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 10:34 AM ^
I hope they don't lose any good ones - I'd love to be able to pick and choose, and it wouldn't be a hard decision in most cases.
It's sad for the employees when it was management's poor judgement and runaway spending that led to the current cash crisis.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:39 AM ^
They treat hockey like a third tier sport now.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:44 AM ^
+1 for that. I'll miss Burnsides hosting the Hockey Today Podcast. Hopefully they'll continue it though.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:47 AM ^
Pierre LeBrun just got laid off too
Well folks, as you can tell by my new Twitter handle, I was also among the cuts today at ESPN.
— Pierre LeBrun (@PierreVLeBrun) April 26, 2017
April 26th, 2017 at 11:27 AM ^
Burnside and LeBrun are both pretty good reporters and personalities. Reflects ESPN not giving a hoot about hockey. Back to TSN and The Hockey News
April 26th, 2017 at 10:48 AM ^
Still, to fire hockey people during the Stanley Cup Playoffs? Wait a few weeks on that.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:52 AM ^
I agree with you, but I'm sure the thought process went something along the lines of, "do we show any hockey? Are we making any money on hockey? No. Gone." Or, with the current amount of hockey they show, "What is this Stanley Cup thing?"
April 26th, 2017 at 11:54 AM ^
Nice avatar!
April 26th, 2017 at 12:04 PM ^
One is the calm. One is the storm. Both very good though.
April 26th, 2017 at 12:54 PM ^
You as well! Its my hometown. Been too many years since I've been back and I'm going to miss my chance this summer. Hopefully I can get back for Coast Guard Festival.
I've been in Colorado for years, but got back often when my kids were young. They loved the beach and Coast Guard. We rented cottages in Highland Park, great times.
Odd Side Ales.
April 26th, 2017 at 10:56 AM ^
I think he's also working with NHL Network, so they might keep him part-time or at least through the playoffs.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:03 AM ^
Why? ESPN does not care at all about the NHL nor have they since NBC went into a partnership with the NHL after the 2005 Lockout.
Some good people are losing their jobs but they 3% of TV time ESPN gives to the NHL won't really matter very much to them.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:25 AM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 12:12 PM ^
Well the simple fact is that the majority of people in the US don't care about hockey. So for most people, if you're given the choice between a discussion of sports you do care about (NFL draft, NBA matchups), or a recap/coverage of a sport you don't follow or know anything about, then most people are gonna choose the discussion.
I mean c'mon, say it's the end of July, early August. And you have a choice of what to watch, either a discussion of UM/OSU and what their results will be for the 2017 season, or a recap of European handball. If I had extra cash, I'd be willing to bet most people on this site would pick talking about UM/OSU over 95% of the time
You forgot the third option and the source of ESPN's problems, neither.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:03 AM ^
I like hockey because I grew up a Wings fan, but it is a third tier sport unfortunately. Perhaps low second tier sport. It's fun to watch, but it just doesn't draw enough eyeballs.
April 26th, 2017 at 11:04 AM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 11:22 AM ^
April 26th, 2017 at 11:31 AM ^
Please elaborate.
Just because ESPN took it out of the national discussion (and the NHL brass are absolute morons for letting them do so) back when they had that kind of pull doesn't mean it's not a great sport.
When you say 3rd- tier do you mean popularity alone? And what do your top 2 tiers look like?
Stats show that no one under 35 watches baseball anymore but espn covers the hell out of it so people think it's more relevant than it really is.
April 26th, 2017 at 12:24 PM ^
C'mon dude, it's been 10+ years since NBC took over for ESPN as the primary coverage, we have to stop blaming ESPN for the fact that hockey is getting stomped on, ratings-wise, by the other Big 3.
Last year, the Stanley Cup Final averaged 3.948 million viewers, and peaked at 5 million viewers in Game 6.
Baseball, which you claim isn't as relevant as people think it is, averaged 3 million viewers for the 9 Divisional Series'. And that's for a 1-round matchup!
Every year, the other Big 3 (NBA, NFL, MLB) destroy the NHL by millions and millions of viewers, and that has nothing to do with how much ESPN does or doesn't talk about them.
I grew up in a poor urban area, town of about 500. And for those of us that had no money we didn't even know some of our friends were playing hockey until after the fact. They sure in hell weren't going to invite us kids with no hockey gear - most of us were able to get a pair of skates somehow - to show up and watch them. And unless you were in one of the larger school districts, it wasn't going to be offered as a a school sport. Even then, I have a strong suspicion it was one of those that demanded some type of payment by the family. Just too damn expensive and brings in no money for most schools.
I'm not blaming ESPN. I'm blaming the Dave Brandon-level greedy, ass dickheads who are tanking the league. Having said that, "3rd tier" is a bit of a stretch. Also, again...ESPN once (and still to some degree) dictated the national sports discussion....because of this they keep talking about baseball which still hits home with millions of Americans....(mostly over 35.)..and they're the ones who still contribute to the ratings as millenials don't have TV subscriptions. It's totally the NHLs fault...
and hockey has fallen in popularity. But 3rd tier is a joke.