Walton has a message for Irvin haters
Edited"All the (expletive) that people give Zak ... I hate it. I hate it so much. It's like, man, what else you want from the dude? What else do you want? He's played off back surgery. He's got, like, 1,500 career points. He's made a one-eighty as a player. I remember the days when Zak would shoot a contested 3 over two people rather than pass. He's a whole new guy. I mean, dude, are you kidding me? Get off my guy's back."
I am and will remain one of those people critical of Zak for mainly his bad decision making. I love his defense, his effort as of late and his willingness to attack the rim. However, he still scares the life out of me every time he dribbles. There were about 3 or 4 occasions today alone where the ball somehow deflected from his dribble back to himself or another teammate.
But, I think this is one of those times where you are exaggerating a ton. I haven't read a single comment on here calling him a "piece of shit." If you can find that, I'm all ears. But I haven't seen it. And I would be the first one yelling at said poster for being a scum.
March 10th, 2017 at 10:20 PM ^
Out of curiosity I took your challenge and searched "Irvin shit" iin comments - found the following after wading through the results for a minute:
Irvin was straight dog shit
Irvin sucks ass
Fuck you Irvin
Irvin for the shitshow u have put on
Fuck Irvin
Why the fuck does Irvin continue to start?
I'm positive there are more where that came from, as well as dozens and dozens of negative commennts without vulgarity.
Unfortunately, this board can be brutal when it comes to M basketball, and Irvin has been a prime target.
March 11th, 2017 at 11:13 AM ^
But no one called "him", "Zak Irvin the person" a piece of shit.
I think similar things have been said about every athlete on the M basketball program during the course of a game.
Is it right? No. But I don't think anyone called HIM a piece of shit. All basketball related.
This place is pretty ugly pretty often. Game threads arent worth reading. People use the 'Its the internet, get used to it line' which is nonsense. Michigan alums should hold themselves to higher standards. My guess is most people on the board aren't alums.
I do think its more ok to criticize seniors, within reason. For some reason the basketball team always seems to have a whipping boy. I think Evan Styozytsrwfijzk got it the worst, but Irvin has gotten it pretty bad.
mean they are decent people. I don't know if you watched the Fab Five doc, but the guys were talking about how many racist letters were sent to UM about them and some of the letters were signed and included the name and date of graduation of the proudly racist alumnus.
There are a-holes everywhere. The anonymity of the internet makes real tough guys out of lots of pussies who wouldn't say those same things in real life.
Fair, disapointing point.
I love how every time some people on here are douches, someone says "oh they must not be alums". First, what does it matter? Not being a douchebag isn't something a standard to hold because you're a Michigan alum but because you should be a decent human being. The arrogance on this board sometimes is nauseating.
March 10th, 2017 at 10:00 PM ^
Never said anything about "douches". Basic level of civility. Not getting mad at what you read. Not flaming or trolling student athletes or fellow fans. You can operate within those bands while still being a douchebag (see grammar/ spelling nazis).
This is clearly not an attainable for the general internet, but I think it would be if only alums posted here. Not because Michigan alums are so much better (they are a little), but because general internet sucks.
March 10th, 2017 at 11:37 PM ^
Shoot More On The Run You Crazy Zombie. Wow, didn't think I'd ever use that again.
Irvin played all 45 minutes today. The day after playing against Illinois, the day after escaping from a plane crash. Let's all try to remember that tomorrow if he has an off game.
... someone may have beaten him in posting this, and that would be too horrible a tragedy to fathom.
One paragraph is half the story ?
It's literally one quote.
Is going to be getting a big time gig for a major site soon. His articles are just too damn well-written and researched.
Irvin has truly transformed the way he plays the game as the team has progressed. In the last 5 or so games he has let the game come to him, been a facilitator for others, generally picked good spots to be aggressive, and most importantly has played lights out defensive. He was the reason why we tied the game to send it to OT and the reason why we won it in OT. Huge game from him today.
If he can keep this going in the postseason, Michigan will be awfully hard to beat. One player has a bad game, another picks up the team. Just so many damn offensive options. I also think the back surgery set him back much more than we realized. Glad Walton said this and obviously extremely grateful to have Irvin in the program even if I still yell "Damn You Irvin Heroball" a couple times a game. We can live with it a couple times a game especially because he has been hitting a lot more of those shots.
B has some limits, but he does seem to get pretty cohesive teams, with a pretty low "head case" quotient. Good to see him say that about Z, and good on the reporter for honoring an "off the record ... until now" request.
mean things about estraordinary, high-achieving athletes. Today Zak became the second highest point-scorer in UM history, according to the DetNews. If he's a sensitive person and the ugly gets to him, I sympathize. But he'll have the last laugh.
DetNews is full of crap. Irvin has 1,537 points. #2 all-time is Mike McGee with 2,439.
Irvin is #18 all-time. Still pretty good. Wonder where Walton would be if the injuries never happened.
Is it the 2nd-highest Michigan scorer in BTT play? That could be it.
all season they could get hot for a weekend to make the sweet 16. But with the defense playing the way it is now - winning games against great teams despite poor shooting - this team can make the third weekend of the tourney.
"A few weeks ago this team could beat anyone, but also lose to anyone. The latter, now, not so much."
Right. The problem is people forget that almost nobody on this team was playing at the level they are now earlier in the season. Walton was disappointing and couldn't hit anything inside the 3 point line, Wilson and Wagner were promising but very inconsistent (still are kinda), Rahk couldn't hit anything, Simpson was totally lost, Donnal was Donnal, Robinson was playing atrocious D. Irvin looked bad playing hero ball and being the main guy, but he pretty much had to be. Then it looked really bad when he was still playing that role when the team improved. Now, he's learned to take a step back, play great D, and lately he's had some solid offensive games mixed in with some game-winning performances when the rest of the team is a bit off.
Better ball handling and no hero ball bad shots from a 5-star recruit.
I'm just answering what else I'd want. Derrick's talking like there's nothing better.
Recruiting stars count for exactly nothing on the court.
IMO coach Beilein does an excellent job developing players, and he runs a relatively complex offensive scheme that takes time to master.
As contrast, a guy Thad Matta recruits is the same guy as a senior - he's a good recruiter, but terrible at teaching and player development.
Irvin overcame a serious back injury that clearly impacted his development and his play.
His freshman year it looked like he would become a deadly scorer; after his back injury his shot looked absolutely dreadful, and his confidence suffered. He also lost valuable time that could have helped him develop a better handle.
Beilein has been very patient with him, and it's paid off - Irvin has found a very nice role as the best defender on the team, a strong leader, and an often effective slasher/scorer. He doesn't have strong ball handling skills, but he's a pretty damn good finisher.
It's reasonable to be frustrated by his shot selection - other than that, I think he's worked hard to overcome injury and limitations. Good on Walton to have his back.
those are very different things.
I think there are times when he takes bad shots that are more a function of the offense stalling and no one else stepping forward.
But I also confess to having expressed frustration with him probably more than a time or two, as well.
Great to see him balling out here. Don't know where it's come from, but he's got a lift to his game I haven't seen from him in a long time.
Seems like to me this more because that our coaches strategy is to bleed the clock til there is 10 seconds left before starting a play? i wish we would start some plays at 16 seconds instead more times. There were a few plays where it seemed we caught the other team off guard by going at them at them 10 seconds earlier. It always seems like the same play that Irvin does, curls in and shoots. Irvin was making those 3's or long 2's earlier in the season, but somewhere after mid season I've seen him miss it more often, and they weren't even close misses sometimes. Like others, its only a complaint about these kinds of situations and his loose ball handling. 5-10 when not shooting the 3, 1-4 when shooting the three today. His defense and hustle today was really great and he did make his shots when he made it deep to the rim.
there are possessions that just are horror shows from the very beginning. Those just start out of joint and never get on track. But I agree the stall by design often ends disastrously. We throw away possessions at vital times and have been lucky to get away with it. There are golden opportunity possessions where we don't really give ourselves a chance.
As to Zak's shot, it's looked significantly better during this stretch run.
Good to see a great kid from a beautiful family get it going like he has of late.
are almost always among the best in offensive efficiency; this year is no exception (6th or 7th, depending on where you look).
It may not always seem like it, but he has a method that works.
I agree it feels like we start milking the clock too soon sometimes, but it's hard to argue against the effectiveness of his offensive philosophy.
but I wonder what the numbers look like in terms of down the stretch possessions in tight games.
I suspect our efficiency numbers drop, although I'm just guessing here.