Rutgurs and Iowa Confirmed as Night Games

Submitted by M Gulo Gulo on

Link to MGoBlue

The Big Ten Conference Office and its television partners announced Monday (May 2) the primetime games for each of its platforms, with two of the University of Michigan's four conference road contests selected for an evening starting time.

The Wolverines will play its Big Ten road opener against Rutgers on Oct. 8 at either 7 or 8 p.m. EDT. This will be the team's second-ever appearance at High Point Solutions Stadium in New Brunswick, New Jersey. The Scarlet Knights won the inaugural meeting in primetime, 26-24, on Oct. 4, 2014.

The final primetime tilt on Michigan's regular-season schedule will be played at Iowa on Nov. 12. The Wolverines and the defending Big Ten Western Division champion Hawkeyes will battle at 8 p.m. EST/7 p.m. CST from Kinnick Stadium in Iowa City, Iowa. This will be the second time that the two schools have met in primetime, with Iowa winning the match-up, 30-28, on Oct. 10, 2009, at Kinnick Stadium.

The television network for the Rutgers and Iowa games will be selected at a later date. The games could be shown on ABC, ESPN or ESPN2.

The Wolverines have compiled a 29-20 all-time record in night games.

blueblue

May 2nd, 2016 at 11:45 AM ^

Smart move by Iowa. A freak snowstorm, high winds, and cold night temperatures would give them their best shot at winning. Won't be enough, but they should be looking for every possible way to make the outcome based on something other than talent, coaching, and scheme.

DrewGOBLUE

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:48 PM ^

Except you gotta take into consideration that Iowa will be down a couple RB's by then.

If they get stuck having to mostly throw the ball, snow and wind and freezing-ass temps would be a bitch.

M-Dog

May 2nd, 2016 at 11:57 AM ^

The Iowa game makes me nervous.

They won't be the toughest team we play, but it may be the toughest game we play.

On the road at Kinnick, at night, sandwiched between MSU and OSU, could be windy and cold/snow, we could be undefeated with a big target on our backs.

It is a classic trap game scenario.

No matter what Iowa looks like the rest of the season, it won't be the Iowa team we face that night.

 

ijohnb

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:39 PM ^

is why I kind of like it at night.  There will no way the team will be looking past it.  At noon I think it would actually be more tricky.  I worry about fatigue by the time of The Game more than anything.  That is a for real 3 game gauntlet.

bluewings

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:17 PM ^

The Iowa game will be tough. Our players do not play well in the cold. Iowa feeds off the cold and will dominate us. We are weak. Did I get that right?



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

tlo2485

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:19 PM ^

I can't believe PSU or Wisconsin is not at night.. it was such an obvious decision, and if you look at next year's schedule there really isn't one on that schedule that makes a lot of sense. I wouldn't be surprised if we go 2 years now without one. Score a victory for the blue hairs lol.

UM Fan from Sydney

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:45 PM ^

Because many Michigan faithful believe night games in the Big House should be considered "special" and "against a worthy opponent," which is the dumbest argument ever. Yes, Wisconsin and PSU are "worthy opponents," but I don't see anything wrong with playing some shitty team at night in the Big House. I don't think it's a bad thing seeing Michigan kick a team's ass on national TV.

M-Dog

May 2nd, 2016 at 2:43 PM ^

It doesn't have to even be an argument.  There is always at least one opponent each season that is worthy enough to play at night.  It does not have to be a choice between Ohio State or UNLV.

Perkis-Size Me

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:08 PM ^

I guess WD is going to be pretty happy about it. 

This is a case of where the old time traditionalists are still getting what they want. "If Bo said games should be played at noon, that's what Michigan should do from here to infinity." 

This is one of those times where I say to hell with tradition, and to hell with what Bo said. Do I want to play a night game against UNLV or Ball State? No not really. But please tell me how Wisconsin or Penn State are not worthy of night games. What the hell was the point of installing permanent lights if you're going to use them once every 2-3 years? 

I'm so sick of the traffic, weather, and safety excuses. If places like Happy Valley, Tuscaloosa, Baton Rouge, and Columbus can all host at least one night game a year, so can Ann Arbor. 

ijohnb

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:46 PM ^

with the early games in the season, why not?  I am not saying have like 3 night games per year, but if there is not a conference game that really screams night game, why not just make an early season game novel.  Other teams don't need a "reason" to have night games, they just have them.  A perfect example is Colorado this year.  Kind of a ho-hum looking affair against a middling PAC 12 team.  A snoozer, right?  Throw that same game at 8:00 PM and we would have some terrible towels going and the place would be rocking.  I just don't get why we really won't just commit to the entire concept.

M-Dog

May 2nd, 2016 at 2:53 PM ^

I'm so sick of the traffic, weather, and safety excuses. If places like Happy Valley, Tuscaloosa, Baton Rouge, and Columbus can all host at least one night game a year, so can Ann Arbor. 

This^  There are no legit excuses.  We are no different than any of those places.  Period.

If you don't want to have a night game, just come out and say the real reason.  Don't blow smoke up our asses with fake excuses.

If they came out and said:  "Jim Harbaugh does not like night games.  So we are not having night games.  Deal with it",  I would shut up and deal with it.  

You have to take the good with the bad with Harbaugh.  He marches to his own beat.  We all knew this when they brought him in.

 

The Mad Hatter

May 2nd, 2016 at 3:04 PM ^

More night games mean more TV viewers and national exposure to potential recruits.  

I just don't understand how/why people have such strongly held opinions on what time a game should start.  You're getting to watch the University of Michigan Football Team play, who the hell cares what time the game starts?

/OSU should still be an early game though, because tradition.  And by early I mean not a night game.  Unless they're forecasting rain and/or snow, in which case the game should be moved to coincide with the storm.

SBo

May 2nd, 2016 at 11:17 PM ^

OSU needs (NEEDS) to start at 3:30. The Big House was dead this year. Even in the first half, where we were playing them close and looking to come out strong. That game should've been batshit crazy. M vs OSU in a top ten matchup the first year of Harbaugh vs Meyer. The MSU and NW games started at 3:30, and those were insane. In no world should a M vs NW game be louder than The Game. And no, don't blame it on the final score, as it was 17-13 at half (and still dead).

SpikeFan2016

May 3rd, 2016 at 8:58 AM ^

Two other problems besides start time you are ignoring. 

 

They were winning for the entire first half too. The halftime score was 14-10, which was close, but they led 14-3 for a very large portion of the first half and then we scored a touchdown right as the half was ending. They were winning the first half too, even though it ended close. 

 

The amount of seats our annoying, money-hungry season ticket holders give up to their fans really decreased the amount of fans there to make noise. 

 

But also, a ton of Michigan Ohio State games have been incredibly loud. The first half last year really was loud and 2011 and 2013 were both very, very loud. 

SBo

May 2nd, 2016 at 11:30 PM ^

Where have we heard that Harbaugh doesn't like night games? He probably likes them, he's atleast indifferent. This is the coach who routinely tries to pump up the crowd on the sidelines by doing the "can't hear you" thing with his arms. If it provides an advantage, he's all for it.

Avon Barksdale

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:21 PM ^

Great -- a night game in New Jersey on my birthday. I can study for a few hours in the morning, start getting highly intoxicated by noon, and then not remember any of the game while watching it at a Oregon District bar in Downtown Dayton. Go Blue. Go Flyers.

M-Dog

May 2nd, 2016 at 2:59 PM ^

Love the Oregon District.  

Do they still have that massive Halloween block party?  I went one year as an ATM.  I gave out fake money and everything.  Won a bunch of "best costume" contests.

However, as people got more drunk, they started banging on the side of it (with me inside) demanding real money.  It got a little out of hand.  I had to have 3 of the bigger guys in my group be my bodyguards so I could make it to the end of the block.

Good times.

 

UM Fan from Sydney

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:41 PM ^

Molto bene. Night games are a good thing, though I prefer a game such as at Iowa to be at noon. Night games in Iowa are usually tough, but we can do it. I no longer fear being outcoached.

M and M Boys

May 2nd, 2016 at 12:43 PM ^

Rutgers needs to fill the stadium and beat us to slow down the NJ railway to Ann Arbor.

Iowa needs to win period.

The MSU/OSU games are OUR priority...................

Steves_Wolverines

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:06 PM ^

Winning the B1G East is our #1 priority. Which means all games against East teams are of equal importance.

Beating Rutgers is as important as beating MSU, OSU, PSU, IU, and Maryland. 

Iowa (or Wisconsin) are the only games we can lose and still come out alright in the end. Losing one of those two games does not derail us from winning the B1G East. Losing both could, however. 

Richard75

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:19 PM ^

?

The most important games are the ones that are likeliest to serve as a tiebreaker. There is a 0% chance that Rutgers ties for the East title. So of course it's more important to beat a contender like OSU.

Divisional record is only a secondary tiebreaker after head-to-head. So, for example, if U-M, MSU and OSU all tied at 6-2—and Michigan beat them both—it would make no difference whether U-M's losses were in the division. The divisional stuff only becomes relevant in a three-way tie in which the tied teams split against each other.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

SpikeFan2016

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:53 PM ^

The Iowa game will be very difficult, but honestly, it hopefully won't matter that much. 

 

Beating OSU/MSU should be all we need to win the Big Ten and reach the CFP. A loss to Iowa doesn't threaten that unless we have another huge upset loss elsewhere. 

Also, Iowa seems by far the most likely* to reach the title game from the West, and I'd feel good about a Harbaugh revenge match in Indy. 

 

* Iowa plays both Wisconsin and Nebraska at home. We are the only team from the top of the East they draw and they also get us at home (Iowa misses MSU and OSU). On the other hand, Wisconsin has to play @Michigan State, @ Michigan, Ohio State at home. Nebraska has to play @Ohio State and has to go to both Madison and Iowa City. Iowa has an easy schedule to begin with in terms of crossovers, but literally all of their hardest games are at home. Their worst road game is at Penn State. Their second hardest road game is at Minnesota. 

Wave83

May 2nd, 2016 at 1:59 PM ^

I recalled the 1985 game between No. 1 Iowa and No. 2 Michigan (J. Harbaugh, QB) as a night game, but the records tell me it was a 3:30 start.  It was certainly dark by the time it ended with a tight loss for the good guys.