DreisbachToHayes

January 22nd, 2016 at 10:56 AM ^

Yes!  This is what many of us have  been thinking and saying... my favorite part is from the end:

"But here’s the thing. No one objects when a school drops a recruit because he’s not a good citizen in his community or if he fails to perform in the classroom, so why is it thus completely unacceptable to drop a prospect if he doesn’t meet expectations on the football field too?"

In reply to by Pepto Bismol

Stay.Classy.An…

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:13 AM ^

what I have been saying this whole time about Swenson...you keep earning scholarships, that's why academic based ones have GPA thresholds. Unfortunately, the kid let himself down, nothing that is promised today is promised for tomorrow. 

In reply to by Pepto Bismol

UMChick77

January 22nd, 2016 at 12:21 PM ^

I wish I could upvote you a 100 times. Exactly this.  

 

I also want to add that that there are a lot of people here that need to step up and eat their crow. I'm not one of those people who feel JH can do no wrong, but some people here were so quick to throw him under the bus that they really need to step back and ask themselves why when they have no prior proof of any wrong doings. A lot of teens have a warped sense of view to what the truth/reality is when their emotions are tangled up into a situation. 

Dustinlo

January 22nd, 2016 at 10:57 AM ^

It's nice to finally see a recruiting guy put out an article giving more inside knowledge on the situation. I realize that a lot don't want to get too much into a recruit's business, but it shouldn't be such a problem when that recruit is blowing off to media outlets with only his version of the story. It was sort of known in the recruiting world what happened, but mainstream media now running with a story simply because of the coach's name makes mainstream people formulate opinions with only some of the facts in mind.

creelymonk10

January 22nd, 2016 at 10:59 AM ^

Would be nice if the Freep & DetNews published this too as a rebuttal to their bullshit Greenstein piece. But no chance, since only the Greenstein piece will generate clicks.

lilpenny1316

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:03 AM ^

He was less inflammatory but still sides with Swenson and says that we're just getting with the times.  I hate this because somehow the PED-infested team up in East Lansing will be looked at as trying to play the game the right way.  I don't mind us being the bad guys, but only if we earn the label (by blowing teams out 38-0).

FauxMo

January 22nd, 2016 at 10:59 AM ^

Great article. The only thing I am confused about is this paragraph: "I don’t disagree that this whole thing is ugly, and I can completely understand the Swensons or Richardsons or Enis feeling like they got a raw deal, their dream school coming through with an offer only to take it away. " My question is: What is the plural of Enis? Is it just Enis'? Or is Enii better???

MayOhioEatTurds

January 22nd, 2016 at 12:10 PM ^

plural would be "Enes."

III Declension is a funny one.  It can be difficult to find the stem.  In general when a III Declension noun is plural, a short "is" suffix is chopped off and replaced with a long "es" (long and short referring to vowels). 

Thus:

axis (singlular), axes (plural);

basis (singular), bases (plural);

ellipsis (singular), ellipses (singular);

crisis (singular), crises (plural);

Enis (singular), Enes (plural).

 

lilpenny1316

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:00 AM ^

I still don't understand the fuss with all the information coming out now.  I know people who had academic scholarships to Michigan and other top academic universities revoked because their senior year grades dropped.  One girl in 1991 had a full ride offer going into her senior year, but she partied and her grades dropped like a rock.  By the spring of her senior year, the scholarship was gone.

If you want to get pissed, look at Calipari booting guys already on campus when he started at Kentucky.  Look at Saban and other coaches that boot upperclassmen to make room for 35 incoming freshmen.  

But this?  This is just people fearing that we're back to prominence faster than they'd like and their little programs can't keep up.

HoustonBlue70

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:02 AM ^

Really hope that Elliot stays committed and Hill eventually commits or else my army all American ball is ruined :( I know it's frowned upon to post paid content but over on scout they have an article about big changes with those two, can anyone summarize?

SD Larry

January 22nd, 2016 at 1:50 PM ^

FWIW, this article was just picked up by Dr. Saturday as well at yahoo.  Link

http://sports.yahoo.com/blogs/ncaaf-dr-saturday/report--ex-michigan-rec….

Even though we will never know everything, imagine that in hindsight coaches might have some regret about the timing of things here but not much else.  Always easy to second guess. Never thought there was enough info to judge this but like others,  getting to the point  I am ready to move on while  wishing the young man the best.

PTOAD

January 22nd, 2016 at 1:26 PM ^

Wondering if the staff has known for a little bit given the extra attention to the Boss kid from Cali. 

 

Strange all of the momentum that Texas seems to be building the last two weeks with the instate kids who looked determined to leave the state. Unfortunately, we seemed to be in on three of them.

ABOUBENADHEM

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:09 AM ^

what a favor Harbaugh/UM did for him in pulling his scholarship.  Because of the scrutiny over his situation he now has the opportunity to go to NW, ND or somewhere else that has/will offer him, and prove he really is/was a good player.   Good luck to the kid!

CorkyCole

January 22nd, 2016 at 3:16 PM ^

And in all honesty, if the scholarship pull really was because of a lack of effort in his senior year, hopefully the kid can take this as a way to motivate himself to excel in college both athletically and academically. Sometimes it takes a rough/tough situation to provide the proper kick in the butt that we need to become successful. I do not know if this is an accurate assessment of this situation, but if it is then that would be the hope. Wish the kid luck, and I know Harbaugh would shake his hand with an honest sense of joy for the kid if Swenson does in fact "prove him wrong."

Space Coyote

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:16 AM ^

"Some critics will say absolutely. And some will say that Harbaugh extended a written offer to Swenson in September (which the young man tweeted out as proof) so you have to honor that. There’s certainly a case to be made that if the coaching staff was uncertain about Swenson they never should have issued that offer."

Harbaugh and company shouldn't have extended a written offer if they were still evaluating him. Had that not happened, I think I would have been much more comfortable with this situation.

I'm still not a huge fan of the practice in general, at least the extent to which it is used (the number of commits they accept that they ultimately tell to look around), but I think Michigan can at least protect themselves better going forward by changing up some of their approach.

ldd10

January 22nd, 2016 at 11:20 AM ^

Also why wouldn't they have just pulled his offer after he refused to camp?  Or why did coaches meet with him in December and he was tweeting his excitement about enrolling in early Jan?  Still doesn't add up.  

Also bumping his official back a week...and then canceling...makes it APPEAR they were holding onto him while they worked a different prospect (Spanellis?) they liked better.