Dave Brandon's Athletic Department Continues to Use Student-Athletes to Save His Job

Submitted by Jon06 on

Facing a boycott of kickoff in protest of Dave Brandon's continued employment, Dave Brandon's Athletic Department puts out an official photo using a quote from Dennis Norfleet to try to stop the boycott. The caption on the Michigan Football Facebook page: "Fleet".

If you are like me in thinking that it is inappropriate for Dave Brandon to use student-athletes in orchestrated PR ploys intended to save his own job, you'll join me in thinking this is inappropriate, too. Boo, Dave. Boo.

Mrs. Jon06: "Is that official?"

Jon06: "Yes."

Mrs. Jon06: "...He should be fired."

ETA: Mr. Yost down below tries to convince me that this is not a new social media strategy. I asked him to provide an example from the Michigan Football Facebook page of any student athlete quote used in a 2014 ad. I mentioned that coaches' quotes had been used. His responses: basketball players from Twitter (not what I asked for), coaches (not what I asked for), and then a Funchess quote that never appeared on the Facebook page (not what I asked for), which (last time I checked) he is pretending was posted there. If anybody knows where he got that Funchess Chobani image, that'd be great to know. [Image was from Twitter. Again irrelevant. Again obfuscation from Mr. Yost who wants you to forget what we were discussing.] In any case I am just writing this here to register that Brandon supporters appear to be engaged in an active misinformation campaign here. Be careful out there, folks.

ETA2: To be fair, I should add here that Mr. Yost seems to think I'm lying by having moved the goalposts on him. I disagree insofar as social media strategies are a lot more specific than he seems to think, but you can see what you think if you read through the stuff below. The Funchess image he keeps reposting is from Twitter, per the above, unlike the FB-sourced image embedded in this here OP. FWIW, I am now inclined to think MGrowOld is right in the "Why the Surge" thread when it comes to at least part of the increased pressure to attend, but I still strongly dislike the AD using SA quotes in official materials in any way that even has the appearance of being an attempt to move the needle on a boycott aimed at DB.

might and main

October 7th, 2014 at 10:22 PM ^

that is just beyond the pale.  This is clearly DB doing whatever it takes to prevent the kickoff boycott.  He's using the student-athletes now to try to prevent his own extreme embarrassment.  If the students really pull off this boycott it's going to show the emperor has no clothes, and everyone knows it now.  For a man with the ultimate ego, it's looking like this kind of public humiliation - prime time, UTL - is too much to take.

moredamnsound

October 7th, 2014 at 10:33 PM ^

Are you kidding me? It's a half measure. Boycotting a game is one thing, boycotting kickoff is another. If anything, it proves his "it's Michigan Football, they will pay up, show up no matter what" philosophy. So you show up a little late. Who cares? The man still got your money and he still got your attendance.

goblueva

October 7th, 2014 at 10:28 PM ^

People are looking for any reason to bash the AD and the athletic department. Ever think the football players hear the boycott crap and get tired of it? That the team really does want fans there and those fans to be loud and get them hyped? Be positive, show up and cheer for a great game.
Go blue!

moredamnsound

October 7th, 2014 at 11:16 PM ^

Yeah I agree. I want everyone to be fired yesterday just like everybody else. I would also prefer that the team wins and gets every ounce of home field advantage to help them get there. It's amazing that I'm getting downvoted for wanting to support the team that we are all supposedly fans of. I like it when we win, don't like it when we lose. Downvote me all you want, kids.

aiglick

October 7th, 2014 at 11:26 PM ^

We have to make it known in as many ways as possible in as many avenues as possible that Brandon needs to go. If Brandon somehow survives this I would not put it past him to keep Hoke. Again, if Brandon and Hoke are still here nexy year and the stadium is predictably 70-80% full for games would you rather have that happen of have fans fight tooth and nail now to ensure that doesn't happen.

I will say this: sometimes leaders make the tough decisions and they turn out to be right. I' just not sure how Hoke would turn it around next year when he has so clearly failed to do so the further away we get from the RR team.

Not sure why people care whether or not the students are there for kickoff. Maybe you all think Hoke and staff are going to send 10 men out for a kickoff and the fans are needed to boo them so more so they don't make that mistake a third time.

bigmc6000

October 7th, 2014 at 10:23 PM ^

So instead of a boycott since apparently the players can't deal with that and/or the media won't realize WHY people aren't in their seat I think the entire student section should chant "Fire Brandon" clap, clap, clap clap clap repeatedly until the actual kickoff. That'll show up on TV. Also, make a GIGANTIC sign. Something to the effect of "Fire Brandon, Michigan deserves better" so that will show up as well. Make it impossible for the media to confuse it with anything else and force them to recognize it.


Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

Doc Brown

October 8th, 2014 at 5:19 AM ^

or they refuse to pay for an ever unaffordable product. If Brandon wants to treat alumni like customers, then I will not pay for his shit product. I will also not pay for a program that does not have player safety as its top priority. I don't buy for a second that Dave's sudden emphasis on player safety. 

I refuse to donate to the athletic department until Dave is gone. That also includes ice hockey. 

mGrowOld

October 7th, 2014 at 10:34 PM ^

I want Brandon fired as much as anybody here and if he was smoked in an hour it would be 59 minutes too late for me.  I cannot stand the smug, sanctimonious SOB and think he is single-handidly destroying our fan base.

That being said I see no issue in this whatsoever.  His job is to get fannies in the seats and he's trying to do just that.  What I find interesting is that all the noise generated on this meaningless little blog seems to be getting to him a bit.  I do think this move is directly in response to the boycott, the protests and all the attention recently focused on attendance.

Looks to me like our efforts are starting to have an impact.  

Jon06

October 7th, 2014 at 11:09 PM ^

But we know the AD revamped PR strategy last Wednesday. I urged President Schlissel, in the same email where I notified him of my pending FOIA request, "to instruct the athletic department to put an immediate end to any activities intended to produce positive social media buzz about the current athletic director in a way that places current student-athletes at risk of harsh public censure."

At the time I was reacting to last week's spate of pro-DB SA tweets. But this image is more of the same, and it should be beneath Michigan Athletics to repurpose an athlete's enthusiasm to protect the Athletic Director from a protest. 

Ain't no reach.

Bodogblog

October 7th, 2014 at 11:27 PM ^

You are suggesting that athletes supporting DB is putting them at risk.  That's int-... that's not really something I need to respond to.  

There is some portion of you that realizes these kids are probably just supporting the guy they see come to all of their games, right?  Trying to get them better facilities, help them compete?  

Mr. Yost

October 7th, 2014 at 11:44 PM ^

Unless every single kid is going to sign a petition and generate a bunch of media attention in support of Brandon, it's moot.

No President is going to make a decision off of the opinion of some outspoken student-athletes.

That would be like allowing this football team to pick their next coach when Hoke is fired.

He's worried about nothing. He needs to be worried about what the donors are saying. If they're in support of Brandon it'll go a hell of a lot further than a few outspoken athletes on Twitter or a public statement by SAAC.

In the end, if you're in a position of power...and you're making a hire, you can only be influenced so much. Otherwise you're not doing your job and YOU are the issue...not that failed person that you hired because of pressure.

To be worried about a few focal students is so beyond silly. 

You REEEALLY think the University President isn't going to fire Brandon because a few girls on the field hockey team really like him?

Jeez, just think. For two seconds. THINK.

Mr. Yost

October 8th, 2014 at 6:30 PM ^

I don't see too many people beating down the doors in support of Hoke or Brandon. I see the media sticking microphones in faces and saying "TELL ME WHAT YOU THINK!"

Take it with a grain of salt.

When the head MBB, WBB, MIH, BA and SB coach get together and start a petition and generate some legitmate buzz in support of Brandon and/or Hoke.

THAT is when you worry.

If the entire student-athlete body got together and did the same...

THAT is when you worry.

You don't worry about a few vocal athletes and a few more coaches being PC.

Don't forget for a second. DAVE BRANDON IS STILL THEIR BOSS!

What the F is John Beilein supposed to say? "Yea, my boss, he sucks...I hope he gets fired over this mess because this is not how we do things at Michigan."

Why in the world would any current coach say anything bad about their boss to the media?

Shit - the recession is not over, and that's Ann Arbor, Michigan...less than an hour from Detroit. I'd be out there leading the way..."Mr. Brandon is a wonderful man! We love him and hope he's our AD for a long time!" (code: hey motherfucker...if you survive this shit, just remember who was leading the way in support for you. Don't think for a second you can get rid of me now. That was job security.).

I'm somewhat joking, but seriously...no one in their right mind would bash their current employeer. How the hell are they going to get another job? If I'm another AD, I'm not hiring you if I know you're going to throw me under the bus to the media.

Reader71

October 8th, 2014 at 12:11 PM ^

Nonsense. Brian Cleary is being mocked because the people doing the mocking are assholes. They think their opinion is the only one that matters. You cannot have it both ways. In this boycott, you are simply putting your perceived need to do something to get Brandon fired in front of the potential home field advantage that might help the players. That is fine. It is your right, and frankly, I understand that urge. WestwardWolverine has admitted that is the goal. Why won't the rest of you? It might be a worthwhile goal. But you cannot pretend that in this instance you are both boycotting and supporting the players equally.

4godkingandwol…

October 7th, 2014 at 11:02 PM ^

... to fire Brandon is weakened by this gish gallop.  Getting fans to attend a game is not Brandon trying to save his job, it's Brandon doing his job.  There are plenty of real reasons to fire him, stop trying to make everything fit into your pretty narrative.  Accept that there are nuances.  

Real reasons for firing Brandon:

1) Failure to conduct a real job search in the marquee sport that focused on hiring a candidate that would foster a positive environment and onfield success.  His coaching search focused too much on appeasing alumni in the short term and not enough on finding a qualified candidate.  

2) Failure to handle the Brendan Gibbons situation with any level of decorum.

3) Failure to ensure the medical staff at football games are properly equiped to manage head injuries.  That is not a Hoke job.  Hoke's job should have been to be more aware.  AD's job is to make sure medical staff is on top of shit for all sports.  

4) Failure with multiple PR episodes and promotions -- Noodle was minor, coke was a big mess up, a couple others

5) Failure to foster a positive attitude between the athletic department and student body. 

M-Dog

October 7th, 2014 at 11:09 PM ^

It is so Brandon to address this through PR rather than, you know, actually seeing what the students and fans want and then making some adjustments.  And if it is successful, it will only encourage him more to keep operating unilaterally from on-high.

HOWEVER . . . Brandon aside, the players do need the support of the fans, throughout the entire game.  This is their only night game at home.  They deserve at least as good of an environment as Rutgers had.

Find another way to target a protest directly at Brandon.  A boycott, even "just for kickoff", will have too much unintended collateral damage.

 

Njia

October 8th, 2014 at 8:09 AM ^

Not to mention he will be able to control the narrative of what is said about any "boycott" that occurs. It happened last Saturday night when Jim Delaney made up a cock-and-bull story about the rally on the Diag being a protest against the Shane Morris incident and a losing streak.

He even said, evidently trying to make me vomit (or destroy my TV) words to the effect of: "I mean, they've put in place the necessary process to ensure those oversights can't happen again. I just don't know what more the fans can ask for."

As buckeyejonross said in an earlier thread: don't fight an enemy who can buy ink by the barrel.

jblaze

October 7th, 2014 at 11:13 PM ^

All I'll say is this. I have an MBA from ross (or michigan B-School as the old guys call it) and you and ms. Jon are completely wrong. I'd neg you, but I'm on the app.

KSmooth

October 7th, 2014 at 11:27 PM ^

Whether it's Brandon trying to sell tickets, or Brandon trying to save his own butt, or (most likely) a little of both, this thing strikes me as desperate.  It's like he's saying "Please come to the game!  Don't you realize the team needs you?"  It wasn't that long ago that this didn't need to be said.  Michigan fans couldn't wait to get into the stadium, especially for a marquee opponent.

I think it's starting to dawn on some people in the athletic department that they are in serious danger of losing their fans.  'Bout time someone got a clue.

Bb011

October 7th, 2014 at 11:37 PM ^

Don't worry norfleet, we all support you and the team. It's the coach and AD that people have a problem with. I do have to give it to norfleet though, he brings a ton of energy and gives it his all.

cincygoblue

October 7th, 2014 at 11:45 PM ^

These remind me so much of when you deactivate or cancel your Facebook. For those of you who haven't, the page says "These friends will miss you" and has random pictures of people you're friends with.

Mr Miggle

October 8th, 2014 at 2:00 AM ^

if they banned you for awhile. In the absence of that, you should consider stepping away. Note that I'm not accusing you of doing anything ban-worthy. I just think it would be in your best interests.