I'm A Bitter Man, I Know, But Listen Honey You're No Fun Comment Count

Brian

12/28/2013 – Michigan 14, Kansas State 31 – 7-6, 3-5 Big Ten, season mercifully over

11623692184_a34ba130a1_z[1]

we are desperate lonely and underpaid [Adam Glanzman]

If you were disinterested in a December bowl game that kicked off at 10:15 PM, don't feel bad about it. You are far from alone. Frank Clark:

"I think a lot of guys lost the will to play as a family. That's one thing you can't do in football. In football, you've got to stick in there and stay together as a family.

James Ross:

"It was our mindset from the jump, we weren't totally into it I would say. We didn't come out with a lot of energy."

For their part, the coaches didn't bother to go into the hurry-up down 18 points with 8 minutes left. As far as unconvincing attempts to look interested go, the fan is on level footing with the rest of the program.

The coaches did go up-tempo once it was 31-6, mysteriously. You've already given up. No one is going to feel better about losing by three scores to a 7-5 Big 12 team instead of four. I guess you have to send the message that You Never Give Up despite having already given up. That's the kind of program this is. We Never Give Up (we gave up).

That's as indicative of the current state of the Michigan football program as anything. Fail to live up to expectations, try to make it look good with meaningless hand-waving after things are decided. Michigan is just six… eight… sixteen… okay, thirty-five plays away from a really good season, you know, and Lloyd Carr's seniors are about to ride to the rescue.

--------------------------------------

I guess it's good that Michigan conceded from the drop that they could not run the ball whatsoever, because they were right about that. Eight tailback carries on the night, and three of those were option pitches. Michigan did not repeat their mistakes from the Penn State game.

Unfortunately, while they've learned what they cannot do they have not learned to do anything. Kansas State gave up 301 rushing yards to Oklahoma on the second to last weekend of the regular season; Michigan stared that front seven down and said "no thanks, we like end-arounds."

The most frustrating thing about this season is that any hint of progress is quickly stomped out. Michigan has a human run game against Northwestern, then gets obliterated by Iowa; they are once again human against Ohio State, then correctly assume they are helpless against Kansas State.

Meanwhile, the defense is so incompetent against a modern packaged offense that Kansas State essentially ends the game by the second quarter. Michigan had zero answers for a play that Rich Rodriguez pioneered at this very university. Here we are, talking a big game about how This Is Michigan and playing football like it's 1989, the last time This Is Michigan actually meant This Is A Consistently Elite Football Program.

Bo hovers over the program with speeches about the team the team the team, but his penchant for running quarterbacks and option football and running the damn ball has been discarded in favor of notions about a "pro style" offense that reflects the modern-day NFL in no way whatsoever. Chip Kelly's taking a team that was 4-12 last year to the playoffs with Nick Foles as his quarterback. QED.

At the beginning of the year I wondered aloud if Michigan was going to end up on the wrong side of history here, what with their failed attempt to move to the spread traumatizing them so much that they'd mutter something about Denard Robinson holding the offense back from its true form, which is apparently lots and lots of end arounds with two tackles next to each other. And sacks. Michigan's base play this year was a tackle for loss. This was our innovation.

I like the thing where the quarterback pulls up to throw late better.

------------------------------------

It'll get better. I mean, you'd think so. I know that's what everyone said about the offensive line this year. But we've detailed the various ways in which the previous coaching staff decimated this roster on both lines and the fact that Hoke has collected and retained a lot of guys who will be maturing over the next couple years. Michigan won't be ripping the redshirt off an offensive lineman midseason again.

But at some point I realized that the only thing that resembled what football used to be—fun—came when Dennis Norfleet grabbed the ball on kick returns and once when he took an end-around. He juked a guy and got nine yards and I felt a little flutter. Then the grim trudge resumed.

Maybe the reason I hold onto Denard so hard is because he's about 90% of the fun that Michigan football has provided since Bo died. As this season descended into a lifeless backwards march, I kept thinking about my uncle's exclamation during the 2008 Fandom Endurance III Northwestern game: "We do this for fun!" We did even then. There was a perverse joy in our abject stupidity. Five years on, all the diamonds have been sifted from that ash. We do this out of momentum now.

Awards

brady-hoke-epic-double-point_thumb_31[2]Brady Hoke Epic Double Point Of The Week. Obviously no one on the defense can acquire this, as the defense was completely disassembled. The offense… barely scraped over 200 yards thanks to a Shane Morris QB draw that went for 40. Jesus. Uh.

Well, Jeremy Gallon did break the single-season receiving record and is a cool dude, so Jeremy Gallon.

Honorable mention: Shane Morris?

Epic Double Point Standings.

3.0: Jeremy Gallon (ND, Indiana, K-State)
2.0: Devin Gardner(ND, OSU)
1.0: Desmond Morgan(UConn), Devin Funchess(Minnesota), Frank Clark(PSU), Matt Wile (Nebraska), James Ross (Northwestern)
0.5: Cam Gordon (CMU), Brennen Beyer (CMU)

Brady Hoke Epic Double Fist-Pump Of The Week. Nope.

Epic Double Fist-Pumps Past.

8/31/2013: Dymonte Thomas introduces himself by blocking a punt.
9/7/2013: Jeremy Gallon spins through four Notre Dame defenders for a 61-yard touchdown.
9/14/2013: Michigan does not lose to Akron. Thanks, Thomas Gordon.
9/21/2013: Desmond Morgan's leaping one-handed spear INT saves Michigan's bacon against UConn.
10/5/2013: Fitzgerald Toussaint runs for ten yards, gets touchdown rather easily.
10/12/2013: Devin Funchess shoots up the middle of the field to catch a 40 yard touchdown, staking Michigan to a ten-point lead they wouldn't relinquish. (Right?)
10/19/2013: Thomas Gordon picks off an Indiana pass to end the Hoosiers' last drive that could have taken the lead.
11/2/2013: Clock expires.
11/9/2013: Nebraska muffs a punt through no action of Michigan's.
11/16/2013: Michigan executes a clock-running last-second field goal to get the game to OT.
11/23/2013: 404 file not found
11/30/2013: Michigan forces a Hyde fumble to get back in the game.

imageMARCUS HALL EPIC DOUBLE BIRD OF THE WEEK. Michigan, down 31-12 with two minutes or so left, runs a two-point conversion that features Jeremy Gallon taking an end around and throwing the ball to a wide open dude for the score.

First of all, you gave up already. Screw you and your two point conversion. Second, every Ohio State fan on twitter instantly said something along the lines of "oh wow that totally would have worked against us." I don't think it's possible to be more disgusted with a successful two point conversion.

[AFTER THE JUMP: stuff.]

Offense

11623319895_3cac34e55f_z[1]

Glanzman

Welp. There's not much you can do when your QB is a freshman who is liable to put the ball in a defender's chest twice consecutively when you finally do have to open things up far, far too late and your tailbacks rush eight times for 16 yards. Borges did the things he could do, implementing a screen and edge-rush attack that saw Michigan mount actual drives on their first two possessions.

Unfortunately, you can only run constraints for so long before they start getting obliterated, and once the scripted fancy new stuff was over so was the offense. The game was over once Michigan could not punch the ball in on either of their first two possessions and then punted once; down 21-6 without a prayer of a non-gimmicky offense, it was over. Gameplan took Michigan their first 120 yards, and then they had no more. On an individual game level, you can't expect much more from your offensive coordinator.

That Michigan went into this bowl game utterly convinced they could not run the ball conventionally against a not particularly good run defense is a huge failing that you can spread out to at least three different people: Rodriguez, Funk, and Borges. Rodriguez for the roster, Funk for being the position coach, and Borges for treating this rag-tag assemblage of walk-ons and freshmen like they're the Denver Broncos and expecting they could handle every run concept ever expressed by man as they were being bounced around like gas molecules.

Statistical complaint #341. It's inane that those touch passes forward that are essentially handoffs get filed as passes. Jeremy Gallon's probably happy that is the case since without those he probably does not pass Braylon Edwards for the single-season receiving record; everybody else should be shaking their fist at the NCAA scorer in the sky in a futile attempt to get stats that make sense. Scorers should be able to judge whether a play is a run or pass and credit accordingly.

One step forward, one step back. Michigan's approach to this game was mentioned above, but to reiterate: despite being forced to start a freshman quarterback Michigan assumed they were totally incapable of moving the ball on the ground. And they were.

I have no idea how this line improves enough next year for Michigan to be able to do anything after losing both tackles, who are going to be on NFL rosters next year. They can be better, but like the radioactive situation Rodriguez walked into the reclamation project here is a two-year job. (Yes, thanks in large part to Rodriguez.) Next year's line has no seniors and one junior.

God willing, Michigan goes into spring practice focused on getting this unit competent at one base running play instead of three and does not try a blizzard of different combinations during the season. That might be enough to make their running game bad. Anything more is in the realm of the fantastical.

Morris eval. Could have been worse. Hosing hoser hoses, which mitigates some freshman issues since he can rifle the ball late and not get punished because the thing gets there so fast. Has accuracy issues caused by firing every ball a hundred miles an hour and predictably put two balls in K-State defenders' chests late when Michigan was forced to try to go downfield; overall an encouraging debut. Morris's wheels are a surprising asset, as well. He is not Gardner; neither is he Navarre. He could be a Connor Shaw type QB who takes the occasional carry to mess with defenses. (Hypothetically.)

QB controversy? No. The training wheels were obvious and once taken off the punishment was immediate. Given what we've heard about practice he has Gardner's INT issues except worse, and as long as both guys improve at the same rate Gardner will still be well ahead.

Defense

11624126596_c057b470d8_z[1]

Glanzman

That was a total disaster. The season as a whole was a macrocosm of the defense in each game: pretty good for most of it, gives up one WTF touchdown midway through (Indiana), and then collapses in a heap at the end. Kansas State has an underrated offense but even so, this drive chart…

  1. 75 yard TD
  2. 60 yard TD
  3. 59 yard TD
  4. 59 yard FG miss
  5. 33 yard drive ending in fumble one play after Tyler Lockett dropped a touchdown
  6. 60 yard FG drive
  7. 39 yards, punt
  8. 7 yard TD drive
  9. EOG

…is a total and comprehensive failure. Michigan did not force a punt until there were 7 minutes left in the game and things were over. This follows a game in which Michigan gave up 393 rushing yards to OSU.

Now instead of having one solid unit that can expect to take another step forward as they age, Michigan has question marks everywhere. Mattison's reputation as salvager and hero took enormous hits over these last two games. Hooray.

Exposed. Tyler Lockett is an incredible player who was checked by essentially nobody this year; it seems like KSU decided they were going with Waters late mostly because he takes best advantage of a guy who is probably the best WR in the country. Any ideas that Blake Countess is in that league as a defensive back are now bleeding out in the gutter after Lockett ghosted in and out of Michigan's defensive backfield all night, knives at the ready.

While Raymon Taylor struggled equally, Taylor had been targeted all year and we had some grasp of how good he was already: decent, but not Lockett good. Countess had largely been avoided and made a lot of interceptions when not avoided; this was a comedown in hype and expectation level on par with that Mattison suffered.

Spread and shred. The most brutal event of the night was K-State busting a fullback up the seam for 40 yards on a version of QB Oh Noes that put Desmond Morgan in a bind: defend the QB draw or cover the fullback. With Waters not a huge threat on the ground, the answer was "cover the fullback fergodsakes"; either way the Wildcats were about to get a good chunk of yards. Morgan acted like it was a run and Kansas State was on their way to their third touchdown.

In the aftermath…

…that was my exact thought, too. K-State just looked hard to defend in ways that Michigan is not. A lot of people were griping about Michigan's decision not to double Lockett, but when you're going up against a defense that uses the QB's legs in a way that demands attention you find yourself with limited options unless you can win certain one on one battles. Michigan could not, and as in the Ohio State game once that was the case it was over. There is no hiding weak spots against these spread to run attacks, and against Tyler Lockett every member of the secondary is a weak spot.

About that line. Dominated again. Zero pass rush and after some nice stops on the first drive, K-State had a quality day on the ground. Michigan spent much of the day stunting defensive ends into double teams, and those ended up with Clark and Ojemudia and Beyer on their back as dudes darted by.

I will never understand the insane deployment of Quinton Washington this year; we're now deep into Announce Everyone Was Injured All Year time and there hasn't been a peep about Washington, who was a quality starter all last year and spent most of this one on the bench. Without him and Pipkins, this outfit was just too light to hope to hold up. Other than Willie Henry, who is a freshman who needs some technique work badly, the rest of the line is Black, Beyer, and Clark: defensive ends all.

Things should get better next year, at least, with great piles of returning players and Pipkins hopefully coming back from his ACL tear. Much rests on him. I mean, much rests on him for a team that projects to finish third in their division.

Here

Inside The Boxscore:

* Spielman said something about how he asked Mattison who his best defender was this year, and the first thing out of Mattison's mouth was "Frank Clark." Against Ohio State, Frank Clark had one tackle. Against Kansas State, Frank Clark had one tackle. When your best defender is averaging 1 tackle per game in his last two, something is wrong.

* As Ace pointed out, our two leading rushers were our QB and Tight End. Our running backs should be made to watch how K-State's little Hubert ran. I get it that the offensive line generated zero push, but eventually someone has to break a tackle or make someone miss. Our 4 RBs combined for 8 carries and 13 yards. Our offense was slightly better in not giving up so many TFLs, but that's because we rarely had the ball. K-State had 5 TFLs for a total of 13 yards lost. Hey, I'm looking for positives, no matter how small.

Best And Worst:

Worst:  The Coordinators

I’ll admit to being a bigger fan of Greg Mattison than Al Borges, so up front I want to make it clear that Al Borges called a pretty good first half of football and Mattison seemed absolutely lost in stopping a team whose passing offense was “throw to #16” and “throw to guy wide open in the middle of the field.”  Borges has no functional running game, in part, because nobody seems able to block defenders, and so he went about trying ever-ludicrous methods to move the ball on the ground and the air without putting too much pressure on Shane Morris.  These were all plays fans have seen before, but he wove in screens, end-arounds, sweeps, and easy middle-distance throws into a coherent gameplan that let UM move the ball pretty effectively on their first couple of drives.  At the very least, he came out punching despite having one hand behind his back, and for that he deserves kudos.  And in particular during that first foray into the redzone, a PI on either of Morris’s two passes to Gallon and Funchess probably would have allowed UM to score a TD and kept the game closer.  The fact the offense sputtered in the 2nd half isn’t that surprising, as WR runs and delayed screens only work so often when your base offense is churning up less than a yard a carry and your WRs are being blanketed when they aren’t dropping passes from your amped-up QB.  Borges has shown an ability to adapt somewhat these past couple of games, and next year it is going to need to be flexible because I have a hard time believing it will suddenly start running the ball under center for 4 ypc while airing the ball out with aplomb.

On the other side of the ball, this “bending” defense clearly broke in the first half, as KSU had no trouble moving up and down the field despite holding penalties putting them in some poor down-and-distances.  Taylor and Countess couldn’t keep Lockett even remotely contained, and it seemed virtually impossible for the team to bring pressure while also maintain their assignments, leading to long conversions after acres of open field just appeared.  The defense tightened up somewhat in the 2nd half, but this defense needs to make a massive step forward next year for this team to improve on their record, and it’s now been two games in a row where the defense seems flat-footed and ill-prepared against good offenses.  That needs to change, and given the youth out there (Gedeon, Thomas, and Henry seemed to get significant run) along with some improving older players like Clark and a healthy Ryan, I expect that to happen.

bronxblue brings up the 2013 == death meme, and takes issue with it since the basketball team did make the NCAA final. I would like to point out that my particular version of 2013 == death is based on the Old Yeller premise, in which our once-loved dog contracts rabies, and is therefore 100% accurate except in this version of Old Yeller the dog is a cyborg with shotgun arms and continues blasting us long after our corpse has cooled.

Comments

m83econ

December 30th, 2013 at 2:11 PM ^

Given the coach's obvious lack of confidence in the players ability to execute properly, no surprise that there was no coherence. The question which Brian has answered in the negative is whether the ability to execute improves next year. If not, 2014 becomes poor damn Devin.

readyourguard

December 30th, 2013 at 2:17 PM ^

Wow.  And I didn't think I could be any more depressed following that shit I watched on Saturday night.

Someone on State Street needs to WAKE THE FUCK UP!  We couldn't win the MAC this year.  If this shit-show continues, we wouldn't be able to win the fucking GLIAC. 

What a goddamn disgrace.

HAIL 2 VICTORS

December 30th, 2013 at 2:29 PM ^

Although this is a very well written article it fails to mention the ultimate contributor to this years futility being youth.  The youth of the O-line coming into the season was of grave concern and once injuries depleted the defense we saw more of the same on that side of the ball.  

Both Mattison and Borges brought knives to a gun fight when an offense cant run a play between the tackels and the defense must blitz to force pressure.  The only solution to the current situation is for the boys to grow into men.

As poorly as this team played against UConn and Akron and Penn State they played valiantly against ND, Minnesotta and Ohio State.  There is as much hope as their is despair and this write up failed to capture that.

 

kingmoose

December 30th, 2013 at 2:31 PM ^

Great post Brian, you always say what I'm thinking.   I've been watching this team for a long time, and the last time we out coached anyone was Lloyds last game.

Tagg

December 30th, 2013 at 2:37 PM ^

One week on Gameday David Pollack asked a question that I feel is a great one. "What does Michigan do well?" Desmond tried to answer but really couldn't but I can. The answer is on the field, Michigan does nothing well and showed little improvement from week to week. In my veiw, the team that took the field on Saturday night was not any better than the team that took the field in September and that is what worries me. If they did lose the will to fight, the team we saw Saturday might be worse than the team that touched the banner against Central Michigan.

Reader71

December 30th, 2013 at 8:27 PM ^

Well, their starting QB was out. That QB was responsible for 75% of Michigan's offense. When that QB was healthy, they were a pretty good passing offense. You can't compare the team in September to the team in December sans Gardner. You could argue that no offense should be that dependent on one player. I would love if we had the type of team that could swap QBs and not miss a heat. But this is college football. One player is often the difference between a good team and a bad one.

uminks

December 30th, 2013 at 2:40 PM ^

The thing they really all have said to me is that "I did not know Michigan was that bad of a team". I guess that is the most embarrassing part for me. I just say youth and we will get better in a few years. But now I'm really starting to doubt it. We may have a coach, who is a great guy, who may be way over his head here. I'm still willing to give Hoke a couple more season but I'm really starting to doubt if he is the answer to our coaching needs.

matty blue

December 30th, 2013 at 3:01 PM ^

...i think of a team that went 11-0 to start out and had a national title game in its sights until it got blowed up in its conference championship...dropped down to a mediocre bowl game, they came out flat and got beat by a so-so bcs also-ran.

that team?  the 1998 kansas state wildcats.  cruised through the season, were upset by texas a&m in the big 12 championship, then lost to a less-talented purdue in the alamo bowl.  coached by bill snyder, who, because he just beat us, is being hailed as a great coach.

which he is, i hasten to add.  but you can never, ever say that coming out flat or having an underperforming team is ALL on the coaches, any more than you can blame 2012-13 michigan hockey on red berenson.  sometimes you just get a group of kids who never gell.  i can't help but wonder if that's what happened this year.

matty blue

December 31st, 2013 at 12:35 PM ^

purdue was a good team, but not great.  on the other hand, people thought that k-state team was really, REALLY good, as in top-5 in both offense and defense, heisman runner-up at quarterback...and purdue really took it to them for 3 quarters, until k-state woke up and came back late to take the lead.  brees took purdue all the way down the field to win it late.

it was (and is) generally regarded as a huge upset - k-state was #4 in the country going in and purdue was an unranked also-ran.  nobody who saw that game (which i did) would suggest that it was anything other than a lousy, uninterested effort by kansas state.

uncleFred

December 30th, 2013 at 3:39 PM ^

whether or not they are facts, or even remotely true. We've each decided and no one is going to convince us that we might be wrong or the team's problems aren't black and white and simply fixed.

Being a passionate fan is used to justify any level of virulence directed against any target. Any negative consequence of building such repugnant echo chambers is dismissed because no one cares what is said on the internet. 

It was an ugly season, not the ugliest I've lived through but certainly one of the four or five worst in the fifty or so years I've followed Michigan football. Thankfully Michigan's 2013 football season has come to an end. It is now in the past. 

Some observations:

Competent management does not fire someone to send a message. If you fire someone to send a message it is a demonstration that you don't know how to fix the problem. Competent management fires someone where a failure in performance is that person's fault and the existing personnel can be brought to success by different leadership. Ideally management has already identified the replacement, because the unhired stranger on the street is, in the vast majority of cases, unlikely to be better than the guy you fire.

Maybe the major contribution to the team's problems was coaching and not youth. Maybe the coaches actually did a laudable job of coaching young players who simply didn't mature fast enough. It's likely that only Hoke and Brandon know the answer, and in the end the ultimate decision will be Hoke's.

I believe that good coaching should keep a team together. I am troubled, deeply troubled, by Clark's and Ross's comments. While I doubt that Hoke has lost the faith of his players, and if you read the entire article Clark's statement is in defense of the coaches not an indictment of them. It's been pretty clear since mid-season the players have felt abandoned by most of the fan base. Comments from various players about playing for each other and only being able to trust their fellow players and the coaches to have their backs. It's got to be hard to insulate a team from the tire fire the fan base was this season. It's got to be hard to convince the players that a bowl game matters when the most vocal and visible chunk of the fan base spends a month screaming about how the game is meaningless. How important can a game be which is not worth attending to "watch a crappy product in a crappy bowl that no one cares about"? 

Yes yes fans are going to be fans and haters are going to hate and no one pays any attention to anything that gets said on the internet. Still ultimately keeping players motovated is a key aspect of coaching. Although the fan base might have made the coach's jobs a bit easier.

 Brian: Nice post. Hopefully we'll all find fun in watching the team in 2014. I for one am optimistic and plan to remain that way throughout the off season. 

User -not THAT user

December 30th, 2013 at 4:15 PM ^

"Maybe the reason I hold onto Denard so hard is because he's about 90% of the fun that Michigan football has provided since Bo died. "

I feel your pain.  He was magical.

We'll always have 2011, as batshit crazy as that year was from start to finish.

Mind, we're paying one helluva karmic price for it since, and I suspect will continue to do so next year.

Thanks, Brian...there's a reason MGoBlog is the standard for new media sports coverage...you're great when we're good, but when we're bad you're even better.

Reader71

December 30th, 2013 at 8:36 PM ^

Yeah, but Denard was also a part of some poor teams. Those poor seasons were not very fun. I had more fun in 90, 91, 92, 97, 98, 00, 03, 04, and even 06. All B1G championship teams but the last. Denard was fun. He was a great player, one of our very best. But I think 90% is a bullshit number. Here's my bullshit number: I attribute 90% of the Denard hagiography on the fact that his success came about while Michigan was running an offensive system that a lot of people prefer

Space Coyote

December 30th, 2013 at 7:17 PM ^

I believe the S&C program is about as near to 0% of the problem as there is, honestly. The young players will continue to gain strength, etc, and until they have time to do so they won't be as strong as the counterparts. More important, they will learn technique. You can be as strong as you want and have poor technique and get beat every time. You can be pretty equal, which most players relatively are, and it comes down to technique.

For the most part, size/strength will come with age, but the technique is what needs to be learned now.

I have no problems with Barwis, but he got hyped by this fanbase and other fanbases because he sought hype. His theories and methods are no better or worse than other S&C coaches. They don't all do things the exact same ways, but none of them are performing magic that others can't essentially match.

west2

December 30th, 2013 at 7:53 PM ^

I found myself saying uh, uh yup, huh, yup yup huh....actually agreeing with everything that was said.  I started to pay attention to Brian's posts this fall and thought at first that he was somewhat harsh on the coaches but now after this season I am in total agreement that the coaches are....maybe....lacking?!

The most whacky part of the season is that for 10 games I thought the D was ok and the O sucked.  But after the last 2 games its the total opposite.  What the...?!!

You Only Live Twice

December 30th, 2013 at 8:41 PM ^

A lot to think about.  I'm no closer, and never will be close, to finding answers but the questions are very interesting. 

If we play a game called "Imagine you are Dave Brandon, what would you do?"  because it's a game and we're not pretending otherwise, there are no real life encumbrances such as the corporatization of America or the fact that we are not him.  So, if I were DB... I would...  (in no particular order...)

1) Move away from each and every sacred cow.  Figure out the good that we have gained from recent coaches, including Carr, Rod and Hoke.  And their staffs.  Make note of that good and make no mistake, everyone contributes some good.

2) Isolate the negative and decide what to get rid of.  Not people, just the bad results and influences, whatever isn't working.  It's OK to start with, "No more losing seasons" but after that the analysis needs to be a little deeper.   

3) Leave my office for days or weeks at a time.  Spend time at all areas under my watch that are having problems (FOOTBALL) and with all people in the program.  Watch practices, not tapes.  The coaching staff should watch tapes.   Don't comment or expect any sucking up.  Don't criticize or micromanage.  Observe what is happening and be receptive to anything anyone says.  Get to know people and let them get to know me.  Buy pizzas for everyone now and again.  Not Domino's. 

4) If I don't sense that my people would burn their fingers to keep me warm, invest in whatever course or coaching is needed to improve my connections with people and make them want to excel.  Pay close attention to individual stories everywhere.  Don't ever, ever throw anyone under the bus, for any reason. 

5) Read or reread Bo's Lasting Lessons.  One of the best tutorials you could ever find on how to treat people and coach excellence.  Not saying this is about football the game in 2013 as opposed to 1969.  It's about how to gain credibilty with people.  Bo had this.

6) I'm not a fan of "Action Plans" but I would want to have some structure in mind for how to help my people become better coaches.  After it has become clear that whatever I did before wasn't working, well, that tells me it's time to step out of the box and do something differerent.  Always keep the definition of insanity in mind. 

 

Notice now, I left out all specific aspects of coaching or recruiting, etc. that I wouldn't know how to add.  No point in my doing that.  And I love reading the analyses and dissections from those that do know.   Happy 2014 everyone! 

greenphoenix

December 31st, 2013 at 9:48 AM ^

Kelly chose the Eagles b/c of the organization, not the roster.

1) Kelly has stated repeatedly that he adjusts his offenses to match his players.

2) Additionally, a lot of the Eagles players had to make serious changes to weight point and conditioning to fit into the system.

3) Foles is a pocket passer first and foremost, and was chosen over the more mobile Vick.

None of these data points suggest that the Eagles were a "spread-ready" team. Kelly is a good coach.

SalvatoreQuattro

December 31st, 2013 at 10:33 AM ^

Whether you want to believe it or not, but Celek, Jackson, Cooper, and LcCoy are perfect for the spread. Foles is as well due to his accuracy. The offense Reid ran emphasized speed and skill, the same attributes Kelly wants.

Kelly wisely picked an organization that knows how to draft and sign players. He knew that when he signed on. He deserves all the credit in the world and so do the Eagles for taking a risk on a college coach who runs an unconventional offense( for the NFL).

michiganfanforlife

December 31st, 2013 at 4:02 PM ^

I really thought Brady would do great things at Michigan. He still might, but to me it was obvious which staff knew how to coach college football Saturday night. I think we are lucky this game was so late at night, because a primetime matchup would have generated a ton more negative vibes for our recruiting. About half way through the season I thought Borges was pretty bad, but Brady and Mattison were really good. Now I'm not sure any of them really are. I realize that our team was the youngest in the B1G, and I also know all about what happened before Hoke arrived. I just can't believe how pathetic all phases of our team looked. We are sucking a big phat donkey **** at this point, and reading about this team until next year will be a challenge. I will always support this team and their coaches, but I have no confidence in them anymore. I'm not even sure I'm looking forward to the spring game at this point, and I'm usually all about counting the days down for that.

[email protected]

January 1st, 2014 at 9:06 AM ^

"Maybe the reason I hold onto Denard so hard is because he's about 90% of the fun that Michigan football has provided since Bo died."

When I was there ('91-'96) I don't know.

 

Beating OSU was kind of fun. B1G titles were mildly entertaining. 

 

1997 was livable I suppose. It didn't suck at least. 

 

Carr beating MSU like a drum was 'do-able'. I didn't choke into my beer. 

I hate this. Hate hate hate hate hate this reasoning. Its indicative of a 'Can't be satisfied fan base' attitude that drives me crazy. 

 

I had a family member who would just rail on Carr as being 'not up to Michigan standards' and not making use of his talent. He wanted a 'modern' coach. I remember warning him that coaching changes, especially with scheme changes, are *really* hard, and that UM wasn't one game from the MNT. Ooops. 

 

Its fine to be disappointed with this team right now. Its correct to be very concerned about our future. 

But to say that the era from Bo's retirement to now wasn't 'fun' is ludicrous to me. I realize its subjective, but its like a friend of mine complaining that San Francisco was getting ruined by all the new money in the .com era. 'Yup. Those of us in Detroit feel for you. I'm sorry you aren't happy'. 

 

And why? Because we weren't running the 'right' offense? Because you didn't agree with the calls? Seriously? Really? 

Would you not be happy with a night in Vegas with a huge bankroll because you weren't in Monaco? 

 

If the standard of success here is not just winning, but competing for the MNT all the time, and doing it with the 'correct' scheme and calls, then almost no coach could win here. Ever. 

Champ Kind

January 1st, 2014 at 4:27 PM ^

You've cofused the words "died" and "retired" and gone on a long rant based on your mistake. You're arguing a point that no one made. Even the quote you included to argue against has the word "died" in it. Your desire to argue superceded your desire to stop and think what was orginially said.