OT: Goodell has discussed eliminating kickoffs in the NFL

Submitted by Erik_in_Dayton on

http://nfl.si.com/2012/12/06/roger-goodell-opens-up-on-letting-the-chiefs-play-possible-rule-changes/?sct=hp_t2_a5&eref=sihp

Roger Goodell recently discussed the possibility of eliminating kickoffs with the head of the NFL's competition committee.  Even more interestingly, they talked about Greg Schiano's suggestion that a team that scores should have, after its extra point try, essentially a 4th and 15 at their own 30 yard line, from which they can either punt or try to win another possession by getting the 15 yards. 

I like Schiano's idea because it would add to the excitement of the game by allowing for more comebacks.  I also think that organized football faces an enormous threat to its existence as we know it because of the research that is coming out about concussions, so something has to be done, and it might as well be a fun something.   What do you say? 

EDIT:  Further info:  There were 270 reported concussions in the NFL in 2010, 35 of which were on kickoffs.  There were 266 reported concussions in the NFL in 2011, 20 of which were on kickoffs.  The drop in concussions on kickoffs coincided with the move of the kickoff line from the 30 to the 35, which increased touchbacks.

http://seattlesportsagents.wordpress.com/2012/08/10/concussions-down-in-nfl-last-season-due-to-new-kickoff-rule/

go16blue

December 6th, 2012 at 4:57 PM ^

I don't really like it, but it would be nice to run a (very difficult) play for possession of the ball as opposed to the 99% chance based shit show that is the onside kick.

snarling wolverine

December 6th, 2012 at 7:23 PM ^

I disagree.  Kicking is part of the game (it is football, after all) and should not be downplayed more than it already is.   

I do think it'd be cool if there were some requirement that kickers be regular players, though, and not just pure specialists.  Like, require them to play at least five snaps in non-kicking situations before they're eligible to attempt a FG. 

turtleboy

December 6th, 2012 at 5:24 PM ^

Eliminating kickoffs would remove one of the most exciting parts of the game, and would in no way address the vast majority of where concussions occur. From 2010 to 2011 kickoff concussions did drop from roughly 13% of all concussions to around 7% of all concussions, and that's wonderful. Job well done. While they achieved a good measurable result, it'd be nice if they focused on the other 93% now, instead of drastically changing the game for an almost negligible additional result.

aratman

December 6th, 2012 at 5:29 PM ^

I just read about the study at Boston University and the possibility of long term damage, chronic traumatic encephalopathy, being caused by repeditive subconcussion.  The studies, so far, seem to show the greatest issue is with Linemen who get hit repeatedly.  This didn't cause a concussion but add up.  If the problem is many subconcussions caused on every play and many times every practice I am not sure what you can do to eliminate the issue.  Less practice and less games or contact free practice like the coach at D2 St. Johns in minnesota ran. 

jsa

December 6th, 2012 at 5:35 PM ^

Let's all just admit that the endpoint of all this is an NFL 7-on-7 league. Flag football. WHEE...

I already don't give a shit about NFL football. To me, Schiano's idea isn't that outlandish. I'd put it at the 35, and make the team move across midfield to keep possession. Or just make it 4th and 20 from the 30. Most people would punt/faircatch in that situation anyway. It basically turns it into the safety rules with an opportunity for a longshot at keeping the football. That's not all that bad in my book.

Purists gonna be pure, though...

HipsterCat

December 6th, 2012 at 5:43 PM ^

this seems like there would be a HUGE difference in field position.

from my untrained eye, I see punts as much less consistent when compared to kickoffs, they also don't travel nearly as far so this seems like there would possibly be more punt returns than there are kick returns now (since its a touchback like every time now). and these returns would be starting at the 25ish yard line since the average punter kicks like 45+ yds for an average kick i think. plus you factor in an average return of like 4-5yds and you get starting field postion of 25-30 yard line which is pretty good getting an extra 5 yds to start (not much but it matters). It also lessens the impact of those players who specialize in kick returns

LSAClassOf2000

December 6th, 2012 at 5:58 PM ^

"...a radical rule change proposed by Tampa Bay coach Greg Schiano. Instead of a kickoff, the team that scored would then take the ball on its own 30-yard line in, essentially, a 4th-and-15 situation." - from the article

Interesting. If you run 4th and 15 at your own 30 through the 4th Down Calculator, pretty  much regardless of time left or quarter or score difference, you're looking at about 19% success rate based on NFL averages (which is the rationale behind this calculator - I ran about 40 scenarios but kept 4th and 15; expected points don't vary much either). Like others, I don't really enjoy the idea of the kickoff going away, but it would be intriguing to see a team attempt a play at which it was at a distinct statistical disadvantage. 

 

aratman

December 6th, 2012 at 6:23 PM ^

The average net NFL punt this year is 41.52 yards this puts the ball on the 29.48, the average kickoff return is the 23.5 this year.  If there is a 19% chance of making 4&15 that is worse than the average of onside kicks at 26%.  I am not sure of the difference in scoring from the 30 vs the other 30 but if they don't onside now they likely wouldn't "go for it" either.  I don't believe this would lead to 100 point games.  

natesezgoblue

December 6th, 2012 at 5:51 PM ^

Here's an interesting idea, instead of kicking off. The team kicking off instead gets the ball on their own 35 and its 4th and 10. Most teams would punt. It would also eliminate a lot of the head on collisions. It would be fun to see some teams go for it.

Don

December 6th, 2012 at 6:56 PM ^

The 1957 NFL Championship between the Lions and the Browns:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jFQPJtmhEaQ

If you watch enough of this, you'll see a complete absence of guys leading with their heads. There are none of the kill shots we're accustomed to seeing many times per game, even in college. With few exceptions (such as Jim Brown) all these guys were slower, smaller, and certainly not as powerfully built as your average player is today. Coach Schiano's (our version) suggestion of a weight limit is actually a good one, if your goal is to reduce injuries.

 

funkywolve

December 6th, 2012 at 7:03 PM ^

the nfl just have players sign a waiver that they understand it's a dangerous sport with risks of serious injury and they'll hold the nfl harmless for injuries suffered during their career or injuries after their career that resulted from playing in the nfl?

Bill the Butcher

December 6th, 2012 at 7:37 PM ^

This.  I'm glad someone else has this thought to.  All that has to be done is require the players to sign a permission slip.  Many of them are well aware of the risks, they just choose to play anyway because that is the best way for them to provide for their families.  

Gitback

December 6th, 2012 at 8:00 PM ^

Every sport does. Waivers are meaningless in situations involving gross negligence or failure to release information or failure to take reasonable steps to avoid unnecessary injury. The rub is: where is the line for "negligence?" What are "reasonable and necessary" steps? It's not as simple as "have them sign a waiver." You can't waive your right to be "reasonably" protected from harm.

RowoneEndzone

December 6th, 2012 at 7:08 PM ^

It would suck to see kickoffs go away. If it happens it would be cool if they still kept them for the beginning of the game and the beginning of the second half do we don't lose it completely.

Tater

December 6th, 2012 at 7:25 PM ^

I would like to see leather helmets with no facemasks, and soft pads only.  If players can't use helmets and shoulder pads as weapons, and they can no longer circumvent nature's most effective warning, pain, there won't be nearly as many injuries, especially concussions.

Gitback

December 6th, 2012 at 7:35 PM ^

Like it or not, it will happen. If the league doesn't take proactive steps now it will be forced on them. At the current rate it is only a matter of time before a player dies on the field... Flat out, on national TV, dies. It'll be some type of Daydrion Taylor/Bob Stevenson kind of thing, only they'll both weigh 255 and run 4.5 40's and collide head to head and one of them will die after going into gruesome convulsions; while millions watch. A public debate will occur, all the mainstream news organizations will join in, congress will feel compelled to threaten involvement and the game will be forced into some major changes to survive. So, make gradual controlled modifications now or risk drastic overhauls later by an outside force after the unthinkable (inevitable?) happens.

Njia

December 6th, 2012 at 7:44 PM ^

NFL players are paid multiple millions of dollars to play a so-called gladiator sport. It's not like anyone is forcing these guys to play the game. At the salaries being paid to them from the combined treasure of fans, sponsors and media outlets, we should expect them to carry swords, clubs, axes, flails, maces and mauls onto the field like the warriors in the Colosseum.

Vasav

December 6th, 2012 at 9:53 PM ^

In 1905, Teddy Roosevelt threatened to outlaw football after 19 college players died that season. The NCAA was formed in 1906, and instituted rules changes the brought about the forward pass, 7 men on the line, limited pre-snap motion, and made a first down ten yards instead of five.

At the end of the day, while I loved playing on the kickoff team, and it is the most exciting play in the game, I wouldn't mind getting rid of it to make everyone safer and preserve the game I love.

I Bleed Maize N Blue

December 6th, 2012 at 8:17 PM ^

Allow the kickoff return team to use the forward pass.  That should stop the whole kickoff team from running full throttle downfield at the guy who catches the kick.  And the kickoff may become the most entertaining play.

Vasav

December 6th, 2012 at 9:38 PM ^

That's an awesome idea! Would they be allowed to do it from anywhere on the field, from the point of the catch, from some predetermined position (20 yd line)?

I would LOVE this. I don't think Schiano's idea is bad - he first came up with it after Eric LeGrand's injury, I believe. But yours would a) make kickoffs safer, and b) make the most exciting play in football even more exciting.

Just think - do you want a QB catching the kicks? How do you set up plays on a kickoff? What strategy does a defense use to defend this? Is it possible to set up a "kickoff screen?"

I Bleed Maize N Blue

December 6th, 2012 at 10:05 PM ^

Hmmm, probably a RB/KR to catch, toss it to the QB (not necessarily a starter, could be a running QB), and block/be an outlet.  A couple TEs or WRs around midfield on either side of the field behind some blockers.  Another receiver up the middle.  Maybe have two concentrated sets of blockers, and one receiver with one blocker.  If the one guy is Calvin Johnson, does the coverage team send an extra guy that way and be outnumbered somewhere else?

I guess the ball would be always live until down or out of bounds, unless an incomplete results in the ball being spotted at the point of the throw.  If always live, what if the kicking team gets the ball and is also allowed to pass forward?  Hilarity ensues.

Bigasshammm

December 6th, 2012 at 9:05 PM ^

So they want to eliminate 13% and 7.5% of the concussions over the last two seasons? That's basically putting a bandaid on a gaping wound. Why not actually do some research on helmet designs? If the players run around with helmets the size of bath tubs on their heads but it saves concussions that's a hell of a lot better than eliminating one specific play. What next eliminating the crossing routes or wrs?

The Barwis Effect

December 6th, 2012 at 9:15 PM ^

Go 8v8 on kick offs. Less people on the field means less opportunities for collisions. Less people also means more open space. More open space should lead to more exciting plays. Win win.

Vasav

December 6th, 2012 at 9:33 PM ^

Along with an earlier poster saying "football is turning into flag 7 on 7." Would you watch the NFL if it turned into 8 man football? Wide open, lots of eligibility, a lot more open field tackling. Still football, but a very different version than the 11 man version we've known and love. Not sure if it'd be any safer (I don't think your 8-man kickoffs would be) and I'm also not sure whether I'd like it - but I feel like a lot of casual football fans would. And the lack of down linemen and need to open field tackle could make it safer too.

Buck Killer

December 6th, 2012 at 9:23 PM ^

Most are freaking out with depression from lost pussy and money. That is why they commit suicide. Fame and money to being a has been would be tough. I feel bad that the NFL doesn't provide better off boarding.

sammylittle

December 6th, 2012 at 10:22 PM ^

Keep the rules the same, but change the conditions. If the game was to be played in say two feet of standing water, the speed of impact would be greatly dimished and so would resulting concussions!