Warde Manuel appears open to loosening rules for OSU

Submitted by crg on December 8th, 2020 at 6:04 PM

Per McMurphy: 

https://mobile.twitter.com/Brett_McMurphy/status/1336418276293943296

My Name is LEGIONS

December 8th, 2020 at 7:20 PM ^

I don't think so. The majority of fanbase are buttholes but the higher ups respect the rivalry and want us stronger than the others.  The rivalry goes to shit when one team sucks.  And soon a SEC rivlary will be the premier one unless we get back to prominence.  

brad

December 8th, 2020 at 7:27 PM ^

2016, 2004, 1973.  Those guys do not respect Michigan enough to pass up a chance to screw us.  I know this is not the point of the OP, just reminding that if Michigan is ever good again it will be in spite of Ohio State's best efforts to ruin us.

LabattsBleu

December 8th, 2020 at 7:23 PM ^

Yeah, I mean it sucks, but at the end of the day, if the roles were reversed, we'd ask for the same thing.

The B1G is a conference, and ultimately, they are looking out for what's in the best interests of the conference... While i know that's a bitter pill to swallow, as the conference hasn't exactly jumped to Michigan's defense in the past...

Fielding Fan

December 8th, 2020 at 9:52 PM ^

Indiana just shut down for COVID outbreak...so there goes the "better job overall of keeping the team healthy" idea.

Can't hate OSU anymore than I do.  But they beat Indiana head-to-head when Penix WAS playing.  we all know who the better team is.  Having someone else represent the East would make that B1G Ten Title a joke.

And I still value a B1G Ten Title.....would be nice to win one again!

Hail to the Vi…

December 8th, 2020 at 6:12 PM ^

This is a money grab for the league. Michigan, like the rest of the league, gets a small cut if a league member gets a CFP birth. That's all this is. Terrible look, given the current situation the football program is in, but I am assuming that is what this comment is related to.

ThadMattasagoblin

December 8th, 2020 at 6:17 PM ^

I don't think anyone thinks that Ohio State isn't deserving. The point is that they already made rules before the season about this topic and they wouldn't change it to get Indiana into the BTCG if the shoe was on the other foot.

Damn straight

December 8th, 2020 at 7:18 PM ^

Nobody was publicly advocating for Wisconsin because the last time they were #10 and undefeated was week two. There was no need to even contemplate the scenario and you know it. They lost their next two games and are third in their division.

Your argument is emotional, not rational.

Jon06

December 8th, 2020 at 6:57 PM ^

I think OSU isn't deserving. They could've played Illinois but chose not to. Now they are short of 6 games. The rules they agreed to say they aren't deserving. 

To me this is completely ad hoc bullshit that calls into question whether anyone involved in the B1G has any business in leadership positions. People shouldn't be affected by decisions they made months ago?? What happened to taking responsibility for your actions?

Damn straight

December 8th, 2020 at 7:25 PM ^

You can say the same thing about Michigan though.  You can argue that Michigan could play but chose not to and OSU was punished.

OSU didn't cancel Maryland either.  Same thing.

If the Big10 leaves the #4 (undefeated) team out of the Championship game, recruits for all teams will start questioning how committed the conference is and it rightfully so.  Other conferences are playing 10+ games because they started on time and built-in open weeks.

The Big10 just can't afford to look any dumber than it already does.

 

Damn straight

December 8th, 2020 at 6:19 PM ^

Even if we beat OSU, they still win the division over Indiana.  There is no logical reason to keep OSU out.  It just makes the conference look worse than it already does.

Let OSU schedule an OOC game or change the rule.  It's pointless to punish any team with arbitrary rules in a season this screwed up.  

crg

December 8th, 2020 at 7:34 PM ^

Why do you say it's an "arbitrary" rule?  Wasn't the point to ensure that the teams that made the championship game had a substantial enough body of work to justify being there?

The people that complain about *where* that line is drawn give no justification about where that line *should* have been drawn.  A six game minimum is just as reasonable as a five or seven game minimum - the point is that the line *was* drawn and was agreed by all parties at the outset.  It shouldn't be changed just because it didn't give the expected result.

1VaBlue1

December 8th, 2020 at 8:56 PM ^

"It's pointless to punish any team with arbitrary rules in a season this screwed up."

So it's pointless to punish teams when its OSU that didn't get to the finish line.  But it's okay to punish them when Indiana passed the finish line?  IU did an arguably better job in managing their season than did OSU.  OSU will beat Iowa to give them 6 wins, and the CFP will choose them over IU - even if IU wins the CG.

Everybody wins, no reason to fuck over IU for having a great season.

ColoradoBlue

December 8th, 2020 at 6:21 PM ^

Helps give credence to the fact that UM isn't pulling out of the game just to screw OSU.  OSU is going to the CFP regardless of whether or not they play in the silly B1G "championship" game, so might as well play nice and preserve the political capital.

Also provides a little bit of moral high ground to say "Fu@k you, Herbstreit!!" once again.

ehatch

December 8th, 2020 at 6:26 PM ^

Who could possibly imagine that trying to play 8 games in 8 weeks in the middle of a pandemic would possibly result in this exact scenario? Who could possibly imagine that not allowing a team to schedule an Out of Conference game if a game got cancelled would have these consequences (other than Nebraska, but they don't count). 

  

GoBlueGoWings

December 8th, 2020 at 6:26 PM ^

Rules are made to be broken/changed if it means the team that can get the B1G the most money. This is not a screw OSU reaction, this is a rules are rules. Show me in the text that this was made months ago. But if they do play in Indy, I'll shrug and move on with my life.

My dad always says," Money is the answer. What is the question."

At the end of the day for all of us

UMVAFAN

December 8th, 2020 at 6:26 PM ^

Fire Warde! It’s one thing to vote in favor of letting OSU play, which would be the reasonable thing to do, but to openly advocate for it??? MSU and OSU would kneecap Michigan if the situation was reversed. Do what is right and don’t block them, but stay quiet about it and make them squirm a bit and look like babies advocating for special treatment. No need to lobby hard if your biggest rival is bowing down.

Tesel

December 8th, 2020 at 6:27 PM ^

If I had to imagine, the original policy was designed to make sure a 4-0 team couldn't coast to the championship and avoid the toughest games on their schedule. Say Wisconsin had another COVID outbreak and missed their NW and Indiana games - this policy would make a lot of sense. It's unfortunately clear that OSU is the best and most deserving team in the East, so this is probably the right call.