Schlissel: AD without U-M ties might help us even better
Refreshing article from The Daily.
I would imagine that we’ll begin the process of organizing a search in the coming weeks,” Schlissel said. “I can tell you with certainty I haven’t talked to anybody at all — no matter what you read in the media — about whether they’re interested in a permanent position here.
Also this:
I’m always open to the idea that someone from the outside might help us be even better. I just want to get the best person.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:06 PM ^
Double OP's!!
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:06 PM ^
But what if Jeff Long, Warde Manuel, Brad Bates, or Joe Parker are the best option?
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:08 PM ^
I think his point is that he's not ruling out outsiders.
Implicitly, that means he's including insiders.
But I don't read blogs
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:13 PM ^
November 4th, 2014 at 12:02 PM ^
problem at all with an AD or a new head coach hired without M ties. Whoever it is will just have to demonstrte he (or she) understands and cares about our traditions. This doesn't necessarily mean 3 yards adn a cloud of dust. This theme goes back to RR's treatment and I understand he was not treated well. That said he didn't help himself at all. Didn't care enough about the tradtions to learn them let alone observe them. Rolled on in and changed everything besides Coach Jackson. New $1m weightroom? yep. old one sucks. Michigan Replay? Nope. that sucked. He just didn't do himself any favors. Charlie Strong sounds like an awesome guy who has thoroughly embraced Texas. I'd imagine he'd have us all wrapped around his finger within about 10 minutes. Just like Hoke did most of us.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:16 PM ^
Right! These guys have led athletic departments at major universities, and at this point that is much more relevant than 30-40 year old Michigan connections. Under no circumstances should Michigan ties be held against somebody.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:17 PM ^
of that possibility. Reading: yer friend.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:18 PM ^
Gotta read the article. The headline here is misleading.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:13 PM ^
November 4th, 2014 at 12:00 AM ^
Unless Schlissel is a bald-faced liar.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:10 PM ^
Hopefully we start right now and don't wait a few weeks.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:10 PM ^
He said the same thing almost word-for-word at the presser Friday.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:15 PM ^
gets it.
November 4th, 2014 at 1:34 AM ^
That's because he's a Michigan Man! We should only ever --
-- Whats that now?
November 4th, 2014 at 11:13 AM ^
We all love Schliss now. But wait until he tells the new AD that there is no way the University is going to pay $5 million dollars to a football coach and then another couple of million on assistants.
Brace yourself.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:18 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:24 PM ^
Why wait a few weeks or more? If this is their intent, then Sam and Ira may be on something. MIchigan has a vacant CEO of an important department (interim head is have little value since it would require considerable time to understand what is going on within the depart.) and there is no urgency to fill it?
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:36 PM ^
Plus, the man has more to worry about than just athletics.
November 3rd, 2014 at 10:04 PM ^
I thought we weren't calling it a CEO anymore, Brandon's out, he was the CEO. We want an athletic director.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:25 PM ^
I hate to say this, but, "Start the process of organizing a search in a few weeks" kind of reeks of November-December, 2007. Granted that's different as we're talking AD now and not coach, but I really hope this is just standard "not tipping my hand" speak.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:32 PM ^
I doubt that's the case. I'm sure this process has already started. Hell, the regents likely had the process started before Brandon was gone.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:14 PM ^
That's what I'm assuming and hoping, but man, I can just never be sure given the past. I realize they can't just run out and hire Awesome Guy 1A yesterday, but I figure the back channels have been open for a while now. So my hope is that particular line of the statement is just keeping it close to the vest, and I agree that the scenario you envision is likely the case.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:56 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 10:14 PM ^
I agree. First of all, the AD position search can't be screwed up or appear to be rushed.
Second, it really would be nice to have a first-rate AD who can take the department into the future in a good way.
As much as I want a great coach here, nothing works unless the athletic department is well-run.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:59 PM ^
at least you could quote him correctly.
“I would imagine that we’ll begin the process of organizing a search in the coming weeks,”
That may sound overly deliberate, but it's not necessarily the same as waiting a few weeks to get started. I agree that he's likely just going out of his way to not say much. When he says he hasn't talked to people like NW's AD, that leaves open the possibility that someone else here has contacted them.
We're not going to hear anyone from Michigan say they've contacted a candidate until he's accepted the job. Everyone always wants to leave the impression they've hired their first choice.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:26 PM ^
Yeah I've never understood why it takes so long to hire for these positions. I feel like it should take no more than a week to get a very short list of excellent candidates.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:38 PM ^
It's the "process."
In all seriousness, I suspect that they are putting together the search committee, reviewing roles and responsibilities, structuring the interviews and hiring processes, etc. They have to open a requisition for the position, etc., etc.
Having done executive searches before, it's pretty rare that any organization just picks up the phone and makes an offer, particularly for a public university. Frankly, I'm glad that there's some rigor to this.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:15 PM ^
Reviewing roles? Structuring interviews and hiring processes? What does that mean? I genuinely don't understand what takes so long.
November 3rd, 2014 at 8:15 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 9:15 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:21 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:04 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:25 PM ^
Hiring the best person possible for the position.
What was the previous criteria? I could lob alternatives, but don't want to be counterproductive.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:29 PM ^
People don't bring up guys like Bates, Manual or Long because their Michigan ties make them better ADs, just that their MIchigan ties make them more likely to leave their current job for Michigan. Let's say Michigan is looking at the ADs from Cal and UCLA. Both are very accomplished and from great schools with big athletic departments. One of them grew up on CA and has spent his entire career on the West Coast and another grew up in Royal Oak, did his undergrad at Michigan and has family who still live back in Michigan. They may be very similar candidates, but one guy would jump at the job and the other guy might not take it even if the pay was significantly higher.
This does not mean you don't go after the West Coast guy if you really like him. And Brian and other aren't profiling the guys with M ties because guys with M ties make better ADs. But all things held relatively equal, when you're asking someone to leave a job where they're currently successful and have been for number of years, the guy with the ties is far more likely to take it.
It's similar to Harbaugh. Normally, an NFL HC who is doing well wouldn't leave to come coach Michigan. So the "ties" sometimes help you grab a candidate you normally wouldn't be able to grab.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:33 PM ^
I think Brandon AND Hoke prove that Michigan ties can really mean nothing.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:35 PM ^
Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:36 PM ^
We are in an unfortunate time period with respect to a potential football HC hire. A few timing points (assuming a hoke firings):
1. There is a dead period as far as recruiting from mid-December through 1/14/15. Ideally, our new coach is in place at least a few days before then. He will have his work cut out to salvage this class. We have already seen the impact of a skipped recruiting class.
2. If we want our coach in place by 1/5 (give or take), then we need to have our AD in place at least 2 weeks before then so that he has time to get situated and do a proper coaching search. So, our new AD needs to be in place by mid-December.
I guess if we form a committee by mid-November, the whole AD process could be completed in 2-4 weeks and still work out, but can anyone here think of a reason not to start sooner rather than later?
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:47 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:53 PM ^
It would be nice for the coach to know whom he's going to be working for.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:10 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:13 PM ^
For a guy like Harbaugh? Essential.
"Hey Jim, we promise we'll hire someone you'll like"? Not sure that'll fly.
November 3rd, 2014 at 8:56 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:00 PM ^
One possible alternative storyline here is that you've now got an interim AD - with all the authority of a bona fide AD - to do that particular bit of dirty work for you and then you can bring in a new AD without all that stress which would normally come with a football HC search. I have a feeling that Hackett could very well be the one who handles this particular chore if indeed the athletic department moves in a different direction in football coaching, if you will.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:13 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:36 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:39 PM ^
than it is for a football coach. An AD should understand the culture and tradition at the University as it is far more relevant to his job than a football coach's job which is just about wins and losses. That said, I don't think it should be a prerquisite, just that I think it could boost someone's resume all things else being equal.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:51 PM ^
Yeah, if we want to bring the football gameday experience back to what it used to be, our best bet is probably to hire a Michigan guy.
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:54 PM ^
Just hire people who know what they're doing. If someone is competent, they'll learn the traditions and idiosyncracies that make a place a Place.
November 3rd, 2014 at 7:18 PM ^
November 3rd, 2014 at 6:57 PM ^
I can tell you with certainty I haven’t talked to anybody at all — no matter what you read in the media — about whether they’re interested in a permanent position here.Schlissel hasn't talked to anyone, that doesn't mean other people haven't started reaching out