OT: Matt Stafford Super Bowl Champion

Submitted by Gavia immer_MI on February 13th, 2022 at 10:08 PM

What a sentence. Good for him. 

Z1ppz

February 14th, 2022 at 12:24 AM ^

Stafford went through hell for 12 years in Detroit and never said boo. He was never going to win here ever. The organization is utter trash. He earned it by sticking it out and getting his ass beat for 12 years. I’m glad he didn’t end up like Barry and Kelvin.

bcnihao

February 14th, 2022 at 9:03 AM ^

Through the past few decades (at least), there have been exactly zero QBs in the NFL who would have won a super bowl with Detroit.  By SagNasty's "reasoning," none of the QBs on super bowl winning teams have earned it--their teams have been stacked when compared to Detroit.  (Not that QBs who've won super bowls care about what SagNasty thinks.)

DetroitBlue

February 14th, 2022 at 11:27 AM ^

Come on SN, this is ridiculous. Can you name a single QB that could’ve led the Lions to the superbowl? Tom Brady is the undisputed GOAT, and I can’t even see him getting the loins to the playoffs very often, let alone winning it all. 
 

You should really take a step back and realize how insane your expectations are and let go a bit of that Stafford hate

Stringer Bell

February 13th, 2022 at 10:13 PM ^

Happy for him, he earned it with all the shit he took for the Lions.  And the Fords deserve to have him win a Super Bowl the first year he gets away from their garbage organization.

mgoblue_in_bay

February 14th, 2022 at 12:43 AM ^

Agree - the Rams had a lot of top players at their position, but far from "stacked" and "a lot" here means like, 3?  out of ~20 positions (and 50+ people on the roster).

My favorite point of comparison for stacked is the 2001-2002 Detroit Red Wings - 10 future Hall of Famers, out of ~19 players on the gameday roster.  Yes, most were either past their prime, or well before their prime, but I'd be really interested in seeing other HoF ratios on stacked teams.

MgofanNC

February 14th, 2022 at 7:27 AM ^

Went through AZ, TB (on the road), and SF before beating the Bengals. Good team, stacked team, whatever you want to call it, he played damn well in all those games. He won the super bowl. If you are bitter about that for some stupid reason like "he also had good teammates" (which is a hallmark of all championship teams) why are you in this thread?

lhglrkwg

February 14th, 2022 at 12:36 PM ^

I really don't understand how people can look at Matt Stafford winning a Super Bowl in his first year away from the Lions and conclude Wow why didn't Matt do more here? What a bum. You should be concluding Wow. The Lions organization is awful. They had a Super Bowl caliber QB for 12 years and did next to nothing with him.

Don

February 14th, 2022 at 3:18 PM ^

Sam is well aware of how shitty the Ford ownership has been, so why has he been so obsessed with the question of how good Stafford was in Detroit? He's gone, so what difference does it make now? What's the harm in admitting Stafford is a bit better than he thought he was? I don't get it.

Eng1980

February 14th, 2022 at 9:25 AM ^

Of course, the refs picking up the flag in Dallas is insignificant, and the tuck rule never helped anyone, and every win is a clean win without controversy.    Terry Bradshaw and Troy Aikman single handedly carried their teams to multiple SB victories.

I shouldn't need this but . . .    /s

BeatIt

February 14th, 2022 at 5:08 PM ^

Bradshaw and Aikman both played on 2 of the best teams in the NFL during their careers. It’s absolutely laughable that you think either of them won those SB’s because of the QB’s. That Steelers team Bradshaw put on his back and carried probably had 11 HOF’s  of their 22 starters. Worst “hot take” ever.