OT: Lions/Skins Game Blacked Out

Submitted by MGoBlue22 on
The Lions/Redskins game on Sunday will be blacked out on local television due to the fact that about 10,000 tickets remain unsold. Finally, a "winnable" game for the Lions and we won't be able to watch it on tv. The NFL should modify the blackout rule in this tough economy, don't you think?

CheckOutMyRod

September 25th, 2009 at 9:42 AM ^

I'm driving up from ohio to go to that game. As a die hard Redskins fans please dont say that the lions can win this game. I have been to 3 skins games and they hae lost all 3! I will admit that the lions can very easily win this game if they can score over 17 points,although I dont see that happening against the skins defense.

Hannibal.

September 25th, 2009 at 9:52 AM ^

The NFL should have gotten rid of the blackout rule decades ago. It's a retarded rule that accomplishes nothing besides making sure that lots and lots of fans can't see their hometown team on TV. Millions of people never got to see some of Barry Sanders's greatest home games (like his 230+ yard game against Tampa Bay) because of the dumbass rule. I don't know anyone who has ever said "Uh oh, the game's not on TV. Guess I better go buy a ticket!" Also, for some dubass reason, Toledo has always been included in the blackout area for the Lions. This was true even when the Lions were playing in the Silverdome despite Toledo being 80+ miles away. Growing up as a Lions fan closer to Ohio than Pontiac, that sucked big time.

Brhino

September 25th, 2009 at 9:48 AM ^

The blackout rule is completely idiotic and unjustifiable in ANY situation, including this one. Heck, I was going to tune in to a PRESEASON game just to see how they're looking this year and they blacked that out. Nobody says "oh, gee, I can't watch the game on TV, I guess I'll go buy a ticket". You're either interested enough to pay money for a ticket, or not.

Block M

September 25th, 2009 at 9:57 AM ^

Living in Chicago I don't get most of the Lions games anyway, so I result to going to the bar or this year NFL TV has a channel called RedZone (I think its free for Comcast people). Basically it shows you live action from around the league whenever someone is about to score, so its constantly showing different games (and yes, on occasion you can watch the Lions score). So I catch part of the games that way, but RedZone is perfect for Fantasy Football...

Njia

September 25th, 2009 at 10:11 AM ^

I was listening to a sports talk radio program in Ohio a few years ago, and the discussion was about the Bengals. The host mentioned that the ownership finally started doing something about the putrid team and its front office when the fans finally quit going to games. Ownership didn't really know when fans weren't watching from their living rooms. But when the game wasn't on, fans found something else to do on Sundays. That led to less interest in the team in general, which led, in turn, to less attendance at the games. Ultimately, season ticket sales declined. Ford Field was limited in size because of the fear that the Silverdome had so many seats, blackouts were inevitable. Now, the Lions can't even fill Ford Field. The economy is being blamed, but I wonder.

Hannibal.

September 25th, 2009 at 10:18 AM ^

With Michigan's economy in a continuous state of decline, I don't see how the city can support four professional sports teams indefinitely. Something's gotta give. The Lions might be the first to go.

Brodie

September 25th, 2009 at 10:55 AM ^

That's really just idiotic. Detroit supports it's teams to same degree other cities do... put the Lions in New York City and see how many people you can rope into coming to play. The economy plays a role, yes. People aren't going to waste thousands of dollars to go see the Red Wings and Pistons play first round playoff games when they haven't missed the playoffs in forever. But by and large the support is still there.

VAWolverine

September 25th, 2009 at 10:20 AM ^

if the Lions beat the Skins this weekend then Jim Zorn is gone. The Skins are the most painfully boring team to watch in memory. I would not want Zorn's job. Snyder is a free spending, meddling owner who's record for developing a winning team has yet to be recorded. Zorn also takes crap from Redskin's color commentator, former QB God Sonny Jurgensen. An interview between Sonny and Zorn this week had Sonny saying if Zorn had sent in a halfback pass play in the red zone as he did last week, Sonny would have called an audible or a time out to raise hell with the coach. Zorn's response to Sonny? "I would have taken you out of the game then Sonny." Geez...that's tough.

VAWolverine

September 25th, 2009 at 10:29 AM ^

and it would not surprise me if we see Todd Collins if the Skins start to lose more. Their schedule is very favorable the next 4 games though. I think Campbell has some talent but there is not enough speed and talent around him for his skill set to excel. I think Portis and Moss are overrated and over-the-hill.

Topher

September 25th, 2009 at 1:55 PM ^

Northern Shanny valley? I have a friend who's an asst DA in Front Royal and a coworker who grew up in Winchester. Other than that I've never been there yet :-\ Thanks, we will have fun - I have a FB game to coach so I'll only make the first half. We take over Bailey's at Ballston, but they aren't known for their service. Last year for The Game they let Buckeyes squat our section and I left a Reggie Germany tip*. *Reggie Germany was the Ohio State wide receiver kicked off the team with a 0.00 grade point average.

Don

September 25th, 2009 at 10:47 AM ^

If Lions fans are too stupid (itself a redundancy) to keep from watching them on TV on their own, then the NFL is performing a valuable public service in mandating blackouts. Anybody who spends even five minutes watching that pathetic product should regret wasting time they'll never get back. The only reason the Fords have been able to maintain ownership over their incompetent reign is that each year since 1965 there have been several tens of thousands of people who are so brainlessly gullible that they'll willingly take the hard-earned money out of their own wallet and put it into William Clay Ford's pink, manicured palm.

Blue Bennie

September 25th, 2009 at 11:01 AM ^

I'm a Lions fan, and I don't think that I'm too stupid. I know that they are bad. I know that they haven't won anything for 50 years. However, I like watching football on Sunday's, the Lions have been my favorite team since I was a kid, and I'm going to keep watching them. It is what it is, and it is entertaining to watch them lose in new and creative ways. They win: great! They lose: no skin off my back. No waste of time, as I enjoy watching football, good or bad. That said, I moved to Indianapolis ten years ago. I could have easily became a Colts fan. Most of my friends are. I could care less about the Colts, though. So am I stupid for maintaining loyalty to the team that I have rooted for my entire life, or should I have simply have become another douche bag Colts fan?

Don

September 25th, 2009 at 11:47 AM ^

Do you enjoy watching bad live music? Do you enjoy watching bad TV shows or movies? Do you enjoy a crappy book? If your answer is no in each case, that doesn't mean you don't like good music or good TV/movies or good reading material, it simply means you don't like crap. Why is watching incompetent football (or any other incompetently played sport) different? I don't understand why growing up in a particular geographical area means a fan automatically abandons qualitative performance criteria when it comes to the team nominally representing that area, especially when it comes to buying tickets. It's not like the Lions have occasional lapses into mediocrity followed by stretches of real competitiveness. If that were the case, then sure, support them in the thin years as well as the flush years. That ain't the Lions. Continuing to support them is like the battered wife who continually runs back to and defends her abusive husband. "I just ran into a door and fell down the stairs, honest. He would never do anything to hurt me, officer."

Blue Bennie

September 25th, 2009 at 1:50 PM ^

One man's crap is another man's German porn. I know that they are crappy. Hope that they get better. In the mean time, I enjoy watching Calvin Johnson. I enjoy watching their folly. For me, it's entertainment, and you said that I was stupid for watching it. I'd rather watch the team that I have been loyal to my whole life, and have fun doing it, than switch teams every year. Not that I'd pass judgement on one who would want to switch teams, though.

Smitty D

September 25th, 2009 at 10:53 AM ^

game is going to be blackedout, except for the thanksgiving game so lets not act surprised this is what happens when, idiots run your team for fifty years so until they sell the team nothing will change see tight end first round typical lions move, don't freaking draft defense ever god i hate them, just wanna punch them in the face

Brodie

September 25th, 2009 at 10:59 AM ^

The blackout rule is idiotic for a league like the NFL. It's not a rule any other major league has. All it does is deprive the league and it's sponsors of a few million eyes. The Lions need to consider going the Jacksonville route. The Jags haven't sold out a game in like 12 years, but they tarp off parts of the stadium so all available seating is sold.

DY

September 27th, 2009 at 1:31 PM ^

The blackout isn't going anywhere. Bob Costas interviewed Roger Goodell a couples weeks ago on Sunday Night Football. Here's what he said: Costas: Last thing here briefly, you avoided any blackouts this week, but there’s a very distinct possibility of a larger number of blackouts than we’ve seen in recent years. Given the economic circumstances. The Jaguars for example are saying maybe all of their home games would not be seen on local TV. Given the present economic circumstances in our country, would it make sense to suspend the blackout rule for a year and then figure out what to do after that? Goodell: We don’t believe it does, Bob, we recognize that it’s publicly a very attractive proposal, but this has been a policy that has been in place for several decades we had blackouts lifted that were well below the numbers that we’re talking about now we’re looking at no more than 20 percent of our games blacked out and we’re working hard. We had games that we thought we’d have blacked out that weren’t this weekend, so fans are responding, we want them in the crowd at full stadiums. http://digitalsportsdaily.com/costasroger-goodell-interview/ It's a retarded policy. I don't understand how they think preventing people from watching games encourages attendance. Winning encourages attendance plain and simple. Put a good product on the field and people will go.

befuggled

September 27th, 2009 at 2:45 PM ^

Campbell just threw two passes in a row that should have been intercepted, the last one for a pick 6. While they have shown some signs of improvement, I think I'm going to stop watching now while they're ahead. EDIT: Up 13-0 at the half, the Lions are actually looking halfway decent in comparison to Washington. Stafford has been decent, which I find encouraging. The Washington offense has been terrible (0 rushing yard, 94 yards total offense) and the Detroit offense has made several long drives (116 yards rushing, 275 yard total offense). On the other hand, they haven't taken full advantage of their opportunities and have settled for two field goals. With 20 seconds left in the half, the ball in the red zone and no timeouts, Stafford threw a little dunk pass to Northcutt in the middle of the field instead of throwing it in the end zone. As you'd expect, Northcutt can't get out of bounds, and the Lions have to spike the ball and kick the field goal. And of course these are the Lions. I look forward to the creative measures they will undoubtedly take to lose the game.