OT: The latest response from Tucker's legal representation

Submitted by Amazinblu on September 26th, 2023 at 2:44 PM

It appears that Mel Tucker will "not go gentle into that good night."   An article on ESPN highlights the response from his attorneys to MSU's Intent to Terminate.   It's quite clear that Mel's legal team intends to challenge the "for cause" aspect of his coaching contract and the $79M remaining on the deal.   

The link to the article (not paywalled) is: https://www.espn.com/college-football/story/_/id/38491036/mel-tucker-responds-formally-msu-attempt-fire-cause

On an aside - the Spartans record in the first two games of this season, with Mel coaching the team was 2-0.   The Spartans, with Dantonio back on the sidelines, are 0-2.  

S.G. Rice

September 26th, 2023 at 2:48 PM ^

Thankfully we are almost past the stage in the proceedings where the parties communicate by trading press releases.

The next stage should be conducted mostly by communications between the lawyers.

At some point Tuck will get paid something and he can go on with his life, and Sparty can get on with the business of hiring the next John L. Smith.

MgoBlueprint

September 26th, 2023 at 3:05 PM ^

Thankfully we are almost past the stage in the proceedings where the parties communicate by trading press releases.

The next stage should be conducted mostly by communications between the lawyers.

While it's a novel concept, I just don't see it happening. Both sides have made this a fight for public image and perception. Both of their livelihoods hinge on this to a certain degree. I think this holds true for Brenda Tracey moreso  than Mel Tucker because we've seen how this plays out with Hugh Freeze, Rick Patino, and Bobby Petrino. Mel doesn't have their track record of success though. 

Brenda on the other hand, if it comes out that she was less than truthful, disingenuous, or leveraging this situation for gain than she's done. No team will want to work with her and the societal implications would be huge. 

Either way, owning and controlling the narrative publicly will be a part of their PR strategy in addition to their legal strategy. Legally, both Tracey and Tucker will get paid.

bluebyyou

September 26th, 2023 at 4:02 PM ^

MSU does NOT want this case to get to the discovery phase where many party's emails, texts, etc. can be retrieved to say nothing about depositions. I have zero love for Tucker but from a legal perspective, it would seem to me that the way MSU has handled this issue puts them in the cross hairs for a very large settlement.

mackbru

September 26th, 2023 at 10:54 PM ^

This assumes Sparty did something illegal. It also assumes that discovery will find something damning about Sparty and not about Mel. Something tells me Mel Tugger is the last person who would want to hand over all his communications in discovery. God only knows what other shit he had going on.

Girlbleedsblue

September 27th, 2023 at 10:16 AM ^

Do you know how we can apply for the MSU HC job? I feel that I am qualified. I can pretend to be a Spartan for as long as it takes for them to fire me for losing to Michigan. I don't think they'll notice the other games or the fact that I'm not a coach. 

I'd do this for free, but I may be able to get $100 million out of it if someone shows me how to use the transfer portal. 

PopeLando

September 26th, 2023 at 2:52 PM ^

There's no way that MSU want to let this go to Discovery. We're probably getting close to a quiet settlement where Tucker signs an NDA in exchange for $X million, where X < $79M but greater than $10M.

AWAS

September 26th, 2023 at 2:55 PM ^

Now that both sides have disclosed their initial positions, and with the clock ticking toward a Title IX hearing, I assume settlement talks are in full motion.  Any thoughts on where the line should be set for over/under on the settlement amount?  

Denard In Space

September 26th, 2023 at 2:57 PM ^

"In fact, as discussed below, under Michigan law, assault and battery does not even constitute 'moral turpitude,' and the flimsy foundation of the university's finding -- a private relationship involving mutual flirting and one instance of consensual phone sex -- falls far short of the mark."

Evergreen meme

SalvatoreQuattro

September 26th, 2023 at 5:04 PM ^

As an UM employee I can confidently state that if caught looking at porn or jerking off at work I would be terminated. As an union member it would take a period of months, but the result would be termination.

I did have a co-worker who got his job back after sending dick pics but that was due to the victim leaving the state and not coming back for the hearing. Another was suspended with pay for an alleged sexual assault, but was eventually allowed back to work because she dropped the case.

Wendyk5

September 26th, 2023 at 8:25 PM ^

I worked in an office where a guy was coming in on the weekends and masturbating while standing in the window (floor-to-ceiling windows). The dumbest part was that the building was right across from a hotel and a guest figured out which floor and which window, and thus which office the guy was in. He did it from his own office. Buh-bye, flasher masturbator.