MSU is still blocking details of Mel Tucker’s $95 million guaranteed contract

Submitted by chuck bass on October 2nd, 2022 at 7:37 PM

Isn’t this odd? The next court date in this FOIA battle with Detroit Free Press is in a few weeks. What could MSU be hiding? My hunch, the two billionaire boosters aren’t paying much of the $95M, let alone “all” of it as many Sparties continue to claim? In other words, it looks like more reckless spending at taxpayer expense by a university with financial challenges?

Axios-Detroit: Lawsuit involving Mel Tucker's contract heats up

The closely guarded funding sources of Michigan State football coach Mel Tucker's $95 million contract will be discussed in court Oct. 25 as part of a public records lawsuit.

https://www.axios.com/local/detroit/2022/09/30/foia-friday-lawsuit-mel-tucker-contract

rice4114

October 3rd, 2022 at 4:32 AM ^

What is crazy is how specifically karma came at the MSU fans.

”Harbaughs a bum. He has a bloated contract, loses a couple times a season in big ten, finishes 3rd in the east, and gets blown out by OSU.”

The best part is Harbaughs median season that they were laughing at may be Tucks ceiling. 

Leaders And Best

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:08 PM ^

As it says in the article, it may be more to hide any promises made to the donors in order to get the money. Maybe MSU promised to send business to them, etc?

I am not sure how MSU expects to keep this contract private. Even if the money came from private funds, Tucker is still a public employee.

NittanyFan

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:09 PM ^

Maybe (probably?) MSU is hiding something, but I feel most Universities fight FOIA requests on general principle.  They don’t really like the idea of transparency and oversight.

With my own school - it’s eye-rolling: when ANY of Pitt, Temple or PSU (the 3 foremost state related schools in PA) are asked for something, they ALL generally come to the defense of each other (and will support each other’s lawsuits).

clarkiefromcanada

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:05 PM ^

With you own school it has, indeed, been eye rolling and I fully agree with the criticism of no FOIA in Pennsylvania.

It seems like you're a pretty decent guy based on your posts. However, please never again equate my alma mater with your "school" and it sycophant administration in their actions though.

"We aren't"

 

NittanyFan

October 3rd, 2022 at 4:30 PM ^

Fair enough - I'm not arguing with you for singing that song.  Carry on.

I'm not familiar with the Temple campus, so I can't answer your question. 

I will share this metric, for what it's worth:  The number of "statues of one-time PSU football statues standing on PSU campus grounds" is lower today than it was 11 October Thirds ago (2011).

MGlobules

October 2nd, 2022 at 8:24 PM ^

ANY controversy around this is bad bad news for MSU. Whatever the details, the fact that he's getting 95 million to suck is going to be repeated a million times. Love it. 

cbutter

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:30 PM ^

The amount of times I had to see or listen to, Harbaugh makes X and can’t even finish better than 3rd in the east is suddenly going to be so rich it’s hilarious. 

Even when MSU lost to Michigan they’d still say that. Well here we are, sparty fans, hope you like that narrative. 

JonathanE

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:30 PM ^

I'm convinced that LSO offered Tucker a 10-year, $95 million deal, [it's no coincidence that Brian Kelly got the same 10 year, $95 million deal.] and that Tucker gave MSU the option to match or he would walk on over to LSU.

At the time, Tucker had beaten Michigan for the second straight year and had not played Ohio State. MSU saw how much trouble they had to go through just to get Tucker to leave Colorado after everyone else had given MSU a pass. So, gun to their head, they bought into the hype and matched what LSU was offering fearing what letting Tucker leave would do to the program. 

 

MadGatter

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:40 PM ^

There's no way LSU was serious about Tucker. They wanted a big name splash hire with proven long term success. Mel's name was just thrown around by his agent to leverage Sparty for money. Happens all the time in the sport and it's almost always just media hype. Sparty was desperate enough to fall for it and then Mel Tucker was sleezy enough to push for it 

bronxblue

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:10 PM ^

I've heard that there was some level of interest in Tucker - LSU struck out on a lot of guys so if you're down to trying to steal Brian Kelly from Notre Dame you're probably in the Tucker-tier in terms of flawed candidates (Brian Kelly's being he's Brian Kelly, the most New England coach this side of Don Brown but who can coach teams, while Tucker it's limited coaching success but a decent recruiter) - but it definitely wasn't worth $95M to MSU to find out.

bronxblue

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:07 PM ^

Yeah, the fact MSU "didn't take no for an answer" when Tucker turned them down initially is starting to look like a missed escape since they've basically locked themselves into a less successful version of Brady Hoke (at least Hoke had won elsewhere before he wound up at UM) who they can't fire cheaply AND who doesn't seem to have any great affinity for MSU.  At least with Hoke you had a guy who loved the school and wanted to be there.  Tucker feels like a guy a house flipper who's going to keep trying to get out from the deal if a better opportunity shows up.

chuck bass

October 2nd, 2022 at 9:55 PM ^

I am pretty sure the alleged $95 million contract was offered and signed right after Ohio State had just embarrassed them 49-0 after two quarters. My hunch is the LSU “rumors” were fabricated by Tucker’s team and/or MSU to confer status to the coach and rationalize their irresponsible “historic” and “record breaking” contract offer while the university was strapped for cash.

RobM_24

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:08 PM ^

I hope MSU has no way out of this contract and Tuck coaches every day that he signed up to coach. Michigan State bought themselves something for $95MM, but it's somehow a gift to Michigan. 

AZBlue

October 2nd, 2022 at 10:10 PM ^

I remember seeing some speculation the first time this came up that this could be title IX related.

I believe it was something about gifts or outside funds tied to specific sports - having to be balanced under (at least) some interpretations of the rule. 

It was also speculated that M gets around this somewhat by endowing portions of it's larger coaching contracts.  ---- I would guess you would need a HUGE endowment to cover $9.5mm yearly for Tucker - (and I believe the new contract also included big increases in the assistant pool ..)

This could very well have been BS - otherwise couldn't coaching buyouts fall under the same restrictions?

I'mTheStig

October 2nd, 2022 at 11:33 PM ^

My hunch, the two billionaire boosters aren’t paying much of the $95M, let alone “all” of it as many Sparties continue to claim? In other words, it looks like more reckless spending at taxpayer expense by a university with financial challenges?

But why are you worried about this?

It's not like Staee petitioned the state legislature for Mel's contract.  It comes out of their budget.

Moo U gets n millions allocated from the state.  If they chose to give Mel n+x and short other departments that's their prerogative.

As a taxpayer, I don't feel like Mel is ripping me off.  I'm just LOLing at Sparty that they have this huge albatross of their own creation.

Blinkin

October 3rd, 2022 at 8:03 AM ^

As much as I like them sucking at sports, it's valuable to the state of Michigan that MSU not be a total dumpster fire as an academic enterprise.  If their idiot AD is somehow robbing the academic departments (even indirectly), that's harming our state's future workforce. 

So yes, we should care.  I want MSU to be a dumpster fire on the field, but I also want them to be a solid academic institution.  Those goals are not incompatible. 

harmon40

October 3rd, 2022 at 12:43 AM ^

I was texting my younger brother, a spartan grad, yesterday. He said that from a certain perspective, you could argue that Kenneth Walker’s brilliance ended up killing their program, because he is the only reason Tucker got that big contract