Dave Brandon Story/Interview at Crain's Detroit Business

Submitted by MGoShoe on

Dave Brandon talks about his vision for Michigan Athletics with Crain's Detroit Business in an interesting article and accompanying set of video clips. Some things that seem new from the article:

  • The Athletic Department will soon have a Chief Marketing Officer 

The athletic department is conducting a national search for its first chief marketing officer, and Brandon is looking at where money should be spent on promotion.

"The first thing you need to do is resource properly against the areas that are very important. This is a department that's been under-resourced in terms of marketing muscle and expertise," he said, noting that just three people worked on marketing for UM athletics. The new CMO will add more staff.  "(We will) craft the message a little better in the media in terms of who we are, what's going on here and why it ought to be attractive to people," he said.

  • The Athlectic Department is developing its first business plan since 2003

"One of the things we need to do is have a business plan," he said. "When I got here, it had been since 2003 that we really did any planning." Brandon continues to put together his leadership team and plans to conduct a retreat at which the strategic goals will be discussed.  Whatever the goals, money will make them happen.

"We're going to need to grow our revenues, we're going to need to continue to find out ways to stimulate growth in our external revenue streams and maybe create some new revenue streams that afford us the ability to grow," he said. Plans on just how to do that are still being formulated.

  • New sports, new facilities projects?

He has no plans to add sports or new facilities -- already under way is a $20 million renovation of Crisler Arena, home court for the Wolverines' basketball teams, and a $226 million renovation of Michigan Stadium was completed this year -- but instead will look at things such as value-added ticketing and improved concessions.

While club seating is likely, there are no plans to add suites or ice-making equipment at Crisler, and the department will renovate Yost Ice Arena by replacing the bleachers, improving food service and adding a new scoreboard and audio system, he said.

The lights scheduled to be installed at Michigan Stadium after the season likely will mean more night football games, which are lucrative to schools because the networks feast on the high ratings.

"We create all of our revenues that we use to support ourselves, we fund all of our capital projects, we cover our own costs," he said. "Our job is to bring in more revenue than we have costs, and then take what's left over and reinvest it in facilities and equipment and things we need to be successful."

  • What schools does Brandon measure Michigan against?

UM zealots may consider it heresy, but Brandon pays especially close attention to how archrival Ohio State University operates its $120 million athletics program, with its NCAA-leading 36 teams.  "I have great admiration for what they've achieved in their athletics program," he said. "The fact that Ohio State is very good at what it does affords me the ability to look down the road here at a very comparable institution we want to match up against, and we want to win. I have a whole bunch of ways to measure our performance against Ohio State and do that on almost a daily basis."

Brandon also benchmarks Michigan against two other successful large programs, the University of Florida and the University of Texas, looking at revenue, ticket prices, condition and competitiveness of facilities and coaches' records.

In the accompanying video piece, Brandon discusses:

  • His view on the firing of coaches. Talks about how Bo never won a national championship, at one point was 1-6 [sic] in bowl games and had no prior connection to Michigan and wonders if it would have made sense to fire him then. Makes it clear he does not have a quick trigger on the firing switch. The unstated comparison of RichRod to Bo is powerful.
  • His perspective of the football program's violations of NCAA rules. Explains they made errors and need to be better, but bemoans the fact that there are only two categories of violations (major and secondary) and that Michigan's violations are lumped in with things like gambling, pay-to-play, et al.
  • The media's superficial take on the program. Talks about how his perspective inside the program is much broader than that held by bloggers, talk radio types and the rest of the media.

In a related topic (but not covered in this article/interview), in Saturday's pre-game chat with Bruce Madej at MGoBlue.com, I asked a question about former associate athletic director for compliance Judy Van Horn's departure and Bruce replied privately.  According to him, her departure was not expected and not engineered by anyone at Michigan. She took the South Carolina job on her own and there's currently a candidate search underway. This makes sense since there was no announcement about a successor in Brandon's abbreviated comment about her move. Pimp hand notwithstading.

[Edit: Video embedding doesn't seem to be working. If you're interested in viewing it, click on the link at the top of the OP and view it at the source.]

kind of a big deal

November 14th, 2010 at 11:31 PM ^

Hopefully a coaching search isn't required in the near future, just saying I feel much more secure with DB at the helm of of the athletic dept than Bill Martin.

Martin may have been the architect of the Big House renovations, but his coaching search after Lloyd Carr retired was a complete cluster f*&K.  

Don

November 15th, 2010 at 7:39 AM ^

Martin had made his intentions to stay for only a limited number of years very well known, so his exit was not forced or accelerated. What he did was no worse than Bo physically shoving the Michigan Daily reporter in 1979.

It still was inexcusable, though, and out of character for a guy who otherwise always seemed pretty self-effacing.

Abe Froman

November 15th, 2010 at 10:17 AM ^

happy to unite with the wolverine nation, but "bill martin was awesome" is not my rallying cry.

i know a few athletes that have had some very critical things to say about bill, and frankly had he held himself to the same stadard he holds michigan student-athletes, he would have resigned immediately.

again, we don't know the details of what happened precisely because this was swept under the rug.  that doesnt make it better, but rather worse.  

and many apologies sir, but i cannot disagree with you more in ever characterizing any university administrator using physical force against a student as a "minor incident."  that should be an instant dismissal, end of story.

Abe Froman

November 15th, 2010 at 10:18 AM ^

my understanding was that he originally announced his departure date for september 2010, then left many months earlier.  am i missing something?  was it simply the announcement of a capabale replacement that obviated his need for staying longer?

 

i wasnt aware of bo shoving a kid in '79.  that's equally reprehensible in my book, but i cant speak too much for society and cultural norms back then as i didnt really experince much of the 70s.  i can say that reflecting back on how and why moeller left the program, i would have thought these circumstances would've qualified as cause for termination.

Mr.Jello

November 14th, 2010 at 11:35 PM ^

Nicely formatted post, even with the video issues. I love Brandon as our AD and think he is the right guy for the job. The future is bright, and that is a future with Rich Rod at the helm.

yossarians tree

November 14th, 2010 at 11:36 PM ^

The tone this guy is setting will impact the football program immensely. He is not only smart, he is wise. If he makes a coaching change, it will be the exact right thing to do. If not, same.

Bluestreak

November 14th, 2010 at 11:43 PM ^

I love how he remembers his days with Bo and respects him.

Michigan man through and through

" I tell people I graduated from the Bo Schembechler school of leadership"

MGolem

November 14th, 2010 at 11:44 PM ^

so classy and intelligent about Brandon. Media people are so fucking stupid when it comes to sensationalizing every little thing and it is great to see him put them in their place even if they don't realize they are being owned. Do any media outlets do any research or know any facts before they run with stories about M athletics of any kind? I know this is venting and not exactly relevant to Crain's but ESPN and the like have gotten way out of control. Who gives a shit what Brett Favre had for breakfast or which of his teammates came to give him a tug, report some real, credible, original sports news for god's sake.

MGoShtoink

November 15th, 2010 at 12:24 AM ^

he was CEO of Dominos and engineered/orchestrated a complete turn-around of that company and its product?

I like where he's looking to head and I am thrilled for the future of our athletic department with him at the helm.

 

 

Also... this is Diary worthy... Mods... what say yee?

jmblue

November 14th, 2010 at 11:54 PM ^

Talks about how Bo never won a national championship, at one point was 1-6 in bowl games

Actually, Bo was once 0-7 in bowls.  He never won one in the 1970s. 

Abe Froman

November 15th, 2010 at 12:12 AM ^

i truly wonder sometimes if we do not have the best AD in the country.  old-school Bo lineage, fortune 500 experience, and maybe best of all -- a former regent... we are really fortunate to have this guy, and perhaps moreso when you consider what he walked away from to take the job.

 

no matter how conflicted i ever feel about whether to fire or keep RR (and ill admit ive regularly considered both options), i feel like brandon is the perfect guy to make the decision, and im confident he'll make the right choice regardless of what it may be.  we've got the right guy with the right experience there to make the call.  and frankly as optimistic as i get at times -- with denards success, a few big commitments, and the occasional victory -- it's cause of DB that i honestly beieve one way or another we will climb back to dominance.

 

Don

November 15th, 2010 at 7:31 AM ^

of both an Oscar and a Heisman, his comments make it abundantly clear that he is not going to fire RR, regardless of what happens against Wisky and OSU. The only scenario that could lead to letting RR go after this season would be if he pulls a Woody Hayes and punches an opposing player or some serious NCAA-level scandal erupts.

Thanks for the link, Shoe.

Don

November 15th, 2010 at 9:10 AM ^

I would bet that if you scratched below the surface of those vociferously complaining about our victories against Illinois and Purdue, you're likely to find a Jim Harbaugh fan privately disappointed that we won those games.

inshallah

November 15th, 2010 at 8:49 AM ^

It's quite shocking that the AD did not have any priority in marketing itself and did not even have a business plan. Isn't that Business 101? Anyway I'm glad we have Brandon, especially with the current issues facing the football program

WolverBean

November 15th, 2010 at 1:18 PM ^

The idea of having business people rather than sports people run the athletic department is still a relatively new idea, historically speaking.  It's only in the last 10, maybe 15 years that many schools have started going this route, and a lot of schools still haven't: former football coach Barry Alvarez is still AD at Wisconsin, for example, and former hockey coach Ron Mason was AD at MSU until 2008.  Remember too that the athletic department is just one part of the University as a whole, and public universities aren't exactly run the way Fortune 500 companies are.  Mary Sue Coleman is a professor by trade, not a CEO.  So yes, it may be "Business 101," but the emphasis here isn't on the "101" part (i.e. this is so basic, how could they miss it) but the "Business" part (i.e. are they actually running the show the way a business is run).

The idea that we haven't focused on marking is also not that shocking.  How many Michigan fans do you know who feel that "It's Michigan; it markets itself!"  But I agree with you -- I'm glad they're starting to focus on this now, and it does seem that Dave Brandon is exactly what the doctor ordered.

Hardware Sushi

November 15th, 2010 at 4:09 PM ^

 

While B. Martin did many good things for the Michigan athletic department - getting it in the black from a roughly $5 mil deficit, provided the ability to finance major facilities renovations that not only got us up the the norm but helped raise the bar in college athletics, and distancing the athletic department from the scandal that tarnished the overall department rep in the late 90s - he was not the best in other aspects of the job. I always felt like his background in banking led to a numbers-based approached versus using numbers as a part of a higher-level whole. (I won't get into my disdain for scheduling teams that are a no-win situation because they perform much better than their brand-value, like Utah and App State.)

I believe DB is taking that to the next step by applying media relations, marketing, and performance in addition to the numbers, just like a true CEO would. The point made by ducatidoc is also a reason I believe DB will make the right choice regarding RichRod - he has the relationships and clout with boosters and the Michigan administration (not to mention his personal financial situation) to allow him to make the decision he feels is best for the program - without allowing politics or external pressure to play into his decision. Heck, he technically used to be Mary Sue Coleman's boss as President of the Board of Trustees.

I'm very confident with him at the helm. Every time I hear him speak or read an article about him, I always come off more impressed than before. GO BLUE!

Search4Meaning

November 15th, 2010 at 10:06 AM ^

There is a new strength at the top.  It will not be for lack of Mr. Brandon's leadership if Michigan does not quickly rise to the top.

If you have read any of my (many) posts regarding tOSU program, you know that I believe they are the template for successful programs of the future.  I do not know the Texas program as well, but I think it would be a worthy model to look at as well.

Not copy, just look at.

JamesBondHerpesMeds

November 15th, 2010 at 9:29 AM ^

Bill Martin was able to push through an extraordinarily sophisticated -- and, from all preliminary assessments, successful -- stadium and athletic campus overhaul without a business plan for his "company" (that being the Department) is remarkable. 

I know that Martin is getting hacked on here a little bit, and some for justified reasons, so I shall offer one counter-point: Tom Goss.  In hindsight, we've been very, very fortunate to have consistently good Department leadership throughout two recessions and several NCAA investigations in the 2000's.  Even through all of this, we have perhaps the most robust coaching staff in the country if you consider the entire spectrum of Michigan athletics.

This isn't an attempt to discount DB's pimp-handedness, rather to ensure that Martin gets some credit where it's due.

treetown

November 15th, 2010 at 10:28 AM ^

While we may all have our own thoughts about hiring decisions of the coaching staff, it is hard to argue that under Bill Martin's reign the physical facilities were not improved. The stadium renovation done while we were still using the stadium is a feat which is much underrated and underappreciated. The new look fits quite nicely with the neighborhood and area and keeps the original low profile look of the bowl from Yost's time. Dave Brandon in contrast may not be a "building guy" so his strengths may be in personnel decision. He is an inspiring speaker. I had the opportunity to hear him speak before our alumni group and he was terrific; really gave us all hope that things are heading in the right direction. If you have the chance to go to a talk by him, please do so, it would be worth your time.

oldcityblue

November 15th, 2010 at 10:49 AM ^

The new CMO position and the priority of a clear business plan are great examples of DB understanding the importance of the Michigan brand. He would probably have made this move regardless of the current climate, but the timing here is awesome.

Right after the NCAA findings, he will coordinate and launch what I anticipate to be a solid campaign of positive promotion for Michigan. You can see that the aggressive negativity towards the program from the Freep has really clarified the importance of correcting this wrong doing, and DB it going to take up this cause with vigor.

Michigan couldn't be in better hands.

st barth

November 15th, 2010 at 12:05 PM ^

...of glancing the taboo subject of politics, I have to admit that Brandon has been impressive enough as a leader at M already that I'm now kind of wishing that he had run for governor.  I mean that as a compliment and nothing more.