Civil rights icon Rep. John Lewis dies at age 80

Submitted by Joby on July 18th, 2020 at 12:41 AM

He was the face of Selma, beaten and bloodied, but still marching on. No one alive embodied the civil rights struggles of the 1960s like he did. He was a hero to many people, and particularly to black men like me, teaching us to persevere and fight back with votes and policy change. 

 

https://www.nytimes.com/2020/07/17/us/john-lewis-dead.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage

 

 

bsand2053

July 18th, 2020 at 2:28 AM ^

If any of you haven’t seen the video of him at the National Book Award ceremony, do yourself a favor and google it.  He was giant and it breaks my heart that he passed while a [comment redacted] sits behind the Resolute Desk.

He was strong and gracious.  Demanded justice but gave love.  I’m his memory, let’s make “good trouble” and “vote like you’ve never voted before”

MaizeBlueA2

July 18th, 2020 at 7:15 AM ^

lol no it isn't. 

It's wrong. It's ignorant. But it's not racist...that's not what that word means or how words work.

If someone calls you an Ohio State fan, that doesn't make them an Ohio State fan if you're a Michigan fan. What a weird take. And the fact that you believe it to be true, hoooo boy.

MaizeBlueA2

July 18th, 2020 at 7:34 AM ^

(Also for you to say the "proud boys aren't remotely racist" when yes, the group is, a the very least, remotely racist considering it's leader had tried to rebrand the mission and redefine itself, in part because its members are often expressing their racist and white supremacist views, attending racist rallies, etc.

So I would say that is indeed "remotely" racist, and to some, you can't be remotely racist...you are or you aren't, but that's a completely different discussion.

But no matter which way you slice it, yes, the proud boys is at a minimum a remotely racist group, just like Washington's NFL team is, at a minimum, a "remotely" dysfunctional and misogynistic organization...can we get back to honoring the life and legacy of Mr. Lewis?)

yoyo

July 18th, 2020 at 7:59 AM ^

The FBI labeled them an "extremist group with ties to white nationalism." The FBI are run by Christopher Wray, appointed by Trump and not a libcuck. They've tried to rebrand themselves as pro western values recently but that's like McDonald's selling salads and saying they're a health foods store. 

Vote_Crisler_1937

July 18th, 2020 at 9:08 AM ^

Hi, I’ve stood toe to toe with two members of Proud Boys in a protest/counter protest and listened to them talk at me for hours. Somewhere they have the body cam footage to prove it. I can confirm these two members were at least in part racist so much more than “remotely”. I will take their actual words instead of media talking points from any source. 

JTrain

July 18th, 2020 at 10:58 AM ^

Some of you need to take a look at American history. 
It was the Republican Party that fought to free the slaves. That voted for civil rights For minorities. It was the dumbocrats that fought to keep slavery. That voted against civil rights for minorities. That formed the kkk. 

 

JTrain

July 18th, 2020 at 2:41 PM ^

Lol. Sounds convenient. 
For the record...I upvoted the comment in all three of the same posts above about renaming a bridge after him. 
I support guys like him and MLK that can peacefully protest and not burn towns down and f up hard working business owners businesses because a bunch of Idiot white Marxist political activists convinced them to believe police brutality = racism. 
But, it’s all good...I’m just here to rile up libnation. It’s ez. Ez like Sunday morning....

#trump2020

 

btw...I’m sure mod-dude will edit this out and put something racist in because it fits Lib-mob-cancel-culture-agenda....

click the link.... I dare ya....
 

 

rob f

July 18th, 2020 at 5:29 PM ^

First, to answer your accusations: yes, I again removed the link, as it's again a  blatant attempt on your part, no more and no less, at trolling the board.  What's more, I have NEVER inserted a racist remark while editing a thread.  

You've made your choice jtrain.

You could have taken it to the mod sticky thread, but are so intent on continuing trolling the board that now I make my choice (and yes, there's an extensive history of trolling the board, click on his username to see all the evidence).

Take it to whatever "chan" sub-forum welcomes your commentary. Bye.

Don

July 18th, 2020 at 2:25 PM ^

"It was the Republican Party that ...that voted for civil rights for minorities."

Of the 21 Democratic Senators who voted no, every one of them hailed from a state that had formerly been part of the slaveholding Confederacy. Those same states today are dominated by the Republican Party.

Barry Goldwater was one of 6 Republican Senators who voted against the 1964 Civil Rights bill.

Oddly enough, the party that was so devoted to the cause of civil rights saw fit to nominate Goldwater for the Presidency that very same year.

Even more oddly, the five states that Goldwater won in '64—South Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, Mississippi, and Louisiana—had for almost a century formed the core of the so-called "Solid South" for the Democratic Party and had not ever voted for a Republican Presidential candidate. The Republican Party barely existed as a functional party in these states up until 1964, yet suddenly these states went for the GOP candidate who just happened to oppose the 1964 Civil Rights Act.

That wasn't a coincidence.

BroadneckBlue21

July 18th, 2020 at 4:31 PM ^

Quite amazingly, time and each parties’ history did not stop and be static after WW2. Here’s how to think about this sheep thinking he’s a genius who knows more about history by espousing a beat to death talking point:

Interestingly, there were all kinds of shifts in the mid20th century where a racist like Strom Thurmond left the Dems to become a Republican, and all the racist Southern Dems followed him. 

Oddly, your tired argument is for people who want to deflect from contemporary policies and statistical disparities in financial and educational opportunities for gens. People who make your comment are doubly racists, because your inference presupposes that a majority of Black Americans (by party registration) are too inferior to your intelligence to recognize which party supports equality and policies meant to help build equitable paths.
 

Do you think you know more about which party supports Black people more today? Which party supports ending police brutality and change sentencing and prison disparities? Which party believes in reparations and equal funding of public schools rather than the funneling of it to white flight suburbs?  Versus which party points to eighty years ago and says that protestors are rioting thugs and that they see no color? Yeah, Democrats today are far from perfect, but a large majority of us strive for enacting policies that are brought forth by POC and others historically discriminated against. GFY.

1VaBlue1

July 18th, 2020 at 7:54 AM ^

Oh, look - another Fox News, Breitbart, and Alex Jones watcher on the board!

It's funny that you tell people to use their brain, yet you lock into a single news source yourself.  I mean, its apparent that you're locked into a single news source - your comment comes straight from Fox News talking points.  You should open your mind and look around.

Not that it will matter, it's readily apparent that your closed mind is incapable of seeing something different.  I fully expect your hate-fueled rants, without attribution, will continue.  After all, you're here shitting on the grave of a man that fought for civil rights.