Unverified Voracity Gives Self C- Comment Count

Brian

site note: UFR tomorrow AM and PM. Sorry about the delay.

29938923242_9ace63666f_z

Breakout star Ben Gedeon [Bryan Fuller]

Oh, man, please do not excite me. PFF breaks down the Michigan-Ohio State matchup as only they can, and Michigan comes out ahead on most counts, including all three defensive units. Ben Gedeon is a surprise standout:

This was without question the biggest area of concern for the Wolverines heading into the season, but both Ben Gedeon and Mike McCray have played well thus far. Gedeon’s 89.1 run defense grade is second-best in the country behind only the Ohio Bobcats’ Blair Brown, and McCray has graded well in all three phases while posting 10 pressures (three sacks) and a QB rating against of 42.1 in coverage.

That's a huge boost to a defense that didn't really need one.

Ohio State's biggest advantage is quarterback, unsurprisingly. JT Barrett and Wilton Speight are grading out similarly as passers; meanwhile there is a slight Barrett advantage on the ground. The overall tone of the article is... uh... far too encouraging for me to be comfortable with.

But the level of dominance the Michigan defensive line has achieved to date can only be challenged by Alabama, as six players have run defense grades of at least 80.0 (by comparison, Alabama has two) and five have pass-rush grades higher than 75.0 (Alabama has six). DTs Ryan Glasgow and Maurice Hurst and DEs Chris Wormley and Taco Charlton are all likely top 100 picks (should they all choose to enter the draft this year), and last year’s No. 1 recruit DE Rashan Gary has been as good as advertised.

Michigan is now slightly favored in the Game by S&P+ and it sounds like PFF would pick Michigan as well. This terrifies me.

Lewis on Lewis. Rather frank self-scout right here:

"There's still a few things I can clean up," Lewis said this week. "I've let a few guys behind me a little bit and have just relied on my quickness and makeup speed. But I've got to stop cheating (with my eyes) and use my technique more."

Not as harsh a self-assessment as Peppers giving himself a C-, but that is accurate. Three or four times the ball has gone in the air with Lewis in seemingly bad position; he's made a play each time. Ideally he'll be able to wipe out that moment of nervousness when the ball is in the air.

29597771473_a3d85e3f09_z

The Peppers factor [Patrick Barron]

Fancystat fight. Football Outsiders has two advanced CFB metrics: S&P+ and FEI. FEI, a drive-based metric, doesn't release until this week, and so we haven't been able to compare the two yet. In general FEI is less impressed. Michigan is third, not first, and their defense is fourth instead of an absurd runaway #1. OTOH, FEI has Michigan's offense third in the country, which seems optimistic.

The thing that really leaps out is special teams, though: S&P+ has Michigan 107th. FEI has Michigan 1st.

The FEI drilldown is how you'd expect. Michigan's been horrible at field goals (119th), meh at punting and returning kickoffs, and very good at their own kickoffs and returning punts. That shouldn't add up to the #1 team in the country but FEI also includes metrics for starting field possession on offense (#1) and defense (#13) that must factor in? Those numbers are only slightly about special teams.

S&P+ relies on "success rate" for kickoffs and punts, which has always seemed odd to me since there's no first down to shoot for. A yard is a yard on special teams. In any case, Michigan's terrible S&P+ rating is due to a heavy weight for FG kicking, which fair enough, and a poor punting success rate.

FWIW, the Mathlete's numbers that convert everything to points lost and gained have Michigan 16th.

My take: FEI is overrating the special teams because the defense is so dominant that it's moving field position outside the bounds of normal, and S&P+ isn't weighting the explosive Peppers returns enough. I asked Bill Connelly, the S&P+ purveyor, about this, and he said much the same thing. He's got good reasons to go with success rate but a guy like Peppers blows assumptions inherent in that choice out of the water.

Glasgow getting it done. Graham, that is. He got his first start this weekend and a newpaper breaks down film(!!!), where he impressed:

First and foremost, we have to highlight the performance of rookie Graham Glasgow, making his first start. Playing left guard, no Lions lineman drew Donald more often, matching up against the All-Pro 16 times, including 11 snaps in pass protection. Surprisingly, Glasgow rarely was given the assistance of a double-team, getting help from a teammate three of those snaps.

636123937637283837-2

Glasgow was terrific throughout the first half. He didn't give up any pressure, until losing his block on Donald during Detroit's final offensive play. Stafford managed to escape that pressure, bailing from the pocket and finding Andre Roberts for a short touchdown on fourth down.

Is this an opportunity to say I foresaw all of this as early as Glasgow's first few games? Maybe. Probably. Yes.

The revamp is for real. John Beilein already had one major revamp of his program that ended in a Final Four run. Revamp #2 is on now, and it's seriously serious:

This is going to be a fascinating year.

Etc.: This midseason All Big Ten team is incorrect because the defense is not Michigan's starting 11, but it does have Ryan Glasgow on it so I give it ten points. Big Ten Geeks previews basketball. What went wrong with Notre Dame. People are so mad about this arm-grab thing from Richard Sherman that just looks like good crafty D to me. Early Big Ten hockey impressions. Brady Hoke could recruit some.

A toast to Yost. The cookie monsters.

Comments

dragonchild

October 19th, 2016 at 5:29 PM ^

NOT relative to others, but relative to what he can do (which is Dunning-Kruger so this is agreeing with you -- the competent tend to evaluate themselves harshly by only considering their peers, and Peppers doesn't have many peers).  I think that's what he's trying to convey.  He's certainly doing a lot already, but Brown's defense does so many things, I flip back and forth between marveling and openly wondering if Peppers has truly unleashed his final form.  Also, he might feel a bit underutilized if only because the DL keeps sniping his kills.

stephenrjking

October 19th, 2016 at 5:34 PM ^

Hard to believe we're going into season ten of Beilein. Interesting and hopeful to see someone who has made the Final be willing to assess weakness and make significant changes to his approach, a character trait that not all coaches have.

I waffle on how good our defense is, from "excellent" to "best ever." I tend to think "best ever" when I watch incredible performances like the last couple of weeks.

I lean back to "excellent" when I see Alabama's cadre of athletes look totally unbeatable. Even if we get that far, we could be facing an all-time juggernaut, kind of like when USC was steamrolling into the Rose Bowl in January of 06.

But we have to get past OSU first, no sure thing at all. At least it doesn't look quite as dark as it did a couple of weeks ago; Urban is still a great coach, and they still have great athletes, though.

corundum

October 19th, 2016 at 5:40 PM ^

I was lucky enough to read this an hour and a half ago when it was accidentally posted early (I'm assuming). After OSU's games against Wisconsin and Indiana, I'm really starting to get cautiously optimistic about the game. I know the rabble rabble coachspeak about not overlooking opponents, but I really hope Harbaugh spent a day or two of Rutgers/Bye/Illinois weeks on preparing for OSU.

FrankMurphy

October 19th, 2016 at 8:17 PM ^

Not everyone is a good recruiter, even if they have a solid brand like Michigan behind them. Being able to sell a recruit on your program is a skill like any other skill, and Hoke did excel at it (getting his recruits to perform once he got them in the door is where he failed miserably). Credit where credit is due. 

CoverZero

October 19th, 2016 at 5:50 PM ^

The problem that I have always had with these "advanced metrics" as applied to football in a microcosm...is that football is not played as a microcosm.  The games ebb and flow and things change greatly based on field position, momentum and game situations.   I tend to discount most of these metrics other then using them as cursory looks at how a team is doing.  Box score metrics are much more telling to me as an accurate depiction of a game and how a team played that day.

As for Graham Glascow...when he made his first start at C a few seasons ago...I was immediately impressed and stated so on the MGo Game forum.   I stated that Graham would eventually be All Big 10 and would play in the NFL.  I was scoffed at by everyone else...but you could see his size, leverage and athletic ability even back then as a walk-on.

B-Nut-GoBlue

October 19th, 2016 at 6:28 PM ^

Yea I saw that earlier on my FB page.  And actually all the Iowa fans down here commenting on it disagreed and wondered as well wondered how the hell they came up with that.  Must be the way they grade individuals and then makes some sore of composit score.  Could that somehow equate to them being the best "graded" unit?

JMK

October 19th, 2016 at 6:13 PM ^

Peppers is probably more of a D+ than a C-. He totally needs to come back next year if he hopes to get anywhere near a C. He's basically undraftable right now. Right, guys? Right.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

xtramelanin

October 19th, 2016 at 6:35 PM ^

lots of football left to be played.  looking very good, but way too easy to get over-heated.  college football has its inexplicable ups and downs like no other sport. 

 

was cool to see glasgow play, and play so well.  he will end up being the starting center next year. 

bsand2053

October 19th, 2016 at 7:12 PM ^

So far, Ryan Glasgow has collected the most cookies through six games, with Wormley’s best week resulting in three dozen cookies 

 

Don't get me wrong, I love Wormley, but I was thinking guys got like 5 or 6 cookies for a good week.  Mrs. Mattison is putting in work.  

dragonchild

October 19th, 2016 at 9:03 PM ^

FFS these days a defensive back needs to be a goddamn paralegal to avoid getting penalized.  Sherman and other DBs have found various angles they can actually lay a hand on a receiver without getting punished for it.  It's extremely crafty but that's all they can do to actually defend a pass.  Linemen are smashing into each other like barbarians every damn down, linebackers and running backs fly at each other with regularity, QBs take blindside hits from mangry 290-pound DEs but wide receivers basically get red carpets as long as they're not holding the ball.  FFS if the wide receiver runs you over you're the one called for pass interference.

The ticky-tack nature of PI is getting out of hand, and people around here know me as a strong advocate for player safety.  The play SBNation is all huffy about is some hand-fighting.  Hand-fighting!  I don't want to see wide receivers getting killed out there, but when you can't even nudge a guy without getting severely penalized, STFU and give Sherman a break already.  Sure he plays all sneaky-like but you can't make his job any tougher.

BPocern

October 19th, 2016 at 10:05 PM ^

Encouraged by Beilein's off-season comments about emphasizing defense. Many coaches could simply say "my way or the highway" but, he knows his weakness and has made adjustments to improve this. Very anxious for hoops, as well as the remainder of this football season!



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad