I think we need a .gif of Funchess jumping over a cloud.
There Will Be Bombs
10/19/2013 – Michigan 63, Indiana 47 – 6-1, 2-1 Big Ten
Jake Butt's block gets Devin Funchess cupcake dog eyes. [Eric Upchurch]
Chris Tucker! Jackie Chan!
YET MORE EXPLOSIONS!
EVERY ATOM IS RAPIDLY RECEDING FROM EVERY OTHER ATOM WITH FLAAAAAMES!
Someone mentions that 67-65 Illinois game!
And he gets thwacked!
This is Michigan!
I have confirmed this with people who do not care about Michigan football that much: that was not a collective fever dream brought on by the stress of the Penn State game. It happened, because Indiana is #1 in Big Ten offense and #546th in total defense. A team that put up 42 on them last week waddled towards their first and only offensive touchdown halfway through the fourth quarter of a game against Purdue. They gave up 35 to Indiana State while torching those guys for 70 points. They walloped Penn State by 20. Adam Jacobi has taken to calling the Hoosiers #CHAOSTEAM because at any moment they will break you or be broken themselves, leaving seven points and a flaming wagon wheel in their wake.
Pick literally any stat about offense you want and laugh. Indiana first downs: 28! Michigan's average gain: 9.0 yards! Indiana time of possession in a third quarter in which they scored 23 points: six minutes! Devin Gardner YPA: 17.3! Number of Indiana receivers with catches of at least 20 yards: 5!
This purports to be the same sport that Michigan played against Minnesota. I say it is not. I say it was a test pilot for TV executives from a dystopian future looking for something that will distract the masses from their slave-like drudgery in the fur mines. It was wildly successful. I barely remember anything about my day to day life in the fur mines.
In the aftermath, no one knows if anything means anything. Our ears are still ringing, shrapnel still falling, ham fragments scattered in the front yard. One of the children is walking with a limp and tilting his head funny in a way that seems worryingly permanent. The oil derrick is on fire.
In these situations it's hard to tease out judgments, especially when last week your offense was a few deep balls to Funchess and pain and your defense seemed rather good. A week later, Michigan's setting program records for total offense and getting eviscerated on the other side of the ball.
We had this debate last week about Raymon Taylor and now it's writ large: can any part of this team decide whether it sucks or it is awesome? Lewan and Gallon excepted, it seems like everything Michigan does is prone to insane swings. On the player level, hey look it's Devin Gardner, who explodes in all directions. Or Taylor, who was repeatedly roasted one game after having an awesome interception and was the primary hand in shutting down Allen Robinson for 3.99 quarters. Or Dennis Norfleet, who had an electric juke-you-out-of-your jock kickoff return and an electric reverse-field-twice-and-get-tackled-at-the-nine kickoff return. Even previously consistent Brendan Gibbons is now two for his last five with two line-drive blocks.
On the unit level, the defense waxes between perforated against Akron to crushing against UConn and Minnesota and most of the Penn State game. The offense nukes Notre Dame, nukes itself against Akron and UConn, reconfigures itself into a dump truck to out-dump-truck Minnesota, is bombs and turnovers and pain against Penn State, and then rewrites the record book this weekend. On a team level… well, you saw the Akron and UConn games. Michigan's quite a CHAOSTEAM itself.
Meanwhile, the opponent. In the second half, Michigan's game plan seemed to be max-protect pass after max-protect pass on which Funchess and Gallon would wander out in different variations of deep routes. Indiana would cover Funchess; Gallon would engage his cloaking device to become improbably open, then catch a ball and run for many yards. At some point in the second half, Gallon had already broken the Big Ten all-time receiving mark and one of these two man routes found him open by literally twenty yards.
Jeremy Gallon has three hundred receiving yards and the defense is blowing a coverage on him.
Blow a coverage on everybody else! Penn State intentionally blew a coverage and got an interception out of it! Are you recent immigrants from Malaysia? Do you think this is… Malaysiaball? I need Michigan to score a touchdown here and I am still slightly angry at you, Indiana. Incompetence so vast is a thing to behold, but how are you supposed to take this performance and extrapolate anything from it? It exists in a different world from football; it is for dystopian future distractions.
I probably shouldn't be looking for life lessons after that in any case. It's my natural inclination to search for What It Means For The Future after playing Indiana, since for my entire life as a Michigan fan Indiana games have been speed bumps on route to games Michigan might actually lose. This is a bad instinct after a game that will be That Indiana Game for the rest of time.
Here we should set those things aside and align ourselves in repose. Whatever just happened has no bearing on the future. Lay back, let your feet flop open, and breathe. Our neck muscles and inner ears could use the rest.
I'M FINISHED [Upchurch]
Brady Hoke Epic Double Point Of The Week. That Jeremy Gallon's epic, Michigan and Big Ten record-setting performance has the whisper of a challenge here is testament to the ridiculousness of this game. Even though Devin Gardner set some Michigan records of his own, Gallon's the guy.
Honorable mention: Gardner, obviously. Thomas Gordon's interception was the biggest defensive play of the day, by some distance. The line kept Gardner clean for long stretches.
Epic Double Point Standings.
2.0: Jeremy Gallon (ND, Indiana)
1.0: Devin Gardner (ND), Desmond Morgan(UConn), Devin Funchess(Minnesota), Frank Clark(PSU)
0.5: Cam Gordon (CMU), Brennen Beyer (CMU)
Brady Hoke Epic Double Fist-Pump Of The Week. After a couple weeks during which it was a stretch to pick anything, here the problem is paring it down form an explosion symphony to a quartet. Or singlet. Whatever. Music things!
But there is a pretty obvious item: Thomas Gordon undercutting a badly-thrown deep ball to intercept moments after Devin Gardner had fumbled a snap on the two yard line. Indiana got to the line instantly, caught Raymon Taylor off guard, seemingly had burned him for yet another immense touchdown, and Sudfeld left it short. A catch and return later, Michigan was once again in position to regain possession of the two-possession lead that was the only thing between Michigan fans and mass chaos. More mass chaos, anyway.
Honorable mention: Gallon catches ball, Gallon catches ball, Gallon catches ball, Gallon catches ball. Etc. Gardner scrambles, gets flipped into the endzone. Funchess leaps damn near out of the stadium to near the endzone in the second half.
Epic Double Fist-Pumps Past.
8/31/2013: Dymonte Thomas introduces himself by blocking a punt.
9/7/2013: Jeremy Gallon spins through four Notre Dame defenders for a 61-yard touchdown.
9/14/2013: Michigan does not lose to Akron. Thanks, Thomas Gordon.
9/21/2013: Desmond Morgan's leaping one-handed spear INT saves Michigan's bacon against UConn.
10/5/2013: Fitzgerald Toussaint runs for ten yards, gets touchdown rather easily.
10/12/2013: Devin Funchess shoots up the middle of the field to catch a 40 yard touchdown, staking Michigan to a ten-point lead they wouldn't relinquish. (Right?)
10/19/2013: Thomas Gordon picks off an Indiana pass to end the Hoosiers' last drive that could have taken the lead.
[After THE JUMP: Gallon catches ball, Gallon catches ball, Gallon catches ball.]
All is as before. This game had strong 2011 vibes, specifically the aftermath of that ugly loss at Iowa in which Michigan decided they were an I-form team and acquired under 200 yards of offense before chuck and pray time against a Hawkeye outfit that had just gotten beat by a very bad edition of Minnesota. Michigan followed that by reverting to a spread 'n' shred against Illinois in a 31-14 victory featuring 16 passes against 47 runs mostly out of the shotgun. They proceeded to put up 45 and 40 against Nebraska and Ohio State, also with shotgun-oriented running attacks.
This year Michigan reacted to the fact their tight ends couldn't block anyone by installing the ill-fated tackle over stuff. Once that was demonstrated to not work, they again moved more towards spreading the field. With Drew Dileo injured, Jeremy Jackson got a ton of run as a slot receiver. Gardner operated mostly from the shotgun in the first half, and occasional forays into running under center were just testing the water. Still shark-filled. Yep.
In the second half Borges went with all the max protect play action since Indiana wasn't covering any of it. This, too, is a callback to 2011, when ace sets were 80% play action pass.
How this goes down. Our own Bryan Mac has offered up the perfect video clip of how Brady Hoke perceives this development:
Hooray Borges until the next time we forget the lesson herein. I'm less enthused about Michigan's latest Lazarus moment than the first couple times. At this point you have to expect that at some point later this year Michigan will talk itself into another manball gameplan they don't have the personnel to execute yet. It's clear the staff looks at the Indiana gameplan like Ron Swanson above, and only hypnoshock therapy can force them to get the banana down. The clock is ticking once again.
But for now, hooray beer. Downs set on fire were kept to a minimum and probably necessary to provide the slight threat of a run that keeps DL from teeing off on pass immediately. Michigan actually ran actual run plays out of the shotgun. Drew Dileo would have featured heavily if he was not hurt. Etc.
Maybe? Michigan did proceed to go more under center as the game went on, which was less effective in the run game. Not that this is a surprise. Baumgardner has the numbers:
The Wolverines ran 14 times for 92 yards from the shotgun in the first half, but this wasn't strictly a zone-read situation. Under center in the first half, Michigan ran 12 times for 37 yards.
…Toussaint's breakdown for the game was 13 carries for 78 yards from the shotgun, 19 carries for 73 yards from under center -- including a 27-yard touchdown on the final offensive snap.
Michigan got a ton of big plays from under center in the passing game… and also from the shotgun. Again… Indiana.
Line shuffling. If Michigan's offensive line had a band they would be named And You Will Know Us By The Trail Of Guards.
Burzynski started, left a Michigan touchdown drive limping, returned to the field, got a couple of plays blown up, and left. He has torn his ACL and is done for the year, which sucks. This paved the way for Kyle Bosch to burn his redshirt. Magnuson played the whole game at some position or another; Kalis got in on various larger sets, especially in the second half. He went back to right guard while Magnuson bumped out and Schofield or Lewan took on quasi-tight-end duties.
I've got no idea how well Bosch and Magnuson performed in their new roles because I haven't gone over things in detail and they may as well have been playing against air. Even with the air thing, the under center run game still seemed pretty bad. The contrast between it and the shotgun running Michigan used caused people around me to grumble when Michigan went heavy.
But, you know, whatever you have to do to get some production. Bosch makes sense since he's a natural guard and enrolled early. Burning his redshirt is fine by me—with five other guys in his class redshirting Michigan is not likely to have issues similar to the ones they're experiencing now when Bosch is not around for his fifth year.
Funchess! Only four catches for only eighty-four yards is… uh, about two thirds of his production for the entirety of the Big Ten season last year. I think our expectations may be a little distorted. Funchess did do this, though:
I think we'll keep him around. I'm not kicking into Jim Mandich watch mode because cumong man dude is a receiver.
Norfleet is a ghost. Kind of alarming that even with Dileo out Michigan gave Norfleet zero touches—zero snaps, IIRC—on offense. That kickoff return showed some of Norfleet's ability to make guys miss in space—electric. Is he really that bad at doing WR things that you have to keep him off the field? Michigan's inability to have him on the field except as a jet screen guy/jet screen fake guy is frustrating.
Exchanges. Third straight game that a Glasgow/Gardner under center exchange has been fumbled. This one was a turnover that could have been a disaster if not for the timely intervention of Thomas Gordon. It is officially an issue.
Tempo'd. I thought Indiana would get some yards, fast but gradually. Instead they discombobulated Michigan's defense early and ripped them apart for more big plays than they'd given up all year. I don't know if safeties or corners are mostly the issue until I look at the film; I do know that without stars who consistently win one-on-one, Michigan's defense is effective because it is organized. Indiana's tempo blew that to smithereens, with results like:
- four play 72 yard touchdown drive requiring 1:21
- three play 57 yard touchdown drive requiring 1:03
- four play, 83 yard touchdown drive requiring 1:10
- five play, 75 yard touchdown drive requiring 1:25.
One Indiana touchdown drive took longer than five plays, an eight play, 71 yard drive that still took less than two minutes off the clock. Michigan got shredded.
Why was this so effective? Well, Indiana can score on almost anybody. They put up 28 on the monstrous Michigan State defense, for one. Also Michigan seems unprepared to deal with this sort of light speed offense what with their leisurely strolls to the line. Their flailing two minute attempts speak to a program that's uncomfortable going at any pace other that glacial, and while Michigan had clearly attempted to prepare for Indiana's pace there's only so much you can do in one week when you're a tortoise program.
Many explosions in the secondary. Indiana burned Raymon Taylor, Blake Countess, Channing Stribling, and Jourdan Lewis at points during the game. Those guys are also know as "the entire cornerback corps" since Courtney Avery was used as a safety.
Taylor got tempoed a couple of times; Countess was beat over the top by tiny shifty Shane Wynn; Jourdan Lewis once again suffered an inch-perfect ball over the top of his very good coverage and gave up an ain't-even-mad bomb; Stribling phased out of this reality at the exact wrong time again and an interception turned into another long touchdown.
It could have been worse, too. Taylor was looking at the sideline on Thomas Gordon's first interception and got smoked over the top; a deeper, more outside throw and that might have been an eighty-yarder. Taylor also somehow managed to turn a sure interception into a Jake Ryan dismaying big play:
Kick it onside man. After the unsportsmanlike penalty on that Gardner rushing touchdown, Michigan should have tried a surprise onside kick of some variety. A conventional attempt costs you 15 yards of field position in a game where field position means nothing, and if you do one of those pop-up things it probably ends up on the 30 at worst. Hoke said he thought about it, at least.
the last touchdown was completely unnecessary [Fuller]
What was with the end of the game? Michigan had the ball with two minutes left; Indiana had no timeouts. Instead of kneeling out the clock, Michigan kept running until Toussaint was in the endzone. Indiana duly launched a drive with far too many plays in the minute left over. Was Hoke pissed off? Was he trying to work on the under-center run game? Did he just not realize he could kneel out the clock?
Going for two. Seeing the some of the usual complaints about a team that's down eight going for two earlier than the last possible second after IU went for it with a lot of time left. Not to single out Sap, but let's single out Sap:
BRENDAN GIBBONS – Gibby extended his school record consecutive PAT streak to 136. Don’t think extra points are important? Just ask Indiana. They went for two to try and tie the game instead of going for one and keeping it a one-possession game. Their failure to convert changed the complexion of the game by making it a two possession contest. That’s a BIG difference even if your offense can score in 90 seconds.
An eight point game is not a one possession contest. 47% of the time it's a one possession contest and 53% of the time it's a two possession contest. The trailing team should go for it as soon as possible so they know which one of those they're in and adjust accordingly. "As soon as possible" is generally when the game gets short enough that the opponent isn't going to be kicking two field goals, so Indiana could have gone for two on the first possession of the second half and I'd probably have defended it.
This one, on the other hand, was huge. [Upchurch]
Other game theory bit. Pretty standard now, but Michigan's second touchdown drive featured a fourth and one play from the two that Toussaint took into the endzone. Subtract four points from Michigan's score and how are you feeling about most of the second half?
That kind of thing is why I thought some of the stuff about how Hoke was just another Lloyd Carr in this department was massively overblown. The Penn State stuff was an outlier.
Student bitching: the flipside. All things considered I thought the student section was fine. The new GA policy makes the same number of students seem smaller since they're packed in as efficiently as possible instead of spread out. There were probably as many alumni tickets that went unused judging from my section, which was decidedly roomy. This may be a side effect of stadium atmosphere resignation on my part. It is what it is.
Verizon: why do you suck? I'm going to put a poll up later this week to survey stadium wifi/cellular reception, because I'm curious if it's just me or everybody. Before this year I could get out tweets and get them in without problem except for the most jam-packed, OMG-text-worthy events. This year I can't get anything even hours before the game at my tailgate; reception improves late, I assume because thousands of phones that have spent hours straining for signal have given up the ghost. The backslide in coverage seems obvious to me.
The stadium wifi is erratic at best, meanwhile. Not that I'm surprised. At least they're trying. Even if I have to enter [email protected] to log on.
Weird halftime. Halftime was weird. It was a coded ad for having your wedding at Michigan Stadium.
Blog items. MVictors discovers that one of Indiana's plays is Ladies Of ESPN:
And suggests this might have been a more productive alternative:
Also more Gallon photos.
TRICKED OUT SLED GUY – Props to the dude who slides this pimped out Denali into the Champions Lot, not far from the tunnel:
Runner-up: Blue Wacky Wind Tube boy:
I was sure that the blue guy would win with his janky weird homemade nightmare fuel.
Hello, Thomas Gordon. Gordon had a weird stat line. It consists of the following: 2 interceptions returned for 41 yards. That's it. No tackles, no pass breakups. And those were his first two picks of the year. Opposing quarterbacks have been testing Michigan's cornerbacks more than the safeties this year, but I've been a little surprised that Gordon hasn't been more involved up to this point.
The Daily caught up with that girl who became internet famous after Gardner's fumble on the two. You know, her:
How else are you supposed to react to that game, I ask you.
I like the dude behind her. Shifty-eyed dog, the man.
On what happened on the first Taylor-ceded TD:
On Indiana’s second possession, it took just 10 seconds from a first-down play to the next snap. Taylor, Hoke said, was trying to get the call from fifth-year senior safety Thomas Gordon. Meanwhile, wide receiver Cody Latimer streaked past Taylor. The safety help Taylor believed would be there never came. The play went for 59 yards and a touchdown.
That is what it looked like, yes.
i know that countess has taken over at the nickel position, but i figured they'd still find a way to get him on the field after all the summer hype. also same question goes for taco charlton.
Dymonte Thomas is a great athlete, but he's a safety not a corner. We've been rotating guys at corner more because at different times, whatever not-Countess corners we've had in haven't always played well and because we've needed more pass coverage help. Unluckily for Thomas, our starting safeties have been playing pretty well.
As for Taco - he was always going to be third string at that spot, which means reps but not a ton of them. Compounding matters for him, Beyer has become a legit pass rush guy, so he has taken some pass rush WDE reps that may have gone to Taco.
"Even previously consistent Brendan Gibbons is now two four his last five with two line-drive blocks.
I think you wanted "for" there.......
And FWIW I was one of the alumni who didnt show. I got as far as Sandusky and the combination of rain, cold and the fact our normal tailgate crew wasnt going to be there caused me to turn around and head back home to Medina, Ohio.
now we all know where your MGoBlog name originates /s
I froze ... had been to the Eagles concert in Indy on Friday night, home @ 2am, up and off to AA (2.5 hr. drive) where my 6 layers of fabrics on the top of me did NOTHING for the bottom half and it was COLD AND WET! But the game was an entertaining change of pace as I thought it was 2 excellent offenses. I kept thinking that IU wouldn't have the patience to execute a long drive ... and I was right - other than they never needed to (their final drive of the game may have used more plays than any other drive) ... and they didn't score.
LOL....maybe I should change my name to "mGrowWussy" or something.
Actually one of the biggest reasons for the turn (outside of the awful weather) was my lovely wife's father is in Stage 5 Parkinson's and is close to passing. Her mind, needless to say, is a million miles from football and I thought to myself "why am i doing this to her" and turned around. She goes to the games with me with a smile (been to the last two bowl games too) and never complains (even though her entire familiy are HUGE OSU fans) and even wears our colors and cheers right alongside me.
I thought I owed her one so we came home.
Well, okay. We'll let it slide this one time.
I won't blame you for the student section that never filled up. In my opinion Student attendance has been worse than it has ever been.
Medina, OH eh? My Michigan Alumni Uncle lives there. Very nice town. GO BLUE!
+1 sir ..... familes should be everyone's priority!
idea for a new Indiana play sign. Then they might have actually covered Gallon! I think this is exactly what has made the fanbase so, shall I say, Animated? The team we love is quite erratic. You never know what you will get from week to week. (half to half??) Put it all together for Little Brother, boys!!!
Very apropros. I'm guessing the banana could also represent how they feel towards bubble screens.
Fitz is the king of late TD's that do nothing. I should skim the boxscores, but it seems like that's at least the 4th or 5th time he's done that. Maybe it speaks to his conditioning and this is a sign that he's really, truly, back to his old self.
I don't think Fitz has been a problem. His coaches waste his talent on the under center runs of doom and his line is also subpar on those plays. He is at his best when the offense goes spread and that showed on Saturday (along with IU's terrible defense). If they try to revert to manball against Sparty it will get ugly.
I agree... but the good news is that no matter how bad things get on offense against msu... we should still be in the game... heres to hoping Borges goes 75% spread concepts against MSU... sure is easier to block when u have defenders out of position huh?
Nebraska 2011, 07:33 MICH - Toussaint, F. 31 yd run (Gibbons, B. kick) 1 play, 31 yards, TOP 0:08, NEB 17 - MICH 45
Illinois 2011, 02:24 MICH - Toussaint, Fitz 27 yd run (Gibbons, Brendan kick)2 plays, 40 yards, TOP 0:48, MICH 31 - ILL 14 Minnesota 2012, 03:05 MICH - Toussaint, F. 41 yd run (Gibbons, B. kick) 4 plays, 50 yards, TOP 2:12, MICH 35 - MINN 13
And Saturday's game was a 27 yarder with 1:12 left on the clock.
What about the three other touchdowns he scored on Saturday that meant something?
In the pros they call this "stat padding"
Well, his first TD was on a nice bounce out after IU crushed the line on 4th and 1. That certainly was important.
The second was a 7-yard TD that put UM up 14 into the second quarter, and the third was another plunge from the 1 yard line that put them up 8.
Yes, the last TD was "stuffing" if you mean it didn't matter to the overall outcome, but his play this year is definitely not racking up yards against crap defenses late in games like, say, Rawls last year against Purdue or UMass. In fact, if you look at a lot of his carries late in games, they are within the flow of the offense and usually help to run the clock down. He's not busting 60-yarders late to pad his stats by any means.
are misunderstanding me. I'm not digging at Fitz, just noting the he has this quirk of breaking off a long run late in a game after the defense has been worn down, and when he's healthy, it's probably due to his good conditioning.
That sign is awesome. How has this not happened already?
This column had me rolling. Back to funny Brian! More funny Brian! Ignore these playa haters, yo
When are we going to see the "21=1: The New Math" shirts hit the MGoStore?
manball I will owe many of you an apology (not you, dizzy ranter). I just believe that they ran the ball because it's the long-term plan, that it didn't work, and that they kept doing it because, given the level of competition, it should have worked. We have only lost to PSU and wiser heads have clarified that we lost because of poor time management. I am still leery of Hoke's long-term plan, and leery of Hoke (much more than I am of Borges, personal teddy bear feelings aside). But if we did have a solid I-form running game to rely on now, along with the rest of a big bag of trix, we would be a more formidable threat to the yikes (I mean likes) of MSU. And not be wondering if DG will survive MSU at all.
We shall sell seashells.
I remain skeptical that anything about this running game is "powerful", "long-term", or "not due to playing Indiana." But yeah, if this team can find a way to consistently run the ball that is fine, but spending 2/3 of the season trying to install it against the crap of your schedule and, frankly, failing to do so, I don't see the utility in continuing with it prominently against the actual good teams.
Pretty sure Indiana had 1 timeout still when we scored last.
But I can't find Indiana's third timeout.
If they did it would have involved one more punt.
I was at a bar, so I couldn't hear everything, but on the 3rd and 6 play, which Funchess caught for 38 yards, he went down in bounds (confirmed in Vimeo video above). Thus, either the clock would have started again after the chains moved (burning off ~30 seconds) or Indiana would have had to use its last timeout. But the clock never moved.
Instead the Funchess play went off at 2:48, and the next play went off a 2:38. How did that happen?
They had a timeout left. It was 2nd down with about 80 seconds left. I think that a run play in that situation is justified to burn more clock than a kneel.
First IU Timeout was used at 2:52
Second IU Timeout was used at 2:48
Third IU Timeout was used at 2:38 BTN screwed up and didn't update their graphic.
The play-by-play (which may use the BTN broadcast, for all I know) doesn't list it.
If IU did NOT have any time outs, than that was gross mismanagement by Michigan. It took us from a 99.99% chance at winning (b/c if you have first down with 2:02 left, three kneel downs takes a minimum of 2 full minutes off the clock, effectively ending the game) to about a ~98% chance of winning (esp considering Fitz had fumbled once).
It was still remote, but the way IU was scorching our D and scoring TDs in literally about a minute, they would have just needed to do that again (with a 2pt conversion), recover the onside kick and then convert a Hail Mary (which they would have had ~2 chances at). Very, very unlikely, but why give them a 1-2% chance when the other option is 0%?
We must be missing something. IU had to have another time out, otherwise two handoffs into the line when you're already up two scores with 2 minutes to go doesn't make sense.
Positive. I was watching the replay at the time of posting. ESPN play by play lists IU taking all 3 timeouts
That makes sense, as I couldn't understand why the clock stopped if IU had not used the time out.
Since that's the case, Hoke & co screwed up clock management at the end of the game for the second straight game. Because after Fitz got the first down on the next play with his 13 yard run, it was kneel down time (with 2:02 left and it being first down; the play clock is 40 seconds long). Instead, by scoring two plays later, they game IU a (very small) chance.
They need to hire a grad asst or something. This is not good.
Maybe they had money on the game....
Pretty sure they didn't. We needed to run 1 more play before victory formation, due to play clock. Was this one of those "let em" scores? Fitz should have slid down short of endzone, our row agreed... AFTER we hi-fived, so... easier said than done in the moment!
that last reply slotted in several posts below what I was replying to. IU did NOT have any TO left. We DID need to run 1 play or potentially face a 4th down due to play clock.
On the bright side, when you're going junior, redshirt sophomore, freshman, freshman, and it's actually the junior you're most worried about, the future looks pretty good.
And yes, I did actually LOL at the Gallon playcall sheet.
I guess we know what Big Ten team will have a newly-installed, never-before-seen up-tempo offense in two weeks!
(I'm talking about MSU)
When you get a jalopy running OK , you still don't want to take it on the free way.
Excellent point by "evenyoubrutus". Whatever full-time assistant coach is assigned to scout Michigan 365 days per year will have now seen their D get gashed by PSU and IU. When Dantonio is running trick plays to score on offense against Purdue and other lowly B10 teams you can only imagine what he'll pull out of the closet for us. Tempo is definitely on the agenda with how frequent Michigan subs and how they still like to flip their DL.
It'll be great; this way they can throw incompletions and dropped balls 18% quicker!
Tempo like Indiana is NOT something you can install in a week or two. If you try that, all you get is a collection of very fast 3-and-outs.
And this differs from MSU's usual offensive flow how?
This Norfleet thing mystifies me.
He's got some skills
I have seen enough questionable decisions of various kinds by him for me to be itching for more touches for him right now.
He's had questionable decisions on punt/kick returns, but it's difficult to make a poor decision running a hitch, an out, a screen, a fly, etc.
I don't know if this is specific to Dileo, but our slot routes seem to be option routes where it's up to the receiver to read coverage and find the empty spot. Maybe Norfleet just isn't good at that yet. Dileo seems to be very good at it, and provides most of what you would want in that position so it's not surprising Norfleet isn't being pressed into service there. I would guess if there's any long term injury to Dileo (knock on wood, please stay healthy Drew), he'll be asked to step up.
He doesn't seem to be handling the duties for his HS team. I doubt we would throw him to the wolves like that. Once the ball is in Pepper's hands, I am sure he will be electric, but catching punts and kickoffs are an art form and he is losing valuable reps not doing so in HS.
Maybe sometime down the road he can contribute on special teams. But I wouldn't think he will as a Freshman.
Handling kickoff return duties is about as simple of a job as you can get in football. I'm sure Peppers could handle it. Returning punts is a different animal because of the decision making, fair catches, when to pick it up off the bounce, looking at the oncoming tacklers, etc. Just because he doesn't do it in high school doesn't mean he can't handle returning kicks. It's probably just looked at by his coach as a chance to get the kid a breather.
Who knows what's up. Maybe he drops to many passes in practice. Maybe his route running isn't crisp. Maybe he's not a very good blocker and as much as the coaches would like to get him some touches, he's a liability if he isn't getting the ball when he's on the field.
"I barely remember anything about my day to day life in the fur mines."
I refused to rescue you because I was already at my quest quota. Don't make this weird.
"Even with the air thing, the under center run game still seemed pretty bad. The contrast between it and the shotgun running Michigan used caused people around me to grumble when Michigan went heavy."
I was OK with it. They went to heavy because they were desperate to slow down the game. The spread offense was scoring in bunches but really only matching Indy TD for TD. They were going to need a stop and the more they went Indiana's pace, the less likely it was to happen. Overall the strategy was as well-balanced as the ND game.
"Is he really that bad at doing WR things that you have to keep him off the field?"
My guess is that Norfleet is bad at blocking, which makes him productive only when he either has the ball or the defense thinks he has it. When Drew Dileo is on the field and NOT getting the ball, he finds himself a guy in the backfield to donkeyhate.
"Michigan kept running until Toussaint was in the endzone. Indiana duly launched a drive with far too many plays in the minute left over. Was Hoke pissed off?"
I'm thinking Indiana had him so spooked he kind of forgot that was an option. I'm no coach, but I was just watching the game and the thought never occurred to me that Michigan could kneel it out. I was that caught up in the tempo.
"Halftime was weird. It was a coded ad for having your wedding at Michigan Stadium."
Do we still have a band, or has Brandon gotten rid of it because it's not monetized enough?
"I like the dude behind her. Shifty-eyed dog, the man."
I think that's Leonardo DiCaprio.
Most folks in my area were wondering aloud why Michigan was not running out the clock. Then we wondered if Fitz should've fallen on the ground near the goalline so as not to give the ball back to IU. All in all it didn't obviously matter other than tacking on another 37 yards of passing for IU.