Monday Presser 9-8-14: Brady Hoke Comment Count

Adam Schnepp

Hoke presser 2

file

News bullets and other items:

  • Hoke will tell us if someone is out for the year. That’s about all you can expect as far as injury updates go.
  • Graham Glasgow is taking snaps at center and right guard.
  • Hoke thought the team prepared well last week.
  • He emphasized red zone defense and finishing drives as the two areas that most need to improve.
  • Matt Wile and Kenny Allen will compete for kicking duties.

Opening statement:

“Thanks for coming. You know, as far as where we’re at as a team, we went back to work yesterday and the attitude and how our guys have stayed together, the leadership throughout the team has been awfully positive. I like the work ethic and I still like the work ethic from a physical and mental standpoint. You always evaluate where you're at and what you need to do and what could you have done differently and we've done that. We've talked about it from coaching staff-wise, from player-wise. Preparation was awesome throughout the week. It was as good as I've been around. Preparation in Michigan City at the hotel was awesome. Feel very good about our football team in a lot of ways. We've got to prepare. We got to execute a little better but as far as where this team's at I'm excited. We understand that our goals are still out there and now we've got to turn to Miami and be back at home with our students and the Michigan fans and go back to work."

How does the defensive approach have to change when you lose some key people like out of the secondary? I think you talked about when you can press man and when you had to back off of that.
“Well, I do think you've got to know your personnel. Number one, you want to make sure you put your personnel in positions so that they can be successful. In the second half we played more zone and from a defensive standpoint there were some things that we need to be tighter on. Some technique issues that we've got to clean up. Sometimes that happens when guys gets in certain environments where your fundamentals and techniques are everything. I thought we lost that and some of that is the environment that you're in. You either speed up – and I think we did that a little bit because of that or you just lose your fundamentals and techniques. So to answer your question yeah, you look at it and you change it a little bit."

Talk about having Jake Butt back and what his ceiling is. You look at his tools and where his ceiling is; where might he go?
"Well, you know, Jake was kind of a gametime decision in some ways and didn't play a lot of snaps but we'll see how he progresses. I think we’re going to be very cognizant of where he is from a physical standpoint and what's too much. We do the same thing in practice, what's too much and what's not. The technology today with some of the GPS things we’re into teaches a lot and you learn a lot. Health and wellness issues are part of that and talking about Jake is making sure we are doing the right things with him."

Talk about his…
"Well, we think he’s a very good football player. He ended up last year very well. I think he's learned a lot and he's one of those guys who is on the leadership council that isn't afraid to, even though he's a young guy, speak his mind and give his true reactions and feelings."

Talk about some of the positives and the improvement in the run defense.
"Well, the front seven I thought he did a pretty good job from that standpoint. Guys that we rotated throughout in the middle of the defense, I think they were aggressive. I thought they were gaps sound. I think Willie [Henry] may have had the most production of all of them but he and Ryan [Glasgow] as a group in there, I thought they did a nice job. That was a physical offensive line and so we got to take from what they did last week into this week and improve upon that."

Devin Funchess- we saw him leave the game and come back in. How’s he doing?

"He's fine. I'm not going to talk about any injuries but he's fine."

Did he workout and everything yesterday?
"He was in the building yesterday, yeah."

[After THE JUMP: pointed words about a lack of faith in the Big Ten, Hoke’s message for Michigan fans, and more player-specific non-injury-related questions]

You mentioned Willie Henry. Seems like he’s come a long way. Talk about his development and what is it that he’s doing particularly well?
"You know, I think it's a maturation process with Willie. He played some a year ago. In fact, he didn't play at all in this game a year ago and so he kind of had to earn his way back on and by the end of the year he was playing more but it's more his maturity. I think it is with all of the young guys. They really don't understand how to prepare totally. You talk about the tape and you talk about your work ethic. You know, you have a guy like Tom Brady when he came and spoke to the team and talked about what he does. Elvis Grbac has done the same thing. Richard Sherman – there’s a video that he talks about how he prepares every week and fundamentals and techniques being sound. We show that, talk to guys about it trying to help younger guys maybe mature a little faster in their execution and preparation but I think Willie's done that. And Willie might be the strongest guy on the football team overall but he still needs to separate himself more from where we are at."

With Jabrill and Ray [Taylor] both having injuries in the game what’s the situation this week? At what point do you need to know if they’re able to go to determine if they can play?
"I think it's a day-by-day thing."
There's not a deadline?
"No. No. It's a day by day thing. Obviously if they don't do much then we'll see what's best for the team, number one. If it's best for the team it'll be the best for them."

You mentioned younger players a little bit. In terms of rebounding from a loss like this, how important is it to tell them not to hang their heads too low? How do you get them motivated and not sulking for too long?
"Well, number one, I think they're pretty resilient. I think all 18- to 23-year-olds are pretty resilient. I think the other thing is from the leadership that we have within, the older guys. It's been addressed. We've got to learn from it and make sure that things that we can handle as coaches that we're handling those and then worry about the preparation again and the execution."

With Jabrill, he’s such an intense guy, he’s excitable and everything else. Has he been frustrated with this? Has it been difficult for him to sit? I mean, he dressed and it looked like he wanted to play. Has it been hard?

"Well, I think he's a competitor. I think we've got 105 competitors on our team so I don't think there's any doubt that he wants to play. I think it's part of what his DNA is and what he likes to do."

With the run defense and the pass defense, I think you guys got a bigger push on the run defense at least from the way it seemed. Was there something that was working better for the ground game as opposed to getting pressure on Golson?
"Number one, if you go through the tape and I know some of you do that and play coach, but some of the three-step drop game you're not going to do much with anyway. The ball is going to get out. The best way to do that is not to rush and to put your hands up, to be honest with you. And then he got out of some situations. From a run defense standpoint, I think in some ways we expected us to play that way versus the run. The biggest thing for us defensively: we have not created any opportunities for our offense. We haven't created field position. We haven't created any turnovers and that's as much as anything. So what's that mean? We’re not hitting the quarterback enough? Yeah, some of it's that. We’re not forcing bad throws. Not playing tight enough on those bad throws."

We’ve talked a little bit about Raymon and Jabrill, but just from a depth standpoint in the Appalachian State game that seemed to be a big strength, how many guys you could play. How does that effect what you guys want to do back there when there are presumably starters who aren’t going to be able to play?
"Yeah, the depth issues I think you always have. That's part of it. I think from a standpoint of where we’re at and where we want to be there's some guys like Jourdan Lewis and Stribling, Terry Richardson. We talk about the expectations are for the position and always have been and how they prepare is going to be really important."

You talked last week about the Notre Dame game being kind of a measuring-stick game. You talked about psyche and work ethic. Where do you think this team is on the football field? How good is this team right now?
"If you judge it from that game we did some things very well and did some things not very well. We had eight tackles for a loss defensively. That's the most we've had since UConn. 54 yards rushing, held them to that. Ran the ball efficiently at times and in spurts. What I think we didn't do: didn't play well enough in the red zone defensively and we didn't finish drives and when you have opportunities to put points on the board we've got to be able to do that. You have a nine play drive and you don't finish – that gets a little disheartening. The good thing was they stayed together and they kept going forward."

 

 

A lot of Michigan fans are disheartened, to use your word, with the loss. Is that your message to them right now?
"Our goal is still there. Our goal, and I've stated it 1,000 times, is to win the Big Ten championship so that's out there. Now, do we have to get better and work hard? Yeah, we do."

Offensive line- you’re happy with Glasgow at right [guard]?
"I thought when you take the film and look at it if you know what the play call is or the check to the play call and you go through it, or who's in charge of what protection-wise and all that, I thought they hung in there. Now, did they play perfect? No. They don't play perfect. At the same time, there were some guys playing against pretty good guys that I thought was encouraging."

When the game was out of hand late in the game you kept a lot of your starters in. Is there any thought about injury at that point or concern? How do you balance that?
"I think that's a delicate balance to some degree. I don't know if you really are someone who competes, is the game ever over? I know I played Ball State and we scored 21 points in a minute and six seconds one year."

In your mind where’s that line?
"I don't know if I can answer that because that's not how I look at things from a competitive standpoint. You've got a point there. There isn't any doubt that you don't want to be too prideful and too bullheaded and all that kind of stuff but we were still in the football game."

Referencing running backs, in week one we saw Derrick [Green] and DeVeon [Smith] run quite hard, a lot of drive behind them. It would appear that they were running quite hard against Notre Dame but the production wasn’t there. What was the root cause…
"The root cause was Notre Dame, right? It's a different team, so that was a little different. I think both of them play-wise played, I want to say, and I'm not saying carries but play-wise I think one was 25 plays and one was 26 plays. Something like that. You know, you've got to give Notre Dame some credit. I mean, if not I think you're being foolish."

What happened with why you weren’t able to create for them against Notre Dame? Other than Notre Dame being a good team or a better team than Appalachian State is there something you can cite? The offensive line?
"No. I mean, they're playing against better guys."

When you went back and looked at the film with Devin Gardner, what are you seeing there? You talked a little bit about it after the game but habit-wise, some of the turnovers, what are you seeing?
"Well, you're seeing he understands and realizes that when he’s going to run the ball we've got to have better ball security. He understands that as he pre-snap reads something there’s also a progression from there that he's got to do a better job with. He also made about five throws in there that were pretty special."

 

After the second turnover he came out and it looked like you went over and spoke with him. What’s your message to Devin in the middle of the game when some of those things are going wrong?
"Well, it certainly is that we believe in him. It certainly is go through your progressions. I think that's one thing that's great about having Nuss down on the field."

You say every year that the goal is the win the Big Ten Championship. Given the struggles for the conference over the first few weeks does that give you some sort of comfort that all of these teams are improving or have to?
"Well, you're probably one of those on the bandwagon that our conference isn't very good and I would tell you that that's opinions that I don't really think much of it because I think we've got a great conference. I think you see the teams in our conference and the competitive nature that they have. Now, do we need to win games like the game that we just played in? No question. We've got to worry about Miami of Ohio. More importantly, we've got to worry about Michigan because that's where it all starts."

You kind of already said what your message is to the team. As far as the fans that watch from the outside and see some of the similar issues that they saw last season, what would you say to them and how concerning is it as a coaching staff?
"if they’re truly fans they'll believe in these kids and what they've done and the hard work that they've put in. If they’re not, they won't."

One more question about the offensive line. Is Kalis, I’m not asking specific injury, [but] is he healthy?
"He dressed. He went through warm-ups and all that."
But you feel more comfortable with Graham at right guard why?
"Well, I think compete and challenge. So by the end of the week could it be different? It could.”

And is Glasgow still competing at center?

“We’re getting him reps there, yeah. We’ve got a good rotation, a good mix of what we’re doing.”

On [Matt] Wile: last week you said it wasn’t a competition. Is it now?

“Yeah, that’s a good question when you say it that way. I think Matt, I’ve got a lot of faith in Matt. We’ve got to get him straightened away. To be honest, the right hash a little bit was a little bit of a problem for him. He got it straightened out. I think the second one, if you watch it he slipped with his plant foot which caused it [to go] low and everything else. Like anybody they’re going to compete and challenge and Kenny [Allen] we’re going to give some kicks to and we’ll see who we feel most comfortable with, who can help Michigan win, and that’s who will kick for us.”

We saw all the guys who were dressed and I know you don’t want to discuss injuries, but is Desmond’s a long-term injury?

“You’re asking me something that I won’t answer.”

Well, it seems like it’s a different situation than the other guys.

“If there was a guy who was out for the year I’d tell you. Let’s put it that way.”

Comments

maizeonblueaction

September 9th, 2014 at 8:32 AM ^

We were listening to xm sirius radio yesterday and were caught off guard when an announcer joked "Has Michigan scored yet?" It's come to that - Michigan football has become a joke! It is time for Hoke and Brandon to go. My perception of what is now killing Michigan football is there is a serious morale problem. Even in the years with Rodriguez, the team had a fighting spirit - I have always appreciated their grittiness and determination to win. It was a Michigan identitiy thing.That was very much missing in the game with Notre Dame. For myself, I can date this lose of morale to the Ohio State game a couple years ago when Denard Robinson and Devin Gardner were both playing. I don't know much about football but it was clear even to me, that when Gardner was up, there would be a pass. When Denard was up, it was going to be a run. I suspect this was even more glaring to Ohio State. Michigan did very well the first half with both of them on the field at the same time and then everything fell apart in the second half with this "you can't miss our stragey approach'. After the game, Hoke threw the kids under the bus, by saying they didn't execute well and that's why they lost. Actually, the real glaring reason was the offensive play calling. Brandon should go because his last minute action of firing Rodriguez left them with Hoke, who at that moment was the only one who wanted the job. Hoke should go because he's not an effective coach and turning on your own players to cover for a poor offensive coordinator is unacceptable. Go Blue!

Shop Smart Sho…

September 8th, 2014 at 8:18 PM ^

I'm curious as to how aggresively Brian is willing to have you ask strategy questions.  

Is there any thought to asking if getting to the line so late in the play clock is by design or just something that is happening?

I'm assuming the quote about looking at game tape and "playing" coach is directed at MGoBlog, because I very much doubt that any of the other people there are doing it.

getsome

September 8th, 2014 at 8:51 PM ^

well its true to certain extent.  you can learn a good deal from re-watching and analyzing a game, scouts do it all the time though theyre almost always supplied with the best tape.  but you can only learn so much being outside the program.  

you really need coaches tape along with the calls / checks in order to truly understand assignments for all 11 guys when the balls snapped - evaluating without only provides so much  (ie can magnuson really blow his assignement or fail to communicate so often or does gardner really still lack ability or confidence to run his progressions past his primary read?)

hoke seems like nice guy, prob too nice since loyalty likely ruins him  (along with his lack of coordinator ability / analytical skill and his stubborn view of college football at its zenith still being michigans 97 team / personnel / schemes, evolution be damned) , but hes def become more hostile with media members

Year of Revenge II

September 9th, 2014 at 7:35 AM ^

"With the run defense and the pass defense, I think you guys got a bigger push on the run defense at least from the way it seemed. Was there something that was working better for the ground game as opposed to getting pressure on Golson? 
"Number one, if you go through the tape and I know some of you do that and play coach, but some of the three-step drop game you're not going to do much with anyway. The ball is going to get out. The best way to do that is not to rush and to put your hands up, to be honest with you. And then he got out of some situations. From a run defense standpoint, I think in some ways we expected us to play that way versus the run."

I do not know who asked this question, but I can cut him or her some slack.  They may be overwhelmed by the moment, or nervous, or just talking rather than having prepared a question, though you would think they would have prepared SOME.

The reality is though, that the question is anything but succinct. It could have been asked better by a fifth grader, but that seems harsh.  Yet...how about, "You seem to have a physical defensive line against the run, and can push forward there, but you cannot get any pressure on a quarterback looking to pass. Why not?"

I'll cut the questioner slack for a number of reasons that are not important for the purposes of this post. 

The questionee; however, is the head football coach at the University of Michigan, and that is now a sad state of affairs.  If he can be intimidated, and fearful, and put on the defense by some former engineering student who runs a tootball blog, we are a laughing stock.  

And we are. 31-0 for one.  Coach seems absolutely clueless during the game, looks like a special guest or a player's father grateful to be on the sideline rather than someone in charge of the team, and therefore lets his assistants function as coach.  

As for his answer to the question---I am tired of his act.  Blaming Brian Cook, or anyone but himself for his deficiencies, is not the Michigan man way.  I generally like his character, his personality, his genuineness, his take on life as far as an outsider looking in is able to glean that, which may not be very much.  However, he is not up to the task of running a major football program in my relatively ignorant opinion, certainly not a Michgan, an Alabama, a USC, a Texas, a Notre Dame, an  Ohio State, a Nebraska, an Oklahoma, etc. If that is not crystal clear to you now, you are in my opinion somewhat thick, or you just have not been paying attention.

Maybe it would got better this way---Q-"Hey Fred, how come we can't get ANY pressure on the quarterback?  A-"Gee, I don't know Barney, where are Wilma and Betty?" 

I am not qualified to debate good, experienced football coaches on what should be done, but I did graduate from Michigan, and I can read the writing on the wall.

BloomingtonBlue

September 8th, 2014 at 6:34 PM ^

Was nothing about tweets towards players He was deflecting blame to the players. I was negged to hell for a bunch of bullshit about taking it out of context.

pearlw

September 8th, 2014 at 8:12 PM ^

I now see why you make the reflecting comment. I didnt understand at first. The transcript above is not really what Hoke answered. Hoke cut off and answered the reporter after he said "what would you say to them" and before the reporter started to add the part about the concern of the coaching staff. This is at 16:43 of the video on the football website. You can make out the reporters question as Hoke is already answering. This may or may not affect how you view this as there was no mention about the coaches concern when Hoke started to answer it.

joeismyname

September 8th, 2014 at 7:02 PM ^

Funny how Hoke apparently deflects all blame on players and yet his players constantly stand up for him when asked about him. Hoke knows he needs to do better....and he does know something a lot about coaching the game of football, despite what many say. People at this point are looking for reasons to cherry pick everything the man says or does.

I'm not 100% sold on the man as our savior, but I'm still rooting for him to succeed, not to fall apart based on one comment. You all need to chill out. We got our ass beat, and Hoke admitted that, which is inherently deflecting blame on himself considering he was coaching the game. I played football and know for a fact it is the player's fault virtually every time a team loses. Hoke is not picking apart players, he's just saying they need to improve.

I really just think that we as a fan base are having a hard time giving Notre dame any credit because we can't accept the fact that they are out of their rut, and we are not out of ours.

pearlw

September 8th, 2014 at 7:12 PM ^

It depends how you interpret his statement. I look at his statement about fans and view that as sticking up for his players because i see all the stuff on twitter. If players hear noise about how the team sucks, then ai view Hoke's comments as standing up for the players. Clearly you dont take it that way but I think some do,

pearlw

September 8th, 2014 at 7:34 PM ^

Everyone interprets answer based on what they saw in the press conference to that point (if they actually watched it) and what they know is going on and tries to understand what his intentions were. Im not saying his comment was about twitter but I dont think it is a leap to say his comment was him trying to rail against any criticism of the players. (the twitter comment was just an example of this to show people it is real). Was it needlessly abrasive? Probably. It was directed to a select few and was an attempt to stand up for his players. it clearly was a mistake because everyone will take it as he is talking about a wider piece of the fan population.

dragonchild

September 8th, 2014 at 8:53 PM ^

The injury could be minor and he could still be wearing a boot.  If it's a joint injury you want to immobilize it, they probably have boots in stock and those things are much quicker to prepare than a cast or even taping.  A player could just have the sort of mild sprain where the swelling's gone in a few days and I'd still put them in the same boot you use for torn ligaments.  It's just easy.

What that really means is we don't know jack about the injury.  It could be a ding or a full-blown tear and he'd still be in a boot.

Jonesy

September 8th, 2014 at 6:20 PM ^

I know we got blown out, but I didn't think Michigan looked that bad.  Their defense line beat up our offensive line which was expected, and Golson was amazing while our cornerbacks weren't great, which wasnt expected.  I felt we played well most of the time but couldnt finish drives and couldn't get off the field defensively on third down while Golson was throwing perfect balls all day long.  I still think our team's pretty good and don't understand the sky is falling attitude.

Jonesy

September 8th, 2014 at 8:33 PM ^

The one where we stuffed them on the ground, outgained them overall, but couldn't finish drives, couldnt pass protect to save our lives and couldn't close the not so big windows golson perfectly threw to on every single down without 2 of our top 3 corners.  Seriously, I've never seen a team look better in a 31(7) point blowout.  We knew our O-line would suck and thats on RR and Borges and maybe Funk and there's nothing we can do about Golson playing like the next Heisman winner.  I feel much better about how we played this game than I do about how we played in almost every game last year including half the wins.

jsquigg

September 8th, 2014 at 11:26 PM ^

I'm sorry, but all this blame on Rodriguez for the state of the O-Line is complete and utter bullshit.  For starters, even if the gap in recruiting happens with Rod having the support of the AD, I'm more confident in him developing competent lineman than what Hoke has done with 4 and 5 stars.  This is year 4 of Hoke.  My optimism meter is in need of ressurection.  At some point the coaches become a problem.

The thing that really frustrates me is that Rod started out in a dark place, and even as the program crawled along little by little, it wasn't good enough.  Hoke is driving this program into a hole.  At the least the defense should be on par with what we saw the offense doing in year 3 of Rodriguez, but even that isn't happening.  We've just shifted the ineptness to the other side of the ball, and while the defense is much better, it is still not elite.

I will still watch and root for this team, but I feel bad for guys like Gardner who is on his third coordinator.  I just don't like it when players aren't being put in the best position to succeed, on either side of the ball.  I'm past the point of having the argument over how naive the fans are and how much the coaches know.  Most fans couldn't coach, but I think fans can tell a lot from what they see, and Hoke's whole insider/outsider act is getting old.

It's put up or shut up time and Hoke is busy talking.....

tricks574

September 9th, 2014 at 2:01 AM ^

When is it going to be Hoke's fault? Was 11-2 all Hoke yet somehow getting the shit kicked out of us 4 years later is all on Rich Rod? Or is it Borges and Funk? 

Who...exactly...do you think hired those guys? Who kept Funk on staff after the single worst O-line in Michigan history?

Jonesy

September 9th, 2014 at 7:25 PM ^

When we don't have a giant hole where upper-class o-lineman should be....

 

Everyone was pro-Borges before last year, after last year Hoke fired him, sounds reasonable to me.  Nobody knows if Funk is a problem, we do know Borges making a crazy young offensive line learn 10 different blocking schemes prevented them from ever being good at anything, and like I said, Borges is gone.

gwkrlghl

September 8th, 2014 at 9:22 PM ^

That was totally different. The defense wasn't being gashed for 30 yard plays. The offense was moving the ball semi-capably. It just felt like a game where Michigan couldn't convert their chances and ND converted all of theirs. Closest 31 point loss I've ever seen

Indiana Blue

September 8th, 2014 at 6:53 PM ^

Golson made ALL the hard throws and actually missed short ones and did have a few dropped balls too.  But in the first half he nailed every big play.  His running was non-existent, so the defense made him one dimensional, but he made the plays (sucks but give the kid credit).

I do have concerns with Hoke's game strategy.  Michigan is the underdog, so play the game like that.  Why go for it on 4th and 3, then not when your 18 yards closer?  Where's the trick plays?  In 2011, we faked FG's, punts, went for it on 4th down in our own territory ... it was contagious and the team simply believed in themselves and DAMN IT we WON football games!

Finally - I love Devin's heart to play football, but I believe the coaches know that he is having trouble throwing the ball to receivers moving up the field.  Zero slants (nd killed us on those throws), zero deep balls (one intermidiate to the endzone that wasn't catchable).  The wideouts got almost no yards after catch last week ... and Gallon was huge last year on yards after catch.  You can't button hook every freaking pass.  

Go Blue!