[Marc-Gregor Campredon]

Michigan 82, Purdue 58 Comment Count

Brian February 10th, 2022 at 11:27 PM

Well… we're saying there's a chance? Michigan picked up its first marquee victory of the year by stomping a Purdue team that had suffered its other three losses by a collective total of ten points. This Michigan team looks like a tourney lock. Penn State Michigan looks like an NIT team. The travails of youth.

This was a comprehensive beat down. You can point to the three-point shooting, and yeah that's a factor, but Michigan won virtually every facet of the game. They grabbed 7 more OREBs than Purdue and had seven fewer turnovers; Jaden Ivey was held to merely human levels of production; the eye test suggests the three-point gap was significantly influenced by shot quality.

How did this happen? Well, your intrepid observer has a few different suggestions.

  1. Hunter Dickinson three-point gravity is a thing. Michigan stuck in the game at Mackey because Dickinson was making everything, and Purdue clearly focused on Dickinson pick and pop action early. Juwan Howard anticipated this and the early portions of the game featured a lot of Moussa Diabate dunking the ball as the Purdue big got lifted out of the paint and Mason Gillis was neither aware enough or big enough to do much about Diabate cutting to the rim. Dickinson's gravity was a major factor in Michigan's OREB dominance.
  2. The kitchen sink was thrown at Ivey. After some dispiriting early possessions Michigan straight-up doubled/trapped Ivey on every screen and dared anyone else to make a play. This prevented Ivey from getting into the lane and was effective at reducing his usage and playmaking. Ivey went from 7 assists and 2 TOs in the first meeting to 0 assists and 5 TOs in the second. Ivey still went 5/8 from two and 5/7 from the line, but a couple of those baskets were early before Sink Time and a couple more were in transition. The defensive gambit worked.
  3. Purdue's wonky defense gave Michigan the wrong looks from three. Caleb Houstan is elite at taking standstill three pointers and Purdue gave him six looks. He made four. Eli Brooks got open corner looks as well, and after the initial "oh no Dickinson" phase gave way to more caution about Diabate as a roll man, Dickinson got a number of good looks himself.
  4. Zach Edey got in foul trouble. Dickinson drew a foul on him under a minute in and he played four first-half minutes. Trevion Williams continued to make Trademark Trevion Williams Garbage™™ but not having Edey as an option was problematic in a lot of ways for Purdue; when Williams was in Purdue frequently auto-doubled Dickinson, leading to rotations and the wrong looks from three.
  5. Shooting randomness for the win. Yeah, Michigan dared the nation's leading ORTG guy to bury a few threes and got lucky he missed. Still… would rather rely on Mason Gillis bombing you into the stone age than Jaden Ivey.

All that adds up to an F5 night on Kenpom, and indeed as your author types this and the game makes the system Michigan flies up 20(!) spots and is now projected as a 17-13, 11-9 Big Ten team. That would be enough, probably. Just have to keep shooting a billion percent from three.

Comments

RAH

February 11th, 2022 at 12:42 AM ^

Admittedly the shooting randomness of the event was important but Howard and the staff put together a great game plan, made the right in-game adjustments, and made excellent decisions on player use. It wasn't just shooting luck that produced this result. (Not forgetting, of course, that the players ran the offense beautifully and executed the defense at the highest level of the season.) 

outsidethebox

February 11th, 2022 at 7:18 AM ^

This is an elite coaching staff...have clearly demonstrated this through their first two seasons together. Anyone who does not know this has a very pedestrian understanding of this game. 

The ceiling for this team remains very high...this game does not assure that they are going to reach it-but it is there. 

Stringer Bell

February 11th, 2022 at 9:20 AM ^

It's not just the shooting.  It was the ability to get guys like Diabate open looks at the rim.  The offense looked more like the offense of last year with crisper cuts and ball movement, not relying primarily on post play, etc.  The defensive gameplan was also great.  This was definitely Juwan's best job this season.  Hope he and the team continue it.

spiff

February 10th, 2022 at 11:38 PM ^

A blowout like this when they also missed a ton of shots at the rim. Make some of those and this would have been an even bigger blow out. Great game!!

Z_Wolverista

February 10th, 2022 at 11:38 PM ^

Aaah... a column written by Brian. Good writing, smooth chaser to a sweet game.

(Not that I don't enjoy the on-it coverage, but "This Michigan team looks like a tourney lock. Penn State Michigan looks like an NIT team. The travails of youth" is pure Go Blue.

Where else? do you read a string of sentences like that

Also,

keep flying guys! Get some rest, then round out the year, polish off some buckeyes, yummy dessert (have y'all had some buckeyes? Great for breakfast, nom nom) 

UMinSF

February 10th, 2022 at 11:38 PM ^

Huge, huge win. Total team effort.

Dickinson forcing their giants to chase him out to the three line really opened things up for Diabate.

Purdue failing to contest Michigan's three-point shooters played right into our hands.

Tremendous hustle by Michigan on D - best, most aggressive and determined effort of the season. 

Houstan and Hunter becoming solid three-point threats completely transforms this team. 

Finally, both Brooks and Smith played their hearts out tonight, flying all over the court, attacking on offense and rabid on defense.

What a win - Go Blue!  Keep it going! 

TrueBlue2003

February 11th, 2022 at 12:44 AM ^

I said a few games ago that Hunter needs to take 4-5 threes a game.  I revise that to 6-8.  He's too good at them and it spreads the floor for Diabate to cut, Jones to drive, etc.

And Michigan may have found a solution to their pick and roll defensive woes with this matchup zone.

Great win!  Every starter had a really good game.

outsidethebox

February 11th, 2022 at 7:37 AM ^

Defensively Michigan does not have good man personnel. The infatuation, in general, with playing a man-to-man defense is nonsensical. Michigan should play predominantly zone...one of the "point" zones...1-3-1 or 1-2-2. These zones allow you to, both, keep strong on ball pressure AND defend the interior. I have no idea why more teams do not defend in this manner. Having a talent like Diabate should push Michigan to a 1-3-1 team. This is/has been my only beef with the coaching this year.

Engin77

February 11th, 2022 at 11:07 AM ^

The predominance of man-to-man defense in the nba, and pro scouts seeking those skills, tended to drive teams seeking elite nba-bound players to playing more man-to-man, IMHO.  But I’m told there is more zone being played in the association, so perhaps we’ll see more zone in college basketball.

TrueBlue2003

February 11th, 2022 at 12:29 PM ^

Zone is usually a far inferior defense and teams had been moving away from zones for years because so many players became so good at shooting threes that you simply couldn't run a zone sustainably.

But I think zones became viable again when the three point line moved back to the international level.  It's still not at all preferable, but Hunter has such vast defensive limitations that the zone allows Michigan to survive those because they can just keep him under the basket without needing to defend pick and rolls.

It also has the benefit of novelty at the moment with little tape for opposing coaches to game plan around.  Big ten coaches will very soon figure out ways to crush it the way they did with Beilien's 1-3-1.  Michigan is fortunate that Purdue, the third best 3 point shooting team in the country, missed a bunch of open threes (although they obviously could have made several more as still lost this one).

outsidethebox

February 11th, 2022 at 12:57 PM ^

Man defense favors the offense...is much more entertaining...and this is why the NBA banned zone defenses. 

I was fortunate to play for a great defensive coach who preferred winning and good play over entertaining the fans-I'll restrain my expletive filled rant in this regard...other than to say that in interscholastic sports the playing of the games are about the players-ALL about the players. Zone allows you to maximize your strengths and minimize your weaknesses. 

TrueBlue2003

February 11th, 2022 at 12:38 PM ^

Ivey's usage is still 27.5%.  That's higher than Hunter's usage (27.1).

And I'm not arguing his top 5.  Just noting high good the top end talent is in the big ten this year such that a guy like Ivey isn't in the top 5 and that isn't crazy.  I had a buddy note recently that there are about 8 big ten players projected to go in the first round and wondered if that's the most ever.  Certainly the most in a long time. And that doesn't include good college players like Dickinson and Cockburn.

And while a couple of those guys faded recently (Diabate for one, but maybe he's turning that around), there will almost certainly be 5 taken in the first 15 or so picks: Ivey, Davis, Murray, McGowans and Christie.