artist's impression

Basketbullets: Commonalities Between Lewis Garrison And An Incautious Baby Comment Count

Brian December 12th, 2019 at 1:32 PM

12/11/2019 – Michigan 62, Illinois 71 – 8-2, 1-1 Big Ten

A metaphor only because of the target. Reggae Godzilla done kilt a man:

Lewis Garrison was lying on the court for a full two minutes after that. Because obviously.

It is important to signal your presence when you are in the vicinity of Kofi Cockburn, because if he does not know you are there he may atomize you on accident. This a lesson my one-year-old could also learn. It does no good to babble constantly if she's just going to go dead silent when she is standing directly behind me. It's like she wants to be kneed in the face, but then when you do it she is very upset. I have explained this to her multiple times, and she goes "ba ba ba" like she understands, and then I turn around and I've atomized a baby. I turn to this Onion article for solace. I'd put a bell on her but that would drive me nuts all the time and kneeing the baby in the face is a short-term problem, because babies forget everything instantly.

What was I talking about? Right. Kofi Cockburn : Lewis Garrison :: Normal Adult : Baby That Refuses To Signal Presence. When Illinois comes to Crisler I'd recommend all attendees advertise their location constantly just in case, preferably by making robot noises. BOOP BEEP... PLZ NOT TO KILT ME KOFI ...BOOP BEEP

[After THE JUMP: marginally less silly content]

Sometimes it's just making shots. Michigan went 3/18 from three in a game it lost by nine. Depending on your opinion of Zavier Simpson threes about 14 of them were good to excellent looks that didn't go down at the rate they usually do.

There didn't seem to be any particular reason other than Franz Wagner's wrist injury that Michigan shot 17% from three. There were a lot of other things that went wrong; Michigan could have salvaged the game if they didn't, but the story of the game was Illinois taking advantage of its standout skill—offensive rebounding—while Michigan did not take advantage behind the arc.

Yes, Illinois was 1/11 from three themselves, but unlike Michigan's performance that was within the bounds of reason. Illinois entered as one of the least prolific three-point shooting teams in the country and Michigan entered as one of the best 3PA defenses in the country. Illinois looks were mostly ugly jacks, three of them from centers.

Michigan shot 55% from two and had a total of eight turnovers. Make your threes.

Basketball Dad never left. Man, this was right out of the Beilein road loss playbook: win turnovers solidly, get clobbered on the boards, lose because your open threes don't go down. Michigan didn't commit a foul for the first 17 minutes. They shot 6 free throws all game. If Juwan Howard had gotten ejected at halftime for saying he liked sandwiches it would have been perfect.

49180205803_7c31d1f9b4_k

Simpson: 8 A, 1 TO, seems to be back to junior A:TO levels [Campredon]

Related. Michigan got killed on the boards but because they got 6 OREBs of their own and won TOs by 5 they only had a shot volume deficit of 4. Make shots. Michigan's up to 66th in TO rate and is trending such that they'll hit the top 50 in a couple more games.

Road stuff. One of the bad threes should have been a good one but Brandon Johns turned an open catch and shoot look into a catch, hesitate, pump, and shoot look. Never in the history of basketball has one of those gone down. Michigan also shot horribly at Louisville—although in that game Michigan's average quality of look was poor—and you wonder a bit about whether their decision-making is being affected.

Johns later inexplicably gave Bezhanishvili the baseline for a dunk; given his confidence struggles I wonder if he's got a home/road competence split bigger than most.

Mirror universe Wagner. This Wagner is already a good or better defender. Illinois barely challenged him, with just 2 FGAs against him per Synergy; he turned in three blocks and a steal and had a couple other deflections that could have become turnovers. Also he had a 36 ORTG because he was 0/4 from three and had 3 TOs. Right now he's the precise opposite of his brother.

I get why Michigan's trying to play through it with him, especially when Johns comes off the bench and immediately seems rattled. Just have to hope his stroke comes back.

Michigan executed its gameplan on first shots. Illinois's first 20 points came in the paint. Some of that is Cockburn and Bezhanishvili posting, and fine, whatever. Bezhanshivili hit a hook that was so low I can't believe it got over the front rim. It happens.

Andres Feliz repeatedly getting to the rack was not part of the plan:

But even with those lapses Michigan still pushed over half of Illinois's shots into the midrange, where they went 13/32. They gave up a point per possession because the gave up too many FTs in the second half and they got hammered at the rim, where their normally excellent defense got whacked. Illinois went 14/18 there. Unfortunately, hoop-math has not updated so I'm not sure how many of those makes were immediate putbacks. Chances are about half of them were since Illinois had eight second-chance buckets.

Pretty much the only problem with Michigan's defense was rebounding.

Bad rotations. Brad Underwood substituted his centers at odd times, leading to stretches in both halves when Colin Castleton had to check Kofi Cockburn. These were tenuous at best. Cockburn got a putback immediately after Castleton's insertion in the first half; in the second half Castleton fouled Cockburn on back-to-back possessions trying to deny post entries.

Cockburn did some work on Teske as well but have to think those possessions are more likely to go Michigan's way if he's on the floor.

Comments

theytookourjobs

December 12th, 2019 at 1:45 PM ^

Last night was a reminder that this is a John Beilein roster.  We are going to struggle against physical teams, and if they don't shoot at least 30% from 3, they aren't winning the game.  Still look way better than I had hoped they would at this point.  Gonna be a fun season

1VaBlue1

December 12th, 2019 at 2:48 PM ^

Not sure why, it was a true statement.  If an adult ever expects a 1-yr old person to watch out for themselves, the adult is wrong.  Case closed.

I fully empathize Brian's position, though, because I've been in it.  Sometimes, you just can't see the little things in time to prevent the wife from screaming at you to be more careful.  

KBLOW

December 12th, 2019 at 2:17 PM ^

Officiating last night was definitely on the extreme end of blatant homerism. No, it did not cause the loss and, yes, the team needs to learn how to play through it, but Illinois shooting the double bonus for nearly 10min while they had only been called for 3 fouls was one of the most lopsided games I've seen in a while. And that isn't even getting into the numerous ignored in the paint travels they got away all game long.

Yinka Double Dare

December 12th, 2019 at 3:13 PM ^

My complaint is less how many Illinois was called for and more how our guys got called for one foul in the first half, did not appear to change how they were playing in the second half, and were whistled for 10 fouls in the first 10 minutes of the second half. That's basically impossible to deal with if you're trying to play defense because you have no idea what you can do in the eyes of the refs.

LKLIII

December 12th, 2019 at 4:03 PM ^

One foul in particular really got to me.

Simpson has the ball & is basically hip-checked out of bounds by an Illinois player.  Officials called it a turnover, give the ball to Illinois, and call SIMPSON for a foul for allowing the Illinois player to hip-check him apparently.....

I'm not a guy who complains about officiating very often.  In fact, the last time I did was that 2016 dong-punch football game in Columbus.  But the officiating in this particular game struck me as pretty atrocious.

 

 

yossarians tree

December 12th, 2019 at 2:31 PM ^

I was surprised at how much better and more polished Illinois has gotten since last year. They're way more under control and very physical. Cockburn is a beast for an 18 year-old. That team is ascending.

TrueBlue2003

December 12th, 2019 at 5:29 PM ^

I'm not sure I've seen a team transform the style they play so dramatically in one season without having a coaching change.  They were up tempo to the max last year (and that's typical of Underwood teams), fouled a bunch, forced TOs, turned it over and that has all completely flip flopped.

They're totally different this year. 

They've gone from 306th in the country in defensive rebounding to 18th!! 

They went from 338th in fouling last year (i.e. they fouled a ton) to 3rd this year (i.e. they basically never foul)!!!  That simply boggles the mind.

Even if you decide you want to start fouling less or rebounding more, to be able to turn a complete 180 in one season is amazing because you can tell guys change, you can work on changing but to see such a dramatic change so quickly is impressive.

They went from forcing the 24th most TOs to the 302nd.  Just a totally different approach.

And it seems to be instituted entirely around Cockburn, despite having Ayo "roadrunner" Dosunmu who was probably much better suited to the old style.

Joby

December 12th, 2019 at 3:59 PM ^

Think of this: one arm is about 6% of total body weight. Let's say Cockburn is 300 lbs for easier math. 

6% x 300 lbs. = 18 lbs.

Let's say, for the sake of argument, that he's capable of throwing an 80 mph fastball. Let's also say that his celebration motion used about half of that energy.

 

Would you want to get hit by an 18 lb. piece of plywood reaching a swing speed of 40 mph on the top of your head?

TrueBlue2003

December 12th, 2019 at 2:39 PM ^

I wonder if Michigan is too extreme on the "no threes" defense, given that the three point line was moved back, and especially given this particular opponent.

Illinois is terrible at threes and had, at almost any given time, a complete offensive non-entity on the floor. 

They have two solid bigs.  There were some post ups where their fifth guy even stood almost at the half court line (off the screen) to take the defender far away from the paint.  If that guy is going to take himself out of the offense, play 5 on 4.  This is recipe for mixing some things up and bringing doubles.

I think Michigan right now is playing too much like NBA defense where you legitimately have to worry about every guy hitting threes at a high rate.  In this years college game, with the extended three point line, I think the math has changed a bit in terms of how you should defend.

I say this also because I don't think Michigan's previously excellent FG defense at the rim was sustainable.  They don't have elite shot blocking.  They had an unusually high number of fluky missed layups and such in the first 8-9 games and 14/18 is more in line with what Michigan should expect to give up on at-the-rim shots.

B-Nut-GoBlue

December 12th, 2019 at 2:57 PM ^

This is a good point.  Part of me was wondering last night whether it was the scheme that was allowing, albeit their very athletic and shall we say talented guards, to get into the lane as often they did or are those guys just going to do that to most everybody this year?!  I do think our scheme as you're stating probably had something to do with it as we should've packed and guarded the interior more to disallow penetration...possibly an example, when they go into their weave maybe we don't follow it/guard it well, so much, far from the basket and instead focus on shutting down any penetration lanes and keep forcing them to jack up 3s they likely wouldn't have made enough of.

Also, there is some very shitty luck going on with us in regards to certain rebounds and "loose balls" where the ball seems to be magnetized towards the opposing team versus our guys as we have a propensity to not get these 50/50 balls.  This isn't an effort thing either, and I hesitate to call them 50/50 balls.  The ball when tipped/blocked/clanking off the rim, truly seems to find the other team for them to grab, all too often.  Hopefully that starts to equal out.

TrueBlue2003

December 12th, 2019 at 3:57 PM ^

I was referring more to Michigan putting their bigs on islands without bringing occasional doubles from guys that are literally standing at half court.

My thoughts on some of the dribble drive penetration:

1. I'm a staunch no-middle, force baseline guy so what Eli does here by giving up the middle to Dosunmu (instead of forcing him into the baseline help) makes my skin crawl. Especially because it gave up a drive to the right to a right hander.  That said, Eli stays in front of him and forces a tough shot.  I just goes down.  Dosunmu is much taller and he's a good player.  If you're going to give up drives to the middle, you can't defend much better than that, and you tip your cap.

Eli is a PG often guarding the opposing teams best wing player and he gives up a lot of length in those matchups so he's going to get beat sometimes even if he plays it the best he physically can.

2. DeJulius is struggling with on-ball defense right now and he got toasted a couple times. I don't know that there's much you can do about that other than try to hide him on the worst offensive player.

3. Johns getting burned by Goergi for the dunk was just a terrible mental mistake.  He's looking at the ball instead of being up the line and on the line (i.e. denying his man the ball by being between him and the ball) and then he lunges at the pass which is a terrible mistake and he's out of the play. That's focus and discipline.

LKLIII

December 12th, 2019 at 4:09 PM ^

Not my theory on Franz Wagner, as I heard it on the Edge of the Internet.  But I'll pass it along b/c I like it:

The theory is--along with his wrist injury, played in Europe, came to campus even later in the fall than a normal freshman, and also didn't get several cupcake games in which to warm up....

He's just super young & may have grown quite a bit in the past 6-12 months still.  The observation from the original poster on this theory was "he looks like a baby giraffe out there."  I know it's common scenario in other areas of athletics & dance.  If the dude's body proportions have changed notably over a short period of time, it still make take him an other 6-12 months to get used to the mechanics of his new body.  

For another comparison, somebody said that Wagner is like 1.7 years younger than what Iggy was at this point last year.  Imagine a Wagner with another 12-18 months in the system, Camp Sanderson, etc.  He's going to be a beast as long as as his shot-making confidence isn't destroyed in the meantime.

 

 

B-Nut-GoBlue

December 12th, 2019 at 5:15 PM ^

All makes sense!  He'll be fine.  It may be frustrating for this season especially when we see the glimpses in game, or even full games when we think the breakout occurs...but it's still a process with him.  He'll acclimate over the next year and keep growing into a good player.

TrueBlue2003

December 12th, 2019 at 5:42 PM ^

Well, we know that he was this tall a year ago, don't we?  He's looked like a baby giraffe since then. I don't think that's the problem. He just got back from a broken wrist.

He's only taken 23 threes which means it's such a small sample size that if just three more of them went in, his 3pt% would be at a solid 35 instead of 22.

He's gonna be fine.

mgobaran

December 12th, 2019 at 4:44 PM ^

Shoot more 3s! We went 3/18, but a third of them came from Teske/Simpson. Your 3 point shooters went as follows:

Livers: 2/3 (needed to shoot more!!)
Wagner: 0/4 (shoot more, he already got his misses out of the way!)
Brooks: 0/1 (one three?!)
DDJ: 0/1 
Nunez: 0/1

Livers was actually good from three. Wish he would take over the game more often. Wagner could shoot himself out of a slump. Brooks, DDJ, and Nunez* aren't going to get a good rhythm shooting one three a game. 

 

*Nunez plays pretty limited mins. Big issue I've had in our losses were keeping him stapled to the bench when we need some threes to get back in the game.

TrueBlue2003

December 12th, 2019 at 5:47 PM ^

There's something seriously wrong with the fact that Livers took only six shots total. 

We need MOAR Livers (usage).  He's way down at 17% overall.  He has the lowest TO rate of anyone in the rotation. He can give a little of that up for higher usage.

And he only had one rebound in 37 minutes!! In a game Michigan gave up 14 orebs.  Livers has the lowest defensive rebound rate of anyone in the rotation...as a power forward!  Lower than Z, lower than Brooks, lower than DeJulius.  That's crazy.

Also crazy is that Livers was -1 in 37 minutes last night which means Michigan was -8 in the three minutes he was on the bench.  That's nuts.