10 men on the field for a punt return.

Submitted by Shop Smart Sho… on

Just like the title says.  At 10:45 in the 2nd, Rutgers is punting from midfield. Norfleet is deep by himself.  5 guys on the line.  2 players covering each Rutgers gunner.

1+5+2+2=10.

How in the blue fuck does this keep happening?

 

*****EDIT*****

Decided to look at the rest of the punts.  

Next punt happens at 12:58 in the 3rd.  Michigan was set with only 10 men.  Had to run the 11th guy onto the field.

Next punt comes at 6:42 in the 4th.  They have all 11 guys on the field this time!!

 

So, 10 guys for 1st punt.

11 guys for second, after they noticed they were 1 short.

11 guys for third.

I guess that is progress?

MichiganStudent

October 5th, 2014 at 11:50 AM ^

I hope this gets brought up tomorrow at his press conference. Brady is so far out of his league it's comical.

mGrowOld

October 5th, 2014 at 11:50 AM ^

I keep trying to imagine a scenario where I could fail so spectacularly and repeatedly as Hoke in the fundamentals of my job and still retain it and I cannot. I literally cannot think of one boss I've ever had (and I've worked for a lot of people over the past 40 years) who would tolerate this much ineptness and not fire me.
And I worked for my dad for a while.

Don

October 5th, 2014 at 12:01 PM ^

It's almost as if the entire team and all the coaches are lighting up before the game. That would explain a lot of things—not recognizing formations, screwing up block assignments, being constantly four steps behind on pass coverage, looking so slow like they're running in molasses, and not being able to count to eleven.

goblue16

October 5th, 2014 at 11:55 AM ^

i cant believe these coaches are being paid that much and cant even preform the simplest of tasks. Anyone else think we should send an apology to Al Borges. I was one of those people who blamed all the offensive woes on him. Im beginning to think he was doing everything he could but thats all he had to work with?

MaximusBlue

October 5th, 2014 at 12:02 PM ^

Softened my take on Borges. He had many faults, but our offense at times and in certain games looked very explosive and put up numbers. I've even realized he masked a lot of our faults. I never understood why Mattison always got a pass while Borges took a beating.

goblue16

October 5th, 2014 at 12:07 PM ^

its the whole "Michigan man" thing once again. the defense has been terrible the last 2 seasons yet somehow people turn a blind eye to it. Our pass defense has gotten worse each year under mattison and our rush defense is average at best. The only reason the numbers say differently is because teams havent really needed to run against us but when they need to they gash us for 20+ yards. This whole staff needs to go. Matttison is overrated and Nussmeier wont be able to fix this offense on his own

johnthesavage

October 5th, 2014 at 12:09 PM ^

Borges is still responsible, in my mind, for our unbelievably incompentant running game last year. Nuss was brought in, first and foremost, to fix that, and it has improved a lot actually.

The passing game however has just disappeared. I still think Borges was part of the problem last year, but yeah, believing it was mostly him was obviously wishful thinking.

goblue16

October 5th, 2014 at 12:29 PM ^

but i think the reason the run offense has improved is because Fitz is gone and Smith and green are now your feature backs. i think it was Brady's stubborness to keep Fitz the starter is what doomed the offense. Has the oline really improved that much anyhow? the sacks are still great and we havent been able to run against the good teams either

maizenbluenc

October 5th, 2014 at 12:29 PM ^

the reason Brady Hoke used to call time outs just before the play clock expiring, is because big Al Borges was screaming down from the booth: "play clock, Play Clock, PLAY CLOCK - CALL A DAMNED TIME OUT!!!!!!"

And the GA on the headset told Hoke, and Hoke called it.

acnumber1

October 5th, 2014 at 11:56 AM ^

10 ... 11 ... doesn't really matter when Norfleet is fielding punts.  He is electric.  He's always taking those back for 6.

 

/ not criticizing 'fleet, just making fun of my irrational confidence that he will take one back each and every time he fields a kick / punt.

steve sharik

October 5th, 2014 at 11:56 AM ^

...but it does exist:

This is why you don't have starters on special teams.  If you have depth of talent (as we supposedly do) then the backups can be great special teams players.  And since this is their opportunity to play, they're not likely to forget they need to be out there, whereas it's natural for a starter on O or D to come to the sideline when a series ends.

Like I said, it's not a good argument, because...know your job.

MaximusBlue

October 5th, 2014 at 11:57 AM ^

How is it possible to make the same idiotic mistakes over and over. Shit like this doesn't even happen at the pee-wee level, let alone big time college football. I can't deal. I just can't deal.

goblue16

October 5th, 2014 at 12:02 PM ^

its not just his words. he looks so lost out there like he throws the team out there hoping for something good to happen. Ive never seen a coach look so lost on the sidelines. hes a deer in headlights and the cars about to smash him