Sam Webb LB Tweet

Submitted by Frank Drebin on

Sam Webb @SamWebb77

Change alert! Gut NOW as of this morning says the number of LBs #Michigan takes has a strong chance of being > 2. Recruiting = #ForeverFluid

 

Looks like things are looking good for Gedeon and McCray. Also, it looks like the questions of will we turn away Levenberry or O'Daniel have been answered as well. The coaches must be telling kids we are taking 3-4 LB's again this year.

Section 1

March 5th, 2012 at 10:03 AM ^

He'd be the same sort of backfield presence as Wyatt Shallman, wouldn't he?

Anyway, it wouldn't bother me if we loaded up with 3-4 players of that quality.  It is guys like that who make up the guts of special teams anyway.  And, as a Michigan fan who's been around long enough, I can recall years when we were a bit desperate for more depth at Linebacker.  I'm amazed at how lucky we've been, that Desmond Morgan has been such a surprisingly high-performer, and that we got throught the year with so few injuries at the LB position.

TexanGOBLUE

March 5th, 2012 at 10:27 AM ^

I feel good about taking 4 LBs. Some players just don't produce, some get hurt, or are just overrated and become special teams vets. In a position that is as important as LB we should be very stout.  

gremlin

March 5th, 2012 at 10:10 AM ^

IMO we clear up some room by not offering Bell and Jones 5th years.  Also, it seems to me like we could use a little help at WR now, and wasn't Cam Gordon a WR out of highschool?  Anyone think there is a chance he switches back now that Desmond Morgan and Jake Ryan have filled the void?

AA2Denver

March 5th, 2012 at 10:33 AM ^

I think we should take 2 and move on to other positions of need. Any of them will be fine additions, but we took 4 excellent LBs last year, possibly 5 considering Mario's size and speed, so taking 4 this year isn't necessary.  However, if there are defections and we end up with 24 (+/-) spots then hell yes take all of these great LBs.

 

 

Bodogblog

March 5th, 2012 at 10:55 AM ^

http://mgoblog.com/content/clinic-items-greg-mattison
4-3 versus 3-4: THE FINAL WORD. "We'd be here for hours" if someone tried to argue him away from playing the 4-3 under. Said something along the lines of "if you've got that 330 pound nose tackle and your ends and your linebackers, okay, God bless you." I thought of Pipkins—what is Mattison going to do with a 330 pound nose? Anyway, Greg Mattison will never run a 3-4. End of story.

Chi-Blue

March 5th, 2012 at 10:55 AM ^

What you can really read from this is the following. Michigan would really like to take 2 LB's. The one they really want is Levenberry as he could play 1 of 2 positions and he could start at both SAM and MIKE. He is the bigtime recruit they wanted, but decided to offer others as is always the case. The other one that they really like is Gedeon because of versitility as well and the fact he is going to be a BEAST and Hoke and Mattison know it. McCray is a good player and they will take him if he commits. The one that kind of puzzles me is the O'Daniel offer as he seems like WILL or possibly Mike if he grows. Just an opinion.

Seattle Maize

March 5th, 2012 at 1:22 PM ^

Last year the 4 Lb's we took were all slated for Mike and Will. This year at least 3 of the 4 we lead for could be slated for Sam or DE. Gideon is a freak athlete and kind of reminds me of Jake Ryan and could play Sam. McCray according to Rivals is already 6-4 230 and could easily become a rush end. Ej levenberry could seemingly play either Mike or grow into a Sam and is just too good to turn down. O'Daniel looks like a Will all the way. If we define Lb in the traditional sense (mike or will) then we may only still take 1 or 2 while being able to grab all 4 of these talents. Edit: sorry guys didn't read the rest of the comments which say basically what I'm saying here.