MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 28th, 2016 at 5:53 PM ^

The SEC lifting their ban is just a conference repealing a rule that put its school at a competitive disadvantage.

Correct, and the obvious conclusion to be drawn from that is that the competitive disadvantage was a much greater concern than whatever student-welfare bullshit they used to pretend to justify the ban in the first place.

LJ

April 28th, 2016 at 6:00 PM ^

That doesn't make them hypocritical.  They're just saying "we think it would be best for everyone if this practice were not followed as a whole, but we're not willing to sacrifice our own chance of winning for that."  Maybe that means they're not the best defenders of whatever moral issues they were advocating for, but I don't see how it's hypocritical.

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

April 28th, 2016 at 6:42 PM ^

Because, when asked, they specifically said it was not about a competitive advantage and was entirely a principled stand because Think Of The Children. Hypocrisy, from the dictionary: "a pretense of having a virtuous character, moral or religious beliefs or principles, etc., that one does not really possess."

If they really Cared About The Children, they wouldn't let their coaches partake in such an awful activity, but that would hurt their programs.

WolverineHistorian

April 28th, 2016 at 4:11 PM ^

Never understood what the SEC had to complain about. They'll still continue to throw wads of cash at excellent players and get plenty back on their return. It certainly didn't hurt Auburn when they "recruited" Cam Newton a few years ago. This was going to continue and the media was going to slobber all over the conference regardless if there were camps or not.

LSAClassOf2000

April 28th, 2016 at 4:25 PM ^

We continue to believe football recruiting is primarily an activity best-focused in high schools during the established recruiting calendar, which has provided opportunities for football prospective student-athletes from all across the country to obtain broad national access and exposure but with appropriate guidance from high school coaches, teachers and advisers that focuses on both their academic and athletic opportunities as they decide where they will play college football. - Greg Sankey on the ban reversal

Wait, wait.....so what was the problem you had with camps again, Greg? I mean, other than the fact that your conference had a lame rule and you believed that it best suit your conference if everyone had the same lame rule....and that whole "protect the cartel" thing?

BuckNekked

April 28th, 2016 at 4:48 PM ^

What the hell does this quote mean? Isnt that exactly what Harbaugh is doing? I know there are camps planned with ODU from the FCS level but the camps last season were all run by High School coaches with Harbaugh and staff as invited guest coaches. So these camps were "primarily an activity best-focused in high schools during the established recruiting calendar". And if coaches from colleges arent allowed to work those HS camps how have they  "provided opportunities for football prospective student-athletes from all across the country to obtain broad national access and exposure'?

And if I hear one more person affiliated with the SEC say "student-athlete" when they really mean chattel, Im gonna puke. 

NRK

April 28th, 2016 at 11:18 PM ^

It's a business speak way to imply that your position helps support something nobody will disagree with by saying "continue to believe" while subtly implying that your opponent does not believe in that thing. Typical PR BS spin that most intelligent people can see is a pile of garbage meant to confuse the masses. We support the kids! Yah! SEC!

Steve in PA

April 28th, 2016 at 4:30 PM ^

The ACC and SEC are going to tear themselves and each other to shreds.  I hardly think any of those schools are interested in leaving the talent rich area they are in to come north where 5* recruits are few and far between.  

No, they are now going to each other's backyard.  Every week LSU, Alabama, and the rest of the power schools are going to have someone camping 'out back'.  The SEC's 50 mile fortress has been breached now.

DamnYankee

April 28th, 2016 at 5:29 PM ^

Locals in the know have always said the ban wasn't about keeping other conferences out of the south. It was meant to protect member schools from cannibalizing and one-upping each other until no one was left unscathed.  As my Auburn friend says "Remember, the SEC proudly boasts that it's unofficial motto is "If ya' ain't cheatin', ya ain't tryin."

M-Dog

April 28th, 2016 at 8:38 PM ^

The joke is on the SEC.  They had a ban on satellite camps, not to keep Harbaugh out of Prattville, but ot keep Miles out of Tuscaloosa and keep Saban out of Gainesville.  It was to protect them from themselves.

But now thanks to their whining, they just shot themselves in the foot.  

Harbaugh will come down there for a day or two here and there and that will be the end of it.  But Saban and his assistants will live in places like Baton Rouge.  Likewise for the rest of the SEC coaches.  They are going to be a big pain in each other's asses.

You think you had to work hard for that 5 million dollars before, Hugh . . .  

CoverZero

April 28th, 2016 at 4:42 PM ^

"At Michigan State, we were never No. 1," Saban said. "That was always Michigan. It was always U-M this or that. "If I'd gone to Ohio it would have been Ohio State. Indiana, it is Purdue. Chicago, it's every other school in the Big Ten. Wherever you go you're looking at someone else when you're recruiting, trying to catch up, trying to convince someone you're up there." 1999

Fuzzy Dunlop

April 28th, 2016 at 4:59 PM ^

I don't see this as hypocritical at all.  No reason they should put themselves at a competitive disadvantage -- if other schools are going to come into their territory, they should be able to go to other areas.

The problem was that they were trying to force their self-imposed protectionist measures on the rest of the NCAA.  Now that that ploy has failed, I have no problem with them participating on an even playing field.

BuckNekked

April 28th, 2016 at 5:04 PM ^

Lost amid the euphoria of overturning nthe ban on camps is this part of the statement:

 

"The board members also directed the Council to conduct a broad assessment of the FBS recruiting environment."

 

Will they actually look at the SECs bagmen and oversigning?

 

 

DOBlue48

April 28th, 2016 at 5:12 PM ^

I suspect many on "the council" go looking for the bagmen fairly regularly...Like every time there is a significant decision looming that the SEC might have a particular stance on...nudge, nudge....wink, wink.

gord

April 28th, 2016 at 5:26 PM ^

Great, now Hugh Freeze is going to have to use Trivago to get a deal on hotel rooms for a week or two.  He only makes $13,000 a day guys.  I don't know if his budget can handle bringing his kids on the road with him over summer break.

gwkrlghl

April 28th, 2016 at 5:56 PM ^

stunned that they are so openly and unabashedly selfish. It's honestly incredible that these clowns had the balls to talk up and down about how bad these camps are, basically lying to everyone in the world, only to see them lift their own ban immediately following the national ban collapsing.

Basically these assholes were lying because they were mad they couldn't do it too. When that failed they dropped the charade and played along. Astounding on several levels, completely predictable as well

I hope we have camps in every single SEC town with dozens of other schools just to piss these clowns off