SIAP: Per The Athletic, Jim Delany has been advising multiple conferences behind the scenes about expansion

Submitted by FrankMurphy on August 11th, 2021 at 1:11 PM

I welcome this news. Regardless of what we may think of Delany, he's never been accused of being afraid to make bold moves and shake up the landscape.

Check out the article on The Athletic if you have a subscription.

Blue@LSU

August 11th, 2021 at 1:19 PM ^

Don't have a subscription, so I can't read it. When you say "multiple conferences", does that mean B1G and possible expansion to other conferences, or are you also talking about SEC and the moves they've been making? 

JamieH

August 11th, 2021 at 1:27 PM ^

The article basically doesn't say much except that Delany has found a way to get paid by the Big Ten, ACC and Pac 12 all at the same time.  I hate Delany, but the man has always known how to line his own pockets.  

ERdocLSA2004

August 11th, 2021 at 1:54 PM ^

Everything he does is for the money, which I guess applies to almost everything nowadays.  I’m vehemently against conference realignments and teams leaving one and joining another.  Conferences should be fixed at a certain number, and all schools within said conference should have to be within a certain distance of another.  This new mega conference trend is going to make things worse for the fans while making the conference get richer with their tv deals.  We have plenty of solid teams in our conference for all sports.  I look forward to just about all of the games because of the tradition.  I really don’t care to have our schedule watered down with other teams.  I know most probably don’t agree but isn’t even our historical and competitive conference schedule important anymore?

Blue@LSU

August 11th, 2021 at 2:09 PM ^

I hear you. The safe and conservative route is always best. It's almost like we'd learn from past mistakes and realize that bold moves are stupid. I mean, look at just some of the examples:

Columbus' desire to seek a new route to India

McArthur's landing at Inchon

The purchase of Alaska (aka Seward's Folly)

Rosa Parks refusing to give up her seat

The decision to send humans to space

Gandhi's and MLK's belief in peaceful resistance when confronted with violence

...

Ezeh-E

August 11th, 2021 at 4:04 PM ^

To take an argument about bold sometimes being problematic and countering with risk-averse always being the best is a smooth rhetorical technique. Great examples, though full of confirmation bias.

All the YOLOs on Wallstreet bets provide a nice counter example to bold

It seems like the answer to merits of bold vs. risk-averse would be: it depends.

 

Buy Bushwood

August 11th, 2021 at 1:32 PM ^

It is pretty bold to turn college football into the NFL, complete with an NFC and AFC in two super conferences, and nothing else left, with traditional rivalries meaning nothing.  That's a pretty familiar product, since it's already happening on Sundays.  It's bold, and equally uninteresting.  I won't be watching that much.  

ak47

August 11th, 2021 at 2:34 PM ^

The NFL is a pretty interesting product since its the most watched product in the US. Rivalries, very much exist, in a AFC/NFC type setup you would very much wind up with 'divisions' in which traditional rivalries would exist, one could even create something like an 10 team division in which every team played every other team to move onto a playoff, against the winners of other divisions.

gremlin3

August 11th, 2021 at 8:08 PM ^

I could be wrong, but I thought a significant portion of that viewership is due to gambling, both traditional and fantasy leagues. I mean, the Super Bowl is the most watched event outside of the World Cup (and maybe the Cricket championships--hello, India and its 1.3b people) and probably 75%+ of that audience could give a rat's ass about football. It's an excuse to party and watch expensive productions in 30- and 60-second short films that sell beer, cars, etc.

Buy Bushwood

August 12th, 2021 at 8:34 AM ^

Something being popular doesn't make it interesting. Many college football fans, myself included, don't watch the NFL.  And you've just underscored my point by talking about how it could be like the NFL. What made college football interesting, was that it wasn't like the NFL. It wasn't a formulaic corporate product.  Now, every year, it's edging more and more toward looking exactly like the NFL, with all the tertiary conferences and teams just looking like a collateral high school league. If it were up to me, I'd bring back the old bowl games and their affiliations, and get rid of a playoff.  There was nothing wrong with people arguing about who was #1. 

1VaBlue1

August 11th, 2021 at 1:40 PM ^

I'm not a fan of the pointy haired boss, but he had the gravity to walk into a room and command attention for whatever he was thinking.  He could lead that room even when the SEC was also present.  Kevin Warren?  Not so much...

The B1G will be left behind when it comes to TV revenue/viewership, conference prestige/power, croots, and everything else.  It will cling to dated thoughts of AAU membership, fair play, and noon kicks.

Carpetbagger

August 11th, 2021 at 2:54 PM ^

Before ESPN told Texas the Longhorn Network was done soon, more precisely.

And yeah, my assumption would be that if Delaney was still around he would have had the contacts down there to know about this happening long before it broke, and make one heck of a sales pitch for the Big 10 over the SEC for Tex/OK.

That doesn't mean that Warren didn't know too. We don't know what has been going on behind closed doors, but it sure does look like he was caught asleep at the wheel. Again.

I see no reason to give him any more slack than people gave Delaney. Unless people are judging him differently for reasons of their own.

lilpenny1316

August 11th, 2021 at 4:52 PM ^

We had a shot before there was a Longhorn Network. This article details conversations that happened in 2010: LINK

Oklahoma vs. Wisconsin; Nebraska vs. Texas A&M; Iowa vs. Iowa State; Minnesota vs. Kansas.

Unfortunately, it’s not happening. But there was a time when grouping those eight schools into one division of a 16-team Big Ten was discussed at high administrative levels by members of both leagues.

And...

The feedback from Big Ten school officials was positive, both sources said. The sticking point was devising a revenue-sharing plan to satisfy all. It would have taken at least three to four years for that many incoming schools to hit the financial payoffs sought for moving.