Ohio governor signs law giving businesses/organizations protection from COVID civil liability suits

Submitted by crg on September 15th, 2020 at 6:54 AM

Link: https://www.news-herald.com/news/ohio/ohio-governor-signs-bill-that-protects-against-covid-19-liability/article_4dea99f1-641b-5b5c-96c1-531df8e52d34.html

List of protected organizations includes schools - almost certainly to be extended to their athletic activities.  Law states organizations are immune to liability except for cases of "reckless, intentional, or willful misconduct."  It will be interesting to see how those are defined - especially if the exposure can be proved to occur during the course of work/school activities.

Jedelman11

September 15th, 2020 at 7:26 AM ^

I believe 10-15 states already have similar laws in place. You have to assume all 50 will sooner or later as they don't want their schools, businesses, churches, or state institutions to be under constant threat of litigation. 

WindyCityBlue

September 15th, 2020 at 10:07 AM ^

An overly punitive liability environment, whereby businesses, churches etc. are at constant threat of being sued means businesses shut down a lot (or never get off the ground) over small irrelevant things.  That's not the environment we want.

My liability insurance renews in a month for my business.  The premiums doubled.  Not good.

highlow

September 15th, 2020 at 11:18 AM ^

1.) What do you do, broadly speaking? Premiums doubling sounds pretty remarkable. Did you get hit with a judgment or something recently? 

2.) Business owners and the people who are injured by their actions often have very different views about whether the liability environment is "overly punitive" or whether their lawsuits are, in fact, over "small irrelevant things." 

WindyCityBlue

September 15th, 2020 at 1:00 PM ^

1. I'm the medical device (orthopedics) space.  We have never been hit with a judgement or anything of the like.  We use the same insurance broker we've been using for years, so they shop our policy around for the best rate.  When uncertainly and/or risk increase (whether real or perceived), so do the premiums for everyone.  So when you create a "sue-happy" environment, everyone feels the pain even if you never get sued. 

2. Very true.  But that's not saying much.  Of course different sides of the argument are going to have opposing views.  I know this is anecdotal, but as an UG at Michigan, I worked at a fairly well-know restaurant/bar near downtown, just off main street that typically did not cater to undergrads.  I got to know the owners well.  Back then, it was very much a "patron-friendly" liability environment, and as such, their insurance premiums were crazy high.  They got sued once because some drunk ass while trying to find the bathroom accidentally walked into the storage area (which was supposed to be locked) and thought it would be cool to try and steal some food.  Instead he cut his hand on the end of a table which just do happened to have a sharp end that required a bunch of stitches and missed work. Yep, the restaurant paid through the roof on that one.  Note: I'm not saying who's right or wrong on this.

1VaBlue1

September 15th, 2020 at 8:30 AM ^

We don't care what you do or how you treat your employees - they will not have protection from you!  Unless, you know, they can afford to hire a battery of expensive lawyers to out-litigate the business through several rounds of court hearings.

I mean, "reckless, intentional, or willful misconduct" will be impossible to prove without an entire law firm working on your behalf for years on end...

DMill2782

September 15th, 2020 at 8:42 AM ^

Sounds a bit similar to the days before Work Comp existed. Just treat your employees like dirt and give them no recourse to rectify the situation!

This must be how the make America great again plan works.

*Proving the exposure occurred during work/school is basically going to be impossible. The employee or student will have to detail their every movement to prove they could not have contracted the virus anywhere else. 

mgolund

September 15th, 2020 at 9:38 AM ^

Reckless, intentional or willful are legal terms that are already defined. It is a high threshold to prove. Essentially, the plaintiff would have to show that the business knew of a substantial likelihood of injury (probably the transmission of the disease) but did nothing about it.

Even without this statute, I think it would be a hard hill to climb for a plaintiff. Proving causation would be difficult (but not impossible), there are possibly liable third parties, and the plaintiff probably assumed some risk in patronizing the business.

PopeLando

September 15th, 2020 at 9:56 AM ^

Maybe an MGoLawyer can weigh in here, but this seems like a big "fuck you" to sick workers here.

The key phrases in this bill is "heedless indifference to the consequences" and "substantial and unjustifiable risk" when defining "reckless conduct."

This means that if a business/nonprofit/government/church can show that they made the slightest acknowledgment of the risks and did any kind of cost/benefit, it doesn't matter if that business mandated their employees return to an unhealthy environment. 

Example:

Worker: "Your honor, my employer threatened to fire me if I didn't return to work, even though 90% of the company was confirmed COVID positive and there were absolutely zero safety measures taken."

Business: "Here's an email in which we said that while all of that is true, that the revenue estimates made it worthwhile."

Judge: "Case dismissed."

mgolund

September 15th, 2020 at 10:59 AM ^

Typically, workers' compensation laws govern employee illnesses and injuries. I read this bill as applying to claims by third parties, not employees. Look at section 3(A)(3) and (4). If this bill were intended to remove workers' compensation liability, it probably would have said so.

Also, your example probably meets the "reckless conduct" definition.

DTOW

September 15th, 2020 at 10:35 AM ^

Man, reading some of these comments and it appears that some here either work for really bad companies or have had really bad experiences with their past employers. 

Personally, the company I work for has been very good to it’s employees throughout the pandemic. When things went south and stuff shut down they made sure to keep all employees whole with no reduced pay or benefits. They went into their own pockets costing themselves millions of dollars in doing so. A very admirable thing to do. I hope those that aren’t in a similar situation find an employer that would do the same for them.