[Patrick Barron]

Preview: Rutgers 2020 Comment Count

Brian November 20th, 2020 at 2:55 PM

Essentials

WHAT Michigan at Rutgers

download (7)

WHERE Phil Klein Insurance Group Stadium
Piscataway, NJ
WHEN 7:30 PM ET
Saturday, November 21
THE LINE Michigan –10.5 (Vegas)
TELEVISION BTN
PBP: Mark Followill
Analyst: James Laurinaitis
Reporter: Elise Menaker
TICKETS not this year
WEATHER

cloudy, mid-40s
no rain, minimal wind

Overview

Ah, Rutgers. They've got Greg Schiano back, and the rise of transfer waivers means they're undertaking an expansion draft more-or-less annually. This means they've gotten off the mat. I mean, somewhat. They did just lose to Illinois.

But consider that they beat Michigan State—Michigan did not—and kept the Indiana game closer than Michigan did. And who's raising their hand for a 49-27 final against Ohio State? Michigan just lost to Wisconsin 49-11, and recent Wisconsin-OSU matchups have not gone well for the Badgers.

What I'm saying here is that a double-digit spread is surprising.

[Hit THE JUMP for dinky dink]

Run Offense vs Rutgers

48811628338_378d268196_k

Dwumfour has flipped the script [Bryan Fuller]

I try not to say things are "pathetic" because it gives off a real meathead sports radio vibe but there's no other way to describe Michigan's ground game right now. After rushing for a net 13 yards against Indiana (INDIANAAAAAAA) Michigan scrabbled out 47 against Wisconsin. That is consecutive rushing rutgers. Now: Rutgers.

Michigan will try to get healthy, literally and metaphorically. The return of one starting tackle would be very helpful, especially if it is Jalen Mayfield. The ability to pick up a stunt would also be very helpful, because as Seth notes there's going to be a ton of that from Rutgers:

It's time to talk about the Stunt 43, which front is most associated with the Steel Curtain (that's the 1970s Pittsburgh Steelers for you young 'uns). Rutgers uses it to deal with their lack of large defensive linemen. It's a neat trick, and if Gattis has any success attacking it I'm probably writing about it in more detail next week.

image

… To this they have the 3-tech (Dwumfour) and the 5-tech burst upfield as fast as possible, adding to the mess and forcing the ball the hell out of the middle as soon as possible. Now, normally you don't want to do this stuff because you're asking for your DEs to be doubled to oblivion by the OT and TE. That's fine in Stunt 43 world because they have the ILBs jumping outside those blocks. All you get for removing a defensive end is a linebacker popping up on the same edge, and nobody for him. …

It's an underdog strategy, for sure, so if you get it blocked correctly they're going to break for big chunks.

Emphasis mine. This is our concern, dude.

This weird system crushed MSU, did pretty well against Indiana, and got ripped to shreds by OSU and Illinois. In Illinois's case they did it by putting a Denard-esque guy in at QB, an option that Michigan does not have. OSU is on another level from normal good Michigan teams. Chances are it's back to the salt mines for the ground game as Michigan has a flurry of mis-identifications and eats a bunch of guys in the backfield with no real plan on how to address this specific weird thing since their current practices are more about teaching guys how to eat applesauce than installing specific tweaks to combat what the opposition is doing.

KEY MATCHUP: MIKE DWUMFOUR vs REVENGE. He's their starting three-tech and the kind of things he does are the kind of things he always did. Now they're pointed at the disarray that is Michgian's interior.

Pass Offense vs Rutgers

32660610087_bb32e608af_k (2)

First start? [Bryan Fuller]

Joe Milton imploded against Wisconsin and Cade McNamara threw a few pretty passes en route to Michigan's only touchdown, so the rumor mill is buzzing that McNamara will start. Having a far-and-away fall camp leader who gets yanked in game four while the former #1 QB is hanging out with his brother in Nebraska is a terrible look, but that's (almost) outside the scope of this post.

If it is McNamara, Michigan will be deploying a much smaller and somewhat slower QB than Milton. McNamara will hope to make up for those deficiencies by being more accurate and having better command of the offense. There is some chance of that since McNamara came out of Nevada high school ball with a boatload of experience:

…he enters college with over 1300 attempts to his name. There are vanishingly few high school quarterbacks who can claim as much live-fire experience. And probably just as few have put in more time off the field. Local reporter Jim Krajewski:

[McNamara] started attending elite-level quarterback camps and training sessions all over the West coast starting about four or five years ago. … spends every day, year-round, working out and preparing to be a quarterback.”

On the other hand, he's a redshirt freshman who was behind Milton until he suddenly wasn't.

Whoever it is will be going up against a defense that is not exactly Wisconsin quality. MSU threw for 7.4 yards an attempt against Rutgers; as all games not against Michigan have demonstrated, MSU's offense is a dumpster fire. Indiana hit 9.2 and OSU 11.2. The only game in which they've even sort of held up was last week, when Illinois started Isaiah Williams (not that Isaiah Williams), a 5'10" guy with rocket boots who's out there to rush 31 times for almost 200 yards.

Rutgers has also not been prolific getting to the quarterback, with seven sacks in their first four games despite playing a couple of extremely bad OLs. Michigan's protection has been meh, but that should be good enough to move the ball some if the quarterback is throwing accurately.

KEY MATCHUP: QUARTERBACK vs THIRD AND NINE. Brace yourself.

Run Defense vs Rutgers

48817970823_ff93d02186_k

This will happen some more [Patrick Barron]

The burly and fairly fast Isaih Pacheco returns; he operates behind the usual makeshift line of position switches and transfers. This year they've coped fairly well with the talent level. MSU gave them a hard time but they had a decent day against Indiana (3.7 YPC), a shockingly good one against OSU considering the talent disparities (4.4) and cracked 5 YPC against Illinois. Seth is a fan:

I was saving "Isaih Pacheco is the best running back in the conference" for a hot take segment after I saw him tear Michigan State to shreds, but we've learned since that anybody could tear Michigan State's defense to shreds if you put your athletes in space against theirs.

Anyway Pacheco. You remember how fast he is but his feet are awesome, allowing him to cut ninety degrees on a dime.

After this I started a "Fools Hurdled" counter, a tradition that dates back to when my Sparty brother and I would do this with Le'Veon Bell games. A good Bell game saw at least two and maybe three fools hurdled. Pacheco got up to 4 fools in this one, 4.5 if you count going down after clearing the fool.

QB Noah Vedral is also deployed with some frequency; he's averaging 7 non-sack carries a game. Vedral is smack dab in the middle of "acceptable" as a runner. He'll grab some yards if you don't have someone checking him. He is not a guy you have to gameplan for. He's likely to rip off a couple chunks as Michigan focuses on Pacheco.

Michigan was down both defensive end against Wisconsin and took it on the chin. This was going to happen anyway but the utter lack of edge play probably cost Michigan a yard per carry. Aidan Hutchinson is done; Kwity Paye could return. Michigan's chances in this game go up considerably if he does.

KEY MATCHUP:

Pass Defense vs Rutgers

48812112337_b41a5efee2_k

Melton is the threat

Well, folks, here is an acid test to see if there's any bottom in the secondary. Vedral is averaging 5.3 yards an attempt with six touchdowns and seven interceptions. As is traditional at Rutgers he spends almost all of his time dinking screens and the like around the line of scrimmage: he's averaging 8.1 yards a completion. I have an even better stat if you want the Rutgers passing game in a nutshell: third-stringer Johnny Langan is 5/5 for -1 yards this season.

So yeah virtually any sustained downfield passing is a fire elmo situation. I expect Rutgers to try a bunch of fades despite their clear unsuitability for such an undertaking because their guys can draw blinding pass interference penalties just by being vaguely near a football. Also here's Seth taunting God:

"That could happen to our cornerbacks too!" I hear you say, but if we're busting that badly in double-coverage on the one non-running back target who can get behind a defense, call off the season.

I'm trying to! Seth! I AM TRYING TO CALL OFF THE SEASON!

Anyway. Since Michigan's CBs have generally been in contact with WRs after the MSU game and Rutgers is plainly terrified of their pass protection, dinking will still be the heart of the Rutgers offense. Michigan has been middling at best when contesting dinks. The corners are iffy tackles, and misdirection has popped guys open for screens on the regular.

FWIW, slot Bo Melton is still around. He's the one guy who can get behind the defense mentioned above. He's joined by Wisconsin transfer Aron Cruickshank, another 5'10" guy with B+ wheels who operates as a wide running back. Melton will be the downfield target. He's averaging 17 yards a catch, which is an incredible number given all the other ones associated with the Rutgers passing offense. Cruickhank is averaging 6, which approximately what Pachecho gets when it's checked down to him. Shameen Jones is the only tallish guy on the roster and may get some fade looks.

For Michigan's part they're going to have to be a ton better about falling off guys who crack block than they have been in recent weeks. Getting Kwity Paye back would be a massive boost; without him there is some chance that Vedral can stand in the pocket and survey.

KEY MATCHUP: CORNERBACKS vs TACKLING. All that jet sweep crap Michigan ate last week is on the menu again, albeit against a far less functional team. Rutgers will deliver the ball to the perimeter over and over again and challenge Michigan secondary members to tackle in space.

SPECIAL TEAMS

I did not make these names up as some sort of New Jersey joke. These are literally the names of Rutgers specialists. I repeat: this is not a joke.

Rutgers has split time between placekickers Guy Fava and Valentino Ambrosio. Both have hit 2/2 of field goals; we have no other data on them since Ayime Walkenhear kicked in 2019. Punter—[checks notes] [exhales]—Adam Korsak returns and has picked up where he left of with a 44-yard average.

Cruickshank returns kickoffs and has been replacement-level for Rutgers; he had two KR TDs as a Badger. Punt returner Avery Young has been miraculously bad, averaging 2.6 yards an attempt on 11 tries last year and 2.8 on four this year. How is that even possible? On the other hand, he did throw this cross-field lateral to Bo Melton:

So that's a thing.

KEY MATCHUP:  AHHHH YOU PUT IT THROUGH THE UPRIGHTS

INTANGIBLES

Fava-Bean-12070-C3-5

CHEAP THRILLS

Worry if…

  • Mike Dwumfour is really mad and living in the backfield.
  • Paye is out again.
  • Bo Melton's running fades and someone's trying to hit him with an axe.

Cackle with knowing glee if…

  • Uh
  • Well
  • You See

Fear/Paranoia Level: 5 (Baseline: 5; –1 for Double Digit Line, Folks!, –1 for I Mean It Is Still Rutgers, +1 for Rutgers That Beat MSU!, –1 for After Seven Turnovers, +1 for We're Fairly Rutgers Now, +1 for Injury Plague Still Continuing)

Desperate need to win level: 1 (Baseline: 5; –1 for LPONE zone, –1 for It's Hockey Season In America, –1 for It's Basketball Season In America, –1 for Apparently Harbaugh Isn't Getting Fired).

Loss will cause me to… remember that time Gary Nova went for 400 yards against Michigan as the good old days.

Win will cause me to… continue experience no feelings in regard to football activities.

The strictures and conventions of sportswriting compel me to predict: 

A close back-and-forth game that eventually turns on the fact that Michigan can pass protect a little and Rutgers can't. If Bo Melton is ripping downfield like Ricky White did in the MSU game, that's game over. I think Michigan will be able to bracket him and live with the consequences elsewhere.

Finally, three opportunities for me to look stupid tomorrow:

  • McNamara starts.
  • I watch the game in a half-hearted daze.
  • Michigan, 23-18

Comments

CarrIsMyHomeboy

November 20th, 2020 at 3:05 PM ^

Given this-n-thats about attendance, viewership, message board traffic and other market trends, it's likely we are stuck. There's no getting rid of Michigan Football. And yet:

I'm becoming increasingly comfortable with the cowardice of folding the football program like U-of-C. Do it in the next decade, anytime before OSU can take the series lead. That would be embarrassing, yes. We would be mocked, thumbs-up-cool-guys. But there would be upsides. Aside from individual gains like getting back my Saturdays, beneath the shame, it would also anger and sorely disappoint our rival in a manner that would last forever. 

But I understand reality. How this is not on the table. Not a serious or likely outcome. But I am beginning to want it *so* bad. There's a parallel universe where this change is possible. I must devise a machine to go there.

[sigh]

/I call this dilemma: Deciding Michigan Football's future -- OR -- the direct proportionality of all wisdom and some cowardice.

Erik_in_Dayton

November 20th, 2020 at 3:12 PM ^

Something I find interesting is that, to the best of my knowledge, the athletic department cannot afford to have the football team be anything other than a cash cow. Manuel can retain Harbaugh because of his players' academic achievements and presence in the community (which, don't get me wrong, are good things to value), but eventually fans can veto his decision by withholding their money. Well, he would have to accept a veto or cut sports.

L'Carpetron Do…

November 20th, 2020 at 4:00 PM ^

For real, this is fucking embarrassing. Boo-hoo. Let's just not play anymore. Michigan has more wins than any other program in history and you want to quit? Get this soft shit out of here.

Dear Michigan players, coaches and fans: drop this pathetic loser mentality and get tough. You can't win if you don't want to win. And if you don't want to win, GTFO.

Teeba

November 20th, 2020 at 3:23 PM ^

The MSU-Rutgers score was 38-27. I know MSU helped out immensely with turnovers, but even they scored 27 points. If we win, we’re going to have to score more points than 23. 
Rutgers 27, Michigan 17. I just don’t have any confidence in our offense. Or our defense. Or our special teams. Or our coaching. 

username03

November 20th, 2020 at 3:30 PM ^

We significantly outgain Rutger but have some fluky turnovers and they end up winning. We hear a bunch of yeah but fluky season, fluky turnovers, blah blah blah, who you gonna get that's better (and all those names are held to a MUCH higher standard). The real tragedy is we have to give Rutgers their S back.

Cranky Dave

November 20th, 2020 at 3:39 PM ^

This will be the third week in a row that I’ll be spending time outside rather than watching the shitshow that is Michigan football. I wont be surprised at any outcome except one that has Michigan give more than 5 carries to one RB and rush for 100 yards

bronxblue

November 20th, 2020 at 3:46 PM ^

I think Michigan wins this game somewhat comfortably (10+ points, but not the usual demolition) and a bunch of people slowly dip their toes back in to optimism.  

Teeba

November 20th, 2020 at 4:01 PM ^

It's optimistic folks like him that caused the line to be Wisconsin -6.5. They won by 38 points. If we get a 31.5 point difference from the line this week, we'll lose to Rutgers by 20. I think I'm the optimistic one thinking we'll only lose by 10. I'm only half joking.

P.S. We were favored by 21.5 over MSU and lost by 3. That's a 24 point swing. Has the betting world started paying attention yet?

bronxblue

November 20th, 2020 at 8:03 PM ^

I find the bi-polar cynicism of this site annoying at times.  I said from the beginning that the offense was going to be replacing a ton of known players with a ton of unknowns and it would be janky, especially at QB where a guy who struggled to complete 50% of his passes in HS and was decidedly 3rd in the pecking order last year "beat out" a player who showed far better management of the offense in past spots.  I have actually been pleasantly surprised by Milton's growth as a QB thus far; he seemed like a league-average QB who is also playing behind a dilapidated offensive line.  I'm surprised the defense has regressed but I assumed Gray would be a competent corner and whomever emerged from the other end would be around average; instead both Green and Gray have struggled in various aspects.  The linebackers have been extremely disappointing and I can't really explain that; the defensive line being gouged by Wisconsin pretty understandable given who was out.

I don't see myself as being "unsubstantiated"-ly optimistic.  I thought the team would be an 8-4-ish outfit during a regular season; this site was the one that slathered on unearned praise and expectations for guys like Milton (and talked down to people who disagreed) and are now trying to talk us all into a Matt Campbell coaching regime.  Michigan came into the year with the 2nd-fewest returning starters in the conference and are now down 4 of them; color me unsurprised that they are struggling.  But they are still better that Rutgers and if thinking "they should still be able to beat Rutgers by 10+ points" is blowing sunshine up someone's ass, so be it.

Don

November 21st, 2020 at 6:55 AM ^

"But they are still better that Rutgers"

The problem is that virtually all of us thought we were better than Michigan State, too.

Your pre-season concerns about the offense were sensible and warranted, but as you mention the defense has been surprising in its regression. It's going to be difficult to fix either unit's issues this season.

MGoBlog has always had a bi-polar mentality—it's either ridiculous unfounded "14-0 National Champs baby!" or "we suck worse than anybody has ever sucked."

BrightonB

November 20th, 2020 at 6:59 PM ^

Maybe if Gattis gets to calls 100% of the plays with no interference ....... maybe then ..... And maybe if Cade starts ..... and everything falls into place .... and .....

Man I just want them to win I don't care how ugly but a blowout would make for a happy Saturday. With how they have played I am worried and I shouldn't be.  

evenyoubrutus

November 20th, 2020 at 3:54 PM ^

Any potential confidence he could have destroyed by benching him he already took care of by publicly stating there would be an open QB competition this week in practice. 

And Sam Webb is talking to the roundtable about ideas for what this team can do to prepare for the future by playing younger guys. Here we are, rebuilding for the 8th time in 6 seasons.

evenyoubrutus

November 20th, 2020 at 4:09 PM ^

I have this weird feeling going into this game. Like, barely winning will feel worse than getting creamed. Maybe it won't after all? But this nagging sense that Harbaugh may stick around next year is making that lack of resolution difficult to deal with.