Michigan's record as an underdog
The diary on coins landing tails got me wondering where is our Iowa vs. OSU type moment since upsets seem like fairly random events. I don't follow odds, so I settled on this site for some historical information, and ran the following query for several Big Ten teams:
"You selected XXXXX against anyone during the regular or post season at any location over 30 games as an underdog of 1 to 60 points"
Unfortunately the results were about what I expected
Team Record as underdog since start of 2012 season Michigan 1-18 (Harbaugh is 0-5) Iowa 7-19 Penn State 9-16 MSU 11-9 Northwestern 13-17 since 10/5/13 Rutgers 5-25 since 10/25/14 Wisconsin 5-9 Ohio State 6-0
Michigan is clearly an outlier here and it suggests that this program simply doesn't win as an underdog. Is this a culutral thing? Luck thing? OP bad at statistics thing?
Edit: added OSU at 6-0 since I was counting from the start of the 2012 regular season. I had excluded the 2011 postseason.
Edit: Michigan's one win was against Northwestern in Nov 2013.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:08 PM ^
Wait, UM wasn't upsetting teams on the reg during those years? Are you sure?
November 20th, 2017 at 3:12 PM ^
Has nothing to do with being "pretty good" most of the time, and everything to do with underperforming expectations. Michigan has repeatedly underperformed expectations since Hoke's first year.
November 20th, 2017 at 4:05 PM ^
the only explanation I can think of is that an entitled snobbish University management culture hires snobbish coaches who have little heart or humility
how else do you explain such a horrible record over so many years and coaches? It has to start at the top
we seem to pay big bucks for "star" coaches who may be full of themselves
November 20th, 2017 at 5:46 PM ^
LOL you couldn't disguise your identity as an MSU/OSU troll at least a little bit? I mean, your other posts are obvious enough, but this one is beyond the pale.
November 20th, 2017 at 8:05 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 6:24 PM ^
November 21st, 2017 at 6:20 AM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:05 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:14 PM ^
Michigan has been an underdog just as much as MSU and not that far behind Iowa and PSU. In an case, Michigan's winning-% is way below the median.
OSU has been an underdog 7 times since 2012, and is 6-1 in those games. Michigan just underperforms expectations.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:06 PM ^
That is an insane but unsurprising stat. If Michigan doesn't play to expectations, it's always negative.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:07 PM ^
I gonna guess 2013 ND
November 20th, 2017 at 3:32 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 4:41 PM ^
Ugh...That's kind of even more embarressing. Was that the M00N game (which we almost lost on the very last play of the game)?
November 20th, 2017 at 6:42 PM ^
M00N was in 2014. 2013 was the game where Dileo slid in to get the snap for hold and Gibbons booted a 40 yarder to send the game to OT as time expired. Gardner should have thrown at least five interceptions but the NW defenders somehow dropped every single one. I guess it helped that it was raining.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:12 PM ^
Going back to 2006, Ohio State is 11-9 as an underdog according to the same site OP used.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:15 PM ^
Hard go get a lot of wins as underdogs when you're generally only underdogs to great teams. It's a lot easier to get those wins when you're 100th in the country then when you're often top 25 or top 10 even. Especially since as Michigan we get the benefit of the doubt at the beginning of the year so are often ranked higher than we perhaps should be.
Having a good record as an underdog generally means you're often underrated.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:16 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:19 PM ^
Need to throw more on first down.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:29 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:34 PM ^
lol what a joke
November 20th, 2017 at 3:40 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:43 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:51 PM ^
Bigger national profile=overrated. That, and underperforming lol/sad (steal your) face.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:53 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 3:56 PM ^
We do good at both however.
November 20th, 2017 at 3:56 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 4:01 PM ^
You can check them out on this link:
https://www.covers.com/pageLoader/pageLoader.aspx?page=/data/ncf/teams/…
Really enjoyed the fact that UM was an underdog at Rutgers in 2014....and still lost.
November 20th, 2017 at 4:02 PM ^
Maybe the weather was a factor in those 18 games? lol
November 20th, 2017 at 4:05 PM ^
This tidbit right here is EXACTLY why you shouldn't pencil Michigan into any championship games in the near future. When you just start to look at Michigan as a 9-3 program you'll have a lot more fun watching the games. Then the 10-2 seasons youre real excited. Michigan needs to prove it can win a big fucking game before i'll ever predict a conference championship or playoff berth
November 20th, 2017 at 4:47 PM ^
No one cares what YOU predict, you bag of farts.
November 20th, 2017 at 5:30 PM ^
I got trashed for saying we are the Iowa of college football. However after Iowa smacked Ohio State, I dont want to insult Iowa
November 20th, 2017 at 7:16 PM ^
November 21st, 2017 at 8:33 AM ^
November 21st, 2017 at 6:15 AM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 4:15 PM ^
The oddsmakers have a long track record of accurately assessing Michigan's chances in any given game.
That being said, don't look at the spread this week.
November 20th, 2017 at 4:30 PM ^
Our program and players have been soft for a looong time. I dont see how anyone cannot see it. It took me a long time to come to terms with it not being just "bad luck" after we allowed Dantonio to bring a bunch of criminals and freshman into our house and roll up 200 yards in 1 half
Since Lloyd Carr left Michigan teams have collapsed at the first sign of adversity and frankly its been even worse under Harbaugh.
Id say its 90% mental at this point. This program as a whole has a losing mentality .
November 20th, 2017 at 4:57 PM ^
How would you quantify Folding Under Adversity?
I can think of several counterexamples, in which we fell behind in games, then battled back and eventually won. It's just that those were games that we were expected to win, so they don't count as upsets - unless you started keeping track at halftime.
Maybe that's your stat right there. What's Michigan's record when losing at halftime? How do we stack up against the comparables there?
November 20th, 2017 at 5:08 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 5:58 PM ^
That may be an interesting stat to research. I will leave that up to someone with much more time than me however!
Having said that, you claim to "think of several counterexamples, which we fell behind in games, then battled back and eventually won. It's just that those were games that we were expected to win..."
My issue with that is why the hell were we down in those games to begin with?! In classic UM fashion, we regularly play down to our opponents. Not to be that guy, but this has happened for the last umpteen years (Carr was particularly brutal with it, IMO).
I hate to shred our coaches / players like this, but they often times look completely mentally unprepared to play the game. The FSU game last year was the icing on the cake. It's like our guys didn't even know the game had started!
To address your point though, if Michigan is losing at halftime to an inferior opponent, yet comes back to win - that does not qualify as "Adversity" to me. That's just them getting their proverbial sh*t together and figuring out how to win.
Having said that, if you must quantify "adversity" using whatever measure you deem important, here's a couple of stats:
- As the OP mentioned, we are 1-18 as underdogs recently
- We are 1 - 4 (soon to be 1 - 5 against rivals under Harbaugh)
- We are 1-6 against AP Top-10 teams under Harbaugh
- We are 1-5 against top 25 teams under Harbaugh on the road
I would say the combination of underdog, rivals, and road - in some capacity - feed into "adversity." And, frankly, our performance sucks.
November 21st, 2017 at 8:31 AM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 5:28 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 5:34 PM ^
Just curious: what was the 1 win?
This program, including its head coach, definitely have a cultural problem in my opinion. It feels like the Hoke era entitlement has lasted into Harbaugh's tenure. When the team loses, it's never because we got outplayed by a better team and it's the fans' fault for being disappointed. The team acts like they're on the same field as OSU/Bama without any of the results.
November 20th, 2017 at 5:43 PM ^
Were we dogs to NW in 2015?
November 21st, 2017 at 9:20 AM ^
The game where we kicked a FG with our linemen moving and the refs missed the call. Yay, we're the smartest kid on the short bus.
November 20th, 2017 at 5:46 PM ^
November 20th, 2017 at 8:16 PM ^
It's bad enough the program has floundered all these years but chances are anyone betting on us has lost there shirt. It's a good thing l don't live in Vegas.
November 20th, 2017 at 8:16 PM ^
It's bad enough the program has floundered all these years but chances are anyone betting on us has lost there shirt. It's a good thing l don't live in Vegas.
November 20th, 2017 at 9:53 PM ^
There shirt. There.
November 20th, 2017 at 10:01 PM ^
Watching a college football team play college ball and win, rather than a failed NFL style one try to do things, do them poorly, then fail. Is our O-Line worse than FSU's was last year? BC they could do it...
November 20th, 2017 at 10:00 PM ^
That record really is about mentality. And it starts from the coaching staff. We have been playing big games really tight. Risk averse. To win as an underdog you've gotta take big chances multiple times throughout the game. Punting on Wiscy's 41 yard line is a decent recent example. Peters should've been throwing a lot more. The one bomb to DPJ was not enough, IMO. Open up the trick play book. Catch the other team by surprise and get a lead that nobody expected.