Analysis of Recruiting Classes

Submitted by MGrether on

I admit, this current stage of the program sucks. I hate losing. I hate losing close games. I hate losing to rivals.  

With that said, It is interesting to look at the effectiveness of Harbaugh's first recruting classes:

2013 (Hokes Second to Last Class) 27 Commits, 14 Reasonably Contributing (Just 5 available as RS Seniors)
2014: (Hokes Last Class) 16 Commits, 8 reasonably contributing (This years true seniors)

-----------------
2015: 14 Commits, 7 reasonably contributing (and he had a couple weeks to pull this class together)
2016: 29 Commits, 23 reasonably contributing 
2017: 30 Commits, 12 Already making some contribution as true freshman. (Jury is out because of redshirting) 

 

Let's put this in context -- More true freshman are seeing the field then true seniors. There are more members of the 2016 class contributing, then 2013-2014 combined. In a game where experience and age/development matters... that is heavily skewed against our favor.

Lots of young guys are gaining valuable game experience. Next year, the 2016 group will be Juniors with 23 of them having experienced significant game time. I know the sky is dark now, but I think we will "turn the corner" next year behind a killer running attack and smothering defense, and DPJ/Black/Gentry/McKeon making things interesting in the passing game. I like the direction the DNA is pointing.

LSAClassOf2000

November 20th, 2017 at 8:23 AM ^

The one thing that the more vociferous elements of the "maybe Harbaugh isn't the guy" crowd are forgetting sometimes is that all the eggs are in this basket. That was made very clear in the beginning, and in my opinion, this is the right basket to have them in. The question always was about when we would reach ignition and really take off, if you will. 

LickReach

November 20th, 2017 at 9:52 AM ^

Losing hope in Harbaugh would turn M football into a broken program.  He should get at least a few more years of slack.  Even then his life is perfect here and he is getting every tool he needs to succeed.  Absent a scandal on par with putting in a visibly concussed player this ire is unfounded.  A decade of frustration was worth the Harbaugh hire alone.  

chunkums

November 20th, 2017 at 1:52 AM ^

Two really young teams with excellent coaches played an ugly game against each other in shit weather. One of them fumbled three times and threw two interceptions and the other didn't. The one that didn't do those things won. 

chunkums

November 20th, 2017 at 1:50 AM ^

What's missing from this analysis is the unimpressive senior and redshirt senior classes from Hoke. Here's the 2014 class from Hoke which includes the following contributors. Starters for this year are in bold:

Brandon Watson

Chase Winovich

Lawrence Marshall

JBB

Brian Mone - Starter sometimes?

Wilton Speight - Starter if not injured?

 

Then we have the 2013 class which looked impressive, but is virtually nonexistent:

Henry Poggi

Mo Hurst

Mike McCray

Patrick Kugler

Khalid Hill

 

maize-blue

November 20th, 2017 at 2:17 AM ^

Yes, the next 2-3 years look promising. But what happens when the large 2016 and 2017 class graduate or are drafted? We will be in another situation like this season where we have a team with few upperclassmen. Once again UM will have to "rebuild" again roughly around 2020 or 2021. In 2008, 2013, and now in 2017 they have had to build up. Finding a way to steady out these recruiting ups and downs is the best way build the program.

1VaBlue1

November 20th, 2017 at 8:04 AM ^

Do you not see the 2018 class coming in?  From here out, expect 20-24 recruits/signing period as it evens out.  Some years may be more, some less, depends on transfers, injuries, etc...  But it'll mostly be evened out.  As the Jr & Sr classes are playing, the Fr & Soph will be learning.  That is how you roll experience - it is exactly what Bama and OSU have been doing for years, and what Clemson has started doing, as well.  Michigan will get there with Harbaugh, but it doesn't come overnight.

1VaBlue1

November 20th, 2017 at 9:41 AM ^

Yes.  This year is an aberration from that stand point.  Because of the crappy 2013-14 classes, and the (less than) partial 2015 class, we're in this boat.  Going forward, it should be much better.  Although there'll still be some inexperience next year, with the RS Fr and true Spoh, it will look better.  This year was always going to be iffy, and we've experienced the worst case because of injuries.

Dillon

November 20th, 2017 at 9:39 AM ^

what would you like them to do? not take the talent and keep it at 20-24 for those classes? Hoke's inability to hold on to recruits the previous two classes and harbaugh having no time in the other class caused this. It will even out, but at the time you have to stockpile.

CHUKA

November 20th, 2017 at 2:51 AM ^

I really hope they can develop Gentry into a Gesicki type of jump ball threat in the offseason. This year it seems like they'll throw fades to anybody EXCEPT him (other than one I remember Okorn threw in one of his starts, which Gentry caught through multiple defenders).

Toasted Yosties

November 20th, 2017 at 10:12 AM ^

What’s the context of going 3-16 against OSU and MSU he’s refusing to look at? They’ve won a ton of conference championships and a national title and we haven’t in 13 years. Are we supposed to pretend that isn’t reality? Do you have to have your head buried in the sand to be a real fan?

1VaBlue1

November 20th, 2017 at 10:37 AM ^

What does anything Rich Rod and Hoke did as coach - other than send Michigan football into a death spiral - have anything to do with Harbaugh?  Context - what was Harbaugh left with from Hoke?  What is he coaching with this year?  Context - he's got a very inexperienced group this year, supplemented with upper-classmen that, mostly, never saw the field until they were the default option.  Context - a rash of injuries to starters.  Context - three QB's this year (I feel like a MD fan).

My head isn't buried in sand - I realize what context is.

1VaBlue1

November 20th, 2017 at 11:42 AM ^

Harbaugh's record looks bad, no denying that.  But again - context! 

He's 0-2 to OSU (most likely 0-3 soon).  The 2015 team got whooped - we didn't expect a win, but didn't see the whoopin' either.  Last year was double OT, in the truck stop, with a broken QB and shitastic officiating.

MSU = 1-2.  Batshit crazy finish in 2015, when it should have been an easy win for playoff bound MSU, and 5 turn overs in a 4-point loss this year with a backup QB in a monsoon.

Context.  The record sucks, but put them in context and you'll avoid looking like the total dipshit you now look like.

Toasted Yosties

November 20th, 2017 at 1:00 PM ^

Good one, insults. It really makes your points seem more valid. The weather (MSU also played in the rain), bad luck (O’neill wasn’t prepared for the situation, MSU was and capitalized) the refs (yes, there were some bad calls early, but you ignore the fact that our offense imploded in the 4th. I think we had less than 10 yards of offense that quarter. Harbaugh played it conservative on offense and it cost us.) Regarding the 2015 Ohio State game, I’m glad Bo didn’t take that perspective in 1969 when Michigan played what Woody Hayes called his best team he ever had and came out with a win. If “context” means excuses to you, it doesn’t make the losses seem any better. Yes, we lost all the games by a few points, but the bottom line is we finished 1-3 with a loaded team. The Iowa game should never have been close. If we played to win and not to lose against OSU, we win. You sound like the cons in Shawshank Redemption. “I’m innocent, lawyer fucked me!” We lost those games mostly because of coaching. If you take that criticism as “Fire Harbaugh!”, you’re reaching. In no way am I saying this that. But coaching has cost us several losses. The only meaningful context is for this year’s losses, with Michigan being the youngest team in college football. Last year’s losses, with an absolutely loaded team, were on the coaches. Franklin won the B1G in his 3rd season and started in a much more dire situation. Dantonio won a share of the title in year 4. Can we not expect Michigan to match that?

1VaBlue1

November 20th, 2017 at 1:22 PM ^

2015 OSU - the entire world knew that the middle of Michigan's defense wasn't holding up in the running game.  Meyer exploited that with a team tailor made to exploit that - something we also knew going in.  Rudock got injured, and Durkin never adjusted.

Context means context - you know, where reasons are applied.  I don't call them excuses, but explaining a loss with some context to it makes a world of difference over a broad statement.  YOu say last years team was "absolutely loaded", and I'll disagree with that.  The offense was still limited - there was no elite talent at QB (Speight played better than we all thought he would), WR, and RB.  And the senior laden OL was above average because they were mostly seniors.  Still couldn't do much of anything in space...

As far as "fire Harbaugh", you crapped on me to defend a guy that said exactly that if he didn't deliver a conf title next year.  So yeah, you should own that.  And yes, that groups you with a bunch of dipshits.  If it doesn't fit, then don't defend those who want him fired (there are some...)

BTW, I do put that Iowa game on the coaches - that game plan sucked.

Toasted Yosties

November 20th, 2017 at 2:00 PM ^

He said he’d be optimistic if it happened, that’s it. You should re-read his comment. And does your context help you qualify the losses as good or bad? Does that help you? I’m glad I haven’t heard anyone on the team provide rain as context/excuse for their loss against MSU. They’d be the laughing stock of football and deservingly so.

1VaBlue1

November 20th, 2017 at 10:46 AM ^

"Turn it around next year, as in win a god damn conference title, and I'm back on the optimist train."

You didn't acknowledge anything, you demand a conference title, or bust.  Stop changing your words because you can't edit them.

I get the frustration - I'm there, too.  But I also recognize that the worst case scenario has played out for this team.  From Spring on, we all said 8-4 to 10-2, and here we are.  We've lost the starting - and backup - QB's, and the (now) 3rd stringer is not capable.  (Assuming Peters is out, we'll be playing the 3rd string QB with te 4th string backing him up.)  We've replaced the season starting RT for performance.  We've lost the leading WR (Black), with nagging injuries for the other 2 of the top 3 (Perry and Schoenle, Crawford has been a letdown).  Against UW, Higdon was nursing a sore ankel, and Isaac was out (that's 1.5 of the three RBs).

This is a worst case season, sorry you can't see that.  But your words tell the world that you're a front runner.

Craptain Crunch

November 20th, 2017 at 8:11 AM ^

What is most frustrating is that there are other teams with similar issues but end up playing well. Other teams have "young" and "inexperienced" FR or SO QBs but yet those QBS play well. 

We have not seen that with Michigan in a LONG time. Sure, there was Denard but he wasn't exactly the polished QB, especially in throwing the football. 2011 was a good season but the last decade of Michigan football has been atrocious.

Putting kids into the NFL is a good thing but that doesn't justify the product we are seeing on the field on Saturdays. 

So yeah, it has become all about "Next Year" when it comes to Michigan football. One can only hope "next year" will be that year. 

EGD

November 20th, 2017 at 10:06 AM ^

Yes, but most of those "other teams" would likely be thrilled with an 8-win season and a chance at 9.

There aren't too many national title contenders with inexperienced QBs throwing to raw WRs behind shaky pass protection.

JTrain

November 20th, 2017 at 7:24 AM ^

Harbaugh is awesome. He’s our guy. What people are pissed about tho isn’t the above. It’s the lack of results.
I personally didn’t expect him to walk into the big ten and supplant Urban or Dantonio or just win every game and big ten and national championship just because of who he is.
I think people are pissed tho because his resume is so stellar everywhere he’s been that now that is the expectation. San Diego. Stanford. 49ers. He is a victim of his own success. And half of our fan base is insufferable.
Everywhere he’s been he has turned a perennial loser into a perennial contender. And with our talent and resources people just though it was going to be automatic. I don’t care if Michigan hires Nick Saban tomorrow....it ain’t that easy folks.
I get it but people have to realize the culture change that has already taken place. Where we are now vs four years ago isn’t even close. The record may not indicate it, but if we are lucky enough to have Harbaugh and his staff around for 10 years..I truly believe we will be rewarded. With conference titles and probably even a national title.
Everyone is sick of the “next year” talk...but hitting the reset button every three years is just stupid.

jblaze

November 20th, 2017 at 8:04 AM ^

So, what does it take? 2-3 more years of beating up on Rutgers and Maryland and losing to anybody good and almost losing to any team with a pulse?

Harbaugh's recruiting is great, Hoke's was similarly very good. Harbaugh has no offensive philosophy (he's a kitchen sink or buckshot kind of guy), Peters is not very good, our OL is awful, and Don Brown is way too aggressive (yet generates no turnovers).

I don't care what Harbaugh did at Stanford or with the 49ers (just like I don't care what RR did at WVU or he's doing at UA). Harbaugh needs to make serious changes on O or needs to be fired.

Blue in Paradise

November 20th, 2017 at 9:52 AM ^

out how moronic your post was.  This team is doing exactly what everyone with a brain thought they would do this year.  9-3 was the baseline with 8-4 or 10-2 possible depening on bounces, luck,injuries, etc...

Brandon Peters is not very good?  This is the statement that puts you in the overly emotional f&cktard category of M fans.  Guy has had a 3 starts as a RS Freshman and was carving up a top 3 defense nationally on any play that he had even a moment to set himself. with no running game to take off the heat.  I have seen with my own eyes Elvis Grbac, Tom Brady, Brian Griese and host of other future NFL QBs that were not nearly as good as Peters in their RS Freshman year.

He may or may not end up being a star but nothing that kid has done so far allows someone to say that he is not very good.

OL has been awful - not exactly a hot take.  Yes they have struggled but you know what, so have about 98% of NCAA and NFL OLs over the past several years.  There are about 10 team I can count that have good OLs and that includes the NFL.  DL athletes are just overwhelming OL athletes right now - trend will eventually reverse as more top prospects see the NFL opportunities on the OL.

Complaining about Don Brown?  Dude has led us to top 10 defenses his first 2 years including a year after sending 9 guys to the League.  Defense looks like it is going to be a monster the next 2 years.  Come to think of it, this comment was equally stupid to the Peters comment.

 

 

jblaze

November 20th, 2017 at 11:32 AM ^

I'll dismantle your "logic" now.

1) Nobody thought Michigan would lose to all of our rivals (or any team that doesn't suck). Everybody expected "toss ups", which aside from the MSU game and assuming OSU wins big, none of our losses were even close

2) Peters is not good. If he were, he wouldn't be 3rd string behind JOK (who is awful too). You may be a QB Guru and note that he's better than Griese, Brady, Gerbac (lol) at this point, but he is not. He does not look like a college QB. Watch the plays when he was hit hard. No feel for the pass rush, no stepping aside, no moving his feet. Those are facts.

3) I never claimed a "hot take" on the OL, but they are bad. If 98% are bad, then how bad is Michigan's?

4) Don Brown is good/ great, but he's too aggressive and good teams take advantage of that. Our fancy stats are awesome on D, because we hold Rutgers and Maryland to 200 yards, but against good teams, Brown does not mix it up. Here's another thing, if Brown was the shit, why was he 60+ before getting his 1st big time DC job (BC is not big time)?

Come to think of it, some of us do not bow to our God Harbaugh and again, I hope and want him to turn things around, but there is no semblance of offensive strategy/ cohesion... Read some other blogs where people/ coaches give actual commentary on our play. Not good and no progression from Game 1.

Sten Carlson

November 20th, 2017 at 12:02 PM ^

You personify why I’ve had to leave this blog for long stretches. You’ve got no context, no insight, and an overarching negativity that is unbelievably frustrating. Keep bitching, please. Keep whining and maybe you’ll get what you and your fellow complainers want. Maybe Ward will listen and fire Harbaugh and we can start the whole insane coaching merry go round again! Michigan is in the situation it’s in because of Michigan’s own idiotic mismanagement that began more than a decade ago and didn’t stop until Hackett hired Harbaugh. Do you really think that over a decade of mismanagement can be rectified and remedied in less than three seasons? Really?! Is so, you’re delusional and know absolutely zero about how organizations (let alone, CFB) works. So again, please keep fucking whining and maybe you’ll get what you want. Maybe if Michigan had actually had a real plan to replace Carr, had kept up its facilities and run its program without institutional arrogance we wouldn’t be in this situation. We’ve suffered for over a decade and things are just now starting to look up and all you stupid fucks can do is complain that it’s not looking up fast enough for your liking. All we hear is whining about, “how long do we have to wait?!” You have to wait until you don’t have to wait any longer! You have to wait until the rot that infected Michigan for over a decade is finally gone!

Blue in Paradise

November 20th, 2017 at 9:57 AM ^

was the fact that these overly negative posts have made the Board not fun.  If sports are not fun, then there is truly no point to partaking.

I will continue to enjoy the Harbaugh renaissance and have fun following the team.  If it stops being fun, I will do something else with the very little leisure time that I have available to me.

Last post of the day for me - too busy at work for this $hit.