Purdue does not have AC in Visitor Locker Room
Purdue has AC in their home locker room, but no AC in the visitor locker room.
This seems like a dirt bag move by Purdue.
Harbaugh had the starters sit in the team bus with the AC on, as opposed to the locker room.
Purdue is in the B1G and can afford AC in both. How common is this? It seems like there should be rules against it. If Purdue played us in late November in Ann Arbor, would it be okay to have the heat in their locker room just warm enough so the pipes don't freeze?
https://twitter.com/chengelis/status/911679283206262785
September 23rd, 2017 at 10:43 PM ^
Cool, now go banter with your wife about your random musings.
September 23rd, 2017 at 11:42 PM ^
September 25th, 2017 at 10:59 AM ^
"Isn't questioning the most scientific thing you can do?"
No - questioning based in the scientific method is the most scientific thing you can do.
September 23rd, 2017 at 10:32 PM ^
a total lack of understanding of how the scientific method, and (federal gov't) science funding in the US, works.
There is no vast conspiracy of career civil servants to "punish big coal" or some such bullshit. The best models predict that the net effect of all the additional CO2 in the atmosphere will be continued warming, which in turn results in increased coastal flooding, changed disease and pest vectors, droughts and so on. The exact outcomes are unknown but the general trajectory is clear.
If you could come up with a model that incorporated the known data but predicted radically different and more easily coped-with outcomes you would have very interesting sessions at conferences, get a bunch of funding and would probably get tenure at any R1 institution of your choice.
I doubt this comment will have much effect but it needs to be said.
September 23rd, 2017 at 10:44 PM ^
September 23rd, 2017 at 11:15 PM ^
I meant the ones that have best fit the observed trends, yes. Those have been better than the ones that don't predict global warming, if accuracy is your metric.
On the other hand if passive-aggressive equivocation is your metric then your models do better.
September 24th, 2017 at 10:25 AM ^
September 24th, 2017 at 9:36 AM ^
Provide some data that disagrees with what the overwhelming majority of scientists are saying then.
Oh, you don't have any? Shocker.
You don't seem to understand that scientists get paid to research, not to provide one answer or the other.
September 25th, 2017 at 10:57 AM ^
As if a scientist with data/experiments showing climate change to be not happening COULDN'T get grants?
Grants are based on methodology and area of research, not results.
September 23rd, 2017 at 11:32 PM ^
September 23rd, 2017 at 10:28 PM ^
Our weather is geoengineered. My senator confirmed this. Yes weather can be controlled. Look up HAARP and rapid evaporation. Hurricanes can be steered. This is common knowledge. Now temperatures, they have been going up steadily since before the industrial age, but don't let the sheep fool ya.
September 23rd, 2017 at 11:23 PM ^