GA Tech Runs for 535 yards vs Hoke D Line

Submitted by SBayBlue on

Georgia Tech ran for 535 yards and accumulated 655 total yards last night vs Brady Hoke's D line at Tennessee. TaQuon Marshall, the Tech QB, is a first year starter and ran for the most yards ever by a GT QB. Combine this with Oregon's 7th worst NCAA team rushing yards per game allowed last year means that for all of the praise Brady received for his 1997 Championship D-line, sorry to say but the man is not a defensive genius. I know the Vols didn't have a great rush D last year (107th), but after last night's performance and the upcoming SEC schedule, Tennessee will probably finish near the bottom this year.

I know people say that we should leave him alone and have nothing but kind words for him, and he is a good human being, but I think coaching has passed him by.

Why does Brady have a job anymore?

EastCoast Esq.

September 5th, 2017 at 1:54 PM ^

"I know the Vols didn't have a great rush D last year (107th)"

This caveat alone nullifies your argument. Not to mention the fact that Hoke doesn't have ANY of his own guys on the line, since he was hired after Signing Day. Remember, he was the guy who found Hurst, Charlton, Wormley, etc.

It's a bad look to pile on to a good man when he hasn't even had a chance in his new job.

Mojo Hall

September 5th, 2017 at 2:01 PM ^

What about spring practice and all of fall camp?  I think there was sufficient time to prepare for this game.  But yes, great guy, good role model, etc. and a lot of people want to see him replace Mattison here if he were to retire.   Pointing out stats (especially after his debacle last year at Oregon) is not piling on and is newsworthy. 

MH20

September 5th, 2017 at 2:04 PM ^

It's not like those three guys were lightly-recruited nobodies that Hoke found playing 8-man football in the Yoop.  They were all sought by top programs in the region and/or nation.  Yes, he got them to Michigan but it seems pretty likely that Harbaugh would've gone after them pretty hard, too.

Now, someone like Willie Henry, there's a guy who was unearthed.  Barely in the 247 Composite top-1000 and ends up a fourth rounder.

TdK71

September 5th, 2017 at 4:27 PM ^

Did Mattison find them and Hoke offer them scholarships? Hoke was an LB in college so one would think that he'd do better recruiting LB's than he did... With the exception of McCray and Gedeon our linebacker's were very average. And remember Hoke Didn't recruit Jake Ryan and Desmond Morgan....

 

MaizeAndBlueWahoo

September 5th, 2017 at 1:57 PM ^

What Georgia Tech does on the ground really has no relationship to what other teams will do on the ground.  And the D-line really has little role in stopping that gameplan compared to what they would do against other teams.  With all the cut blocking GT does, the best you can hope for is either to dodge the cut block or create a pileup that the linebackers can deal with.

Perkis-Size Me

September 5th, 2017 at 2:02 PM ^

I'll admit that planning for the triple option offense when you almost never play against it is incredbily tough. And I fully expect Michigan to let at least 1-2 big runs break free against Air Force next week. It's a tough system to defend because almost no one outside of Ga Tech and the service academies ever run it anymore.

But 535 yards when you've had a full offseason to prepare is pretty bad. Hoke's best days are way, WAY behind him. I don't want to rag on the guy too much, but he seems like a guy who has never been able to adapt with the times, especially as the spread has become more and more prevalent.

Makes sense that his DLs were really good back in the 90s when everyone and their mother was lining up in the I and trying to pummel it down your throat.

bronxblue

September 5th, 2017 at 2:37 PM ^

I think people focus too much on this amorphous notion of "preparing" for certain types of offenses as if the offense doesn't play a role in whether or not they get stopped.  GT runs a super-uncommon offense, and it's good coaching not to spend 4 months preparing for it because the return on that investment is one game.  

He's a good identifier of talent and his schemes are mostly sound as far as I can tell.  The last 2 years under Harbaugh, Michigan has struggled just as mightily against spread offenses in certain instances, especially on the ground (307 and 369 yards to IU and OSU in 2015, 275 and 206 to UCF and OSU last year).  Yes, injuries and dumb luck and all that, but looking at the raw numbers it's hard to find a huge difference.  

My point is that hating on Hoke is just unnecessary now, especially when the point of reference is an opening game against GT.  He's not the HC at Michigan anymore, and so I'm not looking for him to suffer because of real or perceived deficiencies in his coaching abilities.

True Blue Grit

September 5th, 2017 at 2:03 PM ^

they're always pointing out something negative about Hoke or what he's done.  I'd say for every positive Hoke post on here (and there haven't been very many) after he left, we get 10 negative ones.  I assume his defenses have had some good games in the last 3 years.  Why not post about that?  This post would have been just fine with me if it didn't mention Hoke at all.  Rushing for 535 yards against Tennessee is pretty newsworthy by itself without dumping on Brady Hoke again.  

Yeoman

September 5th, 2017 at 7:02 PM ^

...but the premise is false. There haven't been any good games yet: year 1 he was out of coaching, year 3 has barely started, year 2 at Oregon was an impossible task, the sort of job only someone late in his career and no longer needing or wanting to build a resume would take on. It was a three-year-plan to completely overhaul the defense and the head coach didn't survive the first year--judging Hoke on the results is like judging RR's Michigan offenses on 2008.

Blueblood2991

September 5th, 2017 at 2:15 PM ^

I said it yesterday in the game thread, but I'm more curious what his thoughts were being on the same sideline as John Kelly out of Oak Park while he ran for 4 TDs. Hoke only recruited him as a DB, because he was too small to play RB in "manball" offense.

Harbaugh only had a month after he was hired to try to recruit him, but it was too late.  Harbaugh even said he was the best athlete in the state at the time.

Jasper

September 5th, 2017 at 2:56 PM ^

That gets at one of my main issues with Hoke and his Michigan ancestors (including Lloyd): Their apparent fixation with size.

Look at the success they had with Ian Gold and Dhani Jones (neither huge) in the late '90s. It's like that was forgotten. Almost as though they really did enjoy watching Chris Graham trying to cover a fast receiver ...

It's hard to imagine Hoke being comfortable with a guy like Khaleke playing a LB-esque position.

bronxblue

September 5th, 2017 at 2:09 PM ^

I like how you noted that UT was terrible on rushing defense last year as well, then sorta waved your hands and said "Hoke is terrible."  Oregon was a tire fire on defensive line last year but people already expecred that given graduation and recruiting.  Also, Tennessee hasn't been a top-50 rushing defense this decade as far as I can tell.  

Hoke isn't a head coach at a P5 program, but he's been put into two really bad situations as DC.  That's his choice and he'll deal with it, but being gashed by GT in your first game of the year doesn't seem beyond the pale, especially when you wind up winning the game.

blueblueblue

September 5th, 2017 at 2:39 PM ^

Your defense of Hoke is about as flimsy as the OP's castigation of him. I think the truth about his paradoxocial career lies somwhere in a complex nexus of factors that we will never be able to pull apart without the whole thing collapsing. So yes, the OP's claims read as somewhat rediculous, but your defense of him sorta does too. 

BassDude138

September 5th, 2017 at 2:10 PM ^

The running attack that GT features exploits the LB's and secondary. There is only so much a DL can do against that type of offense. The OL cuts the DL and it is up to the back seven to fill the gaps and tackle in space on the edge.

Ali G Bomaye

September 5th, 2017 at 2:50 PM ^

I'm guessing he wasn't exactly in high demand after being at Oregon last year, and viewed this as a way to rehabilitate his reputation. After all, Nussmeier was only at Michigan for a year before he got fired along with Hoke, and he still landed on his feet at Florida. The important part is just staying in a high-profile coaching position.

stephenrjking

September 5th, 2017 at 3:06 PM ^

This is a really bad argument. Hoke may do well at Tennessee, or he may do poorly, or things may melt down there and prevent us from truly knowing how good he is.

But to take his first game, taking over an awful run defense, against Georgia Tech of all teams, is absurd.

Georgia Tech is the most sophisticated of all triple option offenses, offenses that succeed in this era in part because other teams have no precedent for preparing for them. Greg Mattison, an NFL DC who also won a national title at Florida, was flummoxed by Air Force in our previous meeting. Nick Saban's Alabama team gave up 300 rushing yards to Georgia Southern (!) running the option in 2011, the year they fielded one of the greatest defenses of all time. Don Brown has been developing his Air Force game plan since before the team went to Rome. It's challenging.

Option offenses require defenses to play unfamiliar assignment football and execute. It is incumbent upon the DC to put those players in the right position to succeed. When the DC does not produce a good gameplan, teams like Georgia Tech carve through them like a scythe.

There is absolutely nothing that can be learned that is useful information about Brady Hoke, good or bad, from this game. If a coach deserves criticism, it is DC Bob Shoop. Regarding Hoke, let the season play out. Maybe he's not that good, maybe he's great, but you can't tell anything from Monday Night.

 

Richard75

September 5th, 2017 at 3:45 PM ^

Georgia Tech was 85th in total offense last season. Yes their offense is unusual but that alone doesn't make it unstoppable. Also, some context for that Ga. Southern-Bama game: --That was Bama's annual pre-Auburn tune-up (meaning they were taking it easy) --a 300-yard game for a triple-option team isn't a huge day if running is all they're doing. Ga. Southern had 341 total yards.

lilpenny1316

September 5th, 2017 at 2:36 PM ^

So there's at least that.  Also, LBs and secondary need to do their job defending the option and they struggled as well.  

If they get gashed by Florida, then you can criticize him.  But until then, enjoy your Top 10 Wolverines.

PeteM

September 5th, 2017 at 2:54 PM ^

Hoke didn't succeed here, but he seems like a good guy and I hope things work out at Tennesee.  It's hard for me to believe that he not ability to coach defense as the defense improved dramatically after he arrived (yes, I know Mattison played a big role).  His recruiting was also the strongest on the Dline with guys like Taco, Hurst etc).

Fieldy'sNuts

September 5th, 2017 at 3:00 PM ^

Hoke is a good guy and a great recruiter. If I'm being honest, that's about as far as it goes. I wish him good fortune but on his best day he's a medocire football/position coach. 

Marley Nowell

September 5th, 2017 at 3:05 PM ^

What makes Hoke a "good guy" exactly? He was terse with the media for really no reason, allowed a clearly concussed player back onto the field which in the business world he could be personally liable for, and covered up for a player being dismissed for rape by calling it a "family issue." He's a good guy because his players liked him? Art Briles' players liked him too, doesn't make him a "good guy."

snarling wolverine

September 5th, 2017 at 3:59 PM ^

Come on. Comparing a coach to Briles (or Paterno) is basically the Godwin's Law of college football.

Hoke screwed some things up (although Brandon was more responsible for the concussion fiasco) but there are a ton of Michigan guys over the years that will vouch for his character - including some on this current team.

MGoTakedown

September 5th, 2017 at 3:32 PM ^

Did you actually watch the game or are you just spouting off stat lines and assigning blame to whoever better fits your agenda? Defensive line is only one part of the equation when putting a defense on the field and you want to blame the position coach who is coaching in his first game? Come on, man.

Michwolverinefreak

September 5th, 2017 at 3:45 PM ^

Im not expecting much from them this year, but the first game was against a triple option (unless Im mistaken) with a rushing defense that sucked last year. I dont think its a great indicator of where they'll be.

Uper73

September 5th, 2017 at 5:02 PM ^

We're Hoke's guys. Not to mention Ryan, Henry and Glasgow. Probably missing a few.

Lay off Hoke. He just was not ready for a HC job like M, and, other than Mattison, did not build a strong enough staff.

He is a strong, ethical coach and excellent recruiter.

BIGBLUEWORLD

September 5th, 2017 at 6:28 PM ^

One more bit of evidence that shows how important Greg Mattison has been to our football team ever since he began coaching here.

Greg Mattison gets a lot of love around here, and he earns every bit of it. I still believe he deserved the Broyles Award in 2011 for the minor miracle how he turned our defense around.

fksljj

September 5th, 2017 at 8:52 PM ^

Nice guy who teaches his players about life lessons. Maybe a little over his head as a head coach. Hell of a recruiter. Gave us Jabrill but also gave us... Speight. I will never doubt his love for Michigan, though.

XiX

September 5th, 2017 at 9:09 PM ^

of the guy who has a great girlfriend but can't stop obsessing about his/her ex.

Harbaugh is here and everything surrounding the program is going great. Why are you still obsessing over a guy in Hoke who loved the University and gave his best to it?

I get it, It wasn't good enough. Get over it.