Is the Sherrone Moore vs Jesse Minter debate a false choice?

Submitted by tah15 on January 16th, 2024 at 11:12 PM

Assuming JH leaves, it seems likely he'd take Minter with him, making Sherrone the obvious successor (especially with DeBoer and Fisch off the table). However, I've seen many argue that Minter would be the better choice for HC due to the strength of the defense the last few years (not wrong!). Although, the offensive line play has been every bit as important.

Were Sherrone to be JH's handpicked successor -- and it seems pretty clear that he is -- wouldn't the Ravens/Michigan/Chargers (or Eagles?) partnership keep the Michigan NFL DC internship open anyway? I can't imagine the Harbaugh's (and Minter) wouldn't take care of Sherrone on this front if he was Jim's handpicked successor. And if that's the case, wouldn't Sherrone's game day HC wins over PSU and OSU, his relationship with the current players on the roster, and his ability to connect with high school and portal players make him every bit as strong (if not stronger) of a candidate than Minter? 

For reference sake, Andy Staples has mentioned this very contingency here

Larry Z

January 16th, 2024 at 11:42 PM ^

I would like to see Minter stick around d either way, whether Sherrone is HC and keeps him as DC, or Minter gets pick to be HC.

I was never really a defensive guy, but since Minter came around, I love it, and don't want to lose it.

Mr Miggle

January 16th, 2024 at 11:43 PM ^

I would just like to say that Michigan will save a lot of money if Sherrone replaces Harbaugh this year. Some of that money will surely go into the salary pool for assistants. I'm not willing to assume any of the assistants are automatically leaving. It would make a lot of sense for Sherrone to prioritize keeping the defensive staff together, especially Minter.

brad

January 17th, 2024 at 12:01 AM ^

The token in favor of taking the OC as head coach and not the DC is that the offense and it's choices can be used to control the pace and flow of the game as a whole, while the defense typically reacts to the game as presented by the opposing offense.  So, the head coach with a meaningful offensive coaching background is at least theoretically more prepared to make winning decisions at any given time, all else being equal, than the one with a defensive background.  

Neither of these guys having been a head coach, there is no way to know who would be better or if either are destined to be good enough.  But as a rule, I would lean to the OC first because of the in-game dynamism it should bring.

ShawarmaChameleon

January 17th, 2024 at 12:02 AM ^

It's 99.999 percent Sherrone Moore if Harbaugh leaves. Not because JH picked him. Not because Michigan hasn't thought about it and poked around. But because he's the best fit. He earned his shot. We saw him grind out Michigan's three toughest wins of the season on the field last year. And his resume is stronger than guys like Fisch and DeBoer had when they got their first shots. 

olm_go_blue

January 17th, 2024 at 12:25 AM ^

Deboer is like 114-12. He beat Oregon 2x this year and Texas as well, those wins are as good as psu, osu and bama (statistically speaking). And Moore was acting hc of harbaugh's team. Who cares whose first 3 (acting or otherwise) hc games were stronger. Either has better overall resumes than moore, and it's not debatable (they have been successful assistants AND successful head coaches!).

At this point, it's harbaugh or Moore, and I'm ok with that, but your line of reasoning as to moore having a stronger resume is ludicrous. You think he is the better fit/continuity/whatever, fine. But resume is more than first shots, it's longevity, recruiting, winning, consistency.  It's not even about earning his shot, every candidate has earned it at this level. But there are no better/more proven candidates left, so its all academic.

NJblue2

January 17th, 2024 at 12:03 AM ^

I really don't think Moore should be the HC. I get that he won those games as the interim, but this team was the most talented team at Michigan in years. 

The highlight of the team was the defense who got the absolutely most out of it's player. The offense, with the best QB and arguably the best RB in school history played well, but was not elite and struggled a lot. I don't think Moore is an elite play caller, I don't think he maximized the talent on offense. I think he's an elite o line coach, and an average/above average OC. I'm just nervous about giving him the keys simply for continuity of culture. 

Especially since more than likely Minter would leave too and we haven't recruited super well the last couple of years and that will probably catch up. Obviously he can hire great assistants, but he has no track record.

tah15

January 17th, 2024 at 12:21 AM ^

I hear you on the play calling concerns. I guess a question I have has to do with the extant to which JH still has influence on in-game play calls? I was never a huge fan of JH's play calling when he used to have the co-coordinators suggest plays to him before he signaled it in himself.

Nowadays, it does seem like Jim's handed the play-calling keys over to Moore for the most part, but I still wonder if he isn't interjecting with some regularity. I have liked the way Moore has implemented some interesting pass-game concepts like, for example, the WR motioning at full speed to a free release behind another WR right at the snap (a Miami Dolphins staple). I doubt that came from Harbaugh. Anyway, I wonder if Moore wouldn't be an even better play caller all on his own. 

olm_go_blue

January 17th, 2024 at 12:41 AM ^

The 4 duos that won the championship have harbaugh's fingerprints all over them. The passing game is not what won the national championship, that's for sure. 22 tds and under 3k yards in 15 games. When he was acting hc, the playcalls weren't some masterclass all of a sudden. It's just as likely he will be the same or worse on his own.

NJblue2

January 17th, 2024 at 1:09 AM ^

I think the play calling during the 3 games Harbaugh was gone, weren't very good. Did he call good plays sometimes, yeah, but overall I think our offense is what Iowa dreams to be. Our passing game is meh with JJ and I can't imagine it ever being better. 

This won't be a popular opinion but out of Harbaugh, Moore and Minter, I'd be 100% cool losing Moore. I just fear that the only reason people want Moore to be coach is purely for culture reasons. I don't think Minter or Moore should be the HC but if I had to pick any, I would pick the better coach which is Minter.

truferblue22

January 17th, 2024 at 12:37 AM ^

You're getting downvoted probably for lack of substance...but you're asking the right question. I think Minter is FAR more important than Sherrone and I think if we kept Minter and Herbert, I'm not sure I would even care that much about Jim leaving. 

Alas, this is most likely fantasy, because as you said, I think Minter goes with Jim.

schreibee

January 17th, 2024 at 9:24 AM ^

Well, Minter maybe doesn't go with Jim if he's offered the HC position. That's kind of the debate here, no?!

And Minter then decides whether to offer Sherrone a fat raise to try to retain him, or let's him move on if not.

There's a lot of merit to this approach - but it's a real are "X's & O's" or "culture" your key value type of debate. 

Which is not to say Minter brings no cultural continuity or Sherrone no X's & O's strengths - just that the other is stronger at those things, from outside appearances. 

SalvatoreQuattro

January 17th, 2024 at 12:39 AM ^

Lance Leipold has six national titles. He is turning Kansas(!) into a winner. Imagine what he could do with Michigan’s resources.

Bringing Jalon Daniels along would solve the QB question.

That said, Warde will go with Moore because it is the path of least resistance. Popular coach, member of national championship staff, widely seen as up and comer, recent  track record of inexperience HC having success…Dabo,Smart, etc.

 

MgoHillbilly

January 17th, 2024 at 12:55 AM ^

This defense is slap yo momma good. That alone puts minter in the retain at all costs  category. I wouldn't be too worried about this coming year so long as we keep minter and Herbert.

Bando Calrissian

January 17th, 2024 at 12:57 AM ^

Did we not just see three straight, very critical weeks of players ready to run through a wall for Sherrone Moore? It's an easy choice, especially if he surrounds himself with a very experienced staff.

trustBlue

January 17th, 2024 at 12:58 AM ^

I like Sherrone a lot, but if Harbuagh leaves, I hope we hire someone with head coaching experience and enough cachet to attract and hire an elite staff. 

Don

January 17th, 2024 at 2:32 AM ^

After Harbaugh leaves for the NFL, no NFL team—the Ravens or any other franchise—is going to give two shits about Michigan's assistant coaches. The only reason McDonald and then Minter came here in the first place was because JH was here and his brother was going to help him out. Once Harbaugh is gone, the pipeline is too.

uminks

January 17th, 2024 at 2:46 AM ^

John will steal Minter for his new DC. Michigan will have to  hire one of the Raven's DB coach or LB coach to keep the Raven D going. Moore will be a candidate for our new coach.

NotAMichiganSpy

January 17th, 2024 at 4:17 AM ^

I was ok with Moore as head coach when I thought it meant Minter would still be there to anchor the defense. Handing the entire program to Moore on his own is a huge risk. Could be boom or bust.

Warde would have to give him all the NIL support he needs.

goblue2121

January 17th, 2024 at 6:59 AM ^

Michigan is very fortunate to have such a great staff to even make this a debate.  The number of other teams that have two coordinators with HC potential is probably zero. 

buddhafrog

January 17th, 2024 at 7:30 AM ^

If Moore is named the head coach we are going to be in a great spot. We'll be able to get an elite DC if not Minter. Hart to OC unless he takes another HC job.

But mostly we know Moore will be a lifer. It'll be a little different than JH. He has the culture and can continue the work being dong. This is about as ideal of a transfer as possible