MSU Snowflakes - The Coaching

Submitted by LSAClassOf2000 on October 21st, 2018 at 3:00 PM

Here's your thread for snowflakes and hot takes regarding the overall coaching performance. 

Ham

October 20th, 2018 at 4:59 PM ^

We covered. Would like to win by more than just 14 when the defense holds the other team to under 100 yards total offense (and they do need to learn how to finish drives better), but considering how dire things looked in the 3rd when State had it at midfield tied with everything seemingly coming unraveled, the team showed great perseverance. And we covered.

BuckNekked

October 20th, 2018 at 5:38 PM ^

The last piece is Shea. Im not sure if hes a bad decision maker or he doesnt trust his eyes but hes holding the ball too long and taking bad losses with too many throwaways. Id also like to see Grant Perry used more on slants and quick hitters as an extension of the running game. It seems every route we run takes 4 seconds and then Shea doesnt throw it on time to make it worse.

Motives

October 20th, 2018 at 5:01 PM ^

Please stop doing a pa pass after rushing for 2 yards or less the previous play, it wasn't working and for good reason.

BuckNekked

October 20th, 2018 at 5:43 PM ^

If you look at studies of PA passing there isnt much correlation between running success and success on PA passes. The Lions for example were one of the worst running teams ever last season but were at or near the top of the NFL in yards per PA pass. Id assume the numbers in college are similar. 

Motives

October 20th, 2018 at 6:27 PM ^

Well, that may be the case but it definitely wasn't working this game 90% of the time, but I am not a coach.  It's not like I don't have faith in the staff or anything but sometimes we seem to do the same thing and get the same poor results over and over, and it can be frustrating to watch.

OwenGoBlue

October 20th, 2018 at 5:01 PM ^

They had them ready to murder and be petty. 

Offense should gtfo with the Paul Chryst stuff punting the first half, but if Shea makes a few more plays that were there this is a hamblasting. 

mfan_in_ohio

October 20th, 2018 at 5:15 PM ^

Why wouldn't you punt in those situations?  We have been ass all year on 3rd/4th and long and MSU has a solid defense.  Meanwhile, MSU's offense is complete butt against our #1 defense, and the weather sucks.  The only way MSU scored was when we set them up in great field position.  The right thing to do on 4th and more than 2 or 3 there is to pin them back, force the 3 and out (which they did both times) and get the ball back. 

Seriously, what play would you have run?  Or would you have Nordin, who looked terrible last week and in warmups today, go for a 50+ yard FG on a windy day that has a good chance of getting blocked?  I know look at those punts like it's "dinosaur football," but when you're in a dinosaur football game, you have to make dinosaur decisions.

OwenGoBlue

October 20th, 2018 at 5:54 PM ^

I get doing some dinosaur stuff but to me the 4th and 5 from the 38 was indefensible and they paid for it on the touchback. If they dinosaured the others but went for it there I'd feel better about it. 

Any number of short passing plays can get you 5 (or 10 on the other) and it's just bad football math based on the risk/reward. A good defense is another reason to go for it, too.

Wolverine 73

October 20th, 2018 at 5:02 PM ^

We seem to play more conservatively in the first half, and to work on softening the other team up, then open it up in the second half.  I wonder if Patterson was programmed not to pull the ball in the first half so State would be stunned when he started to do it in the second half.  Sure worked when he did keep it.

J.

October 20th, 2018 at 6:27 PM ^

That's exactly it.  A large portion of the "slow starts" on offense are actually a result of Michigan attempting to wear down the defense.  You saw the results in the fourth quarter last week, and you saw the results in the fourth quarter again this week.

Give MSU some credit -- their defense was actually very good.  Remember last year's Michigan defense, when they'd eventually wear down because the offense couldn't move the ball?  That's what Michigan is doing to other teams this year.

This isn't going to change -- it's a philosophical thing.  Shea has clearly been told to avoid mistakes early in the game; Michigan intends to win the games late.

CompleteLunacy

October 20th, 2018 at 8:25 PM ^

And it's working. I do want Shea to stop being so gun-shy early in games..but I'd much rather have that than game-changing turnovers.

For however all-too-familiar bleakness we all felt during that 3rd quarter, the defense was still not allowing anything besides that one trick play. 

And despite the 2 fumbles and crappy weather, Michigan won the game pulling away. Sure, they could have scored more earlier, but it's also easy to be conservative when you have the #1 defense in the country. Turnovers are the only reason MSU was in the game in the 2nd half.

And despite all that, Michigan asserted themselves late in the game. Their run game started producing more yards against the best run D in the country. It was not stellar, but it was productive enough. And the run game got them an insurance TD late in the game. Considering our past futilities against MSU on the ground, that's a huge positive. 

 

Ghost of Fritz…

October 20th, 2018 at 5:02 PM ^

Hard to complain when M beats Sparty. 

But...man it still seems like the offensive game plans are not quite there yet. 

Can't say it was a bad game plan and/or situational play calling. 

But, there has to be a better way to avoid so many 3rd and longs against good Ds, and also some better plays for the 3rd and 8 situations.

Hopefully they can add a couple of things in the bye week, because this is the main thing that keeps the O from being really top level.

stephenrjking

October 20th, 2018 at 5:04 PM ^

I was frustrated we squandered those second half opportunities, too. But that's mostly on Shea and Nordin, honestly. Shea passed up open receivers, including that clear opportunity to hit DPJ for a TD the same way Shea was rolling out. 

Michigan ran the ball well and got open receivers with regularity. I've raised the idea that Harbaugh's QB coaching may leave his QBs tentative, so that's a possible coaching nit to pick, but the plays were, for the most part, there. 

Ghost of Fritz…

October 20th, 2018 at 5:15 PM ^

True, Shea did miss DJP. 

Still, where is the slant or Perry (or that sort of concept) to deal with 2nd or 3d and 8ish?

They tried one that would have worked today, but it was batted down at the line.  Patterson not tall enough to make that work regularly?  Not sure.

The Nordin miss was off of a bad snap.  Holder did a good job to even get the ball down, but it threw off Nordin. 

BlockM

October 20th, 2018 at 5:16 PM ^

I felt the opposite. Seemed like the game plan was perfect, and there were just some missed opportunities from the players. Shea not seeing DPJ for a wide open TD (or just not throwing it) changed the entire complexion of the game for a while. Him passing up the earlier keeper also wasn't guaranteed points but would have changed things too. Great scheming, and overall solid execution from the offense I thought.

bdneely4

October 20th, 2018 at 5:02 PM ^

We finished the football game by running the ball and the #1 rushing defense couldn’t do anything to stop us. One of the most satisfying games I have watched in well over a decade. 

Go Blue!

Jamezz23

October 20th, 2018 at 5:02 PM ^

Game plan seemed good, execution at times wasn’t  so good. 

We changed nothing, just executed better. People have to hop off Harbaughs nuts HES A GOOD COACH AND HE CALLED A GREAT GAME