OT-Bret Bielema continues his fight against up-tempo offense

Submitted by BlueLikeJazz on

http://espn.go.com/college-football/story/_/id/12508447/arkansas-razorbacks-coach-bret-bielema-continues-campaign-hurry-no-huddle-offenses-college-football

Our old pal continues to rail against up-tempo offenses, now framing it as a safety issue.  It certainly isn't that these offenses are harder to defend and have made his team look bad the last few years.

My favorite quote from the article:
"We have an obligation to do what's right," he said. "I can't understand how some guys can't see that."

 

East German Judge

March 18th, 2015 at 5:26 PM ^

Excellent point and upvote.  What is worse, a few extra plays with players who weigh less (assuming that up tempo teams favor speed and lighter quicker players to sheer bulk) vs. playing against the type of lineman Bret uses in his offense. 

Also, with a spread offense, you have more people in playing in space and IMO less contact/multiple people tackling one player and blocking per play vs. running between the tackles where it is more tight space wise and more contact.

jmblue

March 18th, 2015 at 5:17 PM ^

I don't know if it's a safety issue but I do feel like the offense/defense balance has become skewed in favor of offenses in college football.  I don't mind some rule changes to help defenses out.  

 

JFW

March 18th, 2015 at 5:21 PM ^

I would too, I'm a defensive guy. To me a stonewall of an offense by a well executing defense is a beautiful thing. But don't expect it to happen any time soon. There are a lot of hard core and casual fans that love to see basketball on grass, and that drives revenue.



Sent from MGoBlog HD for iPhone & iPad

FGB

March 19th, 2015 at 1:26 AM ^

but I don't know exactly why everyone thinks it's so obvious that football shouldn't do something to limit how quickly a team can run a play, as if that's antithetical to the game.

Think about inbounding a basketball, or serving in tennis, or pitching a baseball, or taking a free kick in soccer.  In most sports there's a moment where the ref/ump gives the OK before allowing play, and that OK is largely based on whether the other team is "ready" so to speak.

Of course you could say "well the other team should be ready at all times."  That's one approach to a game.  A different approach is to say "both sides should be given the opportunity to line up with the best strategic move they can come up with and we'll let the one who does that better win that play."

It's not uncommon in almost every other sport, yet people think it's some communist proposal as a way to play football.

Two Hearted Ale

March 19th, 2015 at 5:54 AM ^

The ref doesn't signal when it's okay to in inbound a basketball on a made shot. Beliema is asking for the equivalent of ten seconds to inbound the ball after a made basket so his big fat players can walk leisurely to the other end of the court. It's actually not an unreasonable hypothesis that more plays equals more injuries but there isn't evidence I'm aware of that says uptempo teams or their opponents have more injuries than slower tempo teams and I don't recall him complaining about the playoff or twelfth game which makes me think his motivation is something other than player injuries.

1464

March 18th, 2015 at 5:23 PM ^

Thread hijack. Listening to Columbus radio. Rosenberg is getting absolutely killed by their broadcast team in regards to his stupid Borland story. They're basically calling it the stupidest thing ever written. Not thread worthy, but he is getting destroyed.

HelloHeisman91

March 18th, 2015 at 5:45 PM ^

I think a 270 pound defensive end blindsiding a qb is more of a safety issue than highly conditioned athletes running a few extra plays a game at an uptempo pace.  Shoiuld we change that too?

Tagg

March 18th, 2015 at 7:23 PM ^

There are a number of real issues in regards to safety but up tempo offenses isn't one. I would say the length of the season is more of a threat than no huddle, up tempo schemes with both Ohio State and Oregon playing 15 games.

As mentioned before, what about his scheme using massive linemen? How about sending your  starting RB into the teeth of a defense 20 times per game, taking hits everytime? If he gets concerned about his players safety then use a time out. You get 6 per game Bret, use them. 

Adapt or die. 

NRK

March 18th, 2015 at 8:15 PM ^

In my opinion this is a scummy move by Bielema, he's trying to co opt a serious issue (player safety) into his own personal agenda against up-tempo offenses.

Danwillhor

March 19th, 2015 at 12:09 AM ^

but for honest reasons: I hate the spread offense & always have. I grew up watching teams line it up & play like men. Let the best man win type stuff. The craziest any level of football got was the run-n-shoot lol. BYU & Houston were the Oregon & Auburn back then wrt "get ready for some crazy stats!" football. Now every team runs not just the spread but the read option spread. So, not only are you playing a game inherently skewed to the offense but the offenses are playing this bitchball "fooled ya!" B.S. & it bugs me. I love me some Denard but I never liked our offense, or rather, the fact that we had to resort to that offense essentially telling me that the read option was finally ubiquitous in my favorite sport. Honest? It's pulled my football fandom back in the NFL direction really hard. When Barry Sanders retired my football love was 95/5 between CFB/NFL. Almost couldn't care less about the NFL. The fact that every team now runs an offense that I think is straight up bitchball has made it about 60/40 now. The NFL still lines it up like men. CFB is finding a fast guy that you hope can throw the ball+ play defense= win. Your winning depends on what team has or can stop the team with the faster, better throwing QB that will be a HB, KR, WR or nothing in the NFL. Just my opinion.

micheal honcho

March 19th, 2015 at 8:28 AM ^

And for equal substitutions, its all within the rules. Keep in mind that its also within the rules to have a defensive player lay down with cramps on any or all plays as long as he sits out one play. Thats what a Saban, Bielema or any coach in a big game vs. a tempo team should do.

As far as NFL playing "manball" vs. CFB. Thats due to the placement of the hash marks as much as anything. In the NFL a defense can line up symmetrically and does not need to tip their hand in reponse to the offensive formation due to the long side of the field.