preed1

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:35 AM ^

That I want Pryor to stay only because it will just seperate osu more, and add more fire to the gas where there is already fire

MI Expat NY

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:45 AM ^

I don't think Pryor himself ever spoke on the scandal, but the idea that he sold jerseys to provide money to his family was put forth by OSU and his former HS coach.  http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/news/story?id=5950873

It does seem that Pryor is now trying to have it both ways.  Also, in the ESPN blog post linked below, I find it funny that his dad said that Pryor traded in his car to buy the new one, and specifically mentions the honda they bought him in high school, yet the car the dealership shows was traded in was a dodge charger.

MI Expat NY

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:58 AM ^

You don't think he would have if OSU ever let their players talk to the media?  Everyone around the story was toeing the line "the poor student athletes were just doing what they could to help their families."  You don't think that Pryor would toe that same line, knowing that it sheds his actions in the best possible light?

I understand that the previous excuse doesn't mean that his mother doesn't have the money to buy him at least three cars in three years ("the honda" his dad claimed they bought him, the dodge charger used in the trade-in, and the 350Z he's now using), but it does indicate that OSU/Pryor/et al. were/are lying somewhere along the way.  

chitownblue2

June 2nd, 2011 at 12:00 PM ^

I'm not commenting about what he hypothetically would have done.

The commenter said that "Pryor said...".

He did not.

It's not a matter of interpretation or opinion, it's a simple fact. He did not say that. I'm not insinuating anything by repeating this fact.

chitownblue2

June 2nd, 2011 at 2:39 PM ^

How is it nit-picking? He said that something happened. It did not happen.

That is not nit-picking, it's fact.

There is no interpretation. What he said happened did not, actually happen. Period. Why is this even a debate?

MGoBlue95

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:37 AM ^

""I am not doing anything wrong," she said. "I mean, I have a job, I work all the time. My son's had a car since he was 18-year-old. What's the difference? Everybody has a car. It doesn't matter to me. My son is what matters to me. I wish everybody would understand that." (emphasis added)

http://espn.go.com/blog/bigten/post/_/id/27419/terrelle-pryors-parents-come-to-his-defense 

I guess the "Everybody has it/does it" excuse is embedded in the Pryor family DNA...

RadioSimon1983

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:39 AM ^

She's got a job!  She can afford to pay $250 a month for her sons car while she takes the bus.  I mean, he'll be a big time NFL player so he can just give her millions like he was in college!

jmblue

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:50 AM ^

It's unclear, but based on its wikipedia page, the town of Jeannette, PA seems to be lower-middle-class.  

The median income for a household in the city was $29,091, and the median income for a family was $37,038. Males had a median income of $32,413 versus $21,702 for females. The per capita income for the city was $15,961. About 10.9% of families and 15.0% of the population were below the poverty line, including 21.2% of those under age 18 and 13.2% of those age 65 or over.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeannette,_Pennsylvania

COB

June 3rd, 2011 at 1:22 PM ^

$250 a month is nothing.  Rent in Cbus is nothing.  40k a year goes a long way.  You may not be familiar with the concept but a "20k car", which btw, cost 11k after trade-in, doesn't mean a "20k" check someone writes. 

Erik_in_Dayton

June 2nd, 2011 at 12:07 PM ^

A documentary-type show about Pryor's high school team gave the strong impression of a bunch of kids with very little money.  A die-hard Buckeye friend of mine who reads Bucknuts, etc. religiously told me (based on what was said on those sites) that part of the reason that Pryor sold memorabilia was to help his mother pay her rent.  

Above I said that the explanation that Pryor's mom paid for the car didn't make sense based on what was "reported." I should have been more careful with my language and said "what was said on OSU sites" rather than "reported."  So, I don't know that his mother is poor, but that's the strong impression that I've been given. 

Tacopants

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:50 AM ^

and already posted the ESPN article above.  Still worth reading because in December, Mama Pryor was praising Terelle for getting $1200 to help the family out.

 

Maybe not having a $20k car would have also helped the family out.

Noleverine

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:47 AM ^

is the article seriously stating that though he got his license revoked, he has insurance now so it's ok? a suspended license is a suspended license. This is not EITHER license OR insurance, Terrelle. Its not like EITHER cars OR tattoos. Oh wait...he seems to have both of those things.

profitgoblue

June 2nd, 2011 at 12:10 PM ^

The revoked license issue is my favorite part of this whole scandal.  And Pryor's lawyer's response to the lack of insurance issue is hilarious.  He essentially said that he has insurance, but hasn't shown anyone that needs to know proof of it because he's an idiot.  What a great message to put out there!

 

Steve in PA

June 2nd, 2011 at 1:20 PM ^

I'm still trying to convince my wife we need a 350Z convertible, so I'm familiar with the pricing on them.  I entered Columbus into KBB then selected the lowest optioned 350Z and got this  http://www.kbb.com/nissan/350z/2007-nissan-350z/coupe-2d/?vehicleid=84125&intent=buy-used&category=coupe&pricetype=private-party&anchor=true

Fair (aka POS) goes for ~15K.  That means he allegedly got $5K for a trade on his charger that he got as a trade for his Honda that he had since HS.  

This is reminding me of the kid that traded a cellphone for a Porshe on Craigslist.  http://www.ktla.com/news/landing/ktla-glendora-teen-cell-phone-porsche,0,4101656.story

OSUMC Wolverine

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:50 AM ^

He had to sell all that stuff to support the family.....big surprise since they are buying new cars all the time.  Poor finiancial planning.  Why is everyone picking on these people?  Terrelle is a good kid, from a fiscally irresponsible family....it could have happened to any of us.  Poor kid.

BlueDragon

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:50 AM ^

I had to check the homepage before I realized it was a humor piece.  Then I read the part about Terrelle bailing out and his jet taking out a crowded daycare/senior retirement center, and I called BS.

BiSB

June 2nd, 2011 at 11:50 AM ^

She's brought the car, so he can legally have it.  And she's probably got a license, which means he can drive it.

Wait... what?